remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Remote Sensing Data Interpretation and Validation

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Remote Sensing Image Processing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 11491

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DLR, German Aerospace Center, Münchner Str. 20, BY 82234 Weßling, Germany
Interests: image and signal processing; machine and deep learning; synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and SAR interferometry (InSAR); data fusion for land applications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Interests: SAR; InSAR; multi-temporal analysis; cryosphere; natural hazards
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DLR, German Aerospace Center, Münchner Str. 20, BY 82234 Weßling, Germany
Interests: hyperspectral remote sensing; multispectral remote sensing; feature extraction;, data fusion

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the last decades the number of remote sensing (RS) spaceborne missions has increased, providing a large variety of global earth observation (EO) data. Accordingly with the missions’ targets, different acquisition principles and strategies have been applied, such as the use of optical rather than radar instruments, or the choice of specific orbits and geometries for the determination of coverage and revisit-time. The available imaging modes have also increased: for example, in recent months the first non-experimental spaceborne hyperspectral instruments such as DESIS and PRISMA started orbiting around our planet. This diversity has made EO a constantly growing field of applications, covering a large variety of scientific purposes and commercial applications. Indeed, breakthrough RS technologies and algorithms have been recently developed for the systematic observation of the Earth’s surface and its dynamic processes at a global scale, ranging from carbon stock balance, ocean currents, and glacier melting rates, to coastline change monitoring.

As a consequence to the increased popularity of RS applications, innovative algorithms and techniques, often borrowed from the computer vision field, are being proposed to analyze EO data. For example, recently developed image processing techniques based on deep learning methods are providing powerful tools to face challenging RS problems.

As large coverage and short revisit time are attractive for both the scientific and the commercial communities, the appropriate interpretation and validation of the derived physical quantities, influenced by the frequent lack of reliable ground truth data, remains an open research topic. Hence, one of the main RS current challenges is how to properly interpret and validate the large variety of available RS high-level products, in order to assess the accuracy of the performed measurements and correctly understand the nature of the underlying physical phenomena. Indeed, we refer to interpretation of RS data as the accurate retrieval of information about the underlying physical phenomena observed, while with validation we indicate the process of assessing, by independent means, the quality of the derived data products.

This special issue aims at highlighting best practices in RS high-level products interpretation and setting the groundwork for the standardization and validation of novel methodologies in different application fields.

Authors are encouraged to submit original papers of both theoretical and applicative contributions. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • Data fusion for RS applications, both at pixel level (e.g. pan-sharpening), as well as at feature and decision level (e.g. multi-modal classification);
  • Analysis and processing of RS multi-temporal data series
  • Data assimilation of RS data with ground measurements
  • Large-scale RS datasets for training and evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
  • Deep Learning for RS image understanding (e.g., land use / land cover classification, change detection, semantic labeling, synthetic data simulation);
  • Creation and standardization of benchmark datasets for the evaluation of the performance and the validation of products in specific fields of application.
  • Denoising and pre-processing of RS data.

Dr. Francescopaolo Sica
Dr. Pietro Milillo
Dr. Daniele Cerra
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • image understanding
  • image processing
  • product validation
  • product interpretation
  • data fusion
  • deep learning.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

25 pages, 12793 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of the Global Forest/Non-Forest Maps Derived from SAR and Optical Sensors. Case Studies from Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado Biomes
by Edson E. Sano, Paola Rizzoli, Christian N. Koyama, Manabu Watanabe, Marcos Adami, Yosio E. Shimabukuro, Gustavo Bayma and Daniel M. Freitas
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(3), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030367 - 21 Jan 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4540
Abstract
Global-scale forest/non-forest (FNF) maps are of crucial importance for applications like biomass estimation and deforestation monitoring. Global FNF maps based on optical remote sensing data have been produced by the wall-to-wall satellite image analyses or sampling strategies. The German Aerospace Center (DLR) and [...] Read more.
Global-scale forest/non-forest (FNF) maps are of crucial importance for applications like biomass estimation and deforestation monitoring. Global FNF maps based on optical remote sensing data have been produced by the wall-to-wall satellite image analyses or sampling strategies. The German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) also made available their global FNF maps based on synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. This paper attempted to answer the following scientific question: how comparable are the FNF products derived from optical and SAR data? As test sites we selected the Amazon (tropical rainforest) and Cerrado (tropical savanna) biomes, the two largest Brazilian biomes. Forest estimations from 2015 derived from TanDEM-X (X band; HH polarization) and ALOS-2 (L band; HV polarization) SAR data, as well as forest cover information derived from Landsat 8 optical data were compared with each other at the municipality and image sampling levels. The optical-based forest estimations considered in this study were derived from the MapBiomas project, a Brazilian multi-institutional project to map land use and land cover (LULC) classes of an entire country based on historical time series of Landsat data. In addition to the existing forest maps, a set of 1619 Landsat 8 RGB color composites was used to generate new independent comparison data composed of circular areas with 5-km diameter, which were visually interpreted after image segmentation. The Spearman rank correlation estimated the correlation among the data sets and the paired Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon tested the hypothesis that the data sets are statistically equal. Results showed that forest maps derived from SAR and optical satellites are statistically different regardless of biome or scale of study (municipality or image sampling), except for the Cerrado´s forest estimations derived from TanDEM-X and ALOS-2. Nevertheless, the percentage of pixels classified as forest or non-forest by both SAR sensors were 90% and 80% for the Amazon and Cerrado biome, respectively, indicating an overall good agreement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Data Interpretation and Validation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 8301 KiB  
Article
Situational Awareness of Large Infrastructures Using Remote Sensing: The Rome–Fiumicino Airport during the COVID-19 Lockdown
by Andrea Pulella and Francescopaolo Sica
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(2), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020299 - 16 Jan 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2856
Abstract
Situational awareness refers to the process of aggregating spatio-temporal variables and measurements from different sources, aiming to improve the semantic outcome. Remote Sensing satellites for Earth Observation acquire key variables that, when properly aggregated, can provide precious insights about the observed area. This [...] Read more.
Situational awareness refers to the process of aggregating spatio-temporal variables and measurements from different sources, aiming to improve the semantic outcome. Remote Sensing satellites for Earth Observation acquire key variables that, when properly aggregated, can provide precious insights about the observed area. This article introduces a novel automatic system to monitor the activity levels and the operability of large infrastructures from satellite data. We integrate multiple data sources acquired by different spaceborne sensors, such as Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) time series, Sentinel-2 multispectral data, and Pleiades Very-High-Resolution (VHR) optical data. The proposed methodology exploits the synergy between these sensors for extracting, at the same time, quantitative and qualitative results. We focus on generating semantic results, providing situational awareness, and decision-ready insights. We developed this methodology for the COVID-19 Custom Script Contest, a remote hackathon funded by the European Space Agency (ESA) and the European Commission (EC), whose aim was to promote remote sensing techniques to monitor environmental factors consecutive to the spread of the Coronavirus disease. This work focuses on the Rome–Fiumicino International Airport case study, an environment significantly affected by the COVID-19 crisis. The resulting product is a unique description of the airport’s area utilization before and after the air traffic restrictions imposed between March and May 2020, during Italy’s first lockdown. Experimental results confirm that the proposed algorithm provides remarkable insights for supporting an effective decision-making process. We provide results about the airport’s operability by retrieving temporal changes at high spatial and temporal resolutions, together with the airplane count and localization for the same period in 2019 and 2020. On the one hand, we detected an evident change of the activity levels on those airport areas typically designated for passenger transportation, e.g., the one close to the gates. On the other hand, we observed an intensification of the activity levels over areas usually assigned to landside operations, e.g., the one close to the hangar. Analogously, the airplane count and localization have shown a redistribution of the airplanes over the whole airport. New parking slots have been identified as well as the areas that have been dismissed. Eventually, by combining the results from different sensors, we could affirm that different airport surface areas have changed their functionality and give a non-expert interpretation about areas’ usage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Data Interpretation and Validation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 2298 KiB  
Letter
Comparison of Hyperspectral Versus Traditional Field Measurements of Fractional Ground Cover in the Australian Arid Zone
by Claire Fisk, Kenneth D. Clarke and Megan M. Lewis
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(23), 2825; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232825 - 28 Nov 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3465
Abstract
The collection of high-quality field measurements of ground cover is critical for calibration and validation of fractional ground cover maps derived from satellite imagery. Field-based hyperspectral ground cover sampling is a potential alternative to traditional in situ techniques. This study aimed to develop [...] Read more.
The collection of high-quality field measurements of ground cover is critical for calibration and validation of fractional ground cover maps derived from satellite imagery. Field-based hyperspectral ground cover sampling is a potential alternative to traditional in situ techniques. This study aimed to develop an effective sampling design for spectral ground cover surveys in order to estimate fractional ground cover in the Australian arid zone. To meet this aim, we addressed two key objectives: (1) Determining how spectral surveys and traditional step-point sampling compare when conducted at the same spatial scale and (2) comparing these two methods to current Australian satellite-derived fractional cover products. Across seven arid, sparsely vegetated survey sites, six 500-m transects were established. Ground cover reflectance was recorded taking continuous hyperspectral readings along each transect while step-point surveys were conducted along the same transects. Both measures of ground cover were converted into proportions of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and bare soil for each site. Comparisons were made of the proportions of photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and bare soil derived from both in situ methods as well as MODIS and Landsat fractional cover products. We found strong correlations between fractional cover derived from hyperspectral and step-point sampling conducted at the same spatial scale at our survey sites. Comparison of the in situ measurements and image-derived fractional cover products showed that overall, the Landsat product was strongly related to both in situ methods for non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil whereas the MODIS product was strongly correlated with both in situ methods for photosynthetic vegetation. This study demonstrates the potential of the spectral transect method, both in its ability to produce results comparable to the traditional transect measures, but also in its improved objectivity and relative logistic ease. Future efforts should be made to include spectral ground cover sampling as part of Australia’s plan to produce calibration and validation datasets for remotely sensed products. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Data Interpretation and Validation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop