Testimonials

I agreed to review articles and manuscripts submitted to MDPI, firstly because I found it challenging. Then, the idea of reviewing turned out to be an honest way to support open access journals, and later I have found that I enjoy the work, and the rewards are many. I suggest that young professors, PhDs, and scientists should not hesitate to put themselves at the service of public interest in science, technology, and publishing in these fields. I quickly understood, and I emphasize, in turn, that the peer-review process is essential in the publication of scientific articles, for the proper selection of high-quality articles. This is why I am happy to review articles for MDPI.

Reviewer of Axioms

Less

I was very happy to be able to review a journal article that will be published by MDPI. In short, I can say that the peer-reviewed journal concept meets international standards and fulfills the working mechanism of a reviewer. Thank you MDPI Editor Team from Verdi Yasin.

Reviewer of Symmetry

Less

Taking part in the peer-review process is essential for the integrity of scientific publication. MDPI makes the peer review process much easier than in the past with its thorough and convenient online process.

Reviewer of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Less

My experience with the MDPI review process has been very positive. The interface is simple and intuitive, enabling me to download assignments directly from MDPI. All information about my work as a reviewer is available on the Web of Science website.

Reviewer of Vaccines

Less

MDPI exemplifies the way forward for Gold Open Access publication. They combine excellent operational efficiency with great academic rigour. I am very impressed and would recommend their Journal Languages to any Linguistics professor.

Reviewer of Languages

Less

MDPI's review experience has been very useful in the development of my own reviewing skills. The guidelines for reviewers enlisted on the MDPI website are very detailed, guiding the review process smoothly. After working with the great supportive staff and board members who are willing to answer any questions reviewers have, I would definitely review for MDPI journals in the future again, if given the opportunity.

Reviewer of Biology

Less

Reviewing articles for MDPI journals has been a privilege and a wonderful experience, and has considerably helped my personal development. I am particularly interested in comparing my own reviews with others and learning from them in order to better position the submitted studies.

Reviewer of Adolescents

Less

I would highly recommend applying to review submitted manuscripts. Reviewers are at liberty to select studies in their specialist field. MDPI publishes research on a wide variety of interesting. Continuous constructive information is provided by the editorial staff, which helps reviewers to improve their reports is; at the same time, this demonstrates confidence and appreciation. Moreover, the collaboration with MDPI editorial teams is amazing. I am grateful for the confidence that the Antibiotics editorial staff have in me, and for their approval to make me a member of the Reviewer Board for this Q1 Journal. I am honored to be a part of the MDPI team as a reviewer.

Reviewer of Antibiotics

Less

We thank MDPI for the fast review and publication process. We would like to thank the editors for handling the manuscript in a timely and responsible manner. We would also like to thank the reviewers, who gave us their valuable suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Article in Plants: Involvement of Target of Rapamycin (TOR) Signaling in the Regulation of Crosstalk between Ribosomal Protein Small Subunit 6 Kinase-1 (RPS6K-1) and Ribosomal Proteins

Less

MDPI provided us the opportunity to publish openly, quickly, accurately, and with the appropriate scientific view. A big THANK YOU to the editorial management for the continuous efforts to reach the highest level of values!

Article in Eng: Exploring Neogene Marine Diatomites in Western Crete: A New Source-Rock Candidate with Hydrocarbon Generation Potential?

Less

It is a pleasure for me to work with the MDPI team. Everyone on your team is very kind and answered my questions quickly. The entire process of submitting, reviewing, editing, and publishing took no more than two months. I respect everything you do, and thank you so much for the opportunity to work with you!

Article in Electronics: Software Development for Processing and Analysis of Data Generated by Human Eye Movements

Less

We think the whole process of submission is good. On the one hand, the two anonymous reviewers afford very good constructive suggestions. MDPI provides us with very professional reviewers. On the other hand, as a non-native speaker of English, English editing services are very important. After the paper was accepted, MPDI again provided high-quality English editing services. This is great!

Article in Education Sciences: How to Cultivate the Modern Self: Development of the Concept of Mental Discipline in the University History of the United States

Less

The entire publishing process was a pleasure. Everything is perfectly planned, and they strictly comply with the deadlines. The feedback from the editorial office is very fluid and fast.

Article in Pathogens: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cancer: Differences between Patients with Hematological Malignancies and Solid Tumors

Less

Excellent experience, very satisfied with the whole process. Highly organized personnel with a professional approach. I would definitely recommend MDPI, and I am looking forward to a new opportunity for cooperation.

Article in Applied Sciences: Influence of ZnO (Nano)Rods on the Dielectric Properties of DGEBF Epoxy Exposed to Progressive Artificial Weathering for VHF/Early UHF Applications

Less

I am very satisfied with MDPI's professional and efficient work flow. The interaction with the editors is very fast and smooth. I highly recommend using MDPI. It was a good experience to publish a paper in the Energies journal.

Less

Ours was an excellent submission experience. The editors and reviewers were meticulous and patient in pointing out problems with the article and allowing us to revise and explain. We hope to have another opportunity to publish another article in your journal.

Article in Biomolecules: Action Mechanism of Metformin and Its Application in Hematological Malignancy Treatments: A Review

Less

We appreciated the highly efficient work provided by the editor of Antioxidants and the strict reviews by the reviewers during the whole peer-review process of our article entitled “Potential Antioxidative Activity of Homocysteine in Erythrocytes under Oxidative Stress”. The excellent comments provided by the reviewers really improved our writing of the manuscript. Once again, many thanks for the attention to our article.

Article in Antioxidants: Potential Antioxidative Activity of Homocysteine in Erythrocytes under Oxidative Stress

Less

It was an excellent experience to publish a paper in Antioxidants. We appreciate the reviewers’ comments to help and encourage us further improve our manuscript. We would like to thank the editors for their support and help during the publication process. The whole publishing process is very efficient. The editing staff is always available. This is my first publication in MDPI and it has been a very positive experience. We will continue submitting manuscripts to Antioxidants.

Article in Antioxidants: Is Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 a Target for the Intervention of Cytokine Storms?

Less

This was our first publication in Antioxidants in the Special Issue “From Nature to Synthetic Small Molecule Antioxidants: New Candidates in Drug Discovery”, entitled Effects of Synthetic Short Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides on the Catalytic Activity of Myeloperoxidase, Reducing Its Oxidative Capacity. We have been highly impressed by the fast and effective processing of the manuscript. All stated deadlines for review and other matters have been met. The manuscript was referred to qualified experts in exactly the right field. We thank the assigned editor and the entire staff, who have been extremely helpful in all steps.

Article in Antioxidants: Effects of Synthetic Short Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides on the Catalytic Activity of Myeloperoxidase, Reducing Its Oxidative Capacity

Less

I experienced a high level of professionalism from the Editorial Office of Antioxidants during the peer-review process in terms of publication speed, information flow, and solving formatting issues.

Article in Antioxidants: The Influence of Solvents and Colloidal Particles on the Efficiency of Molecular Antioxidants

Less