In Vitro Digestibility and Ruminal Fermentation Profile, 2nd Edition

A special issue of Fermentation (ISSN 2311-5637). This special issue belongs to the section "Microbial Metabolism, Physiology & Genetics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 24 August 2024 | Viewed by 4262

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
Interests: fermented foods; fuzhuan brick tea; human health safety; gut microbiota; metabolic syndrome
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Agro-Product Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Interests: fermented foods; nutrients; carotenoids; gut microbiota; polysaccharides; friuts and vegetables
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
College of Food Engineering, Anhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, China
Interests: intestine flora; ruminococcaceae; microorganisms
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Food ingredients play a crucial role in human health, and the health-promoting effects of food ingredients are highly related to their digestion and fermentation characteristics in the gastrointestinal tract. A growing amount of evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may serve as an important modulator of the crosstalk between diet and human health. Recently and more strikingly, some reports have demonstrated that some food ingredients, such as polysaccharides and polyphenols, can evade the digestive system without digestion by human enzymes in the saliva, stomach, and small intestine. The indigestible food ingredients can then reach the large intestine intact, where they can be broken down and utilized by gut microbiota. As a result, some health-promoting gut microbiota levels, such as of Akkermansia muciniphila, are increased; furthermore, some beneficial metabolic products such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the area are also enhanced, which may positively contribute to human health. Thus, evaluating the digestion and fermentation characteristics of food ingredients is highly important.

It is well-known that it is difficult to detect the changes of food ingredients if an animal model is used to evaluate the digestion and fermentation characteristics of food ingredients due to the complex composition of the animal diet. However, the digestion and fermentation model in vitro have the advantages of reproducibility, simplicity, universality, and can integrally simulate the in vivo conditions to mimic oral, gastric, small intestinal, and large intestinal digestive processes. Thus, the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation models have been widely used for evaluating the activities of food ingredients.

Thus, this Special Issue of Fermentation focuses on the in vitro digestibility and ruminal fermentation profile of food ingredients, and it is expected that this publication could substantially expand our knowledge of digestion and fermentation characteristics of food ingredients and further stimulate future research. Accordingly, this Special Issue welcomes experts working in the field to submit original experimental studies and reviews that cover state-of-the-art advances in this important area.

This Special Issue will highlight the most recent advances in, but is not limited to, the following subjects:

  • Changes in physicochemical and biological properties during gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation;
  • Innovative approaches to evaluating the digestion and fermentation characteristics of food ingredients;
  • Metabolic characteristics and biotransformation of food ingredients during gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation system;
  • The interaction between gut microbiota and food ingredients;
  • The potential risk of food ingredients on the human health evaluated using a digestion and fermentation model in vitro.

Prof. Dr. Guijie Chen
Dr. Zhuqing Dai
Prof. Dr. Chunxu Chen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Fermentation is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • in vitro digestibility
  • ruminal fermentation
  • gut microbiota
  • multi-omics techniques
  • metabolic characteristics and biotransformation
  • prebiotic activity
  • food ingredients
  • health-promoting functions
  • potential risk

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 278 KiB  
Article
Synergistic Effects of Essential Oil Blends and Fumaric Acid on Ruminal Fermentation, Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC)
by Joel O. Alabi, Peter A. Dele, Deborah O. Okedoyin, Michael Wuaku, Chika C. Anotaenwere, Oludotun O. Adelusi, DeAndrea Gray, Kelechi A. Ike, Olatunde A. Oderinwale, Kiran Subedi and Uchenna Y. Anele
Fermentation 2024, 10(2), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020114 - 19 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1217
Abstract
This study investigated the combined impact of essential oil blends (EOBs) and fumaric acid (FA) on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. Three rumen-cannulated, non-lactating Holstein Friesian cows served as inoculum donors. The substrate, a total mixed [...] Read more.
This study investigated the combined impact of essential oil blends (EOBs) and fumaric acid (FA) on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. Three rumen-cannulated, non-lactating Holstein Friesian cows served as inoculum donors. The substrate, a total mixed ration (TMR), comprised corn silage, alfalfa hay, and a concentrate mix in a 3:1:1 ratio. The four treatments evaluated were Control (TMR without additives), EFA1 (TMR + EOB1 + FA), EFA2 (TMR + EOB2 + FA), and EFA3 (TMR + EOB3 + FA). Sixteen fermentation chambers were randomly assigned to the treatments, each with four replicates, following a completely randomized design during a 9-day experimental period. EOBs and FA were added at 10 µL/g feed and 3% of TMR, respectively. After a 4-day adaptation, samples were collected for 5 days. Results revealed that EFA1 significantly reduced (p = 0.0351) CH4 emissions by 60.2% without negatively impacting dry matter disappearance, fiber fraction digestibility, pH, or gas volume. All EFAs increased (p < 0.001) the propionate molar proportion and decreased (p < 0.001) the acetate-to-propionate ratio. EFA2 decreased (p < 0.05) the acetate proportion by 3.3% compared to the control. In conclusion, EFA1 is recommended as an effective nutritional intervention to mitigate CH4 emissions and optimize ruminal fermentation in dairy cows. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Vitro Digestibility and Ruminal Fermentation Profile, 2nd Edition)
10 pages, 249 KiB  
Article
Feeding Value Assessment of Five Varieties Whole-Plant Cassava in Tropical China
by Mao Li, Hanlin Zhou, Xuejuan Zi, Renlong Lv, Jun Tang, Wenjun Ou and Songbi Chen
Fermentation 2024, 10(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010045 - 06 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1164
Abstract
The feeding value of five varieties of whole-plant cassava (SC5, SC7, SC9, SC14, and SC205) was assessed through analysis of the nutritional composition and in situ ruminal degradability. The results showed abundant nutrients in whole-plant cassava, and the means of starch and crude [...] Read more.
The feeding value of five varieties of whole-plant cassava (SC5, SC7, SC9, SC14, and SC205) was assessed through analysis of the nutritional composition and in situ ruminal degradability. The results showed abundant nutrients in whole-plant cassava, and the means of starch and crude protein (CP) were 267.7 and 176.8 (g kg−1), and ranged from 223.7 g kg−1 (SC9) to 296.4 g kg−1 (SC14) and from 142.4 g kg−1 (SC5) to 195.8 g kg−1 (SC9) (p < 0.05), respectively. Meanwhile, the moderate neutral detergent fiber (NDF) of whole-plant cassava was also observed and ranged from 266.2 g kg−1 in SC9 to 286.6 g kg−1 in SC14 (p < 0.05). In addition, the trace elements, such as Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn, in whole-plant cassava were relatively enriched, and their mean concentrations were 135.8, 1225.2, 5.8, and 105.3 mg kg−1 (p < 0.05), respectively. Both the highest essential amino acid and total amino acid concentrations were obtained in SC7 (p < 0.01). The hydrogen cyanide (HCN) content of fresh and dried whole-plant cassava ranged from 76.5 to 131.6 and from 36.0 to 56.7 mg kg−1 (p < 0.05), respectively. The in situ dry matter ruminal degradability and metabolizable energy (ME) varied significantly (p < 0.05) and were consistently lowest and highest in SC9 and SC14, ranging from 50.9% to 80.0% and from 7.5 to 12.3 MJ kg−1, respectively. Collectively, all varieties of whole-plant cassava had a high feeding value, as reflected by abundant starch, minerals, amino acid, and water-soluble carbohydrates, while having a low fiber content and HCN toxicity, as well as excellent ruminal digestibility characteristics, and they could be used as a potential feed resource for ruminants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Vitro Digestibility and Ruminal Fermentation Profile, 2nd Edition)
16 pages, 3415 KiB  
Article
Impact of High-Moisture Ear Corn on Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity, Rumen Fermentation, and Microbial Diversity in Pluriparous Dairy Cows
by Songlin Shang, Jiajun Li, Wenjing Zhang, Xinrui Zhang, Jinni Bai, Zhiye Yang, Xiangguo Wang, Riccardo Fortina, Laura Gasco and Kaijun Guo
Fermentation 2024, 10(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010044 - 06 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1335
Abstract
Due to the increasing costs of livestock farming, it is important to find cost-effective alternatives of feed stuffs. This study investigated the effects of high-moisture ear corn (HMEC) feeding on the production performance, serum antioxidant capacity, immunity, and ruminal fermentation and microbiome of [...] Read more.
Due to the increasing costs of livestock farming, it is important to find cost-effective alternatives of feed stuffs. This study investigated the effects of high-moisture ear corn (HMEC) feeding on the production performance, serum antioxidant capacity, immunity, and ruminal fermentation and microbiome of dairy cows. Thirty pluriparous Chinese Holstein cows were randomly allocated to two groups: steam-flaked corn (SFC) and HMEC (replacement of 2 kg equal dry matter SFC) and fed for a 60 day trial. The results showed replacing SFC with HMEC significantly increased dry matter intake, milk yield, and 4% fat-corrected milk yield (p < 0.05). Serum levels of superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and immunoglobulins G, M, and A were significantly higher, and those of creatinine and cholesterol were significantly lower, in the HMEC group than in the SFC group (p < 0.05). HMEC also significantly increased total volatile fatty acid and acetate (p < 0.05) concentrations. In both groups, the dominant phyla of ruminal bacteria were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, and the dominant genera were Prevotella, NK4A214-group, and Succiniclasticum. Mogibacterium, Eubacterium nodatum group, norank-f-Lachnospiraceae, and Eubacterium brachy group were significantly enriched in the ruminal fluid of HMEC-group cows (p < 0.05). In conclusion, replacing SFC with HMEC improved production performance, antioxidant capacity, and immunity, while regulating both ruminal fermentation and the composition of the ruminal microbiome in dairy cows. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Vitro Digestibility and Ruminal Fermentation Profile, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop