Next Issue
Volume 3, December
Previous Issue
Volume 3, June
 
 

GeoHazards, Volume 3, Issue 3 (September 2022) – 4 articles

Cover Story (view full-size image): Tsunami Warning Systems (TWS) need to provide a quick estimate for local tsunami action within the first minutes after the tsunami generates. This is generally obtained from deterministic simulations of a single event that embodies uncertainty from unknowns in the source definition. In this study, variability in the tsunami source parameters was included by running 135 tsunami simulations associated to a single event. This study shows that fast computation using high-performance computing resources allows producing alert levels to be incorporated into the Spanish National TWS within one minute. Additionally, it demonstrates that using a set of scenarios considering tsunami source uncertainties helps to avoid possible tsunami warning level underestimations. View this paper
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 5318 KiB  
Article
Comparing Root Cohesion Estimates from Three Models at a Shallow Landslide in the Oregon Coast Range
by Collin Cronkite-Ratcliff, Kevin M. Schmidt and Charlotte Wirion
GeoHazards 2022, 3(3), 428-451; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards3030022 - 01 Sep 2022
Viewed by 2099
Abstract
Although accurate root cohesion model estimates are essential to quantify the effect of vegetation roots on shallow slope stability, few means exist to independently validate such model outputs. One validation approach for cohesion estimates is back-calculation of apparent root cohesion at a landslide [...] Read more.
Although accurate root cohesion model estimates are essential to quantify the effect of vegetation roots on shallow slope stability, few means exist to independently validate such model outputs. One validation approach for cohesion estimates is back-calculation of apparent root cohesion at a landslide site with well-documented failure conditions. The catchment named CB1, near Coos Bay, Oregon, USA, which experienced a shallow landslide in 1996, is a prime locality for cohesion model validation, as an abundance of data and observations from the site generated broad insights related to hillslope hydrology and slope stability. However, previously published root cohesion values at CB1 used the Wu and Waldron model (WWM), which assumes simultaneous root failure and therefore likely overestimates root cohesion. Reassessing published cohesion estimates from this site is warranted, as more recently developed models include the fiber bundle model (FBM), which simulates progressive failure with load redistribution, and the root bundle model-Weibull (RBMw), which accounts for differential strain loading. We applied the WWM, FBM, and RBMw at CB1 using post-failure root data from five vegetation species. At CB1, the FBM and RBMw predict values that are less than 30% of the WWM-estimated values. All three models show that root cohesion has substantial spatial heterogeneity. Most parts of the landslide scarp have little root cohesion, with areas of high cohesion concentrated near plant roots. These findings underscore the importance of using physically realistic models and considering lateral and vertical spatial heterogeneity of root cohesion in shallow landslide initiation and provide a necessary step towards independently assessing root cohesion model validity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Natural Hazards and Disaster Risks Reduction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 946 KiB  
Article
Determinants of Displacement and Displacement Duration Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: A Hurdle Model Approach
by James I. Price, Alok K. Bohara and Wendy L. Hansen
GeoHazards 2022, 3(3), 412-427; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards3030021 - 11 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1716
Abstract
In 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused widespread destruction and displacement in parts of Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi. This research evaluates determinants of displacement and, conditional on being displaced, the duration of displacement for households living in areas affected by these hurricanes. Hurdle [...] Read more.
In 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused widespread destruction and displacement in parts of Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi. This research evaluates determinants of displacement and, conditional on being displaced, the duration of displacement for households living in areas affected by these hurricanes. Hurdle Models, which assume that different processes govern zero outcomes (i.e., no displacement) and positive outcomes (i.e., amount of time displaced), are used to model the likelihood of household displacement and its duration as a function of socioeconomic characteristics, hurricane-caused property and neighborhood damage, social support, and financial assistance. Results show that mobile home residence, marital status, educational attainment, the presence of children, and property and neighborhood damage affect the likelihood and expected length of displacement among sample respondents. Financial assistance and social support are also correlated with displacement and its duration, but endogeneity concerns complicate the interpretation of these results. The findings highlight the diversity of factors that slow households’ return following displacement and underscore the need for additional research on the role of social capital in determining hazard-related outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 8735 KiB  
Article
Conceptual and Analytical Framework as Flood Risk Mapping Subsidy
by Larissa Ferreira D. R. Batista and Alfredo Ribeiro Neto
GeoHazards 2022, 3(3), 395-411; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards3030020 - 27 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2187
Abstract
There are still gaps in defining values and category classifications of exposed items in quantitative damage analysis. This paper proposes a framework that refines the development of flood risk analysis at a local scale. This study first performs a quantitative risk analysis, based [...] Read more.
There are still gaps in defining values and category classifications of exposed items in quantitative damage analysis. This paper proposes a framework that refines the development of flood risk analysis at a local scale. This study first performs a quantitative risk analysis, based mainly on secondary data; it then attempts to communicate the results graphically, aiming to reduce the financial and human resources required. We propose an easily standardized database in a GIS environment, analyzing the influence of a reservoir for flood control and the construction of replicable local-scale risk curves. Hydrological (HEC-HMS) and 2D hydrodynamic (HEC-RAS) models were used to simulate hydrographs considering different return periods. For damage estimation, the processing included vectorization of lots, building use definition with Google Street View, classification of standard designs, and a field survey to validate those classes. In monetary value, this study calculated the effect of the construction of a reservoir for damage reduction, showing the potential to determine the effectiveness of measures adopted to mitigate flood impacts. In addition, for each simulated return period, exposure, hazard, and damage maps can be established, making it possible to perform a complete risk analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4878 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Faster-Than-Real-Time (FTRT) Tsunami Simulations for the Spanish Tsunami Warning System for the Atlantic
by Beatriz Gaite, Jorge Macías, Juan Vicente Cantavella, Carlos Sánchez-Linares, Carlos González and Luis Carlos Puertas
GeoHazards 2022, 3(3), 371-394; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards3030019 - 01 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2342
Abstract
Real-time local tsunami warnings embody uncertainty from unknowns in the source definition within the first minutes after the tsunami generates. In general, Tsunami Warning Systems (TWS) provide a quick estimate for tsunami action from deterministic simulations of a single event. In this study, [...] Read more.
Real-time local tsunami warnings embody uncertainty from unknowns in the source definition within the first minutes after the tsunami generates. In general, Tsunami Warning Systems (TWS) provide a quick estimate for tsunami action from deterministic simulations of a single event. In this study, variability in tsunami source parameters has been included by running 135 tsunami simulations; besides this, four different computational domains in the northeastern Atlantic ocean have been considered, resulting in 540 simulations associated with a single event. This was done for tsunamis generated by earthquakes in the Gulf of Cadiz with impact in the western Iberian peninsula and the Canary Islands. A first answer is provided after one minute, and 7 min are required to perform all the simulations in the four computational domains. The fast computation allows alert levels all along the coast to be incorporated into the Spanish National Tsunami Early Warning System. The main findings are that the use of a set of scenarios that account for the uncertainty in source parameters can produce higher tsunami warnings in certain coastal areas than those obtained from a single deterministic reference scenario. Therefore, this work shows that considering uncertainties in tsunami source parameters helps to avoid possible tsunami warning level underestimations. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that this is possible to do in real time in an actual TWS with the use of high-performance computing resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modelling and Numerical Simulation of Tsunami)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop