energies-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals

A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996-1073). This special issue belongs to the section "A4: Bio-Energy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 January 2020) | Viewed by 40487

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Energy Engineering, Future Convergence Technology Research Institute, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, 33 Dongjin-ro, Jinju 52725, Gyeongnam, Korea
Interests: anaerobic digestion; wastewater treatment; waste management; biomass pretreatment; biogas upgrading; carboxylate platform; resource recovery; anaerobic microbiology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark
Interests: anaerobic digestion; biomass pretreatment; biochemical process modelling; waste management; biogas upgrading; biochemical methane potential; co-digestion; inhibition; biohydrogen production

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are inviting submissions to the Energies Special Issue on “Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals”.

Anaerobic digestion technology offers the sustainable production of renewable energy through the management of waste and wastewater. Anaerobic biotechnology utilizes natural cycles in an engineered system for energy and resource recovery, as well as for platform chemical production. The successful practice of anaerobic digestion requires the command of many different fields, including substrate management, bioprocess engineering, civil and construction engineering, sensors and monitoring, fuel management, environmental engineering, and microbiology. With its long history and recent technological advances, anaerobic digestion is considered as one of the most significant renewable energy sources in the world.

This Special Issue of Energies aims at addressing the state-of-the-art findings and improvements in anaerobic waste and wastewater treatment, biomass pretreatment, biogas upgrading, chemical production, resource recovery, and anaerobic microbiology. Original submissions focusing on fundamental and/or practical issues related to all sub-fields of anaerobic digestion are welcome. The Special Issue will include, but is not limited to:

  • Anaerobic digestion for the treatment of waste and wastewater
  • Pretreatment technologies for biomass
  • Innovative reactor configurations and optimization
  • Biogas upgrading and management
  • Chemical production through anaerobic biotechnology
  • Resource recovery linked to anaerobic digestion
  • Modelling
  • Field-scale practices and case studies

Prof. Dr. Seung Gu Shin
Prof. Dr. Jin Mi Triolo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Energies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • waste and wastewater treatment
  • biomass pretreatment
  • biogas upgrading
  • chemicals production
  • resource recovery
  • anaerobic microbiology
  • biochemical methane potential

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 4050 KiB  
Article
Co-Ensiling of Wheat Straw as an Alternative Pre-Treatment to Chemical, Hydrothermal and Mechanical Methods for Methane Production
by Mads Ujarak Sieborg, Brian Dahl Jønson, Søren Ugilt Larsen, Ali Heidarzadeh Vazifehkhoran and Jin Mi Triolo
Energies 2020, 13(16), 4047; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164047 - 05 Aug 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2329
Abstract
Wheat straw without pre-treatment is only converted to methane to a low degree during anaerobic digestion for fuel production due to its low hydrolysis. Current pre-treatment technologies are challenged by high expenses to energy or chemical agents. We examined the low-tech co-ensiling pre-treatment [...] Read more.
Wheat straw without pre-treatment is only converted to methane to a low degree during anaerobic digestion for fuel production due to its low hydrolysis. Current pre-treatment technologies are challenged by high expenses to energy or chemical agents. We examined the low-tech co-ensiling pre-treatment as an alternative pre-treatment of wheat straw, and compared the results with hydrothermal, chemical and mechanical pre-treatment methods. The effects of co-ensiling duration and the mixing ratio between straw and sugar beet root on the methane yields, surface morphology and chemical composition were examined. It was found that co-ensiling could improve production of methane by 34.7%, while a combined hydrothermal and chemical pre-treatment could increase the production of methane by 25.4%. The study demonstrated that the effect of co-ensiling could overlap with hydrothermal and chemical pre-treatment by having similar effects to increase lignocellulosic hydrolysis and improve methane production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 478 KiB  
Article
Agricultural Biogas—An Important Element in the Circular and Low-Carbon Development in Poland
by Arkadiusz Piwowar
Energies 2020, 13(7), 1733; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071733 - 05 Apr 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 3957
Abstract
The agricultural sector can play an important role in the transformation of the energy economy in Poland. Special attention in this paper has been paid to the development of the agricultural biogas market in Poland. The considerations mainly concern organizational and economic aspects. [...] Read more.
The agricultural sector can play an important role in the transformation of the energy economy in Poland. Special attention in this paper has been paid to the development of the agricultural biogas market in Poland. The considerations mainly concern organizational and economic aspects. Agricultural biogas plant represents the circular cycle of matter and energy. It enables the establishment of low-carbon, resource-efficient links between the agriculture and energy sectors. This is an important element of the circular economy, where waste from agricultural production and the agri-food industry, coming from renewable resources, is transformed into goods with a higher added value. The social and economic needs of the present generation and future generations are considered. The paper presented the characteristics of the Polish market, i.e., the number of entities, the number and location of plants, as well as the production volumes. Analyses were performed in the area of raw materials used to produce agricultural biogas. The analyses were carried out between 2011 and 2018. According to analyses, the potential of the agricultural biogas market in Poland is currently being used to a small extent. It is necessary not only to provide institutional support but also to increase the awareness of farmers and managers in agri-food companies of the possibility of using production waste for energy purposes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 881 KiB  
Article
Ammonium Sulphate from a Bio-Refinery System as a Fertilizer—Agronomic and Economic Effectiveness on the Farm Scale
by Magdalena Szymańska, Tomasz Sosulski, Ewa Szara, Adam Wąs, Piotr Sulewski, Gijs W.P. van Pruissen and René L. Cornelissen
Energies 2019, 12(24), 4721; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244721 - 11 Dec 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5025
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a pot experiment aimed at the assessment of the agronomic and economic effectiveness of ammonium sulphate from an agro bio-refinery (Bio-AS). The Bio-AS was obtained by means of the ammonia stripping process from effluent after struvite precipitation [...] Read more.
This paper presents the results of a pot experiment aimed at the assessment of the agronomic and economic effectiveness of ammonium sulphate from an agro bio-refinery (Bio-AS). The Bio-AS was obtained by means of the ammonia stripping process from effluent after struvite precipitation from a liquid fraction of digestate. The agronomic effectiveness of Bio-AS in a pot experiment with maize and grass in two different soils, silty loam (SL) and loamy sand (LS), was investigated. The fertilising effect of Bio-AS was compared to commercial ammonium sulphate fertilizer (Com-AS) and control treatment (without fertilisation). The crop yields were found to depend on both soil type and nitrogen treatment. Crop yields produced under Bio-AS and Com-AS exceeded those under control treatments, respectively for SL and LS soils, by 88% and 125% for maize and 73% and 94% for grass. Crop yields under Bio-AS were similar to those under the Com-AS treatment. The fertilizer use of Bio-AS affected the chemical composition of plants and soil properties similarly as Com-AS. This suggests that Bio-AS from a bio-refinery can replace industrial ammonium sulphate, resulting in both economic and environmental benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1071 KiB  
Article
Application of Response Surface Analysis to Evaluate the Effect of Concentrations of Ammonia and Propionic Acid on Acetate-Utilizing Methanogenesis
by Seung Gu Shin, Joonyeob Lee, Trong Hoan Do, Su In Kim and Seokhwan Hwang
Energies 2019, 12(17), 3394; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173394 - 03 Sep 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2216
Abstract
Ammonia and propionate are known inhibitors of anaerobic methanogenesis at higher concentrations, and are likely to coexist in digesters treating high-strength wastewater. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the effects of ammonia and propionate on acetate-utilizing methanogenesis when they coexist. Response surface [...] Read more.
Ammonia and propionate are known inhibitors of anaerobic methanogenesis at higher concentrations, and are likely to coexist in digesters treating high-strength wastewater. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the effects of ammonia and propionate on acetate-utilizing methanogenesis when they coexist. Response surface analysis with face-centered central composite design was used to explore the total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) level of 2–5 g/L and the propionate level of 2–8 g/L in acetate-fed batch incubation. Two models were successfully derived to estimate the lag period and the methane yield in response to the concentrations of the two chemicals. The lag period was affected by both inhibitors, with clues obtained of a synergistic effect at a higher concentration rage ([TAN] > 3.5 g/L and [propionate] > 5 g/L). The methane yield was also affected by the two inhibitors; between the two, it was more significantly dependent on the TAN concentration than on the propionate concentration. Real-time PCR showed that Methanosarcinaceae was the major methanogen group in this system. The results of this study improve our understanding of the inhibition of biogas reactors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 2867 KiB  
Article
Effects of Two-Stage Operation on Stability and Efficiency in Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Waste Activated Sludge
by Xinyuan Liu, Ruying Li and Min Ji
Energies 2019, 12(14), 2748; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142748 - 18 Jul 2019
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3911
Abstract
The two-stage anaerobic digestion (AD) technology attracts increasing attention due to its ability to collect both hydrogen and methane. A two-stage AD system feeding with food waste and waste activated sludge was investigated in order to achieve higher energy yield and organics removal. [...] Read more.
The two-stage anaerobic digestion (AD) technology attracts increasing attention due to its ability to collect both hydrogen and methane. A two-stage AD system feeding with food waste and waste activated sludge was investigated in order to achieve higher energy yield and organics removal. The two-stage process consists of a thermophilic H2-reactor and a mesophilic CH4-reactor, achieved the highest hydrogen and methane yields of 76.8 mL/g-VS and 147.6 mL/g-VS at hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 0.8 d and 6 d, respectively. The co-digestion process in this study required much less external alkalinity to maintain the pH values than sole food waste digestion in the literature. Compared with the single-stage mesophilic methane AD process, the two-stage AD system had better performance on operation stability, biogas and energy yields, organics removal and chemical oxygen demand (COD) conversion at high organic loading rates (OLRs). According to the TA-cloning analysis, the dominant bacteria in H2-reactor was closely related to Clostridium sp. strain Z6 and species Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum. The dominant methanogens in two-stage and single-stage CH4-reactor were recognized as acetotrophic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, respectively. The presence of the genus Nitrososphaera in the two CH4-reactors might contribute to the low NH4+-N concentration in digestate and low CO2 content in biogas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1437 KiB  
Article
Sequential Production of Lignin, Fatty Acid Methyl Esters and Biogas from Spent Coffee Grounds via an Integrated Physicochemical and Biological Process
by Minjeong Lee, Minseok Yang, Sangki Choi, Jingyeong Shin, Chanhyuk Park, Si-Kyung Cho and Young Mo Kim
Energies 2019, 12(12), 2360; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122360 - 19 Jun 2019
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3850
Abstract
Spent coffee grounds (SCG) are one of the lignocellulosic biomasses that have gained much attention due to their high potential both in valorization and biomethane production. Previous studies have reported single processes that extract either fatty acids/lignin or biogas. In this study, an [...] Read more.
Spent coffee grounds (SCG) are one of the lignocellulosic biomasses that have gained much attention due to their high potential both in valorization and biomethane production. Previous studies have reported single processes that extract either fatty acids/lignin or biogas. In this study, an integrated physicochemical and biological process was investigated, which sequentially recovers lignin, fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) and biogas from the residue of SCG. The determination of optimal conditions for sequential separation was based on central composite design (CCD) and response surface methodology (RSM). Independent variables adopted in this study were reaction temperature (86.1–203.9 °C), concentration of sulfuric acid (0.0–6.4%v/v) and methanol to SCG ratio (1.3–4.7 mL/g). Under determined optimal conditions of 161.0 °C, 3.6% and 4.7 mL/g, lignin and FAME yields were estimated to be 55.5% and 62.4%, respectively. FAME extracted from SCG consisted of 41.7% C16 and 48.16% C18, which makes the extractives appropriate materials to convert into biodiesel. Results from Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) further support that lignin and FAME extracted from SCG have structures similar to previously reported extractives from other lignocellulosic biomasses. The solid residue remaining after lignin and FAME extraction was anaerobically digested under mesophilic conditions, resulting in a methane yield of 36.0 mL-CH4/g-VSadded. This study is the first to introduce an integrated resource recovery platform capable of valorization of a municipal solid waste stream. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 3327 KiB  
Article
Performance and Microbial Community Dynamics in Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge: Impact of Immigration
by Juhee Shin, Si-Kyung Cho, Joonyeob Lee, Kwanghyun Hwang, Jae Woo Chung, Hae-Nam Jang and Seung Gu Shin
Energies 2019, 12(3), 573; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030573 - 12 Feb 2019
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 4497
Abstract
Waste activated sludge (WAS) is a byproduct of municipal wastewater treatment. WAS contains a large proportion of inactive microbes, so when it is used as a substrate for anaerobic digestion (AD), their presence can interfere with monitoring of active microbial populations. To investigate [...] Read more.
Waste activated sludge (WAS) is a byproduct of municipal wastewater treatment. WAS contains a large proportion of inactive microbes, so when it is used as a substrate for anaerobic digestion (AD), their presence can interfere with monitoring of active microbial populations. To investigate how influent cells affect the active and inactive microbial communities during digestion of WAS, we operated model mesophilic bioreactors with conventional conditions. Under six different hydraulic retention times (HRTs; 25, 23, 20, 17, 14, and 11.5 d), the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal and CH4 production of the AD were within a typical range for mesophilic sludge digesters. In the main bacteria were proteobacteria, bacteroidetes, and firmicutes in both the WAS and the bioreactors, while in main archaeal methanogen group was Methanosarcinales in the WAS and methanomicrobiales in the bioreactors. Of the 106 genera identified, the estimated net growth rates were negative in 72 and positive in 34. The genera with negative growth included many aerobic taxa. The genera with positive growth rates included methanogens and syntrophs. In some taxa, the net growth rate could be positive or negative, depending on HRT, so their abundance was also affected by HRT. This study gives insights into the microbial dynamics of a conventional sludge anaerobic digester by distinguishing potentially active (growing) and inactive (non-growing, dormant) microbes and by correlating population dynamics with process parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 1155 KiB  
Review
Granular Sludge Bed Processes in Anaerobic Digestion of Particle-Rich Substrates
by Fasil Ayelegn Tassew, Wenche Hennie Bergland, Carlos Dinamarca, Roald Kommedal and Rune Bakke
Energies 2019, 12(15), 2940; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152940 - 31 Jul 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3645
Abstract
Granular sludge bed (GSB) anaerobic digestion (AD) is a well-established method for efficient wastewater treatment, limited, however, by the wastewater particle content. This review is carried out to investigate how and to what extent feed particles influence GSB to evaluate the applicability of [...] Read more.
Granular sludge bed (GSB) anaerobic digestion (AD) is a well-established method for efficient wastewater treatment, limited, however, by the wastewater particle content. This review is carried out to investigate how and to what extent feed particles influence GSB to evaluate the applicability of GSB to various types of slurries that are abundantly available. Sludge bed microorganisms evidently have mechanisms to retain feed particles for digestion. Disintegration and hydrolysis of such particulates are often the rate-limiting steps in AD. GSB running on particle-rich substrates and factors that affect these processes are stdied especially. Disintegration and hydrolysis models are therefore reviewed. How particles may influence other key processes within GSB is also discussed. Based on this, limitations and strategies for effective digestion of particle-rich substrates in high-rate AD reactors are evaluated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1605 KiB  
Review
A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration
by Anahita Rabii, Saad Aldin, Yaser Dahman and Elsayed Elbeshbishy
Energies 2019, 12(6), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061106 - 21 Mar 2019
Cited by 221 | Viewed by 9978
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that anaerobic co-digestion (AnCoD) is superior to conventional anaerobic digestion (AD). The benefits of enhanced bioenergy production and solids reduction using co-substrates have attracted researchers to study the co-digestion technology and to better understand the effect of multi substrates [...] Read more.
Recent studies have shown that anaerobic co-digestion (AnCoD) is superior to conventional anaerobic digestion (AD). The benefits of enhanced bioenergy production and solids reduction using co-substrates have attracted researchers to study the co-digestion technology and to better understand the effect of multi substrates on digester performance. This review will discuss the results of such studies with the main focus on: (1) generally the advantages of co-digestion over mono-digestion in terms of system stability, bioenergy, and solids reduction; (2) microbial consortia diversity and their synergistic impact on biogas improvement; (3) the effect of digester mode, i.e., multi-stage versus single stage digestion on AnCoD. It is essential to note that the studies reported improvement in the synergy and diverse microbial consortia when using co-digestion technologies, in addition to higher biomethane yield when using two-stage mode. A good example would be the co-digestion of biodiesel waste and glycerin with municipal waste sludge in a two-stage reactor resulting in 100% increase of biogas and 120% increase in the methane content of the produced biogas with microbial population dominated by Methanosaeta and Methanomicrobium. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anaerobic Digestion for the Production of Energy and Chemicals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop