Journal of Fungi

Research

6 pages, 251 KiB

Open AccessCommunication

The Emergence of Echinocandin-Resistant Candida glabrata Exhibiting High MICs and Related FKS Mutations in Turkey

by Ali Korhan Sig, Meliha Cagla Sonmezer, Dolunay Gülmez, Serhat Duyan, Ömrüm Uzun and Sevtap Arikan-Akdagli

J. Fungi 2021, 7(9), 691; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090691 - 26 Aug 2021

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1978

Abstract

The frequency of invasive fungal infections shows a rising trend as well as a high morbidity and mortality. Among the causative agents, a shift toward the non-albicans Candida species including Candida glabrata species complex is being observed in several centers. Echinocandin resistance is [...] Read more.

The frequency of invasive fungal infections shows a rising trend as well as a high morbidity and mortality. Among the causative agents, a shift toward the non-albicans Candida species including Candida glabrata species complex is being observed in several centers. Echinocandin resistance is increasingly published; however, isolates presenting with an in vitro resistance have not yet been reported from Turkey. We, herein, report the first FKS mutant and phenotypically echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata clinical strains from a single center in Turkey. In a 43-year-old female patient, several enterocutaneous fistulae developed after a long term hospitalization period and several complicated surgeries. She eventually required parenteral nutrition via a tunneled central venous catheter (CVC). Following a number of bacteremic and fungemic episodes as well as intensive antimicrobial interventions (including fluconazole, caspofungin and anidulafungin), a CVC-related candidemia caused by C. glabrata was detected. The isolated strain yielded high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for echinocandins and was categorized as resistant. A resistance-related mutation was detected in FKS2 HS1 (D666V). Blood cultures remained negative after the removal of the CVC and treatment with caspofungin and high-dose fluconazole. Following this first case, two additional C. glabrata strains with high echinocandin MICs were isolated from the urine cultures of two unrelated patients from different wards with different mutations in FKS2 HS1 (S663P and delF659). Our findings indicate that routine antifungal susceptibility testing is crucial and underlines the need for attention for the increasing trend of acquired echinocandin resistance in C. glabrata. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

23 pages, 2552 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Molecular Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility of Trichophyton Isolates in Greece: Emergence of Terbinafine-Resistant Trichophytonmentagrophytes Type VIII Locally and Globally

by Maria Siopi, Ioanna Efstathiou, Konstantinos Theodoropoulos, Spyros Pournaras and Joseph Meletiadis

J. Fungi 2021, 7(6), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060419 - 27 May 2021

Cited by 45 | Viewed by 3878

Abstract

Trichophyton isolates with reduced susceptibility to antifungals are now increasingly reported worldwide. We therefore studied the molecular epidemiology and the in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of Greek Trichophyton isolates over the last 10 years with the newly released EUCAST reference method for dermatophytes. [...] Read more.

Trichophyton isolates with reduced susceptibility to antifungals are now increasingly reported worldwide. We therefore studied the molecular epidemiology and the in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of Greek Trichophyton isolates over the last 10 years with the newly released EUCAST reference method for dermatophytes. Literature was reviewed to assess the global burden of antifungal resistance in Trichophyton spp. The in vitro susceptibility of 112 Trichophyton spp. molecularly identified clinical isolates (70 T. rubrum, 24 T. mentagrophytes, 12 T. interdigitale and 6 T. tonsurans) was tested against terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole and amorolfine (EUCAST E.DEF 11.0). Isolates were genotyped based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and the target gene squalene epoxidase (SQLE) was sequenced for isolates with reduced susceptibility to terbinafine. All T. rubrum, T. interdigitale and T. tonsurans isolates were classified as wild-type (WT) to all antifungals, whereas 9/24 (37.5%) T. mentagrophytes strains displayed elevated terbinafine MICs (0.25–8 mg/L) but not to azoles and amorolfine. All T. interdigitale isolates belonged to ITS Type II, while T. mentagrophytes isolates belonged to ITS Type III* (n = 11), VIII (n = 9) and VII (n = 4). All non-WT T. mentagrophytes isolates belonged to Indian Genotype VIII and harbored Leu393Ser (n = 5) and Phe397Leu (n = 4) SQLE mutations. Terbinafine resistance rates ranged globally from 0–44% for T. rubrum and 0–76% for T. interdigitale/T. mentagrophytes with strong endemicity. High incidence (37.5%) of terbinafine non-WT T. mentagrophytes isolates (all belonging to ITS Type VIII) without cross-resistance to other antifungals was found for the first time in Greece. This finding must alarm for susceptibility testing of dermatophytes at a local scale particularly in non-responding dermatophytoses. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 584 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Azole Resistance in Clinical and Environmental Aspergillus Isolates from the French West Indies (Martinique)

by Lorra Monpierre, Nicole Desbois-Nogard, Isabel Valsecchi, Marielle Bajal, Cécile Angebault, Charline Miossec, Françoise Botterel and Éric Dannaoui

J. Fungi 2021, 7(5), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7050355 - 30 Apr 2021

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2160

Abstract

The emergence of azole resistant Aspergillus spp., especially Aspergillus fumigatus, has been described in several countries around the world with varying prevalence depending on the country. To our knowledge, azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. has not been reported in the West Indies [...] Read more.

The emergence of azole resistant Aspergillus spp., especially Aspergillus fumigatus, has been described in several countries around the world with varying prevalence depending on the country. To our knowledge, azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. has not been reported in the West Indies yet. In this study, we investigated the antifungal susceptibility of clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus spp. from Martinique, and the potential resistance mechanisms associated with mutations in cyp51A gene. Overall, 208 Aspergillus isolates were recovered from clinical samples (n = 45) and environmental soil samples (n = 163). They were screened for resistance to azole drugs using selective culture media. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) towards voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole, as shown by the resistant isolates, were determined using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) microdilution broth method. Eight isolates (A. fumigatus, n = 6 and A. terreus, n = 2) had high MIC for at least one azole drug. The sequencing of cyp51A gene revealed the mutations G54R and TR34/L98H in two A. fumigatus clinical isolates. Our study showed for the first time the presence of azole resistance in A. fumigatus and A. terreus isolates in the French West Indies. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 288 KiB

Open AccessArticle

In Vitro Antifungal Drug Resistance Profiles of Clinically Relevant Members of the Mucorales (Mucoromycota) Especially with the Newer Triazoles

by Andrew M. Borman, Mark Fraser, Zoe Patterson, Michael D. Palmer and Elizabeth M. Johnson

J. Fungi 2021, 7(4), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040271 - 2 Apr 2021

Cited by 26 | Viewed by 3148

Abstract

Mucoromycoses (infections caused by members of the order Mucorales, phylum Mucoromycota [ex-Zygomycota]) are highly destructive, rapidly progressive infections, with dire prognoses especially when they occur in immunocompromised hosts. Current treatment guidelines recommend liposomal formulations of amphotericin B with adjunctive surgery as first line [...] Read more.

Mucoromycoses (infections caused by members of the order Mucorales, phylum Mucoromycota [ex-Zygomycota]) are highly destructive, rapidly progressive infections, with dire prognoses especially when they occur in immunocompromised hosts. Current treatment guidelines recommend liposomal formulations of amphotericin B with adjunctive surgery as first line therapy, with the newer triazoles posaconazole or isavuconazole as alternative treatments, or as salvage therapy. Among the many organisms belonging to this order, a limited number of species in the genera Rhizopus, Mucor, Lichtheimia and Rhizomucor are responsible for most cases of human infection. Here, we present the minimum inhibitory concentration data (MICs) for amphotericin B, posaconazole, isavuconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole with a panel of over 300 isolates of the five most common agents of human infection (Lichtheimia corymbifera, Rhizopus arrhizus, R. microsporus, Rhizomucor pusillus and Mucor spp.) determined using the CLSI broth microdilution method. In agreement with previous studies, the most active antifungal drug for all Mucorales was amphotericin B, with MICs within the range that would predict susceptibility with Aspergillus fumigatus. Conversely, MICs for voriconazole against all species tested were high, and above the range associated with clinical efficacy with A. fumigatus. Interestingly, whilst isavuconazole and posaconazole MIC distributions indicated in vitro activity against some members of the Mucorales, activity was species-dependent for both agents. These data underscore the importance of accurate identification of the causative agents of mucoromycosis, coupled with antifungal susceptibility testing of individual isolates, in determining the optimal treatment of infections caused by these aggressive opportunistic human fungal pathogens. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

22 pages, 891 KiB

Open AccessReview

Molecular Markers of Antifungal Resistance: Potential Uses in Routine Practice and Future Perspectives

by Guillermo Garcia-Effron

J. Fungi 2021, 7(3), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030197 - 9 Mar 2021

Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3937

Abstract

Antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) has come to establish itself as a mandatory routine in clinical practice. At the same time, the mycological diagnosis seems to have headed in the direction of non-culture-based methodologies. The downside of these developments is that the strains that [...] Read more.

Antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) has come to establish itself as a mandatory routine in clinical practice. At the same time, the mycological diagnosis seems to have headed in the direction of non-culture-based methodologies. The downside of these developments is that the strains that cause these infections are not able to be studied for their sensitivity to antifungals. Therefore, at present, the mycological diagnosis is correctly based on laboratory evidence, but the antifungal treatment is undergoing a growing tendency to revert back to being empirical, as it was in the last century. One of the explored options to circumvent these problems is to couple non-cultured based diagnostics with molecular-based detection of intrinsically resistant organisms and the identification of molecular mechanisms of resistance (secondary resistance). The aim of this work is to review the available molecular tools for antifungal resistance detection, their limitations, and their advantages. A comprehensive description of commercially available and in-house methods is included. In addition, gaps in the development of these molecular technologies are discussed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3039 KiB

Open AccessReview

Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations

by Anne-Laure Bidaud, Patrick Schwarz, Guillaume Herbreteau and Eric Dannaoui

J. Fungi 2021, 7(2), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7020113 - 4 Feb 2021

Cited by 28 | Viewed by 6434

Abstract

Systemic fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates despite adequate treatment. Moreover, acquired resistance to antifungals is increasing, which further complicates the therapeutic management. One strategy to overcome antifungal resistance is to use antifungal combinations. In vitro, several techniques are used to [...] Read more.

Systemic fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates despite adequate treatment. Moreover, acquired resistance to antifungals is increasing, which further complicates the therapeutic management. One strategy to overcome antifungal resistance is to use antifungal combinations. In vitro, several techniques are used to assess drug interactions, such as the broth microdilution checkerboard, agar-diffusion methods, and time-kill curves. Currently, the most widely used technique is the checkerboard method. The aim of all these techniques is to determine if the interaction between antifungal agents is synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. However, the interpretation of the results remains difficult. Several methods of analysis can be used, based on different theories. The most commonly used method is the calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration index. Determination of the usefulness of combination treatments in patients needs well-conducted clinical trials, which are difficult. It is therefore important to study antifungal combinations in vivo, in experimental animal models of fungal infections. Although mammalian models have mostly been used, new alternative animal models in invertebrates look promising. To evaluate the antifungal efficacy, the most commonly used criteria are the mortality rate and the fungal load in the target organs. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2714 KiB

Open AccessReview

Rapid Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts and Molds by MALDI-TOF MS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by Miriam Alisa Knoll, Hanno Ulmer and Cornelia Lass-Flörl

J. Fungi 2021, 7(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7010063 - 18 Jan 2021

Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3776

Abstract

Due to the growing burden of fungal infections and a recent rise in antifungal resistance, antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is of increasing importance. The common methods of AFST have turnaround times of 24 to 48 h, and the available rapid methods are limited [...] Read more.

Due to the growing burden of fungal infections and a recent rise in antifungal resistance, antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is of increasing importance. The common methods of AFST have turnaround times of 24 to 48 h, and the available rapid methods are limited by applicability, cost-efficiency or accuracy. Given the urgency of adequate antifungal treatment in invasive mycoses, the need for the rapid and reliable detection of resistance is evident. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AFST based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Twelve studies were reviewed, and data for the comparative analysis of their accuracy and methodology were systematically extracted. Compared to broth dilution as the gold standard, MALDI-TOF MS-based AFST reached a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 84% to 96%) and 95% (95% CI, 90% to 98%), respectively. A comparative analysis showed that the sensitivity was higher for the semi-quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization Biotyper antibiotic susceptibility test rapid assay (MBT ASTRA) technique (96%) than for the correlate composite index (CCI) approach (85%), which is based on spectrum changes. Turnaround times below eight hours reached better diagnostic values than longer incubation periods, qualifying MALDI-TOF MS-based AFST as a rapid and accurate method for the detection of antifungal resistance. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 396 KiB

Open AccessReview

Antifungal Resistance among Less Prevalent Candida Non-albicans and Other Yeasts versus Established and under Development Agents: A Literature Review

by Ana Espinel-Ingroff, Emilia Cantón and Javier Pemán

J. Fungi 2021, 7(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7010024 - 4 Jan 2021

Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2832

Abstract

Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal [...] Read more.

Fungal diseases and antifungal resistance continue to increase, including those caused by rare or emerging species. However, the majority of the published in vitro susceptibility data are for the most common fungal species. We reviewed the literature in order to pool reference minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute—CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility—EUCAST) for rare/non-prevalent Candida and other yeast species. MIC results were compared with those for Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei. Data were listed for twenty rare and emerging Candida spp., including C. auris, as well as two Cryptococcus spp., two Trichosporon spp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and five Malassezia spp. The best detectors of antimicrobial resistance are the breakpoints, which are not available for the less common Candida species. However, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) have been calculated using merely in vitro data for both reference methods for various non-prevalent yeasts and recently the CLSI has established ECVs for other Candida species. The ECV could identify the non-wild type (NWT or mutants) isolates with known resistance mechanisms. Utilizing these ECVs, we were able to report additional percentages of NWT, especially for non-prevalent species, by analyzing the MIC distributions in the literature. In addition, since several antifungal drugs are under development, we are listing MIC data for some of these agents. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

21 pages, 694 KiB

Open AccessReview

Role and Interpretation of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing for the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections

by Frederic Lamoth, Russell E. Lewis and Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis

J. Fungi 2021, 7(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7010017 - 30 Dec 2020

Cited by 34 | Viewed by 7029

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and timely appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for good outcomes. Emerging antifungal resistance among Candida and Aspergillus spp., the major causes of IFI, is concerning and has led to the increasing incorporation of [...] Read more.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and timely appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for good outcomes. Emerging antifungal resistance among Candida and Aspergillus spp., the major causes of IFI, is concerning and has led to the increasing incorporation of in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) to guide clinical decisions. However, the interpretation of AST results and their contribution to management of IFIs remains a matter of debate. Specifically, the utility of AST is limited by the delay in obtaining results and the lack of pharmacodynamic correlation between minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and clinical outcome, particularly for molds. Clinical breakpoints for Candida spp. have been substantially revised over time and appear to be reliable for the detection of azole and echinocandin resistance and for outcome prediction, especially for non-neutropenic patients with candidemia. However, data are lacking for neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis and some non-albicans Candida spp. (notably emerging Candida auris). For Aspergillus spp., AST is not routinely performed, but may be indicated according to the epidemiological context in the setting of emerging azole resistance among A. fumigatus. For non-Aspergillus molds (e.g., Mucorales, Fusarium or Scedosporium spp.), AST is not routinely recommended as interpretive criteria are lacking and many confounders, mainly host factors, seem to play a predominant role in responses to antifungal therapy. This review provides an overview of the pre-clinical and clinical pharmacodynamic data, which constitute the rationale for the use and interpretation of AST testing of yeasts and molds in clinical practice. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1782 KiB

Open AccessReview

The Quiet and Underappreciated Rise of Drug-Resistant Invasive Fungal Pathogens

by Amir Arastehfar, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Rocio Garcia-Rubio, Farnaz Daneshnia, Macit Ilkit, Teun Boekhout, Toni Gabaldon and David S. Perlin

J. Fungi 2020, 6(3), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6030138 - 18 Aug 2020

Cited by 78 | Viewed by 8172

Abstract

Human fungal pathogens are attributable to a significant economic burden and mortality worldwide. Antifungal treatments, although limited in number, play a pivotal role in decreasing mortality and morbidities posed by invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, the recent emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris and [...] Read more.

Human fungal pathogens are attributable to a significant economic burden and mortality worldwide. Antifungal treatments, although limited in number, play a pivotal role in decreasing mortality and morbidities posed by invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, the recent emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris and Candida glabrata and acquiring invasive infections due to azole-resistant C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and Aspergillus spp. in azole-naïve patients pose a serious health threat considering the limited number of systemic antifungals available to treat IFIs. Although advancing for major fungal pathogens, the understanding of fungal attributes contributing to antifungal resistance is just emerging for several clinically important MDR fungal pathogens. Further complicating the matter are the distinct differences in antifungal resistance mechanisms among various fungal species in which one or more mechanisms may contribute to the resistance phenotype. In this review, we attempt to summarize the burden of antifungal resistance for selected non-albicansCandida and clinically important Aspergillus species together with their phylogenetic placement on the tree of life. Moreover, we highlight the different molecular mechanisms between antifungal tolerance and resistance, and comprehensively discuss the molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance in a species level. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

7 pages, 760 KiB

Open AccessCase Report

Resistance to Echinocandins Complicates a Case of Candida albicans Bloodstream Infection: A Case Report

by Laura Trovato, Dafne Bongiorno, Maddalena Calvo, Giuseppe Migliorisi, Albino Boraccino, Nicolò Musso, Salvatore Oliveri, Stefania Stefani and Guido Scalia

J. Fungi 2021, 7(6), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060405 - 21 May 2021

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1969

Abstract

Invasive candidiasis is known to be one of the most common healthcare-associated complications and is caused by several Candida species. First-line drugs, particularly echinocandins, are effective, but there are increasing reports of resistance to these molecules, though rarely related to C. albicans. [...] Read more.

Invasive candidiasis is known to be one of the most common healthcare-associated complications and is caused by several Candida species. First-line drugs, particularly echinocandins, are effective, but there are increasing reports of resistance to these molecules, though rarely related to C. albicans. Even though the rate of echinocandins resistance remains low (<3%), sporadic cases are emerging. Here, we present a case of bloodstream infection by a pan-echinocandin-resistant Candida albicans affecting a critically ill patient, who died in an intensive care unit following therapeutic failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. This case highlights the need to suspect pan-echinocandin resistance in patients with prolonged echinocandin exposure, particularly in the presence of urinary tract colonization. Our study shows the importance of sequencing to predict therapeutic failure in patients treated with echinocandins and persistent candidemia. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antifungal Resistance)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Antifungal Resistance

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (11 papers)

Research

Review

Other

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI