Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Technology Enhanced Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 4075

Special Issue Editor

Department of Educational & Psychological Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
Interests: learning analytics; ethical AI in education; educational data visualization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, a fundamental transformation has occurred in education due to the increased integration of novel technologies such as Educational Data Mining (EDM), Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and Reinforcement Learning (RL) in supporting the teaching and learning practices in current educational settings. Increasing concerns have been raised regarding the reliability in the use of these technologies, from the conceptualization of problems to the collection of data to the construction of models and to the generation and interpretation of results. Immediately addressing these concerns is highly needed, especially in the time for realizing full potential of the artificial intelligence (AI)-related techniques in education.

This Special Issue focuses on “trustworthiness”, which refers to all stakeholders, including individual stakeholders (i.e., users, developers, and researchers), organizational stakeholders, and national/international stakeholders engaged in making laws, rules, and regulations. In educational settings, the trustworthiness of AI emphasizes the accuracy and safety of the AI system as well as the corresponding impacts on human autonomy and privacy and whether they are treated fairly regardless of demographic backgrounds. Topics of interest for this Special Issue include (but are not limited to):

  • Human-centered values. How can AI systems empower educators and support them to make informed decisions about student learning?
  • Transparency and Explainability. How can AI help educators understand how the system works? How does the system generate interpretable and actionable insights to support the instructional process?
  • What metrics can be proposed to mitigate the potential negative impact of AI on teaching and learning? What mechanisms should be put in place to ensure the responsibility and accountability of AI systems’ behavior? What educational policies or theoretical frameworks should be proposed to promote the corresponding requirements in practice?
  • Learning Analytical Dashboard. What kinds of visualization techniques can be employed for convey the analytical insights to educator? What kinds of learning information should be emphasized and visualized to support the better understanding of student learning?
  • AI bias evaluation and mitigation. What kinds of metrics can be proposed to evaluate the fairness level of the proposed AI model in the target analytical context? What are potential sources causing the bias, and how to mitigate the bias while ensuring accuracy?

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Bo Pei
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • AI in education
  • educational data mining
  • learning analytics
  • learning analytical dashboard
  • AI trustworthy
  • AI fairness
  • ethical AI

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 531 KiB  
Article
The Effects of Generative AI Platforms on Undergraduates’ Narrative Intelligence and Writing Self-Efficacy
by Nikolaos Pellas
Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(11), 1155; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111155 - 18 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3136
Abstract
Digital storytelling and generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms have emerged as transformative tools that empower individuals to write with confidence and share their stories effectively. However, a research gap exists in understanding the effects of using such web-based platforms on narrative intelligence and [...] Read more.
Digital storytelling and generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms have emerged as transformative tools that empower individuals to write with confidence and share their stories effectively. However, a research gap exists in understanding the effects of using such web-based platforms on narrative intelligence and writing self-efficacy. This study aims to investigate whether digital story creation tasks on web-based platforms can influence the narrative intelligence and writing self-efficacy of undergraduate students. A pretest–posttest comparison study between two groups was conducted with sixty-four undergraduate students (n = 64), majoring in Primary Education. More specifically, it compares the effects of the most well-known conventional platforms, such as Storybird, Storyjumper, and ZooBurst (control condition), and generative AI platforms, such as Sudowrite, Jasper, and Shortly AI (experimental condition) on undergraduate students, with an equal distribution in each group. The findings indicate that the utilization of generative AI platforms in the context of story creation tasks can substantially enhance both narrative intelligence scores and writing self-efficacy when compared to conventional platforms. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in the creative identity factor. Generative AI platforms have promising implications for supporting undergraduates’ narrative intelligence and writing self-efficacy in fostering their story creation design and development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop