Neuroglia, Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2023) – 5 articles

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a highly intricate neurovascular structure that plays a crucial role in maintaining neural homeostasis by selectively allowing certain molecules to enter the central nervous system (CNS). However, in the context of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a gradual decline in cognitive function, the BBB’s functionality becomes impaired. This impairment leads to the breakdown of the barrier and disrupts its ability to regulate molecular transport effectively. Consequently, cellular infiltration into the CNS occurs, along with aberrant signaling and clearance of molecules, ultimately contributing to neurological deficits. One of the key factors implicated in the failure of amyloid-beta (Aβ) transport, a hallmark of AD, is the decreased expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1). LRP1 plays a crucial role in facilitating the transport of Aβ across the BBB. Additionally, the increased levels of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) further contribute to the deregulation of the BBB in AD. These molecular imbalances significantly impact Aβ clearance and contribute to the development and progression of AD. In this review, we aimed to summarize the critical aspects of Aβ transporters in the BBB that become dysfunctional during the pathogenesis of AD. Full article

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the major causes of dementia and its incidence represents approximately 60–70% of all dementia cases worldwide. Many theories have been proposed to describe the pathological events in AD, including deterioration in cognitive function, accumulation of β-amyloid, and tau protein hyperphosphorylation. Infection as well as various cellular molecules, such as apolipoprotein, micro-RNA, calcium, ghrelin receptor, and probiotics, are associated with the disruption of β-amyloid and tau protein hemostasis. This review gives an overview on the integrative cellular and signaling molecules that could play a complementary role in the dysregulation of β-amyloid and tau proteins. Full article

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an essential neurotransmitter and an important regulator of neuroinflammation and disease. Microglia are important immune cells in the brain that express GABA receptors (GABAR) and respond to both GABA and GABAR agonists, yet the effect of GABA on microglial inflammatory responses is unclear. We hypothesized that GABA and GABAR agonists might modify the activation of a human microglial cell line (HMC3). We further hypothesized that Amanita muscaria extract (AME-1), which contained GABAR agonists (GABA and muscimol), would similarly stimulate HMC3. Ligand-gated GABAR (GABA_AR) and G protein-coupled GABAR (GABABR) subunit expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR, metabolic activity was determined by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-dependent oxidoreductase assay (XTT), reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation was analyzed by 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) production was analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). HMC3 expressed several neuroreceptors such as subunits of the GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR). HMC3 constitutively produce IL-8 and ROS. Both muscimol and GABA stimulated HMC3 to produce more IL-8 but had no effect on constitutive ROS production. GABA and muscimol altered the morphology and Iba1 localization of HMC3. GABA, but not muscimol, increased HMC3 metabolic activity. Similarly, AME-1 induced HMC3 to produce more IL-8 but not ROS and altered cell morphology and Iba1 localization. GABA induction of IL-8 was blocked by bicuculline, an antagonist of GABA_AR. AME-1-induced production of IL-8 was not blocked by bicuculline, suggesting that AME-1’s effect on HMC3 was independent of GABA_AR. In conclusion, these data show that GABA and GABA agonists stimulate HMC3 to increase their production of IL-8. Mixtures that contain GABA and muscimol, such as AME-1, have similar effects on HMC3 that are independent of GABA_AR. Full article

The plasma membrane glucose transporter (GLUT)-2 is unique among GLUT family proteins in that it also functions as a glucose sensor. GLUT2 imposes sex-dimorphic control of hypothalamic astrocyte glucose storage and catabolism by unknown mechanisms. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascades operate within stress-sensitive signal transduction pathways. The present study employed an established primary astrocyte culture model and gene knockdown tools to investigate whether one or more of the three primary MAP kinase families are regulated by GLUT2. GLUT2 gene knockdown caused opposing adjustments in total ERK1/2 proteins in glucose-supplied male versus female astrocytes, augmenting or reducing the mean phosphorylated/total protein ratio for 44 and 42 kDa variants in these sexes. Glucose deprivation amplified this ratio for both ERK1/2 variants, albeit by a larger magnitude in males; GLUT2 siRNA exacerbated this stimulatory response in males only. Phosphorylated/total p38 MAPK protein ratios were up-regulated by GLUT2 knockdown in male, but not female astrocytes. Glucose-deprived astrocytes exhibited no change (male) or reduction (female) in this ratio after GLUT2 gene silencing. GLUT2 siRNA increased the phosphorylated/total protein ratio for 54 and 46 kDa SAPK/JNK proteins in each sex when glucose was present. However, glucose withdrawal suppressed (male) or amplified (female) these ratios, while GLUT2 knockdown attenuated these inverse responses. The results show that GLUT2 inhibits ERK1/2, p38, and SAPK/JNK MAPK activity in male astrocytes, but differentially stimulates and inhibits activity of these signaling pathways in female hypothalamic astrocytes. Glucoprivation induces divergent adjustments in astrocyte p38 MAPK and SAPK/JNK activities. The findings demonstrate a stimulatory role for GLUT2 in p38 MAPK activation in glucose-starved female astrocytes, but it can act as either an inhibitor or inducer of SAPK/JNK activation in glucose-deprived male versus female glial cells, respectively. Full article