Current Advances in Assessment and Intervention for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Otolaryngology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 18 July 2024 | Viewed by 1035

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Département d’Orthophonie de Nice (DON), UFR Médecine, Université Côte d’Azur, 06107 Nice, France
2. Laboratoire CobTeK, Université Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France
3. Université Côte d’Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (University Hospital of Nice), Service Clinique Gériatrique du Cerveau et du Mouvement, Centre Mémoire Ressources et Recherche (Geriatric Brain and Movement Clinic, Memory Resources and Research Centre), 06100 Nice, France
Interests: sensoriality; NTIC; neurosciences

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
Interests: speech therapy; cochlear implant; phonetics; lipreading

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Cognition Behaviour Technology Lab, University Côte d'Azur (UCA), Nice, France
Interests: NICT; cognition; behaviour; neuropsychiatry; arts

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The extraordinary expansion of information and communication technology integrating AI is simultaneous with advances in our understanding of the links between cognition and hearing. In fact, the assessment of deaf patients and the interventions carried out before and after cochlear implantation have greatly evolved.

The aim of this Special Issue is to provide an opportunity to publish innovative studies relating the assessment of deaf patients (taking into account emotional capacities, linguistic skills, social cognition, motivation and recognition of biological movement) and the care of hearing-impaired patients using (or not) new information and communication technologies.

Articles submitted may be related to the following examples:

- New avenues of assessment and care based on a better understanding of the brain function in deaf people;

- Innovations (technological or otherwise) in the field of assessment and rehabilitation of people with cochlear implants;

- Age-related issues and the link with neurocognitive and behavioral disorders.

Literature reviews, original articles and publication of protocols in progress are accepted.

Dr. Auriane Gros
Dr. Stéphanie Borel
Prof. Dr. Philippe Robert
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • hearing
  • innovation
  • assessment
  • rehabilitation

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

30 pages, 2462 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
by James R. Dornhoffer, Shreya Chidarala, Terral Patel, Karl R. Khandalavala, Shaun A. Nguyen, Kara C. Schvartz-Leyzac, Judy R. Dubno, Matthew L. Carlson, Aaron C. Moberly and Theodore R. McRackan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020400 - 11 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 871
Abstract
Objective: to review evidence on the efficacy of auditory training in adult cochlear implant recipients. Data Sources: PRISMA guidelines for a systematic review of the literature were followed. PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were queried on 29 June 2023 for terms involving cochlear [...] Read more.
Objective: to review evidence on the efficacy of auditory training in adult cochlear implant recipients. Data Sources: PRISMA guidelines for a systematic review of the literature were followed. PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were queried on 29 June 2023 for terms involving cochlear implantation and auditory training. Studies were limited to the English language and adult patient populations. Study Selection: Three authors independently reviewed publications for inclusion in the review based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria encompassed adult cochlear implant populations, an analysis of clinician- or patient-directed auditory training, and an analysis of one or more measures of speech recognition and/or patient-reported outcome. Exclusion criteria included studies with only pediatric implant populations, music or localization training in isolation, and single-sample case studies. Data Extraction: The data were collected regarding study design, patient population, auditory training modality, auditory training timing, speech outcomes, and data on the durability of outcomes. A quality assessment of the literature was performed using a quality metric adapted from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group guidelines. Data Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: Data were qualitatively summarized for 23 studies. All but four studies demonstrated significant improvement in at least one measured or patient-reported outcome measure with training. For 11 studies with sufficient data reporting, pre-intervention and post-intervention pooled means of different outcome measures were compared for 132 patients using meta-analysis. Patient-direct training was associated with significant improvement in vowel-phoneme recognition and speech recognition in noise (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively), and clinician-directed training showed significant improvement in sentence recognition in noise (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The literature on auditory training for adult cochlear implant recipients is limited and heterogeneous, including a small number of studies with limited levels of evidence and external validity. However, the current evidence suggests that auditory training can improve speech recognition in adult cochlear implant recipients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop