Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 27885

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
2. Instituto de Investigación Oncológica del Principado de Asturias (IUOPA), Oviedo, Spain
Interests: sarcoma; osteosarcoma; liposarcoma; cancer stem cells; experimental therapies; personalized medicine

Special Issue Information

Dear colleagues,

Clinical advances in sarcoma management have led to significant increases in the overall survival of localized tumors. However, in many cases, advanced or metastatic sarcomas show poor response to current treatments, with survival rates which have remained unchanged for the last decades. Moreover, chromosomal translocations are associated with certain sarcoma subtypes, though only a few recurrent mutations have been identified in most cases of sarcoma. This complex genomics hinders the development of new treatments and highlights the need for studies aimed at characterizing new pathogenic mechanisms with clinical and therapeutic implications. In addition, the high level of intra- and intertumor heterogeneity of sarcomas encourages the development of personalized medicine strategies.

This Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine aims to gather relevant findings which could result in improved treatments for sarcomas through original studies and reviews describing the use of “omics” and screening tools in patient samples and/or relevant models to find altered mechanisms with prognostic, diagnostic, and/or therapeutic implications for sarcomas. The therapeutic approaches described in the submitted works may include targeted therapies against altered mechanisms, drug combinations with synergistic antitumor effects, therapies aimed to overcome drug resistance, treatments directed against tumor microenvironment niches and/or cancer stem cell subpopulations, and drug delivery systems designed to increase the therapeutic index of selected drugs. Finally, this issue will also cover works describing precision medicine strategies which may involve the development of patient-derived models suitable for the testing of candidate therapies.

Dr. Rene Rodriguez
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sarcoma
  • targeted therapy
  • drug resistance
  • cancer stem cells
  • drug delivery systems
  • personalized medicine
  • patient-derived models

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 848 KiB  
Article
Does the Use of Peripheral Immune-Related Markers Indicate Whether to Administer Pazopanib, Trabectedin, or Eribulin to Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients?
by Eijiro Shimada, Makoto Endo, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Mamoru Ito, Hitoshi Kusaba, Akira Nabeshima, Tomoya Nawata, Akira Maekawa, Tomoya Matsunobu, Nokitaka Setsu, Toshifumi Fujiwara, Keiichiro Iida, Makoto Nakagawa, Takeshi Hirose, Masaya Kanahori, Ryunosuke Oyama, Taichi Isobe, Hiroshi Ariyama, Kenichi Kohashi, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Yoshinao Oda, Yukihide Iwamoto, Koichi Akashi, Eishi Baba and Yasuharu Nakashimaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(21), 4972; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214972 - 26 Oct 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1835
Abstract
Pazopanib, trabectedin, and eribulin are administered for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs); however, there is little consensus on which agent should be preferentially used in a clinical setting. This study assessed whether peripheral immune-related markers served as a useful reference when [...] Read more.
Pazopanib, trabectedin, and eribulin are administered for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs); however, there is little consensus on which agent should be preferentially used in a clinical setting. This study assessed whether peripheral immune-related markers served as a useful reference when selecting pazopanib, trabectedin, or eribulin. This study included 63 patients who were administered pazopanib, trabectedin, or eribulin for advanced STSs between March 2015 and December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the first drug administered among these three drugs. Differences in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) among the three groups were analyzed. OS showed no significant differences among the drugs administered first. For patients with low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the OS of patients administered pazopanib as the first choice was shorter than the others (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94–18.13, p = 0.0018). In the low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) subgroup, the OS of the patients administered eribulin for the first choice was longer than that of the others (HR = 0.32, 95%CI = 0.10–0.98, p = 0.046). Therefore, NLR and PLR might be used as prognostic indicators to dictate whether STS patients receive pazopanib, trabectedin, or eribulin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 15501 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Sirolimus Treatment in PEComa–10 Years of Practice Perspective
by Tomasz Świtaj, Aleksandra Sobiborowicz, Paweł Teterycz, Anna Klimczak, Donata Makuła, Michał Wągrodzki, Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Piotr Rutkowski and Anna M. Czarnecka
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(16), 3705; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163705 - 20 Aug 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2224
Abstract
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) represent a family of rare mesenchymal tumors resultant from deregulation in mTOR pathway activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of targeted PEComa treatment. We reviewed all consecutive patients with PEComa who started [...] Read more.
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) represent a family of rare mesenchymal tumors resultant from deregulation in mTOR pathway activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of targeted PEComa treatment. We reviewed all consecutive patients with PEComa who started systemic treatment with sirolimus in our reference sarcoma center between January 2011 and August 2020. Histopathology of PEComa was reviewed and confirmed in all cases by a designated sarcoma pathologist. Any surviving progression-free patients were censored at the last follow-up (31 March 2021). Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test or a Cox proportional hazard model. Fifteen (12 females and 3 males) consecutive PEComa patients were treated. The median age of patients treated systemically was 50 years. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.8-NA) for first-line chemotherapy and was not reached (95% CI: 42.0-NA) for sirolimus as first-line therapy. There was one objective response (OR) in the chemotherapy group. The OR rate reached 73% (11/15 cases) for sirolimus regardless of the treatment line. All patients archived disease control. Three patients died due to disease progression after 55, 32, and 32 months since metastatic disease diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 55.7 (range: 3.2–220) months, the 5 yr OS was 65% (CI 95% 39–100). Our study is the largest single-institution report on PEComa systemic targeted therapy and fills the gap in the field of advanced PEComa care since the FDA/EMEA approval of sirolimus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 27174 KiB  
Article
Complex Interplay of Genes Underlies Invasiveness in Fibrosarcoma Progression Model
by Michaela Kripnerová, Hamendra Singh Parmar, Jiří Šána, Alena Kopková, Lenka Radová, Sieghart Sopper, Krzysztof Biernacki, Jan Jedlička, Michaela Kohoutová, Jitka Kuncová, Jan Peychl, Emil Rudolf, Miroslav Červinka, Zbyněk Houdek, Pavel Dvořák, Kateřina Houfková, Martin Pešta, Zdeněk Tůma, Martina Dolejšová, Filip Tichánek, Václav Babuška, Martin Leba, Ondřej Slabý and Jiří Hatinaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(11), 2297; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112297 - 25 May 2021
Viewed by 2893
Abstract
Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal tumours, with a great variability in their clinical behaviour. While our knowledge of sarcoma initiation has advanced rapidly in recent years, relatively little is known about mechanisms of sarcoma progression. JUN-murine fibrosarcoma progression series consists of [...] Read more.
Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal tumours, with a great variability in their clinical behaviour. While our knowledge of sarcoma initiation has advanced rapidly in recent years, relatively little is known about mechanisms of sarcoma progression. JUN-murine fibrosarcoma progression series consists of four sarcoma cell lines, JUN-1, JUN-2, JUN-2fos-3, and JUN-3. JUN-1 and -2 were established from a single tumour initiated in a H2K/v-jun transgenic mouse, JUN-3 originates from a different tumour in the same animal, and JUN-2fos-3 results from a targeted in vitro transformation of the JUN-2 cell line. The JUN-1, -2, and -3 cell lines represent a linear progression from the least transformed JUN-2 to the most transformed JUN-3, with regard to all the transformation characteristics studied, while the JUN-2fos-3 cell line exhibits a unique transformation mode, with little deregulation of cell growth and proliferation, but pronounced motility and invasiveness. The invasive sarcoma sublines JUN-2fos-3 and JUN-3 show complex metabolic profiles, with activation of both mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis and a significant increase in spared respiratory capacity. The specific transcriptomic profile of invasive sublines features very complex biological relationships across the identified genes and proteins, with accentuated autocrine control of motility and angiogenesis. Pharmacologic inhibition of one of the autocrine motility factors identified, Ccl8, significantly diminished both motility and invasiveness of the highly transformed fibrosarcoma cell. This progression series could be greatly valuable for deciphering crucial aspects of sarcoma progression and defining new prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 14604 KiB  
Article
Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment—20 Years of Experience
by Aleksandra Sobiborowicz, Tomasz Świtaj, Paweł Teterycz, Mateusz J. Spałek, Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Michał Wągrodzki, Marcin Zdzienicki, Anna M. Czarnecka and Piotr Rutkowski
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(10), 2200; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102200 - 19 May 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2895
Abstract
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, some of which are malignant. There are no specific management guidelines for PEComas, and factors correlating with the disease course are not well defined. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes [...] Read more.
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, some of which are malignant. There are no specific management guidelines for PEComas, and factors correlating with the disease course are not well defined. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes of PEComa patients treated radically, including those treated exclusively in the national reference sarcoma center. The secondary aim of the study was to analyze factors associated with PEComa treatment efficacy. We performed an analysis of 27 patients subsequently treated radically for PEComa between 1999 and 2019 who were in follow-up in the national sarcoma reference center. The proportional-hazards model was used to compare the risk of death. The median age at diagnosis was 45 (21–67) years, and 67% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 68 months (95% CI: 39–101). At the time of analysis, eleven patients (40.7%) experienced progression of the disease and four (14.8%) died. Surgery in the reference sarcoma center was associated with a longer disease control (log-rank p < 0.001). The 5-year-OS rate was 88% (95% CI: 74–100) for the whole analyzed group. We concluded that PEComa treatment should be managed in reference sarcoma centers by a multidisciplinary tumor board with an experienced surgical team. Microscopically radical resection is associated with a longer disease-free survival. Patients requiring long-term follow-ups as late recurrence may be expected. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3022 KiB  
Article
Nano-Encapsulation of Mithramycin in Transfersomes and Polymeric Micelles for the Treatment of Sarcomas
by Óscar Estupiñán, Claudia Rendueles, Paula Suárez, Verónica Rey, Dzohara Murillo, Francisco Morís, Gemma Gutiérrez, María del Carmen Blanco-López, María Matos and René Rodríguez
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(7), 1358; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071358 - 25 Mar 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2714
Abstract
Sarcomas are aggressive tumors which often show a poor response to current treatments. As a promising therapeutic alternative, we focused on mithramycin (MTM), a natural antibiotic with a promising anti-tumor activity but also a relevant systemic toxicity. Therefore, the encapsulation of MTM in [...] Read more.
Sarcomas are aggressive tumors which often show a poor response to current treatments. As a promising therapeutic alternative, we focused on mithramycin (MTM), a natural antibiotic with a promising anti-tumor activity but also a relevant systemic toxicity. Therefore, the encapsulation of MTM in nano-delivery systems may represent a way to increase its therapeutic window. Here, we designed novel transfersomes and PLGA polymeric micelles by combining different membrane components (phosphatidylcholine, Span 60, Tween 20 and cholesterol) to optimize the nanoparticle size, polydispersity index (PDI) and encapsulation efficiency (EE). Using both thin film hydration and the ethanol injection methods we obtained MTM-loaded transferosomes displaying an optimal hydrodynamic diameter of 100–130 nm and EE values higher than 50%. Additionally, we used the emulsion/solvent evaporation method to synthesize polymeric micelles with a mean size of 228 nm and a narrow PDI, capable of encapsulating MTM with EE values up to 87%. These MTM nano-delivery systems mimicked the potent anti-tumor activity of free MTM, both in adherent and cancer stem cell-enriched tumorsphere cultures of myxoid liposarcoma and chondrosarcoma models. Similarly to free MTM, nanocarrier-delivered MTM efficiently inhibits the signaling mediated by the pro-oncogenic factor SP1. In summary, we provide new formulations for the efficient encapsulation of MTM which may constitute a safer delivering alternative to be explored in future clinical uses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 2048 KiB  
Review
Cancer Stem Cells as a Source of Drug Resistance in Bone Sarcomas
by Sofía T. Menéndez, Borja Gallego, Dzohara Murillo, Aida Rodríguez and René Rodríguez
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(12), 2621; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122621 - 14 Jun 2021
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3330
Abstract
Bone sarcomas are commonly characterized by a high degree of intra-tumor heterogeneity, which in part is due to the presence of subpopulations of tumor cells presenting stem cell properties. Similar to normal stem cells, these cancer stem cells (CSCs) display a drug resistant [...] Read more.
Bone sarcomas are commonly characterized by a high degree of intra-tumor heterogeneity, which in part is due to the presence of subpopulations of tumor cells presenting stem cell properties. Similar to normal stem cells, these cancer stem cells (CSCs) display a drug resistant phenotype and therefore are responsible for relapses and tumor dissemination. Drug resistance in bone sarcomas could be enhanced/modulated during tumor evolution though the acquisition of (epi)-genetic alterations and the adaptation to changing microenvironments, including drug treatments. Here we summarize findings supporting the involvement of pro-stemness signaling in the development of drug resistance in bone sarcomas. This include the activation of well-known pro-stemness pathways (Wnt/β-Cat, NOTCH or JAT/STAT pathways), changes in the metabolic and autophagic activities, the alteration of epigenetic pathways, the upregulation of specific non-coding RNAs and the crosstalk with different microenvironmental factors. This altered signaling is expected to be translated to the clinic in the form of biomarkers of response and new therapies able to overcome drug resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1163 KiB  
Review
Pathogenesis and Current Treatment of Osteosarcoma: Perspectives for Future Therapies
by Richa Rathore and Brian A. Van Tine
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(6), 1182; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061182 - 12 Mar 2021
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 6003
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and young adults. The standard-of-care curative treatment for osteosarcoma utilizes doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose methotrexate, a standard that has not changed in more than 40 years. The development of patient-specific therapies requires [...] Read more.
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and young adults. The standard-of-care curative treatment for osteosarcoma utilizes doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose methotrexate, a standard that has not changed in more than 40 years. The development of patient-specific therapies requires an in-depth understanding of the unique genetics and biology of the tumor. Here, we discuss the role of normal bone biology in osteosarcomagenesis, highlighting the factors that drive normal osteoblast production, as well as abnormal osteosarcoma development. We then describe the pathology and current standard of care of osteosarcoma. Given the complex heterogeneity of osteosarcoma tumors, we explore the development of novel therapeutics for osteosarcoma that encompass a series of molecular targets. This analysis of pathogenic mechanisms will shed light on promising avenues for future therapeutic research in osteosarcoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 21860 KiB  
Review
Cold Atmospheric Plasma: A New Strategy Based Primarily on Oxidative Stress for Osteosarcoma Therapy
by Miguel Mateu-Sanz, Juan Tornín, Maria-Pau Ginebra and Cristina Canal
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(4), 893; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040893 - 23 Feb 2021
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 5244
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor, and its first line of treatment presents a high failure rate. The 5-year survival for children and teenagers with osteosarcoma is 70% (if diagnosed before it has metastasized) or 20% (if spread at the time [...] Read more.
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor, and its first line of treatment presents a high failure rate. The 5-year survival for children and teenagers with osteosarcoma is 70% (if diagnosed before it has metastasized) or 20% (if spread at the time of diagnosis), stressing the need for novel therapies. Recently, cold atmospheric plasmas (ionized gases consisting of UV–Vis radiation, electromagnetic fields and a great variety of reactive species) and plasma-treated liquids have been shown to have the potential to selectively eliminate cancer cells in different tumors through an oxidative stress-dependent mechanism. In this work, we review the current state of the art in cold plasma therapy for osteosarcoma. Specifically, we emphasize the mechanisms unveiled thus far regarding the action of plasmas on osteosarcoma. Finally, we review current and potential future approaches, emphasizing the most critical challenges for the development of osteosarcoma therapies based on this emerging technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches for Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop