The Regulation of the Cell Cycle II

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section "Cell Proliferation and Division".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (29 February 2024) | Viewed by 6672

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Laboratory of Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tours, 10, Boulevard Tonnelle, 37032 Tours, France
Interests: centrosome; centriole; cilia; flagella; cytoskeleton; mitosis; cell cycle
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Directeur Centre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM), Cell Cycle Team, CNRS CRBM UMR5237, CEDEX 05, 34293 Montpellier, France
Interests: mitosis; spindle; centrosome; kinase; microtubule; cancer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

All living organisms on Earth are made up of cells, which are the functional unit of life. Eukaryotic organisms can consist of a single cell (unicellular) or a group of either identical or different cells (multicellular). Biologists have always been fascinated by how a single cell, such as an egg, can give rise to an entire organism, such as the human body, which is composed of billions of cells, including hundreds of different cell types. This is made possible by cell division, whereby a single cell divides to form two cells. During a symmetric cell division, a mother cell produces two daughter cells, whereas an asymmetric cell division results in a mother and a daughter cell that have different fates (different morphologies, cellular compositions, replicative potentials, and/or capacities to differentiate). In biology, the cell cycle refers to the sequence of events that a cell must go through in order to divide. These events, which always occur in the same order, define the different stages of the cell cycle: G1, S, G2, and M. What is fascinating about the cell cycle is its universality, and the main reason for this is that the genetic information of the cell is encoded by exactly the same molecular entity with exactly the same structure: the DNA double helix. Since both daughter cells always inherit their genetic information from their parent cell, the underlying fundamentals of the cell cycle—DNA replication and chromosome segregation—are shared by all organisms. The 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, awarded to Sir Paul Nurse, Sir Tim Hunt and Dr. Lee Hartwell, recognized the discovery of the two fundamental principles of cell cycle progression.

The current challenges now seem to lie in our comprehension of the division of the variety of different cells in complex multicellular organisms: How do stem cells divide? What are the differences in the regulation of the cell cycle in germ, embryonic, and somatic cells? How do cells divide in an epithelium to preserve the barrier? How is the division of cells controlled to maintain organ size? How does a cell escape cell cycle controls to become cancerous?

This second Special Issue of the journal Cells, “The Regulation of the Cell Cycle II” aims to familiarize readers with the new aspects of the cell cycle beyond the basic principles. It will collect from leading cell cycle specialists answers to the most pressing issues related to current investigations in multicellular organisms and the cell cycle’s link to human pathologies in particular cancers.

Questions we seek to answer include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. Beyond kinases, what is the role of phosphatases?
  2. How many checkpoints are there?
  3. What are the functions of the centrosome and cilia?
  4. What is the connection between the cell cycle and cancer?
  5. What are the functions of cytokinesis, abscission, and midbody?
  6. Is there cell division in epithelia?
  7. What is the connection between the cell cycle and evolution?
  8. How can we explain asymmetric cell division?
  9. What is the connection between cell division and organ size?

Prof. Dr. Rustem E. Uzbekov
Dr. Claude Prigent
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cell cycle
  • interphase
  • mitosis
  • CDK/cyclin
  • checkpoint
  • S-phase
  • DNA replication
  • centrosome duplication
  • cytokinesis
  • cancer

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 10429 KiB  
Article
Mass Cytometry as a Tool for Investigating Senescence in Multiple Model Systems
by Amina Abdul-Aziz, Raymond D. Devine, Justin M. Lyberger, Hsiaochi Chang, Amy Kovacs, James R. Lerma, Andrew M. Rogers, John C. Byrd, Erin Hertlein and Gregory K. Behbehani
Cells 2023, 12(16), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12162045 - 11 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1701
Abstract
Cellular senescence is a durable cell cycle arrest as a result of the finite proliferative capacity of cells. Senescence responds to both intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses, such as aging, mitochondrial dysfunction, irradiation, and chemotherapy. Here, we report on the use of mass [...] Read more.
Cellular senescence is a durable cell cycle arrest as a result of the finite proliferative capacity of cells. Senescence responds to both intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses, such as aging, mitochondrial dysfunction, irradiation, and chemotherapy. Here, we report on the use of mass cytometry (MC) to analyze multiple model systems and demonstrate MC as a platform for senescence analysis at the single-cell level. We demonstrate changes to p16 expression, cell cycling fraction, and histone tail modifications in several established senescent model systems and using isolated human T cells. In bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), we show increased p16 expression with subsequent passage as well as a reduction in cycling cells and open chromatin marks. In WI-38 cells, we demonstrate increased p16 expression with both culture-induced senescence and oxidative stress-induced senescence (OSIS). We also use Wanderlust, a trajectory analysis tool, to demonstrate how p16 expression changes with histone tail modifications and cell cycle proteins. Finally, we demonstrate that repetitive stimulation of human T cells with CD3/CD28 beads induces an exhausted phenotype with increased p16 expression. This p16-expressing population exhibited higher expression of exhaustion markers such as EOMES and TOX. This work demonstrates that MC is a useful platform for studying senescence at a single-cell protein level, and is capable of measuring multiple markers of senescence at once with high confidence, thereby improving our understanding of senescent pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Regulation of the Cell Cycle II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 19619 KiB  
Article
Centrosome Formation in the Bovine Early Embryo
by Rustem Uzbekov, Galina N. Singina, Ekaterina N. Shedova, Charles Banliat, Tomer Avidor-Reiss and Svetlana Uzbekova
Cells 2023, 12(9), 1335; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12091335 - 07 May 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1994
Abstract
Centrosome formation during early development in mice and rats occurs due to the appearance of centrioles de novo. In contrast, in humans and other non-rodent mammals, centrioles are thought to be derived from spermatozoa. Ultrastructural study of zygotes and early embryos of cattle [...] Read more.
Centrosome formation during early development in mice and rats occurs due to the appearance of centrioles de novo. In contrast, in humans and other non-rodent mammals, centrioles are thought to be derived from spermatozoa. Ultrastructural study of zygotes and early embryos of cattle at full series of ultrathin sections show that the proximal centriole of the spermatozoon disappears by the end of the first cleavage division. Centrioles appear in two to four cell embryos in fertilized oocytes and in parthenogenetic embryos. Centriole formation includes the appearance of atypical centrioles with randomly arranged triplets and centrioles with microtubule triplets of various lengths. After the third cleavage, four centriolar cylinders appear for the first time in the blastomeres while each embryo still has two atypical centrioles. Our results showed that the mechanisms of centriole formation in different groups of mammals are universal, differing only in the stage of development in which they occur. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Regulation of the Cell Cycle II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 8598 KiB  
Article
Actin–Microtubule Crosstalk Imparts Stiffness to the Contractile Ring in Fission Yeast
by Kimberly Bellingham-Johnstun, Zoe L. Tyree, Jessica Martinez-Baird, Annelise Thorn and Caroline Laplante
Cells 2023, 12(6), 917; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12060917 - 16 Mar 2023
Viewed by 2593
Abstract
Actin–microtubule interactions are critical for cell division, yet how these networks of polymers mutually influence their mechanical properties and functions in live cells remains unknown. In fission yeast, the post-anaphase array (PAA) of microtubules assembles in the plane of the contractile ring, and [...] Read more.
Actin–microtubule interactions are critical for cell division, yet how these networks of polymers mutually influence their mechanical properties and functions in live cells remains unknown. In fission yeast, the post-anaphase array (PAA) of microtubules assembles in the plane of the contractile ring, and its assembly relies on the Myp2p-dependent recruitment of Mto1p, a component of equatorial microtubule organizing centers (eMTOCs). The general organization of this array of microtubules and the impact on their physical attachment to the contractile ring remain unclear. We found that Myp2p facilitates the recruitment of Mto1p to the inner face of the contractile ring, where the eMTOCs polymerize microtubules without their direct interaction. The PAA microtubules form a dynamic polygon of Ase1p crosslinked microtubules inside the contractile ring. The specific loss of PAA microtubules affects the mechanical properties of the contractile ring of actin by lowering its stiffness. This change in the mechanical properties of the ring has no measurable impact on cytokinesis or on the anchoring of the ring. Our work proposes that the PAA microtubules exploit the contractile ring for their assembly and function during cell division, while the contractile ring may receive no benefit from these interactions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Regulation of the Cell Cycle II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop