Controversies in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 September 2022) | Viewed by 4135

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Unit, Department of Surgery, Lugo Hospital, Health Local Agency of Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
Interests: sleep disordered breathing pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy; hearing loss diagnosis and surgical treatment; head and neck oncology diagnosis and surgical treatment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder, characterized by a quite complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Four physiological traits have recently been identified, which include an anatomical upper airway collapsibility, poor muscle responsiveness, low arousal threshold, and high loop gain. Several controversies are still extensively reported in the literature regarding different methods for the identification of anatomical and non-anatomical OSA phenotype traits, including CPAP dials in sleep labs, the mean inspiratory flow during flow limitations, airflow shapes, negative expiratory pressures, diagnostic PSG findings, and recent advances in imaging techniques, photogrammetry, and the acoustic analysis of snoring.

Since its introduction in 1990, drug-induced sleep endoscopy has been employed for the assessment of upper airway obstruction during apnea, and in the last three decades, considerable developments and progress have been achieved in fine-tuning this procedure and addressing various controversies.

The OSA treatment has undergone significant changes in recent years, other than CPAP therapy, the main non-invasive treatments including the intraoral negative airway pressure or mandibular advancement device. Palatal surgical procedures include minimally invasive radiofrequency and modified pharyngoplasties, with tongue surgery also having been changed from minimally invasive radiofrequency to tongue suspension and tongue base resection. Finally, the conventional maxillo-mandibular advancement is being developed into a minimally invasive version. Based on the clinical evidence, a customized OSA treatment remains an open-question field of research.

The aim of this Special Issue is to analyze the updated literature regarding the most important controversial points of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of OSA.

We welcome prospective, retrospective and meta-analysis papers concerning this topic.

Prof. Dr. Andrea De Vito
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • obstructive sleep apnea
  • critical closing pressure
  • drug-induced sleep endoscopy
  • pharyngoplasty
  • robotic surgery
  • radiofrequency
  • mandibular advancement device

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

10 pages, 1244 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Sleep Bruxism in Respiratory Polygraphy Study
by Klaudia Kazubowska-Machnowska, Anna Jodkowska, Monika Michalek-Zrabkowska, Mieszko Wieckiewicz, Rafal Poreba, Marzena Dominiak, Pawel Gac, Grzegorz Mazur, Justyna Kanclerska and Helena Martynowicz
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(7), 828; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070828 - 25 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1742
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sleep bruxism (SB) may appear concomitantly. Data on the relationship between OSA and SB are limited. It was shown that in a population with an increased risk of OSA, OSA was dependently correlated with SB on the degree [...] Read more.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sleep bruxism (SB) may appear concomitantly. Data on the relationship between OSA and SB are limited. It was shown that in a population with an increased risk of OSA, OSA was dependently correlated with SB on the degree of OSA severity only in mild and moderate cases of OSA. We aimed to confirm this relationship and affecting factors in a group of dental office patients in a prospective, observational study. Adult patients (n = 119) were evaluated using respiratory polygraphy. The risk of OSA was assessed using a STOP-Bang questionnaire (SBQ). The episodes of bruxism and respiratory events were scored according to the standards of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The prevalence of OSA and SB was found to be 63.02% and 41.17%, respectively. The bruxism episode index (BEI) was increased in the group with a higher risk of OSA (SBQ ≥ 3) compared to the group with a lower risk of OSA (3.49 ± 3.63 vs. 2.27 ± 2.50, p = 0.03). The sensitivity and specificity of the SBQ were not sufficient to predict SB. A positive linear correlation between AHI and BEI in the group with AHI < 23/h was found. The study confirmed that OSA was associated with SB in the group of patients with OSA and/or SB risk. The relationship between OSA and SB depended on the degree of severity of OSA and occurred in mild and moderate cases of OSA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 1928 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Role of Isolated Nasal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapy—A Systematic Review
by Emily Schoustra, Peter van Maanen, Chantal den Haan, Madeline J. L. Ravesloot and Nico de Vries
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(11), 1446; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111446 - 26 Oct 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1989
Abstract
Purpose: Nasal obstruction is believed to play a significant role in the pathophysiology and management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, controversy remains about the ability of isolated nasal surgery to improve OSA. The objective of this systematic review is to give an [...] Read more.
Purpose: Nasal obstruction is believed to play a significant role in the pathophysiology and management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, controversy remains about the ability of isolated nasal surgery to improve OSA. The objective of this systematic review is to give an updated overview of the literature on whether isolated nasal surgery can improve OSA subjectively (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)) and/or objectively (polysomnography (PSG)). Methods: A systematic review was performed searching the electronic databases PubMed, Embase.com (accessed on 20 June 2022) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to 20 June 2022. Eligible studies were reviewed for methodological quality using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the included studies reported no significant reduction in the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) after isolated nasal surgery in patients with OSA. The meta-analysis suggests that the AHI slightly decreases after nasal surgery. The ESS was significantly lower after nasal surgery in eighteen studies. Conclusion: Based on the present analysis of objective outcomes, isolated nasal surgery did not improve the AHI significantly in the majority of the studies. The meta-analysis suggests a slight decrease in AHI after nasal surgery, but this reduction is not clinically relevant in terms of treatment success. Isolated nasal surgery should therefore not be recommended as a first-line treatment for OSA. Because of high study heterogeneity, these results should be interpreted with caution. Isolated nasal surgery can possibly improve OSA subjectively. Perhaps only OSA patients with complaints of nasal obstruction or OSA patients experiencing difficulty with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compliance would benefit from isolated nasal surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop