Critical Issues for Senior, Middle and Other Levels of Leadership

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Curriculum and Instruction".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 July 2024 | Viewed by 1223

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia
Interests: educational leadership; organisational communication in schools; teacher job attitudes; classroom management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

After more than two decades of intensified research activity, we know a lot more about how educational leadership works. In particular, it is now widely accepted that leadership in education does not constitute only principals, centre directors, deans, etc. To use the context of schools, for example, non-principal leadership is increasingly being recognized as important to the success of these organisations, especially in relation to teacher capabilities and student outcomes.

Despite the increased attention to, and appreciation of, these other leaders, there is much work still to be performed in the field, as many knowledge gaps and conceptual/theoretical problems exist. Confusion still prevails over which formal positions might be considered senior or middle leadership and, indeed, whether these notions are static or fluid. A strong body of research has emerged in the area of middle leadership at the same time that a rise in research outputs on teacher leaders has occurred, and these two types of leaders are often conflated even though they are also seen as notionally distinct, at least conceptually. There is also a need to re-examine leadership theory to include the possibility of first-level leaders, a concept whose time, I believe, has come. There are knowledge gaps relating to middle leadership roles, the professional development needs at different leadership and career levels, and many other areas.

The aims of this Special Issue are to:

  1. Provide authors with opportunities to share new research into all aspects of senior, middle and other non-principal/non-CEO leadership roles;
  2. Explore new or unique theoretical insights relating to these levels of leadership.

Suggested topics and themes might include, but are not limited to the following:

* Theories on middle or senior leadership;

* How school culture influences middle leader development;

* How senior and middle leadership interact;

* Notions of teacher leadership;

* Teacher leadership and student achievement;

* Middle leader roles and student outcomes;

* The roles senior leaders play in (your institution);

* Junior leadership.

Dr. John De Nobile
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • senior leadership
  • middle leadership
  • teacher leadership
  • first level leadership
  • emergent leaders
  • junior leaders

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 239 KiB  
Article
Re-Imagining Leadership Roles beyond the Shadow of Bureaucracy
by Lisa Catherine Ehrich and Fenwick Walter English
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030331 - 20 Mar 2024
Viewed by 686
Abstract
The aim of this conceptual paper is to revisit the relationship between leadership and bureaucracy. The dominant and unquestioned way of thinking about leadership is to equate it as an undertaking exercised by leaders, those officers who occupy hierarchical positions in organizations. For [...] Read more.
The aim of this conceptual paper is to revisit the relationship between leadership and bureaucracy. The dominant and unquestioned way of thinking about leadership is to equate it as an undertaking exercised by leaders, those officers who occupy hierarchical positions in organizations. For example, senior leadership and middle leadership in schools are often associated with formal hierarchical roles played by senior and middle leaders. However, it can be argued that this perspective is problematic, not only because it is leader-centric but also due to its limitations in explaining the phenomenon of leadership. In order to understand the relationship between leadership and bureaucracy and leadership outside of bureaucracy, the paper reviews some of the extant literature in the field, including a brief history of bureaucracy, its pervasiveness in educational institutions, and current neo-liberal policies and reforms that function effectively within bureaucratic structures. An important contribution of the paper is a synoptic conceptual model that brings together three worldviews or archetypes pertaining to bureaucracy. These are a hard-edged view (system first, people second), a soft-edged view (people first, system second) and a third worldview (issue first, people second, system third). The third worldview signals a departure from the first two archetypes as it is an illustration of leadership outside the confines of bureaucracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Issues for Senior, Middle and Other Levels of Leadership)
Back to TopTop