Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
5.4
3.9
Journals
JCM
Special Issues
Advances in the Clinical Management of Perioperative Anesthesia
share announcement

Advances in the Clinical Management of Perioperative Anesthesia

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Anesthesiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 August 2024 | Viewed by 1782

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Alessia Mattei

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
Interests: anesthesia; pain management; perioperative medicine; anesthesiology; intensive care
Prof. Dr. Rita Cataldo

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
Interests: anesthesia; pain management; perioperative medicine; anesthesiology; intensive care, anesthesia in robotic surgery; ERAS; ERABS
Dr. Alessandro Strumia

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
Interests: anesthesia; pain management; perioperative medicine; cardiac anesthesia; regional anesthesia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Perioperative and anesthetic management undertaken for general surgery improves surgical outcomes. 

It requires close multidisciplinary collaboration between dedicated anesthetic, surgical and clinical teams and should be based on a combination of multimodal evidence-based strategies applied to the conventional perioperative techniques, such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Preoperative evaluation with risk factor optimization, choice of anesthesia and anesthetic drugs, multimodal analgesia and pain management, fluid management, hemodynamic monitoring, postoperative early feeding and early mobilization are key elements of a patient-centered strategy to reduce postoperative complications and achieve early recovery. 

This Special Issue in the Journal of Clinical Medicine aims to publish topical clinical research related to the perioperative care of surgical patients, involving different main areas of interest, from throughout the surgical pathway to recovery. 

We welcome the submission of original research articles, narrative and/or systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on the clinical management of perioperative anesthesia.

Dr. Alessia Mattei
Prof. Dr. Rita Cataldo
Dr. Alessandro Strumia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • perioperative outcomes (surgical, anesthetic, medical)
  • evidence-based care
  • perioperative guidelines and consensus statements
  • preoperative evaluation and risk scores
  • preoperative testing
  • surgical optimization and enhanced surgical recovery programs
  • intensive care unit

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 673 KiB  
Article
Pulmonary Hypertension and the Risk of 30-Day Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Gastrointestinal Surgical or Endoscopic Procedures: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Analysis
by Yoshio Tatsuoka, Zyad J. Carr, Sachidhanand Jayakumar, Hung-Mo Lin, Zili He, Adham Farroukh and Paul Heerdt
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1996; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071996 - 29 Mar 2024
Viewed by 470
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients are at higher risk of postoperative complications. We analyzed the association of PH with 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Methods: A single-center propensity score overlap weighting (OW) retrospective cohort study was conducted on 164 patients with [...] Read more.
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients are at higher risk of postoperative complications. We analyzed the association of PH with 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Methods: A single-center propensity score overlap weighting (OW) retrospective cohort study was conducted on 164 patients with a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of >20 mmHg within 24 months of undergoing elective inpatient abdominal surgery or endoscopic procedures under general anesthesia and a control cohort (N = 1981). The primary outcome was PPCs, and the secondary outcomes were PPC sub-composites, namely respiratory failure (RF), pneumonia (PNA), aspiration pneumonia/pneumonitis (ASP), pulmonary embolism (PE), length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Results: PPCs were higher in the PH cohort (29.9% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001). When sub-composites were analyzed, higher rates of RF (19.3% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001) and PNA (11.2% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.01) were observed. After OW, PH was still associated with greater PPCs (RR 1.66, 95% CI (1.05–2.71), p = 0.036) and increased LOS (median 8.0 days vs. 4.9 days) but not 30-day mortality. Sub-cohort analysis showed no difference in PPCs between pre- and post-capillary PH patients. Conclusions: After covariate balancing, PH was associated with a higher risk for PPCs and prolonged LOS. This elevated PPC risk should be considered during preoperative risk assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Clinical Management of Perioperative Anesthesia)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 853 KiB  
Article
Clinical Efficacy of 10 Min of Active Prewarming for Preserving Patient Body Temperature during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
by Jung-Woo Shim, Hyejin Kwon, Hyong Woo Moon and Min Suk Chae
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1843; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071843 - 22 Mar 2024
Viewed by 428
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) poses a risk of hypothermia. Additionally, general anesthesia lowers the thresholds for shivering and vasoconstriction, which leads to dysfunction of central thermoregulation. Perioperative hypothermia is associated with adverse outcomes after surgery. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate that [...] Read more.
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) poses a risk of hypothermia. Additionally, general anesthesia lowers the thresholds for shivering and vasoconstriction, which leads to dysfunction of central thermoregulation. Perioperative hypothermia is associated with adverse outcomes after surgery. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate that prewarming for 10 min can effectively prevent early hypothermia during PNL. Methods: A total of 68 patients scheduled for elective PNL were recruited to this study from January to June 2022, but two patients were excluded because of a change in the surgical plan. After randomization, patients in the prewarming group (n = 32) received warming using a forced-air warming device for 10 min in the preoperative area before being transferred to the operating room, while the controls (n = 34) did not. The incidence of hypothermia within the first hour after inducing general anesthesia was the primary outcome. Perioperative body temperatures and postoperative recovery findings were also evaluated. Results: Early intraoperative hypothermia decreased significantly more in the prewarming group than in the control group (9.4% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.003). Moreover, the net decrease in core body temperature during surgery was smaller in the prewarming group than in the control group (0.2 °C, vs. 0.5 °C, p = 0.003). In addition, the prewarmed patients had a lower incidence of postoperative shivering and a shorter post-anesthesia-care unit (PACU) stay (12.5% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.031; and 46 vs. 50 min, p = 0.038, respectively). Conclusions: Prewarming for 10 min decreased early hypothermia, preserved intraoperative body temperature, and improved postoperative recovery in the PACU. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Clinical Management of Perioperative Anesthesia)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2156 KiB  
Article
Anaesthesia Management for Giant Intraabdominal Tumours: A Case Series Study
by Olga Grăjdieru, Cristina Petrișor, Constantin Bodolea, Ciprian Tomuleasa and Cătălin Constantinescu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1321; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051321 - 26 Feb 2024
Viewed by 577
Abstract
Background: Due to a lack of randomised controlled trials and guidelines, and only case reports being available in the literature, there is no consensus on how to approach anaesthetic management in patients with giant intraabdominal tumours. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Background: Due to a lack of randomised controlled trials and guidelines, and only case reports being available in the literature, there is no consensus on how to approach anaesthetic management in patients with giant intraabdominal tumours. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the literature and explore the current status of evidence, by undertaking an observational research design with a descriptive account of characteristics observed in a case series referring to patients with giant intraabdominal tumours who underwent anaesthesia. Results: Twenty patients diagnosed with giant intraabdominal tumours were included in the study, most of them women, with the overall pathology being ovarian-related and sarcomas. Most of the patients were unable to lie supine and assumed a lateral decubitus position. Pulmonary function tests, chest X-rays, and thoracoabdominal CT were the most often performed preoperative evaluation methods, with the overall findings that there was no atelectasis or pleural effusion present, but there was bilateral diaphragm elevation. The removal of the intraabdominal tumour was performed under general anaesthesia in all cases. Awake fiberoptic intubation or awake videolaryngoscopy was performed in five cases, while the rest were performed with general anaesthesia with rapid sequence induction. Only one patient was ventilated with pressure support ventilation while maintaining spontaneous ventilation, while the rest were ventilated with controlled ventilation. Hypoxemia was the most reported respiratory complication during surgery. In more than 50% of cases, there was hypotension present during surgery, especially after the induction of anaesthesia and after tumour removal, which required vasopressor support. Most cases involved blood loss with subsequent transfusion requirements. The removal of the tumor requires prolonged surgical and anaesthesia times. Fluid drainage from cystic tumour ranged from 15.7 L to 107 L, with a fluid extraction rate of 0.5–2.5 L/min, and there was no re-expansion pulmonary oedema reported. Following surgery, all the patients required intensive care unit admission. One patient died during hospitalization. Conclusions: This study contributes to the creation of a certain standard of care when dealing with patients presenting with giant intraabdominal tumour. More research is needed to define the proper way to administer anaesthesia and create practice guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Clinical Management of Perioperative Anesthesia)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop