Advances in eHealth

A special issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 43592

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Learning, Informatics, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 171 77 Solna, Sweden
Interests: consumer health informatics; clinical decision making; evaluation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Health Informatics and Technology, Maersk Mc-Kinney Møller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark
Interests: health Informatics; healthcare; health; health care management; eHealth; medical informatics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Interests: economic information systems; medical informatics; eHealth; health informatics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

e-Health offers new ways to access health information, to deliver health and social care, and to perform self-management, and adoption of e-Health solutions has increased substantially during the last decade.

Globally, more than half of all WHO Member States have developed National e-Health strategies, but the progress of their implementation is rarely monitored to document the outcome and proof of significant improvement of health, and social care system performance is still lacking. Moreover, for consumers, such as patients and the general public, it is difficult to know to what extent they can access or influence the delivery and further development of e-Health services.

Nevertheless, further development of e-Health services is crucial to offer better quality and effectiveness and to overcome some of the most challenging issues around easy access, inequality, and equity in health and social care delivery, not least in times of pandemics.

The scope of this Special Issue is to outline the major challenges and future perspectives of e-Health for health and social care delivery as well as self-management.

The goal of this Special Issue is to provide a forum for researchers to share their latest achievements, covering a diversity of articles and work that reflect the state-of-the-art of e-health issues and challenges.

Subject Coverage

We hereby invite papers covering a broad range of topics.

Topics for the Special Issue include but are not limited to:

a) Case studies of implementation and development of e-Health policies;

b) Development and evaluation of citizens use and expectations on e-Health;

c) Institutional issues that influence e-Health innovation;

d) Privacy, security and safety in e-Health;

e) Conceptual papers and systematic literature reviews in relation to decision making around health;

f) e-Health initiatives to allow patient empowerment;

g) Tools/technologies facilitating end-users’ description of health-related web resources in social networks.

Prof. Dr. Sabine Koch
Prof. Dr. Christian Nøhr
Prof. Dr. Vivian Vimarlund
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • eHealth
  • innovation
  • policies
  • evaluation
  • privacy
  • social networks
  • institutional issues
  • evaluation

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

3 pages, 147 KiB  
Editorial
Advances in E-Health
by Vivian Vimarlund, Sabine Koch and Christian Nøhr
Life 2021, 11(6), 468; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060468 - 24 May 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2074
Abstract
E-health offers new ways to access health information, to deliver health and social care and to perform self-management [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

21 pages, 1193 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the E-Health Cloud Computing Systems Adoption in Taiwan’s Healthcare Industry
by Shih-Chia Chang, Ming-Tsang Lu, Tzu-Hui Pan and Chiao-Shan Chen
Life 2021, 11(4), 310; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040310 - 02 Apr 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3394
Abstract
Although the electronic health (e-health) cloud computing system is a promising innovation, its adoption in the healthcare industry has been slow. This study investigated the adoption of e-health cloud computing systems in the healthcare industry and considered security functions, management, cloud service delivery, [...] Read more.
Although the electronic health (e-health) cloud computing system is a promising innovation, its adoption in the healthcare industry has been slow. This study investigated the adoption of e-health cloud computing systems in the healthcare industry and considered security functions, management, cloud service delivery, and cloud software for e-health cloud computing systems. Although numerous studies have determined factors affecting e-health cloud computing systems, few comprehensive reviews of factors and their relations have been conducted. Therefore, this study investigated the relations between the factors affecting e-health cloud computing systems by using a multiple criteria decision-making technique, in which decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), DANP (DEMATEL-based Analytic Network Process), and modified VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) approaches were combined. The intended level of adoption of an e-health cloud computing system could be determined by using the proposed approach. The results of a case study performed on the Taiwanese healthcare industry indicated that the cloud management function must be primarily enhanced and that cost effectiveness is the most significant factor in the adoption of e-health cloud computing. This result is valuable for allocating resources to decrease performance gaps in the Taiwanese healthcare industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 717 KiB  
Article
How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Medical Education during the Last Year of Medical School: A Class Survey
by Gillian Franklin, Clare Martin, Marc Ruszaj, Maliyat Matin, Akaash Kataria, Jinwei Hu, Arlen Brickman and Peter L. Elkin
Life 2021, 11(4), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040294 - 30 Mar 2021
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 4971
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the medical education platform for students in the United States of America (USA). In that light, medical schools had to rapidly rearrange the dynamics of their educational curricula from the traditional platforms, to incorporate [...] Read more.
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the medical education platform for students in the United States of America (USA). In that light, medical schools had to rapidly rearrange the dynamics of their educational curricula from the traditional platforms, to incorporate telemedicine. The telemedicine platform is supported in many specialties, allowing students various options to continue their education without interruption during the COVID-19 pandemic, and beyond. Telemedicine platforms are projected to grow exponentially due to the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing a segue for medical schools to modify their curricula by incorporating telemedicine programs. These distant-, e-learning (tele-education) programs align with the recommendations and guidelines for practicing social distancing. In this article, we surveyed fourth-year medical students to better understand their views on multiple aspects of e-learning, and its impact on their medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed the medical students’ experiences, satisfaction, insight and knowledge with e-learning, tele-education, telehealth, and their related modalities during COVID-19. We provide an organized overview and analysis of the main factors that influence medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic, while bringing forth the main challenges, limitations, and emerging approaches in the field of telemedicine and its application as it relates to medical education and e-learning across medical specialties. We outline the main themes and ideas that the medical students voiced, as to how their medical education is being impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and how they will incorporate telemedicine and tele-education in their future career. A cross-sectional, mixed-method survey was developed and distributed via Google Surveys to 181 University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, United States of America, 4th year medical students, in December 2020. Results were compiled and analyzed after a 6-day open period for responses to be submitted. The survey instrument consisted of questions that inquire about the students’ perspectives as it relates to their rapid switch from their traditional method of learning to the on-line version of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 65 students responded to the survey, of which 63 completed the survey. More than half of the students (n = 63, 57%) indicated that both their specialty of interest, and (n = 21, 33%) their sub-internships were impacted by the temporary lockdown, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Students also indicated that the top three specialties that were affected included surgery, internal medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. When the students were asked if they were satisfied with the use of aquifer for their health care e-learning, only 35% of the students were satisfied. The students expressed that the school’s administration team did a good job in developing the new tele-education curriculum for those in clinical training. In addition, responses indicated that students were open to case-based video learning and readings, when combined with the abbreviated clinical exposure during the make-up “clinical immersions periods” allowed for adequate learning. Overall, the survey responses show that more than half, approximately 54% of the medical students utilized telemedicine platforms during their clerkships that were impacted by COVID-19. The 4th-year medical students did not find tele-education and e-learning to be as effective as traditional medical education that combines in-person didactic classroom instructions and in-person face-to-face in hospital clerkships. Students felt that the telemedicine program that was rapidly set up due to the COVID-19 ‘lockdown’ was fragmented, since it was not a formal integration of a telemedicine E-learning program. Students would have preferred more ‘real’ cases to follow, instead of the ready-made, aquifer type of cases. Telemedicine has significant potential to address many of the challenges facing the medical education environment today. We believe now that people have become comfortable with this method of teaching, that even after the pandemic ends, we will continue to see tele-education used as a platform for medical education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 219 KiB  
Article
Doctor at Your Fingertips: An Exploration of Digital Visits from Stakeholders’ Perspectives
by Selina Demi, Samir Hilmy and Christina Keller
Life 2021, 11(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010006 - 24 Dec 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2556
Abstract
Technological advances and the evolution of mobile technologies enable patients to meet their doctors through their smartphones. While offering the opportunity of digital visits to patients, there are also challenges for this development. The purpose of this study is to enhance the understanding [...] Read more.
Technological advances and the evolution of mobile technologies enable patients to meet their doctors through their smartphones. While offering the opportunity of digital visits to patients, there are also challenges for this development. The purpose of this study is to enhance the understanding of digital visits, as perceived by experts working in telemedicine companies. To serve this purpose, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with managers and employees in eight telemedicine companies. The analysis of the empirical data confirmed the importance of digital visits and their efficiency. The potential of digital visits is expected to increase significantly, should they make use of remote devices to transfer real-time data from patients to physicians. In such a case, digital visits are expected to cover approximately 70–75% of medical cases. However, the use of remote devices must be taken with caution and specific conditions need to be taken into account. We encourage researchers to perform research on promising technologies such as artificial intelligence and remote diagnostic devices, which could make more diagnoses and conditions possible to be treated by digital visits. This is even more important in light of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
16 pages, 670 KiB  
Article
The Medium Is the Message: How Do Canadian University Students Want Digital Medication Information?
by Helen Monkman, Andre Kushniruk, Elizabeth Borycki, Debra Sheets, Jeff Barnett and Christian Nøhr
Life 2020, 10(12), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120339 - 10 Dec 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2388
Abstract
(1) Background: To facilitate optimal prescription medication benefits and safety, it is important that people are informed about their prescription medications. As we shift towards using the digital medium to communicate medication information, it is important to address the needs and preferences of [...] Read more.
(1) Background: To facilitate optimal prescription medication benefits and safety, it is important that people are informed about their prescription medications. As we shift towards using the digital medium to communicate medication information, it is important to address the needs and preferences of different user groups so that they are more likely to read and use this information. In this study, we examined what digital medication information (DMI) format Canadian University students want and why. (2) Methods: This study was a qualitative investigation of young (aged 18–35) Canadian University students’ (N = 36) preferences and rationale supporting these preferences with respect to three potential formats for providing DMI: email, a mobile application (app), and online. Reported advantages and disadvantages of each of the three DMI formats were identified and categorized into unique themes. (3) Results: Findings from this study suggest that Canadian University Students most want to receive DMI by email, followed by a mobile app, and finally they were least receptive to online DMI. Participants provided diverse themes of reasons supporting their preferences. (4) Conclusions: Different user groups may have different needs with respect to receiving DMI. The themes from this study suggest that using a formative evaluation framework for assessing different DMI formats may be useful in future research. Email may be the best way to share DMI with younger, generally healthy, Canadian University students who are on few medications. Further research is required to explore whether other mediums for DMI are more appropriate for users with other characteristics (e.g., older and less educated) and contexts (e.g., polypharmacy and complex conditions). Given the flexibility of digital information, DMI could plausibly be provided in multiple formats and could allow users to choose the option they like best and would be most likely to use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1219 KiB  
Article
People Centeredness, Chronic Conditions and Diversity Sensitive eHealth: Exploring Emancipation of the ‘Health Care System’ and the ‘Patient’ in Health Informatics
by Lars Botin, Pernille S. Bertelsen, Lars Kayser, Paul Turner, Sidsel Villumsen and Christian Nøhr
Life 2020, 10(12), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120329 - 07 Dec 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2370
Abstract
Health care systems struggle to consistently deliver integrated high-quality, safe, and patient-centered care to all in an economically sustainable manner. Inequity of access to health care services and variation in diagnostic and treatment outcomes are common. Further, as health care systems become ever [...] Read more.
Health care systems struggle to consistently deliver integrated high-quality, safe, and patient-centered care to all in an economically sustainable manner. Inequity of access to health care services and variation in diagnostic and treatment outcomes are common. Further, as health care systems become ever more complex, iatrogenesis and counter productivity have emerged as real dangers. In exploring this paradox, this paper considers a subset of those in society living with chronic conditions. Their attributes and circumstances have led to them being marginalized or excluded from ‘end-user’ engagement and/or from their requirements being incorporated into technology supported chronic disease management initiatives. Significantly, these citizens are often the most vulnerable and socially disadvantaged and tend to achieve poorer results and cost more per capita than the ‘average patient’ in their interactions with the health care system. Critically, this paper argues that a truly people-centered technology supported chronic care system can only be designed by understanding and responding to the needs, attributes and capabilities of the most vulnerable in society. This paper suggests innovative ways of supporting interactions with these ‘end-users’ and highlights how reflection on these approaches can contribute to emancipating the health system to move towards more socially inclusive eHealth solutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1160 KiB  
Article
Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content
by Chen Hsi Tsai, Aboozar Eghdam, Nadia Davoody, Graham Wright, Stephen Flowerday and Sabine Koch
Life 2020, 10(12), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327 - 04 Dec 2020
Cited by 69 | Viewed by 21943
Abstract
Despite the great advances in the field of electronic health records (EHRs) over the past 25 years, implementation and adoption challenges persist, and the benefits realized remain below expectations. This scoping review aimed to present current knowledge about the effects of EHR implementation [...] Read more.
Despite the great advances in the field of electronic health records (EHRs) over the past 25 years, implementation and adoption challenges persist, and the benefits realized remain below expectations. This scoping review aimed to present current knowledge about the effects of EHR implementation and the barriers to EHR adoption and use. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore Digital Library and ACM Digital Library for studies published between January 2005 and May 2020. In total, 7641 studies were identified of which 142 met the criteria and attained the consensus of all researchers on inclusion. Most studies (n = 91) were published between 2017 and 2019 and 81 studies had the United States as the country of origin. Both positive and negative effects of EHR implementation were identified, relating to clinical work, data and information, patient care and economic impact. Resource constraints, poor/insufficient training and technical/educational support for users, as well as poor literacy and skills in technology were the identified barriers to adoption and use that occurred frequently. Although this review did not conduct a quality analysis of the included papers, the lack of uniformity in the use of EHR definitions and detailed contextual information concerning the study settings could be observed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 968 KiB  
Article
Photovoice—Towards Engaging and Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities in Innovation
by Sofie Wass and Mugula Chris Safari
Life 2020, 10(11), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110272 - 05 Nov 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2785
Abstract
E-health and welfare technology offer new ways to support health and social care delivery. While initiatives are made to engage disadvantaged user groups in innovation, people with intellectual disabilities tend to be excluded from design activities. This is a concern as this group [...] Read more.
E-health and welfare technology offer new ways to support health and social care delivery. While initiatives are made to engage disadvantaged user groups in innovation, people with intellectual disabilities tend to be excluded from design activities. This is a concern as this group can benefit from the use of assistive technology. However, it can be time-consuming and challenging to involve end-users in the design of technology. This calls for processes that are creative, empowering and that facilitate user involvement. In this study, we report and reflect on the process of using photovoice to understand user needs and to empower participants with intellectual disability in an innovation process. Nine persons with intellectual disability participated in photovoice to identify user needs connected to the design of assistive technology. The findings in our study suggest that the use of photovoice can contribute to the sharing of contextual and individual needs and an empowerment process that includes coping, self-determination and ownership. Photovoice can be a tool to reduce or remove some of the challenges that are faced when identifying user needs and is a way to strengthen the individual’s capacity to cope with the demands of participating in an innovation process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in eHealth)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop