sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Sensing in Plant Phenotyping

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Physical Sensors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2020) | Viewed by 21830

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia
Interests: plant stress physiology; abiotic stress; photosynthesis; crop physiology; chlorophyll fluorescence; non-invasive methods; plant phenotyping
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia
Interests: plant breeding & genetics; biochemistry; cell signaling; metabolomics; transcriptomics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

grade E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Interests: fluorescence sensors; chlorophyll fluorescence analysis; photochemistry of photosynthesis; plant stress; physiology of plants and algae; plant talk and machine learning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Currently, many approaches are being discussed and incorporated into the constantly improving new process of fast, non-destructive phenotyping of plants. Plant phenotyping is the extensive evaluation of multiplex plant features, including photosynthetic performance and responses to various stresses. The developed sensors and systems for phenotyping are important for representing the full set of genetic and environmental factors that play a role in the phenotypic variation of quantitative parameters for cells, tissues, organs or whole plants. Chlorophyll fluorescence sensing represents an important tool enabling the non-invasive analysis of photosynthetic apparatus and the responses of photosynthetic processes to environmental factors or different treatments. Moreover, different techniques and modifications of chlorophyll fluorescence sensors enable us to obtain specific information on plant properties, such as the level of nitrogen nutrition, accumulation of specific compounds (e.g. UV-absorbing compounds, pigments) or structural parameters.

This Special Issue aims to highlight advances in the use of different chlorophyll fluorescence sensors and systems in plants. Topics may include, but are not limited, to the application of the following fluorescence techniques in automated or non-automated plant phenotyping:

  • Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging
  • Fast data acquisition chlorophyll fluorescence sensors
  • Handheld fluorescence sensors
  • Fluorescence sensors integrated in systems with other types of sensors
  • Laser-induced fluorescence (LIFT)
  • Sun-induced fluorescence

Dr. Marek Zivcak
Prof. Dr. Marian Brestic
Prof. Dr. Hazem M. Kalaji
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 4394 KiB  
Article
Integrating SIF and Clearness Index to Improve Maize GPP Estimation Using Continuous Tower-Based Observations
by Jidai Chen, Xinjie Liu, Shanshan Du, Yan Ma and Liangyun Liu
Sensors 2020, 20(9), 2493; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092493 - 28 Apr 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3024
Abstract
Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been proven to be well correlated with vegetation photosynthesis. Although multiple studies have found that SIF demonstrates a strong correlation with gross primary production (GPP), SIF-based GPP estimation at different temporal scales has not been well explored. In [...] Read more.
Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been proven to be well correlated with vegetation photosynthesis. Although multiple studies have found that SIF demonstrates a strong correlation with gross primary production (GPP), SIF-based GPP estimation at different temporal scales has not been well explored. In this study, we aimed to investigate the quality of GPP estimates produced using the far-red SIF retrieved at 760 nm (SIF760) based on continuous tower-based observations of a maize field made during 2017 and 2018, and to explore the responses of GPP and SIF to different meteorological conditions, such as the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), the clearness index (CI, representing the weather condition), the air temperature (AT), and the vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Firstly, our results showed that the SIF760 tracked GPP well at both diurnal and seasonal scales, and that SIF760 was more linearly correlated to PAR than GPP was. Therefore, the SIF760–GPP relationship was clearly a hyperbolic relationship. For instantaneous observations made within a period of half an hour, the R2 value was 0.66 in 2017 and 2018. Based on daily mean observations, the R2 value was 0.82 and 0.76 in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Secondly, it was found that the SIF760–GPP relationship varied with the environmental conditions, with the CI being the dominant factor. At both diurnal and seasonal scales, the ratio of GPP to SIF760 decreased noticeably as the CI increased. Finally, the SIF760-based GPP models with and without the inclusion of CI were trained using 70% of daily observations from 2017 and 2018 and the models were validated using the remaining 30% of the dataset. For both linear and non-linear models, the inclusion of the CI greatly improved the SIF760-based GPP estimates based on daily mean observations: the value of R2 increased from 0.71 to 0.82 for the linear model and from 0.82 to 0.87 for the non-linear model. The validation results confirmed that the SIF760-based GPP estimation was improved greatly by including the CI, giving a higher R2 and a lower RMSE. These values improved from R2 = 0.66 and RMSE = 7.02 mw/m2/nm/sr to R2 = 0.76 and RMSE = 6.36 mw/m2/nm/sr for the linear model, and from R2 = 0.71 and RMSE = 4.76 mw/m2/nm/sr to R2 = 0.78 and RMSE = 3.50 mw/m2/nm/sr for the non-linear model. Therefore, our results demonstrated that SIF760 is a reliable proxy for GPP and that SIF760-based GPP estimation can be greatly improved by integrating the CI with SIF760. These findings will be useful in the remote sensing of vegetation GPP using satellite, airborne, and tower-based SIF data because the CI is usually an easily accessible meteorological variable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chlorophyll Fluorescence Sensing in Plant Phenotyping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2584 KiB  
Article
Salt Priming Protects Photosynthetic Electron Transport against Low-Temperature-Induced Damage in Wheat
by Hui Li, Huawei Li, Yanjie Lv, Yongjun Wang, Zongshuai Wang, Caiyun Xin, Shengqun Liu, Xiancan Zhu, Fengbin Song and Xiangnan Li
Sensors 2020, 20(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010062 - 20 Dec 2019
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2549
Abstract
Low temperature limits the photochemical efficiency of photosystems in wheat plants. To test the effect of salt priming on the photosynthetic electron transport in wheat under low temperature, the germinating seeds of a winter wheat cv. Jimai44 were primed with varying concentrations of [...] Read more.
Low temperature limits the photochemical efficiency of photosystems in wheat plants. To test the effect of salt priming on the photosynthetic electron transport in wheat under low temperature, the germinating seeds of a winter wheat cv. Jimai44 were primed with varying concentrations of NaCl solutions (0, 10, 30, and 50 mM NaCl, indicated by S0, S10, S30, and S50, respectively) for 6 d, and after 11 d of recovery, the seedlings were subsequently exposed to 24-h low-temperature stress (2 °C). Under low temperature, the S30 plants possessed the highest absorption flux per reaction center and higher density of reaction center per cross-section among the treatments. In addition, S30 plants had higher trapped energy flux for reducing QA and fraction of QA-reducing reaction centers and non-QB reducing center than the non-primed plants under low temperature, indicating that S30 plants could maintain the energy balance of photosystems and a relatively higher maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II under low temperature. In addition, the low temperature-induced MDA accumulation and cell death were alleviated by salt priming in S30 plants. It was suggested that salt priming with an optimal concentration of NaCl solution (30 mM) during seed germination enhanced the photochemical efficiency of photosystems in wheat seedlings, which could be a potential approach to improve cold tolerance in wheat at an early stage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chlorophyll Fluorescence Sensing in Plant Phenotyping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4800 KiB  
Article
Phenomic and Physiological Analysis of Salinity Effects on Lettuce
by Neil D. Adhikari, Ivan Simko and Beiquan Mou
Sensors 2019, 19(21), 4814; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214814 - 05 Nov 2019
Cited by 50 | Viewed by 5017
Abstract
Salinity is a rising concern in many lettuce-growing regions. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is sensitive to salinity, which reduces plant biomass, and causes leaf burn and early senescence. We sought to identify physiological traits important in salt tolerance that allows lettuce adaptation [...] Read more.
Salinity is a rising concern in many lettuce-growing regions. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is sensitive to salinity, which reduces plant biomass, and causes leaf burn and early senescence. We sought to identify physiological traits important in salt tolerance that allows lettuce adaptation to high salinity while maintaining its productivity. Based on previous salinity tolerance studies, one sensitive and one tolerant genotype each was selected from crisphead, butterhead, and romaine, as well as leaf types of cultivated lettuce and its wild relative, L. serriola L. Physiological parameters were measured four weeks after transplanting two-day old seedlings into 350 mL volume pots filled with sand, hydrated with Hoagland nutrient solution and grown in a growth chamber. Salinity treatment consisted of gradually increasing concentrations of NaCl and CaCl2 from 0 mM/0 mM at the time of transplanting, to 30 mM/15 mM at the beginning of week three, and maintaining it until harvest. Across the 10 genotypes, leaf area and fresh weight decreased 0–64% and 16–67%, respectively, under salinity compared to the control. Salinity stress increased the chlorophyll index by 4–26% in the cultivated genotypes, while decreasing it by 5–14% in the two wild accessions. Tolerant lines less affected by elevated salinity were characterized by high values of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters Fv/Fm and instantaneous photosystem II quantum yield (QY), and lower leaf transpiration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chlorophyll Fluorescence Sensing in Plant Phenotyping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 5690 KiB  
Article
Exploration of Chlorophyll a Fluorescence and Plant Gas Exchange Parameters as Indicators of Drought Tolerance in Perennial Ryegrass
by Piotr Dąbrowski, Aneta H. Baczewska-Dąbrowska, Hazem M. Kalaji, Vasilij Goltsev, Momchil Paunov, Marcin Rapacz, Magdalena Wójcik-Jagła, Bogumiła Pawluśkiewicz, Wojciech Bąba and Marian Brestic
Sensors 2019, 19(12), 2736; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122736 - 18 Jun 2019
Cited by 88 | Viewed by 5446
Abstract
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) belongs to the common cultivated grass species in Central and Western Europe. Despite being considered to be susceptible to drought, it is frequently used for forming the turf in urban green areas. In such areas, the water [...] Read more.
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) belongs to the common cultivated grass species in Central and Western Europe. Despite being considered to be susceptible to drought, it is frequently used for forming the turf in urban green areas. In such areas, the water deficit in soil is recognized as one of the most important environmental factors, which can limit plant growth. The basic aim of this work was to explore the mechanisms standing behind the changes in the photosynthetic apparatus performance of two perennial ryegrass turf varieties grown under drought stress using comprehensive in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence signal analyses and plant gas exchange measurements. Drought was applied after eight weeks of sowing by controlling the humidity of the roots ground medium at the levels of 30, 50, and 70% of the field water capacity. Measurements were carried out at four times: 0, 120, and 240 h after drought application and after recovery (refilling water to 70%). We found that the difference between the two tested varieties’ response resulted from a particular re-reduction of P700+ (reaction certer of PSI) that was caused by slower electron donation from P680. The difference in the rate of electron flow from Photosystem II (PSII) to PSI was also detected. The application of the combined tools (plants’ photosynthetic efficiency analysis and plant gas exchange measurements) allowed exploring and explaining the specific variety response to drought stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chlorophyll Fluorescence Sensing in Plant Phenotyping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3639 KiB  
Article
Time-Series Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Reveals Dynamic Photosynthetic Fingerprints of sos Mutants to Drought Stress
by Dawei Sun, Yueming Zhu, Haixia Xu, Yong He and Haiyan Cen
Sensors 2019, 19(12), 2649; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122649 - 12 Jun 2019
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4303
Abstract
Resistance to drought stress is one of the most favorable traits in breeding programs yet drought stress is one of the most poorly addressed biological processes for both phenomics and genetics. In this study, we investigated the potential of using a time-series chlorophyll [...] Read more.
Resistance to drought stress is one of the most favorable traits in breeding programs yet drought stress is one of the most poorly addressed biological processes for both phenomics and genetics. In this study, we investigated the potential of using a time-series chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF) analysis to dissect the ChlF fingerprints of salt overly sensitive (SOS) mutants under drought stress. Principle component analysis (PCA) was used to identify a shifting pattern of different genotypes including sos mutants and wild type (WT) Col-0. A time-series deep-learning algorithm, sparse auto encoders (SAEs) neural network, was applied to extract time-series ChlF features which were used in four classification models including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbor classifier (KNN), Gaussian naive Bayes (NB) and support vector machine (SVM). The results showed that the discrimination accuracy of sos mutants SOS1-1, SOS2-3, and wild type Col-0 reached 95% with LDA classification model. Sequential forward selection (SFS) algorithm was used to obtain ChlF fingerprints of the shifting pattern, which could address the response of sos mutants and Col-0 to drought stress over time. Parameters including QY, NPQ and Fm, etc. were significantly different between sos mutants and WT. This research proved the potential of ChlF imaging for gene function analysis and the study of drought stress using ChlF in a time-series manner. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chlorophyll Fluorescence Sensing in Plant Phenotyping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop