General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Anesthesiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 April 2023) | Viewed by 28323

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy
Interests: regional anesthesia; acute pain; chronic pain; thoracic anesthesia

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Anesthesia II, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
Interests: thoracic anaesthesia; ultrasound regional anaesthesia; nerve blocks; intraoperative haemodynamic management; analgesia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The future of Anesthesia is closely entwined with advances in technology and research. The point of care use of ultrasound, new monitoring devices, advances in computational power and other technologies as well as the emerging challenges from the Covid -19 pandemic have all contributed to the development of a new era for Anesthesiology. Advances in surgical techniques might also affect the practice of anesthesiology in the near future. More flexibility and expertise in different clinical settings and situations will be required, as more focus is shifted to non-operating room anesthesia. Also the impact of artificial intelligence and machine learning is now evident in anesthesiology practice with the development of various prediction systems. Finally advances in basic science has led to the development of pharmacological agents which bear minimal or no side effects.

In this Special Issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine we invite you to submit research papers, clinical reports, trials reports, experimental treatment reports, laboratory investigation, reviews and new perspectives specific to recent advances in the field of General and Regional Anesthesia.

Dr. Mario Dauri
Dr. Tatiana Sidiropoulou
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Monitoring
  • General anesthesia
  • Regional anesthesia
  • Anesthetic drugs
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Prediction systems
  • Point of care ultrasound
  • Acute pain
  • Chronic pain
  • Perioperative care

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

11 pages, 2188 KiB  
Article
The Efficacy of Scalp Nerve Block in Postoperative Pain Management after Microvascular Decompression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
by Eun Kyung Lee, Seungwon Lee, Ji-Hye Kwon, Seung Hoon Lee, Soo Jung Park, Yunghun Kim, RyungA Kang, Ji Seon Jeong and Jeong Jin Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4242; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134242 - 24 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1614
Abstract
The scalp nerve block, created by injecting local anesthetics around the scalp nerves, is reported to effectively reduce pain after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of scalp nerve block in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Seventy-four [...] Read more.
The scalp nerve block, created by injecting local anesthetics around the scalp nerves, is reported to effectively reduce pain after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of scalp nerve block in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Seventy-four patients who underwent MVD for HFS were enrolled. The block group received scalp nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine before surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative dose of rescue analgesics 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were included pain scores, postoperative antiemetic consumption, and Quality of Recovery-15 scale. The cumulative dose of rescue analgesics at 24 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the two groups (4.80 ± 3.64 mg vs. 5.92 ± 3.95 mg, p = 0.633). However, the pain score was significantly reduced in the block group at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Postoperative antiemetic consumption was lower in the block group than the control group at 12 h. There were no significant differences between the two groups for other secondary outcomes. In MVD for HFS, a preoperative scalp nerve block might reduce postoperative pain in the early postoperative period, but a larger study using a multimodal approach is needed to confirm the efficacy of a scalp block. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2054 KiB  
Article
Dual- vs. Single-Plane Ultrasonic Scan-Assisted Positioning during Lumbar Spinal Puncture in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Fang Huang, Huili Li, Shaopeng Liu, Mingjiang Zong and Yun Wang
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(18), 5337; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185337 - 11 Sep 2022
Viewed by 2039
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of single- versus dual-plane ultrasound scan-assisted spinal anesthesia techniques to improve the success rate and efficacy of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. A total of 120 elderly patients undergoing [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of single- versus dual-plane ultrasound scan-assisted spinal anesthesia techniques to improve the success rate and efficacy of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. A total of 120 elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery were randomly assigned to either receive single-plane (Group A) or dual-plane ultrasonic scan-assisted spinal anesthesia (Group B). The primary outcome analyzed by this study was first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes analyzed included number of needle insertion attempts, needle redirections, locating time, procedural time, total time, puncture depth, quality of ultrasound images, level of block, adverse reactions, and complications. The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (88.3% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.008). In comparison with Group A, the number of needle insertion attempts (1 (1–2) vs. 1 (1–1), p = 0.005) and needle redirections (2 (1–3) vs. 1 (0–2), p < 0.001) were both significantly lower in Group B; Group B also had a shorter procedural time (249.2 ± 30.1 vs. 380.4 ± 39.4 s, p < 0.001) but a longer locating time (250.1 ± 26.2 vs. 137.8 ± 13.5 s, p < 0.001). The dual-plane ultrasonic scan-assisted spinal anesthesia technique warrants consideration for application in elderly patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1366 KiB  
Article
Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block at the Lateral Supra-Arcuate Ligament versus Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Analgesia after Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Min Guo, Bo Lei, Huili Li, Xiaoru Gao, Tianshu Zhang, Ziwei Liang, Yun Wang and Lei Wang
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(13), 3827; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133827 - 1 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4268
Abstract
Several studies have shown the effectiveness of trans-muscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) in analgesia after cesarean delivery. However, the influence of anterior QLB at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL) in this surgery is unclear. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of [...] Read more.
Several studies have shown the effectiveness of trans-muscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) in analgesia after cesarean delivery. However, the influence of anterior QLB at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL) in this surgery is unclear. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of bilateral TQLBs with bilateral QLBs-LSAL following cesarean delivery. Ninety-four parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled and randomly allocated to undergo either bilateral TQLBs or bilateral QLBs-LSAL with 0.375% of ropivacaine (20 mL each side) following cesarean delivery. Intravenous sufentanil was administered for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was postoperative sufentanil consumption during the initial 24 h post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, time to the first PCA request, postoperative rescue analgesia, satisfaction scores, and nausea/vomiting events. Sufentanil consumption was significantly reduced in the QLB-LSAL group in the first 24 h compared with the TQLB group after surgery (29.4 ± 5.7 μg vs. 39.4 ± 9.6 μg, p < 0.001). In comparison with TQLB, the time to the first PCA request in the QLB-LSAL group was significantly longer (10.9 ± 4.1 h vs. 6.7 ± 1.8 h, p < 0.001). No differences were observed between two groups regarding pain scores, rescue analgesia after surgery, satisfaction scores, or nausea/vomiting incidence. The significant reduction in opioid consumption in the first 24 h and prolongation in time to first opioid demand in parturients receiving QLB-LSAL compared with TQLB suggest that the QLB-LSAL is a superior choice for multimodal analgesia after cesarean delivery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 242 KiB  
Article
Is There a Difference between Perineural Dexamethasone with Single-Shot Interscalene Block (SSIB) and Interscalene Indwelling Catheter Analgesia (IICA) for Early Pain after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Pilot Study
by Yang-Soo Kim, Youngkyung Park and Hyun Jung Koh
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3409; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123409 - 14 Jun 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1146
Abstract
Interscalene block is applied to control acute postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), typically with single-shot interscalene block (SSIB) or continuous interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia (IICA), and dexamethasone (Dex) for extending the analgesic effect. This study investigated whether perineural Dex can [...] Read more.
Interscalene block is applied to control acute postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), typically with single-shot interscalene block (SSIB) or continuous interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia (IICA), and dexamethasone (Dex) for extending the analgesic effect. This study investigated whether perineural Dex can extend the postoperative analgesic effect of SSIB to match that of IICA. A total of 130 patients were recruited and divided into two groups (Group D, SSIB with perineural Dex, n = 94; Group C, IICA, n = 36). The surgical and anesthetic processes were identical except for the method of nerve block. Pain was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after ARCR. The number of each and the total analgesics used and adverse effects were compared. The duration of ARCR was longer in group D. The VAS score was higher in group C 6 h after ARCR, but there was no difference at other time points. More postoperative analgesics were administered to group C, and there was no difference in the number of adverse effects. In conclusion, combining perineural Dex with SSIB can reduce rebound hyperalgesia after 6 h and extend the duration of the analgesic effect to that of IICA. Therefore, IICA could be substituted with SSIB and Dex between at 6 and 48 h after ARCR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
8 pages, 2239 KiB  
Article
Cardio Protective Effects of Lipid Emulsion against Ropivacaine-Induced Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity—An Experimental Study
by Alexandra Elena Lazar, Simona Gurzu, Attila Kovecsi, Marcel Perian, Bogdan Cordos, Mircea Constantin Gherghinescu and Liviu Sorin Enache
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2784; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102784 - 15 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2487
Abstract
Inadvertent intravascular injection of local anesthetics (LA) during regional anesthesia causes Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST). Theories of lipid rescue in the case of LAST proved that the administration of lipids in LAST has beneficial effects. One possible mechanism of action is based [...] Read more.
Inadvertent intravascular injection of local anesthetics (LA) during regional anesthesia causes Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST). Theories of lipid rescue in the case of LAST proved that the administration of lipids in LAST has beneficial effects. One possible mechanism of action is based on the lipophilic properties of LA which allow plasma-free LA to be bound by the molecules of Lipid Emulsion (LE). The association LA–LE is shuttled towards organs such as liver and the kidneys, and the half-life of LA is shortened. The main objective of this experimental study was to assess the possible cardio-prophylactic effect of LE administration before the induction of LAST by intravenous administration of Ropivacaine. This was an experimental, interventional, prospective, and non-randomized study. The subjects were divided into groups and received, under general anesthesia, LE 20% first 0.3–0.4 mL, followed by 0.1 mL Ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, or Ropivacaine alone. At the end of the experiment, the subjects were sacrificed, and tissue samples of kidney, heart and liver were harvested for histopathological examination. LE, when administered as prophylaxis in Ropivacaine-induced LAST, had protective cardiac effects in rats. The LE known side effects were not produced if the substance was administered in the low doses used for LAST prophylaxis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 726 KiB  
Article
A Comparison of Oxygenation Efficacy between High-Flow Nasal Cannulas and Standard Facemasks during Elective Tracheal Intubation for Patients with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Yu-Ming Wu, Chun-Cheng Li, Shih-Yu Huang, Yen-Hao Su, Chien-Wun Wang, Jui-Tai Chen, Shih-Chiang Shen, Po-Han Lo, Yun-Ling Yang, Yih-Giun Cherng, Hsiang-Ling Wu and Ying-Hsuan Tai
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(6), 1700; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061700 - 18 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2253
Abstract
Obese patients are predisposed to rapid oxygen desaturation during tracheal intubation. We aimed to compare the risk of desaturation between high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) and classical facemask oxygenation (FMO) during rapid sequence intubation for elective surgery in obese patients. Adults with a body [...] Read more.
Obese patients are predisposed to rapid oxygen desaturation during tracheal intubation. We aimed to compare the risk of desaturation between high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) and classical facemask oxygenation (FMO) during rapid sequence intubation for elective surgery in obese patients. Adults with a body mass index ≥30 kg·m−2 undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a medical center were randomized into the HFNO group (n = 40) and FMO group (n = 40). In the HFNO group, patients used a high-flow nasal cannula to receive 30 to 50 L·min−1 flow of heated and humidified 100% oxygen. In the FMO group, patients received a fitting facemask with 15 L·min−1 flow of 100% oxygen. After 5-min preoxygenation, rapid sequence intubation was performed. The primary outcome was arterial desaturation during intubation, defined as a peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) <92%. The risk of peri-intubation desaturation was significantly lower in the HFNO group compared to the FMO group; absolute risk reduction: 0.20 (95% confidence interval: 0.05–0.35, p = 0.0122); number needed to treat: 5. The lowest SpO2 during intubation was significantly increased by HFNO (median 99%, interquartile range: 97–100) compared to FMO (96, 92–100, p = 0.0150). HFNO achieved a higher partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) compared to FMO, with medians of 476 mmHg (interquartile range: 390–541) and 397 (351–456, p = 0.0010), respectively. There was no difference in patients’ comfort level between groups. Compared with standard FMO, HFNO with apneic oxygenation reduced arterial desaturation during tracheal intubation and enhanced PaO2 among patients with obesity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 936 KiB  
Article
A Comparison of the Anesthetic Methods for Recurrence Rates of Bladder Cancer after Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors Using National Health Insurance Claims Data of South Korea
by Sang Won Lee, Bum Sik Tae, Yoon Ji Choi, Sang Min Yoon, Yoon Sook Lee, Jae Hwan Kim, Hye Won Shin, Jae Young Park and Jae Hyun Bae
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(4), 1143; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041143 - 21 Feb 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2603
Abstract
Bladder cancers have high recurrence rates and are usually removed via transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Recently, some reports showed that the anesthetic method may affect the recurrence rates of bladder cancers. The purpose of this population-based study was to compare the [...] Read more.
Bladder cancers have high recurrence rates and are usually removed via transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Recently, some reports showed that the anesthetic method may affect the recurrence rates of bladder cancers. The purpose of this population-based study was to compare the effect of anesthetic methods with the recurrence rates of bladder cancers in South Korea. A total of 4439 patients were reviewed retrospectively using the data of the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database from January 2007 to December 2011. Patients were divided into 2 groups who received general (n = 3767) and regional anesthesia (n = 582), and were followed up until September 2017. Propensity score matching was conducted to reduce the effect of confounding factors. After using propensity score matching with a multivariable Cox regression model, age (p < 0.001), sex (p < 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.003), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), and renal disease (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with bladder cancer recurrence. However, there were no significant differences in the recurrence rates of bladder cancers in patients who received general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for TURBTs. This study revealed that there is no relationship between the anesthetic method and bladder cancer recurrence. Either general anesthesia or regional anesthesia can be used depending on the situation in patients receiving TURBT. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm the association between the anesthetic method and the recurrence rates of bladder cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 878 KiB  
Article
The Use of the Hypotension Prediction Index Integrated in an Algorithm of Goal Directed Hemodynamic Treatment during Moderate and High-Risk Surgery
by Marina Tsoumpa, Aikaterini Kyttari, Stamo Matiatou, Maria Tzoufi, Panayota Griva, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Maria Riga, Paraskevi Matsota and Tatiana Sidiropoulou
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(24), 5884; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245884 - 15 Dec 2021
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3308
Abstract
(1) Background: The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is an algorithm that predicts hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 65 mmHg for at least 1 min, based on arterial waveform features. We tested the hypothesis that the use of this index [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is an algorithm that predicts hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 65 mmHg for at least 1 min, based on arterial waveform features. We tested the hypothesis that the use of this index reduces the duration and severity of hypotension during noncardiac surgery. (2) Methods: We enrolled adults having moderate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery with invasive arterial pressure monitoring. Participating patients were randomized 1:1 to standard of care or hemodynamic management with HPI guidance with a goal directed hemodynamic treatment protocol. The trigger to initiate treatment (with fluids, vasopressors, or inotropes) was a value of HPI of 85 (range, 0–100) or higher in the intervention group. Primary outcome was the amount of hypotension, defined as time-weighted average (TWA) MAP less than 65 mmHg. Secondary outcomes were time spent in hypertension defined as MAP more than 100 mmHg for at least 1 min; medication and fluids administered and postoperative complications. (3) Results: We obtained data from 99 patients. The median (IQR) TWA of hypotension was 0.16 mmHg (IQR, 0.01–0.32 mmHg) in the intervention group versus 0.50 mmHg (IQR, 0.11–0.97 mmHg) in the control group, for a median difference of −0.28 (95% CI, −0.48 to −0.09 mmHg; p = 0.0003). We also observed an increase in hypertension in the intervention group as well as a higher weight-adjusted administration of phenylephrine in the intervention group. (4) Conclusions: In this single-center prospective study of patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, the use of this prediction model resulted in less intraoperative hypotension compared with standard care. An increase in the time spent in hypertension in the treatment group was also observed, probably as a result of overtreatment. This should provide an insight for refining the use of this prediction index in future studies to avoid excessive correction of blood pressure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

9 pages, 993 KiB  
Review
Airway Ultrasound for Anesthesia and in Intensive Care Patients—A Narrative Review of the Literature
by Alexandra Elena Lazar and Mircea Constantin Gherghinescu
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(21), 6327; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216327 - 27 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4867
Abstract
Ultrasound is an everyday diagnostic tool. In anesthesia and intensive care, it has a role as an adjuvant for many procedures, including the evaluation of the airway. Ultrasound airway evaluation can help predict a difficult airway, visualize the proper positioning of an intubation [...] Read more.
Ultrasound is an everyday diagnostic tool. In anesthesia and intensive care, it has a role as an adjuvant for many procedures, including the evaluation of the airway. Ultrasound airway evaluation can help predict a difficult airway, visualize the proper positioning of an intubation cannula, or evaluate the airway post-intubation. Protocols need to be established for the better integration of ultrasound in the airway evaluation, however until a consensus is reached in this respect, the ultrasound is a reliable aid in anesthesia and intensive care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4058 KiB  
Review
Prediction and Prevention of Intraoperative Hypotension with the Hypotension Prediction Index: A Narrative Review
by Tatiana Sidiropoulou, Marina Tsoumpa, Panayota Griva, Vasiliki Galarioti and Paraskevi Matsota
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5551; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195551 - 22 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2423
Abstract
Intraoperative hypotension is common and has been associated with adverse events. Although association does not imply causation, predicting and preventing hypotension may improve postoperative outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence on the development and validation of an artificial intelligence predictive algorithm, the Hypotension [...] Read more.
Intraoperative hypotension is common and has been associated with adverse events. Although association does not imply causation, predicting and preventing hypotension may improve postoperative outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence on the development and validation of an artificial intelligence predictive algorithm, the Hypotension Prediction (HPI) (formerly known as the Hypotension Probability Indicator). This machine learning model can arguably predict hypotension up to 15 min before its occurrence. Several validation studies, retrospective cohorts, as well as a few prospective randomized trials, have been published in the last years, reporting promising results. Larger trials are needed to definitively assess the usefulness of this algorithm in optimizing postoperative outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia during Perioperative Period)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop