Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section "Cell Signaling".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 33554

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Signal Transduction Research Group, Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada
Interests: receptor tyrosine kinases; EGFR; signal transduction; cancer therapy; breast cancer treatment; targeted therapy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Phosphorylation is one of the most important and most commonly occurring posttranslational modifications of proteins. Protein phosphorylation plays a critical role in cell signaling in response to extracellular stimulus and is of fundamental importance in biological regulation.

Protein phosphorylation is controlled by protein kinases and protein phosphatases. A protein kinase is a kinase enzyme that modifies other molecules, mostly proteins, by chemically adding phosphate groups to them (phosphorylation). The human genome contains about 518 protein kinase genes, and they constitute about 2% of all human genes. A protein could be phosphorylated in three amino acids, including tyrosine (Tyr, Y), Serine (Ser, S), and Threonine (Thr, T). A protein phosphatase is a phosphatase enzyme that removes a phosphate group from the phosphorylated amino acid residue of its substrate protein. While there are 107 genes in the human genome that encode protein tyrosine phosphatase, there are only a few serine/threonine phosphatases.

Up to 30% of all human proteins may be modified by protein kinase and phosphatase. Phosphorylation and de-phosphorylation commonly act as a switch to turn on and off a signaling cascade. Protein phosphorylation usually results in a functional change of the target protein (substrate) by changing enzyme activity, cellular location, or association with other proteins, which frequently lead to the changes in the biological function of the cell.

This Special Issue will cover the recent progress in all of the areas related to protein phosphorylation and cell signaling. Both original research articles and reviews are welcome.

Prof. Zhixiang Wang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • protein phosphorylation
  • proein de-phosphorylation
  • protein kinases
  • protein phosphatases
  • tyrosine kinases
  • receptor tyrosine kinases
  • serine/threonin kinases
  • tyrosine phosphatases
  • serine/threonin phosphatases
  • extracellular stimulus
  • cell signaling
  • signal transduction
  • structures
  • functions

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

22 pages, 6426 KiB  
Article
Nuclear Translocation of SRPKs Is Associated with 5-FU and Cisplatin Sensitivity in HeLa and T24 Cells
by Ioanna Sigala, Maria Koutroumani, Anastasia Koukiali, Thomas Giannakouros and Eleni Nikolakaki
Cells 2021, 10(4), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040759 - 30 Mar 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4210
Abstract
Serine/arginine protein kinases (SRPKs) phosphorylate Arg/Ser dipeptide-containing proteins that play crucial roles in a broad spectrum of basic cellular processes. The existence of a large internal spacer sequence that separates the bipartite kinase catalytic core and anchors the kinases in the cytoplasm is [...] Read more.
Serine/arginine protein kinases (SRPKs) phosphorylate Arg/Ser dipeptide-containing proteins that play crucial roles in a broad spectrum of basic cellular processes. The existence of a large internal spacer sequence that separates the bipartite kinase catalytic core and anchors the kinases in the cytoplasm is a unique structural feature of SRPKs. Here, we report that exposure of HeLa and T24 cells to DNA damage inducers triggers the nuclear translocation of SRPK1 and SRPK2. Furthermore, we show that nuclear SRPKs did not protect from, but on the contrary, mediated the cytotoxic effects of genotoxic agents, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin. Confirming previous data showing that the kinase activity is essential for the entry of SRPKs into the nucleus, SRPIN340, a selective SRPK1/2 inhibitor, blocked the nuclear accumulation of the kinases, thus diminishing the cytotoxic effects of the drugs. ATR/ATM-dependent phosphorylation of threonine 326 and serine 408 in the spacer domain of SRPK1 was essential for the redistribution of the kinase to the nucleus. Substitution of either of these two residues to alanine or inhibition of ATR/ATM kinase activity abolished nuclear localization of SRPK1 and conferred tolerance to 5-FU treatment. These findings suggest that SRPKs may play an important role in linking cellular signaling to DNA damage in eukaryotic cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7059 KiB  
Article
Phosphoproteomic Landscape of AML Cells Treated with the ATP-Competitive CK2 Inhibitor CX-4945
by Mauro Rosales, Arielis Rodríguez-Ulloa, Vladimir Besada, Ailyn C. Ramón, George V. Pérez, Yassel Ramos, Osmany Guirola, Luis J. González, Katharina Zettl, Jacek R. Wiśniewski, Yasser Perera and Silvio E. Perea
Cells 2021, 10(2), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020338 - 05 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3320
Abstract
Casein kinase 2 (CK2) regulates a plethora of proteins with pivotal roles in solid and hematological neoplasia. Particularly, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) CK2 has been pointed as an attractive therapeutic target and prognostic marker. Here, we explored the impact of CK2 inhibition [...] Read more.
Casein kinase 2 (CK2) regulates a plethora of proteins with pivotal roles in solid and hematological neoplasia. Particularly, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) CK2 has been pointed as an attractive therapeutic target and prognostic marker. Here, we explored the impact of CK2 inhibition over the phosphoproteome of two cell lines representing major AML subtypes. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis was conducted to evaluate changes in phosphorylation levels after incubation with the ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitor CX-4945. Functional enrichment, network analysis, and database mining were performed to identify biological processes, signaling pathways, and CK2 substrates that are responsive to CX-4945. A total of 273 and 1310 phosphopeptides were found differentially modulated in HL-60 and OCI-AML3 cells, respectively. Despite regulated phosphopeptides belong to proteins involved in multiple biological processes and signaling pathways, most of these perturbations can be explain by direct CK2 inhibition rather than off-target effects. Furthermore, CK2 substrates regulated by CX-4945 are mainly related to mRNA processing, translation, DNA repair, and cell cycle. Overall, we evidenced that CK2 inhibitor CX-4945 impinge on mediators of signaling pathways and biological processes essential for primary AML cells survival and chemosensitivity, reinforcing the rationale behind the pharmacologic blockade of protein kinase CK2 for AML targeted therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5923 KiB  
Article
Are FDA-Approved Sunscreen Components Effective in Preventing Solar UV-Induced Skin Cancer?
by Ann M. Bode and Eunmiri Roh
Cells 2020, 9(7), 1674; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071674 - 11 Jul 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5734
Abstract
Solar ultraviolet (SUV) exposure is a major risk factor in the etiology of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). People commonly use sunscreens to prevent SUV-induced skin damage and cancer. Nonetheless, the prevalence of cSCC continues to increase every year, suggesting that commercially available [...] Read more.
Solar ultraviolet (SUV) exposure is a major risk factor in the etiology of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). People commonly use sunscreens to prevent SUV-induced skin damage and cancer. Nonetheless, the prevalence of cSCC continues to increase every year, suggesting that commercially available sunscreens might not be used appropriately or are not completely effective. In the current study, a solar simulated light (SSL)-induced cSCC mouse model was used to investigate the efficacy of eight commonly used FDA-approved sunscreen components against skin carcinogenesis. First, we tested FDA-approved sunscreen components for their ability to block UVA or UVB irradiation by using VITRO-SKIN (a model that mimics human skin properties), and then the efficacy of FDA-approved sunscreen components was investigated in an SSL-induced cSCC mouse model. Our results identified which FDA-approved sunscreen components or combinations are effective in preventing cSCC development. Not surprisingly, the results indicated that sunscreen combinations that block both UVA and UVB significantly suppressed the formation of cutaneous papillomas and cSCC development and decreased the activation of oncoproteins and the expression of COX-2, keratin 17, and EGFR in SSL-exposed SKH-1 (Crl:SKH1-Hrhr) hairless mouse skin. Notably, several sunscreen components that were individually purported to block both UVA and UVB were ineffective alone. At least one component had toxic effects that led to a high mortality rate in mice exposed to SSL. Our findings provide new insights into the development of the best sunscreen to prevent chronic SUV-induced cSCC development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5289 KiB  
Article
Phosphorylation of PLK3 Is Controlled by Protein Phosphatase 6
by Cecilia Aquino Perez, Matous Palek, Lenka Stolarova, Patrick von Morgen and Libor Macurek
Cells 2020, 9(6), 1506; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061506 - 20 Jun 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3867
Abstract
Polo-like kinases play essential roles in cell cycle control and mitosis. In contrast to other members of this kinase family, PLK3 has been reported to be activated upon cellular stress including DNA damage, hypoxia and osmotic stress. Here we knocked out PLK3 in [...] Read more.
Polo-like kinases play essential roles in cell cycle control and mitosis. In contrast to other members of this kinase family, PLK3 has been reported to be activated upon cellular stress including DNA damage, hypoxia and osmotic stress. Here we knocked out PLK3 in human non-transformed RPE cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Surprisingly, we find that loss of PLK3 does not impair stabilization of HIF1α after hypoxia, phosphorylation of the c-Jun after osmotic stress and dynamics of DNA damage response after exposure to ionizing radiation. Similarly, RNAi-mediated depletion of PLK3 did not impair stress response in human transformed cell lines. Exposure of cells to various forms of stress also did not affect kinase activity of purified EGFP-PLK3. We conclude that PLK3 is largely dispensable for stress response in human cells. Using mass spectrometry, we identify protein phosphatase 6 as a new interacting partner of PLK3. Polo box domain of PLK3 mediates the interaction with the PP6 complex. Finally, we find that PLK3 is phosphorylated at Thr219 in the T-loop and that PP6 constantly dephosphorylates this residue. However, in contrast to PLK1, phosphorylation of Thr219 does not upregulate enzymatic activity of PLK3, suggesting that activation of both kinases is regulated by distinct mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1777 KiB  
Article
Functional Alterations in Ciliogenesis-Associated Kinase 1 (CILK1) that Result from Mutations Linked to Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy
by Eric J. Wang, Casey D. Gailey, David L. Brautigan and Zheng Fu
Cells 2020, 9(3), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030694 - 12 Mar 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3136
Abstract
Ciliopathies are a group of human genetic disorders associated with mutations that give rise to the dysfunction of primary cilia. Ciliogenesis-associated kinase 1 (CILK1), formerly known as intestinal cell kinase (ICK), is a conserved serine and threonine kinase that restricts primary (non-motile) cilia [...] Read more.
Ciliopathies are a group of human genetic disorders associated with mutations that give rise to the dysfunction of primary cilia. Ciliogenesis-associated kinase 1 (CILK1), formerly known as intestinal cell kinase (ICK), is a conserved serine and threonine kinase that restricts primary (non-motile) cilia formation and length. Mutations in CILK1 are associated with ciliopathies and are also linked to juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, the effects of the JME-related mutations in CILK1 on kinase activity and CILK1 function are unknown. Here, we report that JME pathogenic mutations in the CILK1 N-terminal kinase domain abolish kinase activity, evidenced by the loss of phosphorylation of kinesin family member 3A (KIF3A) at Thr672, while JME mutations in the C-terminal non-catalytic domain (CTD) have little effect on KIF3A phosphorylation. Although CILK1 variants in the CTD retain catalytic activity, they nonetheless lose the ability to restrict cilia length and also gain function in promoting ciliogenesis. We show that wild type CILK1 predominantly localizes to the base of the primary cilium; in contrast, JME variants of CILK1 are distributed along the entire axoneme of the primary cilium. These results demonstrate that JME pathogenic mutations perturb CILK1 function and intracellular localization. These CILK1 variants affect the primary cilium, independent of CILK1 phosphorylation of KIF3A. Our findings suggest that CILK1 mutations linked to JME result in alterations of primary cilia formation and homeostasis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4854 KiB  
Article
Modulation of the Pol II CTD Phosphorylation Code by Rac1 and Cdc42 Small GTPases in Cultured Human Cancer Cells and Its Implication for Developing a Synthetic-Lethal Cancer Therapy
by Bo Zhang, Xuelin Zhong, Moira Sauane, Yihong Zhao and Zhi-Liang Zheng
Cells 2020, 9(3), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030621 - 04 Mar 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4047
Abstract
Rho GTPases, including Rho, Cdc42, Rac and ROP subfamilies, are key signaling molecules in RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcriptional control. Our prior work has shown that plant ROP and yeast Cdc42 GTPases similarly modulate Ser2 and Ser5 phosphorylation status of the C-terminal [...] Read more.
Rho GTPases, including Rho, Cdc42, Rac and ROP subfamilies, are key signaling molecules in RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcriptional control. Our prior work has shown that plant ROP and yeast Cdc42 GTPases similarly modulate Ser2 and Ser5 phosphorylation status of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the Pol II largest subunit by regulating CTD phosphatase degradation. Here, we present genetic and pharmacological evidence showing that Cdc42 and Rac1 GTPase signaling modulates a similar CTD Ser2 and Ser5 phosphorylation code in cultured human cancer cells. While siRNA knockdown of Cdc42 and Rac1, respectively, in HeLa cells increased the level of CTD Ser phosphatases RPAP2 and FCP1, they both decreased the level of CTD kinases CDK7 and CDK13. In addition, the protein degradation inhibitor MG132 reversed the effect of THZ1, a CDK7 inhibitor which could decrease the cell number and amount of CDK7 and CDK13, accompanied by a reduction in the level of CTD Ser2 and Ser5 phosphorylation and DOCK4 and DOCK9 (the activators for Rac1 and Cdc42, respectively). Conversely, treatments of Torin1 or serum deprivation, both of which promote protein degradation, could enhance the effect of THZ1, indicating the involvement of protein degradation in controlling CDK7 and CDK13. Our results support an evolutionarily conserved signaling shortcut model linking Rho GTPases to Pol II transcription across three kingdoms, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia, and could lead to the development of a potential synthetic-lethal strategy in controlling cancer cell proliferation or death. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5907 KiB  
Article
Rac1 S71 Mediates the Interaction between Rac1 and 14-3-3 Proteins
by Abdalla Abdrabou, Daniel Brandwein, Changyu Liu and Zhixiang Wang
Cells 2019, 8(9), 1006; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8091006 - 30 Aug 2019
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3666
Abstract
Both 14-3-3 proteins (14-3-3s) and Rho proteins regulate cytoskeleton remodeling and cell migration, which suggests a possible interaction between the signaling pathways regulated by these two groups of proteins. Indeed, more and more emerging evidence indicates the mutual regulation of these two signaling [...] Read more.
Both 14-3-3 proteins (14-3-3s) and Rho proteins regulate cytoskeleton remodeling and cell migration, which suggests a possible interaction between the signaling pathways regulated by these two groups of proteins. Indeed, more and more emerging evidence indicates the mutual regulation of these two signaling pathways. However, all of the data regarding the interaction between Rac1 signaling pathways and 14-3-3 signaling pathways are through either the upstream regulators or downstream substrates. It is not clear if Rac1 could interact with 14-3-3s directly. It is interesting to notice that the Rac1 sequence 68RPLSYP73 is likely a 14-3-3 protein binding motif following the phosphorylation of S71 by Akt. Thus, we hypothesize that Rac1 directly interacts with 14-3-3s. We tested this hypothesis in this research. By using mutagenesis, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), Rac1 activity assay, immunoblotting, and indirect immunofluorescence, we demonstrate that 14-3-3s interact with Rac1. This interaction is mediated by Rac1 S71 in both phosphorylation-dependent and -independent manners, but the phosphorylation-dependent interaction is much stronger. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) strongly stimulates the phosphorylation of Rac1 S71 and the interaction between 14-3-3s and Rac1. Mutating S71 to A completely abolishes both phosphorylation-dependent and -independent interactions between 14-3-3s and Rac1. The interaction between 14-3-3s and Rac1 mostly serve to regulate the activity and subcellular localization of Rac1. Among the seven 14-3-3 isoforms, 14-3-3η, -σ, and -θ showed interactions with Rac1 in both Cos-7 and HEK 293 cells. 14-3-3γ also binds to Rac1 in HEK 293 cells, but not in Cos-7 cells. We conclude that 14-3-3s interact with Rac1. This interaction is mediated by Rac1 S71 in both phosphorylation-dependent and -independent manners. The interaction between 14-3-3 and Rac1 mostly serves to regulate the activity and subcellular localization of Rac1. Among the seven 14-3-3 isoforms, 14-3-3η, -γ, -σ, and -θ interact with Rac1. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 2396 KiB  
Review
Growth Factors, and Cytokines; Understanding the Role of Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2 in Gametogenesis and Early Embryo Development
by Muhammad Idrees, Seon-Hwa Oh, Tahir Muhammad, Marwa El-Sheikh, Seok-Hwan Song, Kyeong-Lim Lee and Il-Keun Kong
Cells 2020, 9(8), 1798; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081798 - 29 Jul 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3634
Abstract
Growth factors and cytokines have vital roles in germ cell development, gamete maturation, and early embryo development. Cell surface receptors are present for growth factors and cytokines to integrate with and trigger protein signaling in the germ and embryo intracellular milieu. Src-homology-2-containing phosphotyrosine [...] Read more.
Growth factors and cytokines have vital roles in germ cell development, gamete maturation, and early embryo development. Cell surface receptors are present for growth factors and cytokines to integrate with and trigger protein signaling in the germ and embryo intracellular milieu. Src-homology-2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase (SHP2) is a ubiquitously expressed, multifunctional protein that plays a central role in the signaling pathways involved in growth factor receptors, cytokine receptors, integrins, and G protein-coupled receptors. Over recent decades, researchers have recapitulated the protein signaling networks that influence gamete progenitor specification as well as gamete differentiation and maturation. SHP2 plays an indispensable role in cellular growth, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration, as well as the basic events in gametogenesis and early embryo development. SHP2, a classic cytosolic protein and a key regulator of signal transduction, displays unconventional nuclear expression in the genital organs. Several observations provided shreds of evidence that this behavior is essential for fertility. The growth factor and cytokine-dependent roles of SHP2 and its nuclear/cytoplasmic presence during gamete maturation, early embryonic development and embryo implantation are fascinating and complex subjects. This review is intended to summarize the previous and recent knowledge about the SHP2 functions in gametogenesis and early embryo development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation and Cell Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop