Next Article in Journal
Strontium-Induced Gelation of Sodium Alginate in the Presence of Carbon Nanotubes: Elemental Analysis and Gel Structure
Next Article in Special Issue
Solving Some Graph Problems in Composite 3D Printing Using Spreadsheet Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Electrical Characterization of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Silver and Copper Composites for Switching Contacts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation on Mechanical and Thermal Properties of 3D-Printed Polyamide 6, Graphene Oxide and Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Composites under Dry, Wet and High Temperature Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Carbon-Fiber- and Nanodiamond-Reinforced PLA Hierarchical 3D-Printed Core Sandwich Structures

by
Michel Theodor Mansour
1,
Konstantinos Tsongas
2 and
Dimitrios Tzetzis
3,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Digital Manufacturing and Materials Characterization Laboratory, School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thermi, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(7), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7070285
Submission received: 14 March 2023 / Revised: 16 June 2023 / Accepted: 6 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Composites)

Abstract

:
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the mechanical behavior of FFF 3D-printed specimens of polylactic acid (PLA), PLA reinforced with nanodiamonds (PLA/uDiamond) and PLA reinforced with carbon fibers (PLA/CF) under various experimental tests such as compressive and cyclic compressive tests, nanoindentation tests, as well as scanning electron microscopy tests (SEM). Furthermore, the current work aims to design and fabricate hierarchical honeycombs of the zeroth, first and second order using materials under investigation, and perform examination tests of their dynamic behavior. The mechanical behavior of hierarchical sandwich structures was determined by conducting experimental bending tests along with finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. The results reveal that the incorporation of nanodiamonds into the PLA matrix enhanced the elastic modulus, strength and hardness of the 3D-printed specimens. In addition, the second order of the PLA/uD hierarchical sandwich structure presented increased strength, elastic and flexural modulus in comparison with the zeroth and first hierarchies. Regarding the dynamic behavior, the second order of the PLA/uD honeycomb structure revealed the biggest increase in stiffness as compared to PLA nanocomposite filaments.

1. Introduction

In recent years, additive manufacturing procedures have gained great influence on the manufacturing industry on a global scale. The main advantages of 3D printing procedures are the ability to instantly manufacture composite and complex components and structures without specialized implements as well as reductions in material waste, time and manufacturing costs. In general, thermoplastic polymers are mostly utilized as 3D printing materials, especially using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) technique. However, thermoplastic polymers lack improved mechanical performance. For that reason, it is broadly recognized that there is a vast development increase in composite 3D printing filaments for complex applications as a consequence of their superb mechanical properties. In particular, the inclusion of advanced additives in the polymer matrix such as carbon fibers and glass fibers could improve/enhance the mechanical properties of 3D-printed structures.
For instance, Anwer et al. [1] investigated the mechanical behavior of composite PLA reinforced with carbon nanofiber (CNF) specimens in different concentrations, particularly in 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 wt%. The tensile modulus constantly increased with an increase in carbon nanofiber content (CNF) in the polymer matrix from PLA, reaching an increase of 42% for 15% wt CNF content compared to neat PLA. However, the tensile strength of composite specimens increased slightly up to 3 wt% carbon nanofiber content and then acquired a constant value—about 80 MPa for a higher CNF content in the PLA polymeric matrix. This is because tensile strength depends much more on the strength of the matrix-reinforcing component interface than the measure of elastic modulus. The CNF-PLA interface was not strong, and for this reason, there was fiber disconnection. Therefore, the weak shear strength of the surfaces is probably the reason why the tensile strength did not show a significant increase in higher CNF contents.
Yao et al. [2] studied the mechanical properties of printed carbon-fiber-reinforced PLA structures. Based on the results of the uniaxial tensile and three-point flexural tests, the continuous carbon fibers significantly improved the mechanical strength of the 3D-printed structures; particularly, an increase of over 70% was observed for the tensile strength and 18.7% for the flexural strength, respectively. Also, a weight reduction of up to 26% as well as a reduced printing time of up to 11.41% was achieved without reducing the tensile strength.
According to a study by Ferreira et al. [3], the incorporation of short carbon fibers (CFs) into the PLA polymer matrix resulted in an increase in the elastic modulus of the test specimens compared to unfilled thermoplastic PLA specimens in both the 0° and 90° printing directions, respectively. In particular, the value of the elastic modulus for PLA without any addition was equal to 3376 MPa, and after carbon fiber reinforcement, the value of the elastic modulus reached 7541 MPa for a print direction at 0°. As in the print direction of 0°, the print direction of 90° revealed an increase in the elastic modulus with the inclusion of carbon fibers in the polymeric PLA matrix; specifically, the elastic modulus of the neat PLA, which was equal to 3125 MPa, increased to 3920 MPa. Regarding the tensile strength, the results of the study showed that for both the 0° and 90° printing directions, the admixture of carbon fibers in the PLA polymer matrix did not lead to an increase in strength compared to PLA without any addition. In contrast, the tensile strength of neat PLA for both print directions was slightly higher than that of PLA/CF.
Shofner et al. [4] fabricated composite specimens from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) reinforced with carbon nanofibers through the fused filament fabrication (FFF) method. The results revealed that there was an average increase of 39% and 60% in tensile strength and tensile modulus, respectively, for 10 wt% of carbon nanofibers, compared to ABS specimens without any inclusions. Also, the composite specimens showed a drastic reduction in elongation at failure, as the breaking mode changed from ductile to brittle. The brittle behavior resulted from the low resistance to fiber detachment as well as the reduced fusion between the layers.
Yang et al. [5] manufactured composite specimens using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) reinforced with 10 wt% carbon fiber via 3D printing. The flexural and tensile strength of the composite test specimens was improved and increased by 127 MPa and 147 MPa, respectively, compared to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) specimens without any addition. Additionally, Tian et al. [6] fabricated specimens from continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced PLA. The results showed that in composite specimens with 27 wt% continuous carbon fiber in the polymer matrix made of PLA, the maximum flexural strength and flexural modulus were achieved, which were equal to 335 MPa and 30 GPa, respectively. Van der Klift et al. [7] printed tensile specimens of polyamide reinforced with continuous carbon fibers in different percentages. The results were quite promising for the composite specimens with the highest carbon fiber percentages, both for tensile modulus and tensile strength, respectively.
Also, Karakoç et al. [8] conducted tensile experiments to study the mechanical behavior of neat polylactic acid (PLA) test specimens, nanodiamond-enhanced polylactic acid (uDiam-PLA), polyamide without any impurity (PA6/66) and glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide (GF-PA6) specimens. According to the results, with the incorporation of nanodiamonds in the polymeric matrix of polylactic acid (PLA), there was an increase in the elastic modulus of the composite specimens, while finally, a small increase in tensile strength was observed for PLA without any addition compared to uDiam-PLA.
Liao et al. [9] fabricated composite specimens of the polyamide 12 (PA12) carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CF) matrix in various percentages (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 wt% carbon fibers) and then investigated the mechanical properties of composite specimens through tensile and flexural experiments. In these experiments, it was observed that the incorporation of carbon fibers in the polymeric matrix PA12 led to a significant increase in the tensile strength as well as the tensile modulus of composite specimens compared to PA12 without any addition. Specifically, the mixture of the polymeric matrix PA12 with 10 wt% carbon fibers led to an increase in the tensile strength of the composite specimens from 46.4 MPa to 93.8 MPa, which reflects an improvement of 102.2%. Similar to the tensile strength, in the tensile modulus, a significant increase was observed with the admixture of carbon fibers in the polymer matrix, specifically from 978.8 MPa to 3581.1 MPa. On the contrary, the elongation at break showed a sharp drop, from 192.1% to 8.1% after the addition of carbon fibers. The same work presented the bending properties of the composite specimens. The outcome disclosed that the addition of carbon fibers to the polymer matrix significantly improved the flexural strength as well as the flexural modulus of the composite specimens. By adding 10 wt% carbon fibers in the polymer matrix, an increase in flexural strength and flexural modulus was observed, particularly from 35.6 MPa to 124.9 MPa and 1178.75 MPa to 5257.6 MPa, respectively. After adding 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 wt% carbon fibers in the polymer matrix, an increase in the flexural strength of the specimens was observed by 50.0%, 98.7%, 168.4%, 203.1% and 251.1% compared to unfilled PA12 specimens, respectively. Also, the flexural modulus increased by 53.0%, 116.7%, 252.7%, 278.9% and 346.0%, respectively. The above results show that the carbon fibers effectively reinforce the polymeric matrix PA12 due to the homogeneous dispersion and the good connection between the matrix and the reinforcing component. Finally, the fracture surface of the composite specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to understand the effect of the reinforcing component on the carbon-fiber-reinforced PA12 composite specimens. SEM micrographs showed that the carbon fibers were incorporated into the polymer and covered by the matrix, facilitating the adequate transfer of the load to the carbon fibers as well as increasing the tensile strength and the tensile modulus.
Moreover, combining such advanced materials with honeycomb constructs can potentially lead to lighter and more robust structures with better mechanical behavior. Honeycombs can be utilized in sandwich structures in cases where a combination of high strength and lightweight construction is required. Polymers reinforced with fibers or particles, hard foam polymers, metals, glass fibers or stone wool impregnated with polymer resin are usually used as cores in sandwich structures.
Honeycomb structures frequently display composite orders of hierarchy while each hierarchical level affects the mechanical stability and sturdiness of the final design. Ajdari et al. [10] studied the mechanical behavior of hierarchical honeycomb structures, particularly the regular hexagonal structure (zeroth hierarchy), the first hierarchy and the second hierarchy, with the same relative density. The results of their research revealed that the honeycomb structures of the first hierarchy and the second hierarchy showed up to 2 and 3.5 times more robustness, respectively, compared to the regular hexagonal structure with the same mass (same total average density).
Mozafari et al. [11] studied the compressive behavior of foamed aluminum cellular structures and, after evaluating the results, observed much greater robustness compared to simple cellular structures. In addition, Paik et al. [12] examined the maximum strength of aluminum sandwich cellular structures of different thicknesses as well as different core heights through three-point bending and compression experiments.
Furthermore, Song et al. [13] proposed a new type of sandwich structure, in particular, the Kagome sandwich honeycomb structure. This structure had special properties, such as high strength, robustness, easy processing and low cost, but also showed a significant drawback—the ease of detachment between the outer sheets and the core as well as the weak edges, of which significantly reduced the strength and rigidity of the structure. The innovative proposal of this research is the filling of high-strength PMI foams inside the complex Kagome cellular structure to create a new type of sandwich structure. The proposed structure (PKCSS) was compared with the PMI and Kagome sandwich structures through three-point bending and compression experiments. The compressive and flexural behavior of the proposed structure was examined experimentally as well as theoretically through finite element analysis. The results showed that the proposed sandwich structure significantly improved the overall strength and robustness compared to the other two sandwich structures, with a small weight gain. Specifically, the compressive strength for the proposed sandwich structure was 420 MPa as opposed to 197 MPa for the Kagome sandwich structure and 203 MPa for the PMI sandwich structure. Also, the shear strength of the core for the proposed sandwich structure was estimated at 5.9 MPa, while for the Kagome sandwich structure, the shear strength was 2.6 MPa, and for the PMI sandwich structure, 2.9 MPa, respectively. Furthermore, the limitations of the weak ends of the Kagome cellular structure were effectively overcome. The proposed structure also presented a significantly enhanced anti-detachment capacity.
Tao et al. [14] constructed square hierarchical honeycombs using a commercial 3D printer and then studied the mechanical properties of the structures under consideration. The square hierarchical structures were constructed by replacing each cellular wall of a regular square honeycomb structure with different numbers of smaller square structures. The results revealed an increased compressive strength for the square hierarchical structures compared to the normal square structures of the same mass.
Chen et al. [15] studied a group of hierarchical metallic structures constructed by replacing the cellular walls of normal cellular structures with hexagonal, Kagome and triangular grids, respectively. The Kagome structures and triangular hierarchical structures showed remarkable mechanical properties, and in particular, increased robustness and strength compared to normal cellular structures. Their analysis revealed that the improved mechanical properties of the examined hierarchical structures are attributed to the introduction of the structural hierarchy.
Harizi et al. [16] investigated the flexural behavior of various carbon-fiber-reinforced sandwich composite thermoplastic structures through three-point bending tests. The outer sheets (skins) were made of thermoplastic polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) carbon-fiber-reinforced resin. Also, different core materials (Nomex, aluminum and polyetherimide PEI) with different topological characteristics (honeycomb, straight tubular and inclined tubular at 15°) and two different densities (48 and 64 kg/m3) were used to construct the examined sandwich structures. The results showed that the sandwich structure with aluminum core showed the highest stiffness compared to the other sandwich structures. However, the sandwich structures with a PEI core showed the highest plasticity.
Sun et al. [17] investigated the mechanical properties of sandwich structures with an aluminum honeycomb core through compressive and three-point bending experiments. The experimental results showed that the fracture and reliability of the sandwich structures were significantly affected by the structural parameters under the three-point bending test. They also found that compressive behavior can be influenced by structural parameters as well as the gluing parameters in the compression test. Based on the experimental results, theoretical solutions were defined for the three-point bending experiment to predict the maximum load, energy absorption and fracture mode.
Sun et al. [18] studied the mechanical behavior of three sandwich structures with carbon-fiber-reinforced sheets. Specifically, the three examined sandwich structures were first the sandwich structure with a honeycomb core, then the lattice sandwich structure and finally the sandwich structure with a combination of a honeycomb and lattice core. The honeycomb and lattice core of the examined sandwich structures was made of aluminum. The experimental results of the research revealed that sandwich specimens with a combination of honeycomb and lattice core presented high strength, robustness and energy absorption capacity, which are particularly features for a variety of aerospace applications, the automotive industry and in other sectors where the use of lightweight structures with superior mechanical properties are considered necessary. Also, the results of research disclosed that the interaction between the honeycomb and the lattice core provided a high tolerance for damage compared to the single core. The combination of honeycomb and lattice core prevented both interfacial detachment and local buckling of the core. A finite element model (FEM) was then proposed for the calculation of a critical bending load of sandwich structures with a combination of honeycomb and lattice core. Finally, the experimental and theoretical outcomes divulged that the sandwich structure with a combination of honeycomb and lattice core can offer improved structural properties for various mechanical constructions.
Chen et al. [19] designed and manufactured a new class of hierarchical honeycomb structures through 3D printing. Then, there was an investigation of the compressive behavior of the new order of hierarchical honeycomb structures, which was created after the replacement of the cellular walls of the regular honeycomb structure with triangular grids. The proposed hierarchical honeycomb structures presented particularly increased stiffness as well as improved energy absorption capacity under uniaxial compression. Specifically, it was observed that the stiffness of the hierarchical honeycomb structures is 6.6 times higher than that of the regular honeycomb structure, for the same relative density (ρ/ρs = 0.16) in both cases. The improved stiffness and energy absorption capacity of hierarchical honeycomb structures were related to the introduction of the internal triangular lattice structure into the regular honeycomb structure. In addition, the hierarchical honeycomb structures presented high energy dispersion and shape integrity in large, imposed deformations (up to 60%) under cyclic loading.
This work presents a research study that investigates the mechanical and dynamic behavior of 3D-printed materials and hierarchical honeycombs made from PLA, PLA/uDiamond, and PLA/CF. It is widely acknowledged that using standardized testing protocols for the mechanical characterization of materials is important. ASTM D638, for example, is commonly employed for testing the tensile properties of plastics. This test, although basic and commonly used in the literature, does not provide any experimental testing novelty. In the current study, the focus was on more advanced materials testing procedures such as nanoindentation, quasi-static and cyclic compression, as well as modal analysis testing along with testing of complex hierarchical sandwich structures. These tests offer unique and interesting research data to the readers. Furthermore, these advanced experimental tests hold potential for further exploitation in the future with different materials. The investigation also involves a combination of experimental tests and simulations, which can provide valuable insights into the design and development of new and improved materials for various applications. The results of this study demonstrate the potential benefits of using nanodiamonds and hierarchical structures to enhance the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials, which can have important implications for the field of materials science and engineering.

2. Materials and Test Methods

2.1. Materials and Fabrication of Examined Specimens

The materials utilized in the present study are polylactic acid (PLA), PLA reinforced with nanodiamonds (PLA/uD, Carbodeon Ltd., Vantaa, Finland), whose weight percentage is 0.5 wt%, as well as PLA reinforced with carbon fibers (PLA/CF) in a weight percentage of 15%. The fabrication of 3D-printed specimens was achieved through a commercial open-source Ultimaker 2+ 3D printer via the fused filament fabrication (FFF) method. The examined specimens were cylindrical with a diameter and thickness of 29 mm and 12.5 mm, respectively. In addition, the Ultimaker Cura software (Ultimaker, Utrecht, The Netherlands) was used to define the printing parameters of the printed specimens. Some basic printing parameters used in the current paper were a 2.85 mm extrusion nozzle; a nozzle diameter of 0.6 mm, which was made of hardened steel for the abrasive reinforcing nanoparticles and fibers used; a printing temperature of 200–240 °C; a build-plate temperature of 55–90 °C and a print speed of 35 mm/s. In particular, the printing and build-plate temperatures for the PLA specimens were 200 °C and 60 °C, respectively. Also, the printing and build-plate temperatures for PLA/uD specimens were 240 °C and 55 °C, respectively, while the respective temperatures for PLA/CF were 230 °C and 90 °C.

2.2. Design and Manufacturing of Printed Hierarchical Honeycomb Structures + SKINS

Hierarchical honeycomb structures were designed in Solidworks™ CAD software (Dassault Systemes, SolidWorks Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) and exported as an STL file. The manufacturing of FFF-printed honeycomb structures was accomplished by using a commercial open-source BCN3D Sigma R17 (BCN3D, Barcelona, Spain) 3D printer with a 2.85 mm extrusion nozzle; Ultimaker Cura was used as slicing software. The deposition line (layer) had a height of 0.2 mm, and the deposition line width was 0.4 mm. The selection of a constant extrusion velocity for all specimens was based on device parameters, and the deposition speed was not varied in this study. It is worth noting that high printing speeds have been reported to cause adhesion problems in 3D printing, which could negatively impact the mechanical properties of the printed parts [20]. Therefore, the optimal printing speed of 40 mm/s for manufacturing the honeycomb cores was carefully chosen to ensure proper adhesion and mechanical performance. Additionally, all specimens were fabricated in room temperature conditions. The final FFF-printed core of the sandwich structures had a length of 190 mm, width of 90 mm and height of approximately 18 mm. The composite skins were manufactured using an epoxy resin EPIKOTE™ Resin 828 LVEL hardened with the appropriate amount of EPIKURE™ Curing Agent 866 and EPIKURE™ Catalyst 101 reinforced with TORAYCA T700S twill carbon fiber materials. Three layers of 0.3 mm thick were vacuum-infused with the epoxy resin, achieving a thickness of 1 mm. A symmetrical composite-woven laminate was formed with a stacking sequence of ±45°, 0°/90°, ±45°. The composite skins were glued, using an epoxy paste, to the 3D-printed hierarchical cores, as portrayed in Figure 1.

2.3. Compressive Experiments

The compressive behavior of the printed specimens was evaluated by a universal mechanical testing machine (Testometric M500-50 AT, Rochdale, United Kingdom) equipped with a 50 kN load cell. For each material, five sets of compressive tests were performed to obtain a satisfactory approach. The experiments were performed at a strain rate of 5 mm/min.

2.4. Cyclic Compressive Experiments

Cyclic compression tests were conducted with a constant strain rate for the loading and unloading phase, and all experiments were performed at an ambient temperature. In particular, all measurements were performed using the same testing machine as compressive experiments with a peak load up to 5 kN and a frequency of 0.01 Hz. The speed of the load cell during the loading and unloading phase was set constant with an exact value of 5 mm/min. In addition, the dimensions of the 3D-printed cylindrical samples for cyclic compression testing were the same as those used in compressive tests. At least five 3D-printed samples were investigated under the cyclic compressive regime. In this quasi-static regime, the stress–strain performance was acquired during the loading–unloading stage, and all of the samples displayed hysteretic behavior. The energy loss in each loading cycle was measured by the area of the corresponding hysteresis loops.

2.5. Nanoindentation Experiment

The nanomechanical properties of PLA, PLA reinforced with nanodiamonds (PLA/uD), and PLA reinforced with carbon fiber (PLA/CF) filaments were investigated using nanoindentation. A dynamic ultra-microhardness tester DUH-211 (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) utilizing a 100 nm radius triangular pyramid indenter tip (Berkovich-type indenter) was used to determine the mechanical performance of PLA nanocomposites. During nanoindentation testing, a controlled load with a peak load of 20 mN was applied through a diamond tip on the surface of the nanocomposite filaments and was held for 3 s. As a function of load, the indentation depth was recorded. The indenter was then unloaded, resulting in a load of zero. During the creep time, the maximum indentation load was applied to the indenter. The average value of ten measurements was used to calculate the modulus and hardness.

2.6. Modal Tests

An impact hammer with a high-quality piezoelectric force transducer (Endevco Model 2302-10, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA) was used to give the input load (pulse) to the specimen. The output was captured by an acceleration transducer with a sensitivity of 100 mV/g, Brüel & Kjaer 4507 B (Nærum, Denmark), mounted on the free end, while the sensing cables were kept in a free state to have little influence on the vibration test. Both the force and acceleration signals were acquired and amplified by a PULSE analyzer by Brüel & Kjaer (Nærum, Denmark), and the corresponding results were recorded on a computer. The frequency span of acceleration signals was up to 3200 Hz, the sampling time interval was 0.12207 μs and the sampling frequency was 8192 samples per second (Hz). Thus, the FFT resolution for a block size of 8192 samples was 1 Hz. The resolution of the analytical transfer function was the same as the experimental for the identification procedure. The modal hammer was calibrated by adjusting the level of the signal trigger force. Each specimen was tested 10 times and linear averaging was performed.

2.7. Bending Tests Augmented by FEA

The bending behavior of the optimal AM-produced sandwiches with hierarchical honeycombs structures in various core hierarchies was investigated using the universal testing machine Testometric-M500-50AT equipped with a 50 kN load cell with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. All specimens were tested at a room temperature of about 22–23 °C. The dimensions of the produced parts for the three-point bending tests were 190 × 90 × 20 mm. It is worth mentioning that all experiments were performed three times to secure the reliability and repeatability of the experimental bending results. The setup of the sandwich structures simply supported on the 10 mm pins and loaded by a 10 mm pin is shown in Figure 2a.
To advance the calculation accuracy of the bending tests, a finite element analysis (FEA) model was developed [21,22,23]. A structural FE analysis based on the ANSYS code (Ansys® Academic Research Mechanical, Release 23.1) was utilized to investigate the deformation process of 3D-printed bending honeycomb structures and to extract a constitutive model of their mechanical behavior. Different material parameters were assumed in order to fit the experimental mechanical response of the honeycomb sandwich structures under bending in terms of force–displacement. The mechanical behavior of the carbon skins was modeled linearly with an upper strength limit that was defined by the tensile tests, while the PLA honeycomb core was defined by a bilinear stress–strain model. An imposed displacement was applied for each structure. This value corresponds to an experimental displacement from the bending tests. This procedure was repeated until the last pair of force–depth values were converged, and the solution process ended. The connections of the steel support, the loading pin and the sandwich specimens’ surface were assumed to be frictionless. The surfaces under the supports were considered fixed. The FE model along with the corresponding discretization is shown in Figure 2b. The FFF printing defects were neglected during the simulation.

3. Results

3.1. Mechanical Behavior of PLA Composite Materials

Figure 3 displays the stress–strain curves of unmodified PLA-, CF- and uD-filled polymer matrix 3D-printed specimens under uniaxial compression. Table 1 shows that the incorporation of carbon fibers (CF) and nanodiamonds (uD) resulted in significant enhancements of the elastic modulus of the PLA matrix. Specifically, the elastic modulus increased up to 5452 MPa and 6250 MPa with the addition of CF and uD, respectively, while the elastic modulus of unfilled PLA was calculated to be 2684 MPa. The addition of CF in PLA resulted in an increase of 103%, whereas the incorporation of uD resulted in an increase of 132% compared to the printed specimens of unmodified PLA. The yield strength of PLA specimens was calculated to be 20 MPa.
Figure 4 demonstrates the typical hysteresis loop curves of 3D-printed composite specimens under compressive vibration at 0.01 Hz with a maximum load of 5 kN. The area within the hysteresis loop is related to the loss energy. For polymeric damping materials, a larger hysteresis loop represents higher damping, meaning that it can efficiently reduce the level of vibration [24]. The damping parameters may be extracted by the area enclosed by the hysteresis loops. Based on the free vibration model, the vibration isolation capacity of materials can be determined from the hysteresis damping characteristics.
The specific damping capacity (SDC) is given by:
SDC = Δ W   W   ×   100 % = ( σ d ε   / ω t = 0 π / 2 σ d ε )   ×   100 %
where σ defines the stress, ∆W represents the energy dissipated in any one cycle and W corresponds to the maximum energy related to that cycle [25]. The damping capacity can be associated with the loss factor [26,27,28] by the following equation:
n = Δ W 2 π   W
Considering Equations (1) and (2), the energy loss over a cycle (∆W), the maximum energy of that cycle (W) and the loss factor (n) were calculated to measure the material damping of the loading–unloading experiments, as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, ∆W denotes that the antivibration property of PLA/CFs and PLA/uD is increased as compared to unfilled PLA. Although the ∆W was decreased with the addition of CFs into PLA, the W property was decreased, leading to a higher loss factor. The ∆W property was slightly decreased for PLA/uD; however, the highest loss factor was achieved due to the simultaneous decrease in W energy in the PLA/uD system. This decrease in W energy can be attributed to a higher stiffness of PLA/uD compared to PLA specimens. Therefore, the PLA/CF and PLA/uD materials are expected to improve the ability to transform its kinetic energy to thermal dissipation upon the application of an external force. The highest damping constant n, which is the ratio of ∆W to W, was calculated for PLA/uD specimens. This observation shows faster energy dissipation at particular vibration amplitudes, and the system becomes stable with less vibration cycles. The loss factor for the PLA specimens was calculated to be 3.0%, a slight increase for PLA/CF specimens was measured to be 30%, and the highest loss factor was obtained for PLA/uD specimens, which was 6.2%. The addition of CF indicated a 48% increase in the loss factor of the unmodified PLA. The highest percentage increase in damping was achieved by PLA/uD specimens, with a value of 106%.
The typical load–depth curves of the printed PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD specimens from the nanoindentation tests are shown in Figure 5. The load–depth curves were obtained during the loading and unloading of the indenter against the surface of the printed specimens. The nanoindentation load–penetration depth curves of the FFF-printed specimens demonstrate a creep phenomenon at a peak load of 20 mN. There were no discrepancies in creep behavior among the 3D-printed specimens since no discontinuities or step loading were identified on the curves, revealing that no cracks were developed throughout the nanoindentation procedure. In addition, the maximum indentation depths at the peak load of 20 mN varied approximately between 1.6 and 2.2 μm. The highest depth was observed for the PLA specimens without any addition, where the indenter reached an average depth value of 2.2 μm.
The PLA/CF specimens showed an average depth value of 1.85 μm. The most robust behavior was found in the case of the PLA/uD specimens, where the mean depth value was measured at 1.69 μm. Also, the indentation E-modulus of the unmodified PLA specimens was 3535 MPa. After the incorporation of carbon fiber (CF) and nanodiamonds (uD) into the PLA polymeric matrix, there was an increase in the elastic modulus equal to 5994 and 6934 MPa, respectively, which corresponds to an increase of 69% and 96%, respectively. The E-modulus values are in agreement with the corresponding values calculated from the uniaxial compressive experiments. Finally, the hardness of unmodified PLA was 142.7 MPa, and the values of PLA/CF and PLA/uD were 280.2 MPa (96% increase) and 393.1 MPa (175% increase), respectively.
Figure 6 displays the micrographs of the polymeric matrix PLA with carbon fiber (PLA/CF) and nanodiamonds (PLA/uD) as reinforcing components from the compression specimens using a Phenom ProX (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) scanning electron microscope. Only a few microfibers are visible and protruding, indicating that the microfibers mix well with the matrix. The interface of the polylactic acid polymeric matrix (PLA) with the carbon fiber reinforcing agent (CF) is quite good with a few peripheral fibers peeling, as shown in Figure 6a. The porosity that appears in the micrographs is essentially black holes from areas where there were fibers, but they came off (extraction process) during the preparation of the specimen. Some larger non-symmetrical grooves (ellipsoid with large diameter) come from trapped moisture that evaporated at high print temperatures. The nanocomposite material from nanodiamond-enhanced polylactic acid (PLA/uD) is shown in Figure 6b,c. The roughness of the surface is evident due to the reinforcement with diamond nanoparticles. A good dispersion is observed between the PLA polymeric matrix and the nanodiamond reinforcement component, where the additives appear as flakes, which in the literature, have a thickness of a few nanometers [8]. However, there are areas with visible microcrystals that are agglomerates of crystal flakes, as shown in Figure 6c.

3.2. Modal Behavior of PLA Composite Hierarchical Structures

The experimental apparatus for the forced vibration tests is shown in Figure 7, where the specimen is clamped on rigid support as a cantilever beam and vibrated by the impact hammer with a high-quality piezoelectric force transducer. To obtain the specimen’s modal properties from the transient vibration, the Fourier transforms of both the excitation and response signals were calculated. The ratio of response to excitation functions is computed to obtain an expression from the corresponding transfer function. The response can be calculated in terms of displacement, velocity or acceleration, and as a result, different terms have been used for the ratios of response to force. This study is focused on displacement responses and any reference to the TF expresses the receptance (dynamic compliance) of the system. The displacement is determined through a double integration process of the experimental data of the accelerometer sensor. High pass filters have been used to remove the direct current (DC) components and avoid the integrated errors. Thus, the ratio of the resulting displacement to the applied force is computed in order to obtain the receptance transfer function.
The analytical functions identified the resonance in all three important flexural modes. These mathematically synthesized transfer functions contain all the important resonance information, while interpolation among measured data is considered satisfactory. Figure 8 shows the comparison between the identified and measured complex TFs of the specimens. The identified resonant frequencies of the specimens with different inclusions are shown in a table superimposed in Figure 8. It is obvious that the frequencies of the first mode increase with respect to the hierarchy level. This was expected since the level of hierarchy increases the stiffness of the whole structure in the concept of optimization of the sandwich beams for industrial applications.

3.3. Bending Behavior of PLA Composite Hierarchical Honeycomb Sandwich Structures

The result of stiffening from zero to the second-level hierarchy has also been investigated to determine the stress performance of 3D-printed hierarchical honeycombs. The maximum forces observed from the three-point bending experiments for the nanodiamond-reinforced PLA polymer matrix nanocomposite (PLA/uD) were 2525 N, 2895 N and 3158 N for the regular hexagonal structure (zero hierarchy), the first hierarchy and the second hierarchy, respectively, as shown in Figure 9. The flexural strength for the nanodiamond-reinforced PLA polymer matrix (PLA/uD) hierarchical sandwich structures were similar and were determined to be 1712 N/mm, 1815 N/mm and 1783 N/mm for the regular hexagonal structure (zero hierarchy), the first hierarchy and the second hierarchy, respectively.
The stress distribution was achieved by curve-fitting the compressive experimental results with FEA-generated data. To ensure the mesh-independent response, a convergence study was performed. The accuracy of the mesh sensitivity is also determined by the curve-fitting of the experimental force–displacement data. Based on the convergence results performed for an elastic response of the honeycomb structures, a minimum element size of 0.86 mm was considered to be adequate to obtain acceptable accuracy in the calculated responses. In the current FE analyses, up to 123,583 nodes and 17,687 hexahedral elements (SOLID186) were used for the generated mesh. The degrees of freedom for each node for SOLID186 is three. The curve-fitted force–displacement data obtained from the FEA are shown in Figure 9, where it can clearly be seen that these values agree with the measured curves. Therefore, the initial values of the multilinear stress–strain model of the honeycomb structures were correct assumptions. While it is commonly suggested to construct stress–strain curves, it is important to note that in this particular case, by involving a complex structure comprising a hierarchically designed core and composite skins with carbon fibers at various orientations, the process of generating an experimental stress–strain curve becomes highly intricate. Thus, it is evident that exploring this subject in a future paper holds significant potential. The PLA/uD-sandwich-type hierarchical cellular structures reinforced with carbon fibers resulted in an increase in flexural strength, giving maximum stress values of 256.55 MPa, 391.43 MPa and 399.12 MPa for zeroth, first and second hierarchy, respectively, as shown in Figure 10. The contribution of the skins is essential for the structural integrity of the specimens. The carbon fiber skin panels reinforced the bending strength of the PLA honeycombs, since the maximum stress observed for the PLA (without skins) was calculated to be 1.73 MPa and the corresponding responses for the zeroth-, first- and second-level hierarchies of the sandwich structures were reported to be 2.20, 2.90 and 3.33 MPa, respectively [21]. Compared to other studies [20,21,22,29], the sandwich structures of honeycomb composites of the current work showed improved physical and mechanical properties with a greater increase in flexural strength.

4. Conclusions

This paper aimed to investigate the mechanical behavior of FFF 3D-printed specimens of PLA, PLA/uDiamond and PLA/CF, as well as the dynamic behavior of hierarchical honeycombs made from these materials. Through various experimental tests and simulations, the results demonstrated that the incorporation of nanodiamonds into the PLA matrix significantly enhanced the elastic modulus, strength and hardness of the 3D-printed specimens. Furthermore, the second order of the PLA/uD hierarchical sandwich structure showed increased strength, elastic modulus and flexural modulus compared to the zeroth and first hierarchies. Finally, the second order of the PLA/uD honeycomb structure demonstrated the largest increase in stiffness when compared to PLA nanocomposite filaments. The type and amount of filler, as well as processing conditions such as temperature, pressure and time, can affect the mechanical and thermal properties of the composite materials; they will be the subject of a future study. The improved elastic modulus, strength and hardness of 3D-printed PLA specimens reinforced with nanodiamonds and carbon fibers could provide advantages in specific industries, such as aerospace or automotive industries. The increased stiffness and strength of these materials could lead to the production of lighter, more durable and fuel-efficient aircraft or automotive components. Additionally, the use of hierarchical honeycomb structures could lead to improved performance in dynamic applications, such as sports equipment. The increased stiffness of the hierarchical honeycomb structures could result in better shock absorption and impact resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.M., K.T. and D.T.; methodology, D.T. and K.T.; software, K.T.; validation, M.T.M., K.T. and D.T.; formal analysis, M.T.M.; investigation, M.T.M.; resources, M.T.M.; data curation, M.T.M. and D.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.M.; writing—review and editing, K.T. and D.T.; supervision, K.T. and D.T.; project administration, D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank B&T composites Company (https://www.btcomposites.gr/ accessed on 10 July 2023) for providing the carbon fiber skins for the sandwich composite hierarchical honeycomb structures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anwer, M.A.S.; Naguib, H.E. Study on the morphological, dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of PLA carbon nanofibre composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 91, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yao, X.; Luan, C.; Zhang, D.; Lan, L.; Fu, J. Evaluation of carbon fiber-embedded 3D printed structures for strengthening and structural-health monitoring. Mater. Des. 2017, 114, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferreira, R.T.L.; Amatte, I.C.; Dutra, T.A.; Bürger, D. Experimental characterization and micrography of 3D printed PLA and PLA reinforced with short carbon fibers. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 124, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shofner, M.L.; Lozano, K.; Rodriguez-Macias, F.J.; Barrera, E.V. Nanofiber-reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 3081–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, C.; Tian, X.; Liu, T.; Cao, Y.; Li, D. 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: Mechanism and performance. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2017, 23, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, X.; Liu, T.; Yang, C.; Wang, Q.; Li, D. Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 88, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van der Klift, F.; Koga, Y.; Todoroki, A.; Ueda, M.; Hirano, Y.; Matsuzaki, R. 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermo-plastic (CFRTP) tensile test specimens. Open J. Compos. Mater. 2016, 6, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karakoç, A.; Rastogi, V.K.; Isoaho, T.; Tardy, B.; Paltakari, J.; Rojas, O.J. Comparative Screening of the Structural and Thermomechanical Properties of FDM Filaments Comprising Thermoplastics Loaded with Cellulose, Carbon and Glass Fibers. Materials 2020, 13, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liao, G.; Li, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhu, D.; Jiang, S.; Guo, J.; Chen, X.; Xu, G.; Zhu, Y. Properties of oriented carbon fiber/polyamide 12 composite parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater. Des. 2018, 139, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ajdari, A.; Jahromi, B.H.; Papadopoulos, J.; Nayeb-Hashemi, H.; Vaziri, A. Hierarchical honeycombs with tailorable properties. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2012, 49, 1413–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mozafari, H.; Molatefi, H.; Crupi, V.; Epasto, G.; Guglielmino, E. In plane compressive response and crushing of foam filled aluminum honeycombs. J. Compos. Mater. 2015, 49, 3215–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paik, J.K.; Thayamballi, A.K.; Kim, G.S. The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Thin-Walled Struct. 1999, 35, 205–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Song, S.; Xiong, C.; Zheng, J.; Yin, J.; Zou, Y.; Zhu, X. Compression, bending, energy absorption properties, and failure modes of composite Kagome honeycomb sandwich structure reinforced by PMI foams. Compos. Struct. 2021, 277, 114611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tao, Y.; Li, W.; Wei, K.; Duan, S.; Wen, W.; Chen, L.; Pei, Y.; Fang, D. Mechanical properties and energy absorption of 3D printed square hierarchical honeycombs under in-plane axial compression. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 176, 107219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Y.; Jia, Z.; Wang, L. Hierarchical honeycomb lattice metamaterials with improved thermal resistance and mechanical properties. Compos. Struct. 2016, 152, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Harizi, W.; Anjoul, J.; Acosta Santamaría, V.A.; Aboura, Z.; Briand, V. Mechanical behavior of carbon-reinforced thermoplastic sandwich composites with several core types during three-point bending tests. Compos. Struct. 2021, 262, 113590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, G.; Huo, X.; Chen, D.; Li, Q. Experimental and numerical study on honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and in-panel compression. Mater. Des. 2017, 133, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, Z.; Shi, S.; Guo, X.; Hu, X.; Chen, H. On compressive properties of composite sandwich structures with grid reinforced honeycomb core. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 94, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Li, T.; Jia, Z.; Scarpa, F.; Yao, C.W.; Wang, L. 3D printed hierarchical honeycombs with shape integrity under large compressive deformations. Mater. Des. 2018, 137, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hsueh, M.-H.; Lai, C.-J.; Chung, C.-F.; Wang, S.-H.; Huang, W.-C.; Pan, C.-Y.; Zeng, Y.-S.; Hsieh, C.-H. Effect of Printing Parameters on the Tensile Properties of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) Based on Fused Deposition Modeling. Polymers 2021, 13, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kladovasilakis, N.; Charalampous, P.; Tsongas, K.; Kostavelis, I.; Tzetzis, D.; Tzovaras, D. Experimental and Computational Investigation of Lattice Sandwich Structures Constructed by Additive Manufacturing Technologies. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2021, 5, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zoumaki, M.; Mansour, M.T.; Tsongas, K.; Tzetzis, D.; Mansour, G. Mechanical Characterization and Finite Element Analysis of Hierarchical Sandwich Structures with PLA 3D-Printed Core and Composite Maize Starch Biodegradable Skins. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Giarmas, E.; Tsongas, K.; Tzimtzimis, E.K.; Korlos, A.; Tzetzis, D. Mechanical and FEA-Assisted Characterization of 3D Printed Continuous Glass Fiber Reinforced Nylon Cellular Structures. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sperling, L.H. Introduction to Physical Polymer Science, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rao, S.S. Mechanical Vibrations, 5th ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tsongas, K.; Tzetzis, D.; Mansour, G. Mechanical and vibration isolation behaviour of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber/multwalled carbon nanotube composite machine mounts. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2017, 46, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mansour, G.; Tsongas, K.; Tzetzis, D.; Tzikas, K. Dynamic mechanical characterization of polyurethane/multi-walled carbon nanotube composite thermoplastic elastomers. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2017, 56, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mansour, G.; Tsongas, K.; Tzetzis, D. Modal testing of nanocomposite materials through an optimization algorithm. Measurement 2016, 91, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meifeng, H.; Wenbin, H. A study on composite honeycomb sandwich panel structure. Compos. B Eng. 2008, 58, 709–713. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Unit cell honenycomb hierarcies and assembly of a sandwich structure with a 3D-printed core.
Figure 1. Unit cell honenycomb hierarcies and assembly of a sandwich structure with a 3D-printed core.
Jcs 07 00285 g001
Figure 2. (a) CAD geometry of the PLA honeycomb structure illustrated with a zero level of hierarchy (regular honeycomb) and (b) the corresponding mesh used in finite element analysis.
Figure 2. (a) CAD geometry of the PLA honeycomb structure illustrated with a zero level of hierarchy (regular honeycomb) and (b) the corresponding mesh used in finite element analysis.
Jcs 07 00285 g002
Figure 3. Stress–strain curves from the compression testing experiments.
Figure 3. Stress–strain curves from the compression testing experiments.
Jcs 07 00285 g003
Figure 4. Hysteresis loops of PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD 3D-printed specimens.
Figure 4. Hysteresis loops of PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD 3D-printed specimens.
Jcs 07 00285 g004
Figure 5. Load–depth curves of PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD FFF-printed specimens.
Figure 5. Load–depth curves of PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD FFF-printed specimens.
Jcs 07 00285 g005
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) PLA/CF and (b,c) PLA/uD materials.
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) PLA/CF and (b,c) PLA/uD materials.
Jcs 07 00285 g006
Figure 7. Experimental setup of the modal testing of the hierarchical honeycomb beams.
Figure 7. Experimental setup of the modal testing of the hierarchical honeycomb beams.
Jcs 07 00285 g007
Figure 8. Transfer functions along the resonance frequencies of the PLA and nanodiamond PLA core structures.
Figure 8. Transfer functions along the resonance frequencies of the PLA and nanodiamond PLA core structures.
Jcs 07 00285 g008
Figure 9. Force–displacement graphs and curve-fitted data obtained from the FEA of the hierarchical PLA/uD honeycombs under bending loads.
Figure 9. Force–displacement graphs and curve-fitted data obtained from the FEA of the hierarchical PLA/uD honeycombs under bending loads.
Jcs 07 00285 g009
Figure 10. Equivalent stress distribution for all the levels of hierarchical sandwich PLA/uD specimens under bending load.
Figure 10. Equivalent stress distribution for all the levels of hierarchical sandwich PLA/uD specimens under bending load.
Jcs 07 00285 g010
Table 1. Compressive and nanoindentation properties of the PLA, PLA/CF, and PLA/uD specimens.
Table 1. Compressive and nanoindentation properties of the PLA, PLA/CF, and PLA/uD specimens.
MaterialsCompressionNanoindentation
E-Modulus (MPa)E-Modulus (MPa)Hardness (MPa)
PLA2684 ± 4253535 ± 500142.7 ± 33
PLA/CF5452 ± 6315994 ± 743280.2 ± 47
PLA/uD6250 ± 4876934 ± 588.4393.1 ± 61.4
Table 2. Hysteretic damping properties of the PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD 3D-printed specimens.
Table 2. Hysteretic damping properties of the PLA, PLA/CF and PLA/uD 3D-printed specimens.
MaterialsHysteretic Compression
Loss Factor, nEnergy Loss over a Cycle, ΔWMaximum Energy of That Cycle, W
PLA3.0%0.0170.178
PLA/CF3.9%0.0094620.077981
PLA/uD6.2%0.0169480.086423
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mansour, M.T.; Tsongas, K.; Tzetzis, D. Carbon-Fiber- and Nanodiamond-Reinforced PLA Hierarchical 3D-Printed Core Sandwich Structures. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7070285

AMA Style

Mansour MT, Tsongas K, Tzetzis D. Carbon-Fiber- and Nanodiamond-Reinforced PLA Hierarchical 3D-Printed Core Sandwich Structures. Journal of Composites Science. 2023; 7(7):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7070285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mansour, Michel Theodor, Konstantinos Tsongas, and Dimitrios Tzetzis. 2023. "Carbon-Fiber- and Nanodiamond-Reinforced PLA Hierarchical 3D-Printed Core Sandwich Structures" Journal of Composites Science 7, no. 7: 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7070285

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop