Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit

A special issue of Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382). This special issue belongs to the section "Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 50327

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pharmacology and Toxocology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Interests: pharmacology; toxicology and pharmaceutics; drug-drug interaction; personalized medicine; repurposed drugs
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Antimicrobial agents constitute a fundamental part of medical treatment. Without them, the risk of bacterial or fungal infections would be intolerably high. Alexander Fleming, a Nobel Prize laureate who discovered the first antibiotic “penicillin” in 1928, warned of the stability issues associated with it that can be overcome by producing newer and better derivatives. He also warned that the sub-therapeutic usage of penicillin would cause resistant bacteria. Interestingly, Fleming’s foreshadowing has been fulfilled, as antibiotic resistance is now a modern medicine threat that is fought by clinicians all around the globe. Unfortunately, critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often suffer from pathophysiological changes that affect PK/PD target attainment and result in toxicity or under-dosing/resistance. Despite the increase in the application of therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust the dosing therapy for ICU patients, pitfalls in antimicrobial therapy are still a major concern.

This Special Issue seeks manuscripts that discuss/describe any treatment approach to overcome resistance, such as new methods for drug monitoring, discovery of new antimicrobial agents, or improvement in the stability of antimicrobial agents. In addition, manuscripts that enhance our understanding about this topic and help improve the antimicrobial therapy in ICU are welcome.

Dr. Nahed El-Najjar
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Antibiotics is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • infection
  • antimicrobial therapy
  • toxicity
  • resistance
  • therapeutic drug monitoring
  • personalized medicine
  • intensive care units
  • critically Ill patients

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 2226 KiB  
Article
Interprofessional Collaboration between ICU Physicians, Staff Nurses, and Hospital Pharmacists Optimizes Antimicrobial Treatment and Improves Quality of Care and Economic Outcome
by Stephan Schmid, Sophie Schlosser, Karsten Gülow, Vlad Pavel, Martina Müller and Alexander Kratzer
Antibiotics 2022, 11(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030381 - 13 Mar 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4163
Abstract
(1) Background: Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide health threat. The WHO published a global strategic plan in 2001 to contain antimicrobial resistance. In the following year, a workshop identified crucial barriers to the implementation of the strategy, e.g., underdeveloped health infrastructures and the [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide health threat. The WHO published a global strategic plan in 2001 to contain antimicrobial resistance. In the following year, a workshop identified crucial barriers to the implementation of the strategy, e.g., underdeveloped health infrastructures and the scarcity of valid data as well as a lack of implementation of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programs in medical curricula. Here, we show that interprofessional learning and education can contribute to the optimization of antibiotic use and preserving antibiotic effectiveness. We have initiated interprofessional rounds on a medical intensive care unit (MICU) with a focus on gastroenterology, hepatology, infectious diseases, endocrinology, and liver transplantation. We integrated ICU physicians, hospital pharmacists, nursing staff, and medical students as well as students of pharmacy to broaden the rather technical concept of ABS with an interprofessional approach to conceptualize awareness and behavioral change in antibiotic prescription and use. Methods: Clinical performance data and consumption figures for antibiotics were analyzed over a 10-year period from 2012 to 2021. The control period covered the years 2012–2014. The intervention period comprised the years 2015–2021, following the implementation of an interprofessional approach to ABS at a MICU of a German university hospital. Data from the hospital pharmacy, hospital administration, and hospital information system were included in the analyses. A specific electronic platform was developed for the optimization of documentation, interprofessional learning, education, and sustainability. The years 2020 and 2021 were analyzed independently due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the care of numerous COVID-19 patients at the MICU. Results: Implementation of an interprofessional ABS program resulted in the optimization of antibiotic management at the MICU. The suggestions of the hospital pharmacist for optimization can be divided into the following categories (i) indication for and selection of therapy (43.6%), (ii) optimization of dosing (27.6%), (iii) drug interactions (9.4%), (iv) side effects (4.1%), and (v) other pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacoeconomic topics (15.3%). These suggestions were discussed among the interprofessional team at the MICU; 86.1% were consequently implemented and the prescription of antibiotics was changed. In addition, further analysis of the intensive care German Diagnosis Related Groups (G-DRGs) showed that the case mix points increased significantly by 31.6% during the period under review. Accordingly, the severity of illness of the patients treated at the ICU as measured by the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II increased by 21.4% and the proportion of mechanically ventilated patients exceeded 50%. Antibiotic spending per case mix point was calculated. While spending was EUR 60.22 per case mix point in 2015, this was reduced by 42.9% to EUR 34.37 per case mix point by 2019, following the implementation of the interprofessional ABS program on the MICU. Through close interprofessional collaboration between physicians, hospital pharmacists, and staff nurses, the consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics, e.g., carbapenems, was significantly reduced, thus improving patient care. In parallel, the case mix and case mix index increased. Thus, the responsible use of resources and high-performance medicine are not contradictory. In our view, close interprofessional and interdisciplinary collaboration between physicians, pharmacists, and nursing staff will be of outstanding importance in the future to prepare health care professionals for global health care to ensure that the effectiveness of our antibiotics is preserved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 706 KiB  
Article
Prescription of Aminoglycosides in 23 French Neonatal Intensive Care Units
by Séverine Martin-Mons, Béatrice Gouyon, Séverine Lorrain, Soumeth Abasse, Cénéric Alexandre, Guillaume Binson, Roselyne Brat, Laurence Caeymaex, Yvan Couringa, Cécile Desbruyeres, Marine Dorsi-Di Meglio, Guillaume Escourrou, Florence Flamein, Olivier Flechelles, Olivier Girard, Elsa Kermorvant-Duchemin, Alexandre Lapillonne, Catherine Lafon, Massimo Di Maio, Gaël Mazeiras, Julien Mourdie, Amélie Moussy-Durandy, Anne-Sophie Pages, Duksha Ramful, Hasinirina Razafimahefa, Jean-Marc Rosenthal, Silvia Iacobelli and Jean-Bernard Gouyonadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Antibiotics 2021, 10(11), 1422; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10111422 - 20 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2153
Abstract
Background: Aminoglycosides are the most prescribed antibiotics in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Reducing exposure to antibiotics in the NICU is highly desirable, particularly through benchmarking methods. Methods: Description of aminoglycosides prescriptions in 23 French NICU using the same computerized system over [...] Read more.
Background: Aminoglycosides are the most prescribed antibiotics in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Reducing exposure to antibiotics in the NICU is highly desirable, particularly through benchmarking methods. Methods: Description of aminoglycosides prescriptions in 23 French NICU using the same computerized system over a 4-year period (2017–2020). A benchmarking program of antibiotics prescription was associated. Results: The population included 53,818 patients. Exposition rates to gentamicin and amikacin were 31.7% (n = 17,049) and 9.1% (n = 4894), respectively. Among neonates exposed to gentamicin, 90.4% of gentamicin and 77.6% of amikacin treatments were started within the 1st week of life. Among neonates exposed to amikacin, 77.6% started amikacin within the 1st week. The average daily dose of gentamicin at first prescription increased over the study period from 3.9 in 2017 to 4.4 mg/kg/d in 2020 (p < 0.0001). Conversely, the corresponding amikacin daily doses decreased from 13.0 in 2017 to 12.3 mg/kg/d in 2020 (p = 0.001). The time interval between the first 2 doses of gentamicin was mainly distributed in 3 values during the first week of life: 49.4% at 24 h, 26.4% at 36 h, and 22.9% at 48 h. At first amikacin prescription, the time interval was distributed in 4 categories: 48% at 24 h, 4.1% at 30 h, 8.5% at 36 h, and 37.1% at 48 h. As compared to literature guidelines, the rates of overdose and underdose in gentamicin (1.5% and 2.7%) and amikacin (0.3% and 1.0%). They significantly decreased for gentamicin over the study period. In multivariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with GENT overdose were the year of admission, prematurity, length of stay, and duration of the treatment. Conclusion: This prescription strategy ensured a low rate of overdose and underdose, and some benefits of the benchmarking program is suggested. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 617 KiB  
Article
Variations in Antibiotic Use and Sepsis Management in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A European Survey
by Felipe Garrido, Karel Allegaert, Cristina Arribas, Eduardo Villamor, Genny Raffaeli, Miren Paniagua, Giacomo Cavallaro and on behalf of European Antibiotics Study Group (EASG)
Antibiotics 2021, 10(9), 1046; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091046 - 27 Aug 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3261
Abstract
Management of neonatal sepsis and the use of antimicrobials have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. However, there is no recent background on which antibiotic regimens are used in different European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Our study aimed to describe the [...] Read more.
Management of neonatal sepsis and the use of antimicrobials have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. However, there is no recent background on which antibiotic regimens are used in different European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Our study aimed to describe the use of antibiotics and other aspects of early- and late-onset sepsis (EOS and LOS, respectively) management by European NICUs. We conducted an online survey among NICUs throughout Europe to collect information about antibiotic stewardship, antibiotic regimens, and general aspects of managing neonatal infections. NICUs from up to 38 European countries responded, with 271 valid responses. Most units had written clinical guidelines for EOS (92.2%) and LOS (81.1%) management. For EOS, ampicillin, penicillin, gentamicin, and amikacin were the most commonly used antibiotics. Analysis of the combinations of EOS regimens showed that the most frequently used was ampicillin plus gentamicin (54.6%). For LOS, the most frequently used antibiotics were vancomycin (52.4%), gentamicin (33.9%), cefotaxime (28%), and meropenem (15.5%). Other aspects of the general management of sepsis have also been analyzed. The management of neonatal sepsis in European NICUs is diverse. There was high self-reported adherence to the local clinical guidelines. There was homogeneity in the combination of antibiotics in EOS but less in LOS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 272 KiB  
Article
Paradigm Shift in Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Bacterial Isolates during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Vikas Saini, Charu Jain, Narendra Pal Singh, Ahmad Alsulimani, Chhavi Gupta, Sajad Ahmad Dar, Shafiul Haque and Shukla Das
Antibiotics 2021, 10(8), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080954 - 07 Aug 2021
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 4897
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging public health problem in modern times and the current COVID-19 pandemic has further exaggerated this problem. Due to bacterial co-infection in COVID-19 cases, an irrational consumption of antibiotics has occurred during the pandemic. This study aimed to [...] Read more.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging public health problem in modern times and the current COVID-19 pandemic has further exaggerated this problem. Due to bacterial co-infection in COVID-19 cases, an irrational consumption of antibiotics has occurred during the pandemic. This study aimed to observe the COVID-19 patients hospitalized from 1 March 2019 to 31 December 2020 and to evaluate the AMR pattern of bacterial agents isolated. This was a single-center study comprising 494 bacterial isolates (blood and urine) that were obtained from patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to the ICU and investigated in the Department of Microbiology of a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India. Out of the total bacterial isolates, 55.46% were gram negative and 44.53% were gram positive pathogens. Of the blood samples processed, the most common isolates were CoNS (Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus) and Staphylococcus aureus. Amongst the urinary isolates, most common pathogens were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 60% MRSA was observed in urine and blood isolates. Up to 40% increase in AMR was observed amongst these isolates obtained during COVID-19 period compared to pre-COVID-19 times. The overuse of antibiotics gave abundant opportunity for the bacterial pathogens to gradually develop mechanisms and to acquire resistance. Since the dynamics of SARS-COV-2 are unpredictable, a compromise on hospital antibiotic policy may ultimately escalate the burden of drug resistant pathogens in hospitals. A shortage of trained staff during COVID-19 pandemic renders it impossible to maintain these records in places where the entire hospital staff is struggling to save lives. This study highlights the extensive rise in the use of antibiotics for respiratory illness due to COVID-19 compared to antibiotic use prior to COVID-19 in ICUs. The regular prescription audit followed by a constant surveillance of hospital infection control practices by the dedicated teams and training of clinicians can improve the quality of medications in the long run and help to fight the menace of AMR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
10 pages, 665 KiB  
Article
Clinical Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with COVID-19: Findings from an Observational Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia
by Saleh Alghamdi, Bassant Barakat, Ilhem Berrou, Abdulhakim Alzahrani, Abdul Haseeb, Mohamed Anwar Hammad, Sirajudheen Anwar, Abdulmajeed Abdulghani A. Sindi, Hussain A. Almasmoum and Mohammad Albanghali
Antibiotics 2021, 10(4), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040365 - 31 Mar 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4240
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine-based regimens versus standard treatment in patients with the coronavirus disease admitted in 2019 to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. A comparative observational study, using routine hospital data, was carried out [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine-based regimens versus standard treatment in patients with the coronavirus disease admitted in 2019 to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. A comparative observational study, using routine hospital data, was carried out in a large tertiary care hospital in Al Baha, Saudi Arabia, providing care to patients with COVID-19 between April 2019 and August 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: the Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) group, treated with HCQ in a dose of 400 mg twice daily on the first day, followed by 200 mg twice daily; the non HCQ group, treated with other antiviral or antibacterial treatments according to protocols recommended by the Ministry of Health (MOH) at the time. The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation. Overall survival was also assessed. 568 patients who received HCQ (treatment group) were compared with 207 patients who did not receive HCQ (control group). HCQ did not improve mortality in the treated group (7.7% vs. 7.2%). There were no significant differences in terms of duration of hospitalization, need for and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation among the groups. Our study provides further evidence that HCQ treatment does not reduce mortality rates, length of hospital stay, admission and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

22 pages, 334 KiB  
Review
Efficacy of Vancomycin and Meropenem in Central Nervous System Infections in Children and Adults: Current Update
by Franziska Schneider, André Gessner and Nahed El-Najjar
Antibiotics 2022, 11(2), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11020173 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5590
Abstract
The current antimicrobial therapy of bacterial infections of the central nervous system (CNS) in adults and pediatric patients is faced with many pitfalls as the drugs have to reach necessary levels in serum and cross the blood-brain barrier. Furthermore, several studies report that [...] Read more.
The current antimicrobial therapy of bacterial infections of the central nervous system (CNS) in adults and pediatric patients is faced with many pitfalls as the drugs have to reach necessary levels in serum and cross the blood-brain barrier. Furthermore, several studies report that different factors such as the structure of the antimicrobial agent, the severity of disease, or the degree of inflammation play a significant role. Despite the available attempts to establish pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling to improve the required dosing regimen for adults and pediatric patients, conclusive recommendations for the best therapeutic strategies are still lacking. For instance, bacterial meningitis, the most common CNS infections, and ventriculitis, a severe complication of meningitis, are still associated with 10% and 30% mortality, respectively. Several studies report on the use of vancomycin and meropenem to manage meningitis and ventriculitis; therefore, this review aims to shed light on the current knowledge about their use in adults and pediatric patients. Consequently, studies published from 2015 until mid-July 2021 are included, and data about the study population, levels of drugs in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and measured PK data in serum and CSF are provided. The overall aim is to provide the readers a recent reference that summarizes the pitfalls and success of the current therapy and emphasizes the importance of performing more studies to improve the clinical outcome of the current therapeutical approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
13 pages, 1221 KiB  
Review
Antibiotics Prescribing in Intensive Care Settings during the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
by Lubna I. Abu-Rub, Hana A. Abdelrahman, Al-Reem A. Johar, Hashim A. Alhussain, Hamad Abdel Hadi and Nahla O. Eltai
Antibiotics 2021, 10(8), 935; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080935 - 02 Aug 2021
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4094
Abstract
The prevalence of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were prescribed antibiotics is undetermined and might contribute to the increased global antibiotic resistance. This systematic review evaluates the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in patients admitted to ICUs with [...] Read more.
The prevalence of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were prescribed antibiotics is undetermined and might contribute to the increased global antibiotic resistance. This systematic review evaluates the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in patients admitted to ICUs with SARS-CoV-2 infection using PRISMA guidelines. We searched and scrutinized results from PubMed and ScienceDirect databases for published literature restricted to the English language up to 11 May 2021. In addition, we included observational studies of humans with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical characteristics, and antibiotics prescribed for ICU patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections. A total of 361 studies were identified, but only 38 were included in the final analysis. Antibiotic prescribing data were available from 2715 patients, of which prevalence of 71% was reported in old age patients with a mean age of 62.7 years. From the reported studies, third generation cephalosporin had the highest frequency amongst reviewed studies (36.8%) followed by azithromycin (34.2%). The estimated bacterial infection in 12 reported studies was 30.8% produced by 15 different bacterial species, and S. aureus recorded the highest bacterial infection (75%). The fundamental outcomes were the prevalence of ICU COVID-19 patients prescribed antibiotics stratified by age, type of antibiotics prescribed, and the presence of co-infections and comorbidities. In conclusion, more than half of ICU patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection received antibiotics, and prescribing is significantly higher than the estimated frequency of identified bacterial co-infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3454 KiB  
Review
Bacterial Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents
by Manuel F. Varela, Jerusha Stephen, Manjusha Lekshmi, Manisha Ojha, Nicholas Wenzel, Leslie M. Sanford, Alberto J. Hernandez, Ammini Parvathi and Sanath H. Kumar
Antibiotics 2021, 10(5), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050593 - 17 May 2021
Cited by 101 | Viewed by 20322
Abstract
Bacterial pathogens as causative agents of infection constitute an alarming concern in the public health sector. In particular, bacteria with resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents can confound chemotherapeutic efficacy towards infectious diseases. Multidrug-resistant bacteria harbor various molecular and cellular mechanisms for antimicrobial resistance. [...] Read more.
Bacterial pathogens as causative agents of infection constitute an alarming concern in the public health sector. In particular, bacteria with resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents can confound chemotherapeutic efficacy towards infectious diseases. Multidrug-resistant bacteria harbor various molecular and cellular mechanisms for antimicrobial resistance. These antimicrobial resistance mechanisms include active antimicrobial efflux, reduced drug entry into cells of pathogens, enzymatic metabolism of antimicrobial agents to inactive products, biofilm formation, altered drug targets, and protection of antimicrobial targets. These microbial systems represent suitable focuses for investigation to establish the means for their circumvention and to reestablish therapeutic effectiveness. This review briefly summarizes the various antimicrobial resistance mechanisms that are harbored within infectious bacteria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Agents Used in Intensive Care Unit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop