Next Article in Journal
Research on Quantitative Evaluation Methods of New Energy Accommodation Factors under Synergistic Scenes
Next Article in Special Issue
Reduced-Order Modeling and Control of Heat-Integrated Air Separation Column Based on Nonlinear Wave Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Bayesian Adaptive Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Chart and Paired Ranked-Based Sampling for Enhanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Process Monitoring
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater Aiming Fertilizer Production: Struvite Precipitation Optimization Using a Sequential Plackett–Burman and Doehlert Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Separation and Recovery of Rare Earths and Iron from NdFeB Magnet Scraps

1
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Flash Green Development and Recycling, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
2
Faculty of Materials Metallurgy and Chemistry, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
3
School of Material Science and Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China
4
Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(10), 2895; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102895
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 24 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 30 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Separation and Purification Processes)

Abstract

:
NdFeB magnet scraps contain large amounts of iron, which poses challenges in recycling and greatly hinders the recovery of rare earths through direct hydrometallurgical treatment. To address this issue, we conducted tests using a flash furnace to explore the low-temperature reduction behavior of NdFeB magnet scraps under an H2 atmosphere based on thermodynamic calculations comparing the reduction properties of rare earth oxides (REOs) and iron oxide (FeOx). The results demonstrated that the reduction rate of FeOx surpassed 95% under optimal conditions including a reduction temperature of 723 K, a particle size (D90) of 0.45 μm, and an H2 flow rate of 2 L/min. X-ray diffraction and electron probe microanalysis of the reduction product revealed that the flash reduction at 723 K facilitated the selective reduction of FeOx, owing to efficient mass and heat transfer. Consequently, a two-step magnetic separation process was employed to separate metallic Fe and REOs from the reduction product. Fe-rich phase, obtained with a remarkable Fe distribution ratio of 90.2%, can serve as an economical raw material for weathering steel. Additionally, the REOs are enriched in REO-rich phase, achieving a distribution ratio of 93.9% and significantly boosting the REO concentration from 30.2 to 82.8 wt%.

1. Introduction

NdFeB magnetic materials are widely used in various high-technology fields because of their excellent remanence, magnetic energy product, and intrinsic coercivity [1,2]. NdFeB magnet scraps are primarily produced during cutting, grinding, and polishing, accounting for ~30% of raw materials in the production of magnets. According to various reports [3,4,5,6], the NdFeB magnet scraps containing ~25% rare earth and ~65% iron, which are considerably higher fractions than those found in natural ores, can thus be considered to constitute a valuable “urban mine”.
Numerous studies have been dedicated to the recycling of NdFeB magnet scraps. Several pyrometallurgical methods, such as the glass slag method [7], selective chlorination [8], and liquid metal extraction [9], have been previously explored for NdFeB recovery. However, these approaches typically involve high energy consumption and result in low yields of rare earths, leading to secondary pollution through exhaust gas and waste residue release. In contrast, hydrometallurgical techniques [10,11,12] offer distinct advantages, such as high leaching efficiencies and the production of high-purity rare earth oxide (REO) products. Among these, conventional hydrochloric acid leaching followed by extractive separation [6], commonly utilized in industries like Ganzhou YouLi Technology in Ganzhou, China, and Ji’an XinTai Technology in Ji’an, China, has been widely adopted as a method. Nonetheless, a major drawback is the incomplete recovery of the large amounts of iron present in the scraps, which makes the process cumbersome and leads to the significant generation of secondary solid waste or wastewater. Implementing a low-energy process to address these challenges by separating Fe or enriching REOs before acid leaching could greatly enhance the overall economic and environmental value of the recycling processes.
Consequently, a new process needs to be developed for effective Fe separation, particularly the simultaneous recovery of Fe resources and enrichment of REOs. Directly separating Fe2O3 and Nd2O3 via magnetic separation is difficult owing to their low-intensity magnetic difference [13,14]. However, metallic Fe and Nd2O3 are easily and selectively separated via magnetic separation. Fe2O3 is reduced in a fixed-step process [15]. Specifically, when the temperature exceeds 843 K, the path for reducing Fe2O3 is Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → FeO → Fe. When the temperature is below 843 K, the path for reducing Fe2O3 is Fe2O3 → Fe3O4 → Fe. Pineau et al. [16,17] investigated the low-temperature reduction of Fe2O3 using H2 and observed wüstite and Fe in the reduction product. Therefore, low-temperature reduction below 843 K is feasible using H2. However, a major drawback of this process is that the reduction of iron ores using H2 results in the formation of compact iron layers that can hinder the reduction rate. To avoid this, we first proposed the flash reduction technique [18,19]. The flash furnace is a new and efficient device that has been developed according to the characteristics of raw materials for reduction, oxidation, pyrolysis, and smelting. This technology, owing to its efficient mass and heat transfer and the core technology of rapid fluidized heating, has been widely applied to copper [20], iron [21], and lead [22]. However, the low-temperature reduction behavior of FeOx in NdFeB magnet scraps, particularly with efficient mass and heat transfer using a flash furnace, has not been reported thus far.
In this study, FeOx in NdFeB calcine is directly reduced under the conditions of a H2 atmosphere and then separated via magnetic separation. The flash reaction process must be comprehensively evaluated to efficiently obtain metallic Fe, especially in a short reaction time. Thermodynamic calculations are initially performed using the data in Lange’s handbook of chemistry [22,23] to predict the factors controlling the reduction of REOs or FeOx. The transformations of the Fe-containing phases are characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The effect of flash reduction, followed by magnetic separation, on the microstructure and composition is studied using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The method considered in this study can be used to recycle in addition to significantly improving the concentration of REOs. These Fe-rich phases can be utilized as inexpensive raw materials to produce weathering steel without necessitating additional pretreatments. And the influence of impurity element Fe on the subsequent recovery of REOs can be reduced.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Analysis

NdFeB magnet scraps were provided by Ganzhou YouLi Technology, Ganzhou, China. The main components, phase, and morphology of the NdFeB magnet scraps of particle size (D90) 178 μm were comprehensively characterized via roasting, degreasing, grinding, and oxidizing roasting. The phase of NdFeB calcine was confirmed using XRD (Bruker D8 ADVANCE, Karlsruhe, Germany), as shown in Figure 1a. The NdFeB calcine contains crystalline Fe2O3, Nd2O3, and a small amount of FeNdO3, respectively. The specific composition was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, IRIS Intrepid II XSP, Thermo Electron Co., Waltham, MA, USA). The NdFeB calcine contains 65.5% FeOx, 30.2% REOs, 1.6% SiO2, 0.5% CoO, 0.1% CuO, 0.3% Al2O3, 0.3% CaO, and 1.5% other. The morphologies and compositions of the underflow samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS, MLA650F, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) and EPMA (EPMA-8050G, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), as shown in Figure 1b,c. The calcined NdFeB exhibits a dense morphology, and the REOs and Fe regions are closely linked.

2.2. Experimental Apparatus and Procedure

Initially, the specific particle size of the material is obtained via high-energy ball milling with a 20:1 ball/materials ratio (FRITSCH P6, Hamburg, Germany), and the particle size analysis is carried out using a laser particle size analyzer (Mastersizer 3000, Malvan, UK). As shown in Figure 2, a flash furnace (Φ127 mm × h3000 mm), which was fabricated to be custom-made, is used to selectively reduce FeOx from 100 g of the raw material in several seconds (~5 s). Because the equipment is a flash furnace and the mass of reaction material is just 100 g, the reduction process is approximately identified as a constant temperature process. The reduction temperature is increased according to the desired heating program, using a mixed gas of H2 (30%) and N2 (70%) as the reducing atmosphere. Using the feeding system of the flash furnace, the NdFeB calcine with a carrier gas (N2, 0.3 L/min) is sprayed and dispersed into the reaction tower under the combined force of the hot gas flow of the reducing atmosphere, gravity of the sample, and impulse of the carrier gas. The reduction product obtained from the collector is cooled to room temperature and undergoes a two-step wet magnetic separation process. For this purpose, an XCRS-74 magnetic tube (manufactured by Hengshun, Chongqing, China) with varying magnetic field intensities is employed to recover metallic Fe. The first step involves high-intensity (≥100 mT) magnetic separation to achieve a high yield of metallic Fe, while the second step involves low-intensity (<100 mT) magnetic separation to attain a high degree of metallic Fe. The resulting magnetic and nonmagnetic products are referred to as metallic Fe (Fe-rich phase) and the REO-rich phase, respectively.
The reduction rate of FeOx (η) is calculated using Equation (1):
η = (mr/mc) × 100%
where mr is the mass of metallic Fe after reduction (g), and mc is the total content of Fe in the NdFeB calcine before reduction (g).
The yield of Fe (x) is defined using Equation (2),
x = (mi/mt) × 100%
where mi is the mass (g) of the Fe-rich phase after magnetic separation, and mt is the total mass (g) of the NdFeB calcine before magnetic separation.
The distribution ratios of Fe (yf) and REOs (ye) are then defined using Equations (3) and (4), respectively.
yf = (mf × af/(mf × af + me × bf)) × 100%
ye = (me × ce/(mf × de + me × ce)) × 100%
where mf/me is the mass (g) of the Fe-rich/REO phase after magnetic separation; af/bf is the mass fraction of Fe in Fe-rich/REO-rich phase; and de/ce is the mass fraction of REOs in Fe-rich/REO-rich phase.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermodynamic Analysis

The main phases of the NdFeB calcine determined through the raw material source and XRD analysis are listed with the corresponding reduction reaction of flash reduction via H2 in Table 1. However, thermodynamic data on FeNdO3 are inadequate due to their low content in terms of the NdFeB calcine; thus, these results are primarily used for the H2-based reduction of FeOx and Nd2O3, the latter representing REOs. Thermodynamic calculations were performed using the date in Lange’s handbook of chemistry [23] to predict the factors (such as temperature and reductant concentration) controlling the reduction of rare earths and iron. Lange’s handbook of chemistry has the world’s favorite and complete thermochemical data. The relationship between temperature (T) and the standard Gibbs free energy change for the reduction reaction is shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3a, H2 is a good reductant and reacts easily with FeOx. Moreover, reduction reactions (1−5) can be optimized to facilitate the direct interaction of FeOx phases with H2 at lower temperatures (<1000 K). REOs are not to be reduced under the same conditions. Figure 3b displays the compositions of the FeOx phase under H2 atmospheric conditions. Based on these results, both the reduction temperature and H2 concentration are regarded as crucial conditions in this study. Furthermore, Figure 3b reveals that the reduction temperature should be maintained below 843 K. The H2 concentration should be controlled to exceed 78% to ensure the complete reduction of Fe2O3 into metallic Fe. Therefore, the selective reduction of FeOx could be theoretically achieved according to the thermodynamic calculation. Thereafter, magnetic separation could be used to separate pure Fe and the REO-rich phase.

3.2. Effects of Temperature and Particle Size on the Reduction Rate of FeOx

Based on the thermodynamic analysis and findings reported in the literature [14,24], the effects of temperature (423, 523, 623, 723, 823, and 923 K) and various particle sizes (D90 = 0.45, 0.87, 3, and 37 μm) on the FeOx reduction rate were evaluated in this study (Figure 4a). Other initial conditions were fixed, considering H2 and carrier gas (N2 gas) flow rates of 2 and 0.3 L/min, respectively. The reaction temperature and particle size considerably influence the reduction efficiencies of FeOx. When the reduction temperature is increased from 423 to 723 K, the reduction rate of FeOx increases significantly, particularly in cases of smaller particle sizes (ranging from 5 to 95%). When the temperature exceeds 723 K, the reduction rate of FeOx with D90 = 0.45 μm does not vary significantly, fluctuating around approximately 95%. The smaller particle size, which increases the contact surface of the gas–solid reaction, strengthens the reduction kinetics [25,26]. However, the smaller particle size requires longer durations of grinding and higher levels of energy consumption (Table 2). Considering that the laboratory high-energy ball mill typically cannot be used to grind nanoparticles, D90 = 0.45 μm is selected. When the reaction temperature exceeds 723 K and D90 is less than 0.45 μm, the reduction rate of FeOx approaches 95.2% and tends to stabilize. This result is consistent with the thermodynamic calculations.

3.3. Effects of H2 Flow Rate and Particle Size on the Reduction Rate of FeOx

The effect of H2 flow rate and particle size on the reduction rate of FeOx is elucidated in Figure 4b. It is observed that the reduction rate experiences a slight increment as the H2 flow rate is elevated from 0.5 to 2.0 L/min. However, beyond this point, increasing the H2 flow rate to 3.0 L/min does not notably affect the reduction rate. Consequently, a H2 flow rate of 2.0 L/min is deemed optimal. Conversely, the reduction rate exhibits substantial variation at the same H2 flow rate when particle sizes differ. Remarkably, even in a low reducing atmosphere of 0.5 L/min, a reduction rate of 90% can be achieved. To attain this, a reduction in powder particle size is imperative, thus leading to the selection of a D90 value of 0.45 μm.
To assess the separation of REOs/Fe through magnetic separation, the reduction products undergo characterization using XRD and EPMA (Figure 5 and Figure 6). XRD patterns reveal distinct characteristic peaks corresponding to metallic Fe and Nd2O3, providing further confirmation of the selective reduction of Fe through flash reduction. EPMA results further substantiate this, indicating an enrichment of Fe and REOs, with massive Fe2O3 particles reduced into elliptic metallic Fe particles. This effective separation of Fe and rare earth within reduction products facilitates the subsequent magnetic separation of Fe and REOs, a crucial step in the process.
The comparison and analysis of technological conditions for reducing Fe2O3 from hematite or NdFeB scrap to metallic Fe, as presented in Table 3 [26,27,28,29,30], yield several significant findings. Firstly, the conventional reduction method necessitates a lengthy reaction time that typically exceeds one hour. In contrast, the flash reduction method stands out by significantly reducing this reaction time, optimizing efficiency. Secondly, the gas–solid reduction process exhibits a notably faster reaction rate when compared to the solid–solid reduction process. Moreover, it manages to achieve this accelerated reaction rate while also lowering the required reaction temperature. This result highlights the advantages of the gas–solid reduction approach in terms of both speed and energy efficiency. Thirdly, it is observed that the reduction temperature decreases as the particle size of a raw material becomes finer. Leveraging this characteristic, the flash reduction method, conducted under a hydrogen atmosphere, successfully capitalizes on the small particle size of the raw materials. This strategic choice has led to a substantial reduction in both reaction temperature and duration, marking a significant advancement in the reduction process’s efficiency and sustainability.

3.4. Effect of Magnetic Field Intensity on the Separation Rate of Fe/REOs

Based on the magnetic differences between the reduction products, Fe and REOs were separated using a magnetic tube [31,32]. The effect of magnetic separation field intensity on the separation rate was initially investigated. The yield of Fe powder increased with the increasing magnetic field intensity, and the presence of REOs in the Fe-rich phase simultaneously increased. When the magnetic field intensity increased to 240 mT, a maximum yield of Fe (~80%) was attained (Figure 7a); however, the content of REOs retained in the Fe-rich phase approached 16 wt% (Figure 7b), resulting in a decrease in Fe content in Fe-rich phase (Figure 7c). One-step magnetic separation would result in a significant waste of REOs. Therefore, a weak field intensity is used for the second-stage magnetic separation of the Fe-rich phase. Although the weaker magnetic separation decreases the Fe yield (82.8 to 54.7%), the REOs can be effectively recovered. Particularly, when the magnetic separation intensity is 40 mT, the yield of Fe reaches 54.7% (Figure 7d), the content of REOs in the Fe-rich phase decreases from ~16 to 4.1 wt% (Figure 7e), and the content of Fe in the Fe-rich phase is enriched from ~80 to 90.2% (Figure 7f). Therefore, the proposed two-stage magnetic separation is suitable for separating Fe- and REO-rich phases.
To further verify the effectiveness of the two-stage magnetic separation process, magnetic separation products (Fe- and REO-rich phases) were characterized using XRD (Figure 8) and EPMA (Figure 9). The primary component of the Fe-rich phase is metallic Fe (PDF# 03-065-4899), with small amounts of SiO2 (PDF# 01-083-2469) and Nd2O3 (PDF# 01-028-0671). This is the case owing to the small particle size of the sample with weak magnetic field intensity carried by metallic Fe. The REO-rich phase, with its poor crystal form, predominantly contains SiO2 and Nd2O3, which can be ascribed to the formation of glassy slag in the reduction process [33,34].
The morphological results indicate that the particle size of the Fe-rich phase is larger than that of the REO-rich phase. Additionally, its morphology is consistent with that of the reduced product (Figure 9). The mapping results in Figure 9 verify the favorable effect of the two-stage magnetic separation. Fe and REOs are successfully separated via magnetic separation. The REO-rich phase is recovered using the conventional hydrochloric acid method [35,36]. The process used in this study significantly minimizes the interference of Fe in NdFeB magnet scraps with the leaching of REOs, and the burden of subsequent Fe purification is decreased.
Meanwhile, ICP was utilized to further analyze the quantitative components of the Fe-rich and REOs-rich phases, and the results are presented in Table 4. The findings revealed that the Fe content in the NdFeB calcine increased from 45.9 wt% to 55.6 wt% after flash reduction, while the REOs content in the NdFeB calcine increased from 30.2 wt% to 36.8 wt% following flash reduction. Although a one-step magnetic separation process yielded a high quantity of strong magnetic material, the Fe-rich phase only contained 65.2 wt% of Fe, while the REOs content reached as high as 29.1 wt%, resulting in a significant loss of REOs. However, in the second step of magnetic separation, the yield of the Fe-rich phase was only 67.2%. Nevertheless, the content of Fe in the strong magnetic material increased from 65.2 wt% to 90.2 wt%, and the REOs content in the Fe-rich phase decreased from 29.1 wt% to 3.1 wt%. Conversely, the REOs content in the REOs-rich phase of the low magnetic separation material increased from 30.2 wt% to 82.8 wt%, while the Fe content in the REOs-rich phase decreased from 45.9 wt% to 13.5 wt%. Consequently, after separating Fe/REOs in the NdFeB calcine through the flash reduction–magnetic separation process, the following benefits are observed: (1) The utilization efficiency of a significant amount of iron in NdFeB scraps is significantly improved and can be directly utilized as raw material for iron production. (2) The acid consumption required to dissolve calcine is reduced, and the concentration of rare earth in the leaching solution is increased. (3) The generation of a substantial quantity of leaching waste residue rich in rare earth phases is avoided.
Furthermore, the mass balance of REOs and Fe during flash reduction–magnetic separation is calculated and analyzed (Figure 10). The flash reduction experiment used 100 g of the raw material as its basis. According to the reduction rate of Fe (95.2%) under the optimal reduction conditions, the mass of the reduced product is 80.3 g. Magnetic separation is used to obtain REOs and Fe. In the first magnetic separation step, although the Fe-rich phase is recovered with a 82.8% yield, the resulting loss of REOs is 16.1 wt%. Therefore, the use of weak magnetic separation is proposed. Although the Fe-rich phase yield is only 54.7%, the Fe and REO distribution rates in the Fe- and REO-rich phases reach 90.2 and 95.9%, respectively. Therefore, metallic Fe can be effectively separated and REOs can be significantly enriched using this method.

4. Conclusions

A method involving flash reduction and magnetic separation was developed to effectively separate Fe and enrich REOs from NdFeB magnet scraps. Initially, the feasibility of selectively reducing FeOx was predicted using thermodynamic analysis. The optimization of reduction conditions showed that increasing the reaction temperature and reducing the particle size enhanced the reduction rate of Fe significantly. Ultimately, the reduction rate of FeOx surpassed 95% under optimal conditions (temperature 723 K, D90 = 0.45 μm, H2 flow rate 2.0 L/min) due to efficient mass and heat transfer, which facilitated the reduction kinetics. This conclusion was further supported by XRD and EPMA analysis, confirming the selective reduction of FeOx. Next, the process proceeded to separate metallic Fe and REOs from the reduction product through magnetic separation. Initially, a one-step magnet separation process was tested, employing a magnetic field intensity of 240 mT. Although this achieved a Fe yield of 82.8% with a distribution ratio of 80.1 wt% and a high REO distribution ratio of 16.1 wt% in the Fe-rich phase, a significant quantity of rare earths was wasted in this approach. To mitigate the loss of valuable rare earths, a two-step magnet separation process was implemented, utilizing a magnetic field intensity of 40 mT. Despite the reduction in Fe yield to 67.4%, this modification led to a remarkable increase in the distribution ratio of Fe to 90.2 wt%, while the distribution ratio of REOs decreased to 4.1 wt%. Consequently, these Fe-rich phases could be utilized as inexpensive raw materials in weathering steel production without necessitating additional pretreatments. Flash reduction and magnetic separation process not only exhibit the advantages of having a short process and low energy consumption, but they also realize the stepwise recovery of rare earth and Fe.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W. and J.W.; methodology, X.W.; software, S.X.; validation, X.L., D.L. and F.L.; formal analysis, W.Z.; investigation, H.W.; resources, J.W.; data curation, H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.; writing—review and editing, S.X.; supervision, J.W.; project administration, J.W.; funding acquisition, J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the China Baowu Low Carbon Metallurgy Innovation Foudation (BWLCF202121), the Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Flash Green Development and Recycling (20193BCD40019), Academic and technical leaders of major disciplines in Jiangxi Province (20213BCJ22003), and Jiangxi Province Science and Technology innovation talent project (jxsq2023201012).

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Dudarko, O.; Kobylinska, N.; Kessler, V.; Seisenbaieva, G. Recovery of rare earth elements from NdFeB magnet by mono- and bifunctional mesoporous silica: Waste recycling strategies and perspectives. Hydrometallurgy 2022, 2022, 105855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laatikainen, M.; Makarova, I.; Sainio, T.; Repo, E. Selective acid leaching of rare earth elements from roasted NdFeB magnets. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 278, 119571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Klemettinen, A.; Zak, A.; Chojnacka, I.; Matuska, S.; Le’sniewicz, A.; Wełna, M.; Adamski, Z.; Klemettinen, L.; Rycerz, L. Leaching of Rare Earth Elements from NdFeB Magnets without Mechanical Pretreatment by Sulfuric (H2SO4) and Hydrochloric (HCl) Acids. Minerals 2021, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bohm, D.; Czerski, K.; Gottlieb, S.; Huke, A.; Ruprecht, G. Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from NdFeB Magnets by Chlorination and Distillation. Processes 2023, 11, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. München, D.D.; Stein, R.T.; Veit, H.M. Rare Earth Elements Recycling Potential Estimate Based on End-of-Life NdFeB Permanent Magnets from Mobile Phones and Hard Disk Drives in Brazil. Minerals 2021, 11, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Habibzadeh, A.; Ali Kucuker, M.; Gokelma, M. Review on the Parameters of Recycling NdFeB Magnets via a Hydrogenation Process. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 17431–17445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saito, T.; Sato, H.; Ozawa, S.; Yu, J.; Motegi, T. The extraction of Nd from waste NdFeB alloys by the glass slag method. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 353, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mochizuki, Y.; Tsubouchi, N.; Sugawara, K. Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Dy containing NdFeB Magnets by Chlorination. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, M.; Hu, X.Y.; Peng, L.M.; Fu, P.H.; Ding, W.J.; Peng, Y.H. On the production of Mg-Nd master alloy from NdFeB magnet scraps. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 218, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumari, A.; Randhawa, N.S.; Sahu, S.K. Electrochemical treatment of spent NdFeB magnet in organic acid for recovery of rare earths and other metal values. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 309, 127393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brahim, J.A.; Hak, S.A.; Achiou, B.; Boulif, R.; Beniazza, R.; Benhida, R. Kinetics and mechanisms of leaching of rare earth elements from secondary resources. Miner. Eng. 2022, 177, 107351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Makarava, I.; Kasach, A.; Kharytonau, D.; Kurilo, I.; Laatikainen, M.; Repo, E. Enhanced acid leaching of rare earths from NdCeFeB magnets. Miner. Eng. 2022, 179, 107446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ding, J.; Li, Y.; Yong, P.T. A comparative study of melt-spun ribbons of Nd12Fe82B6 and Nd15Fe77B8. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1998, 31, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ling, Z.Y.; Xiong, M.R.; Zhang, Q.Q. Effects of iron deficiency on magnetic properties of (Ni0.76Zn0.24)O(Fe2O3)0.575 ferrite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2000, 219, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, Z.D.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.S.; Gao, P.; Han, Y.X. Pilot-scale extraction of iron from flotation tailings via suspension magnetization roasting in a mixture of CO and H2 followed by magnetic separation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 172, 105680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pineau, A.; Kanari, N.; Gaballah, I. Kinetics of reduction of iron oxides by H2: Part I: Low temperature reduction of hematite. Thermochim. Acta 2006, 447, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pineau, A.; Kanari, N.; Gaballah, I. Kinetics of reduction of iron oxides by H2: Part II. Low temperature reduction of magnetite. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 456, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.L.; Peng, R.Z. Flash Reduction Comprehensive Recovery Method of Neodymium Iron Boron Waste Acid Leaching Residue. CN201910009569.7, 4 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, J.L.; Wang, H.Q. A Method for One-Step Comprehensive Recovery of NdFeB Waste Acid Leaching Slag by Flash Reduction. CN201910009567.8, 4 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, H.B.; Wang, Y.N.; He, Y.Z.; Xu, S.H.; Hu, B.; Cao, H.Z.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, G.Q. Efficient and safe disposition of arsenic by incorporation in smelting slag through copper flash smelting process. Miner. Eng. 2021, 160, 106661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bao, Q.P.; Guo, L.; Guo, Z.C. A novel direct reduction-flash smelting separation process of treating high phosphorous iron ore fines. Power Technol. 2021, 377, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Constantineau, J.P.; Bouffard, S.C.; Grace, J.R.; Richards, G.G. Pre-ignition behavior of lead sulfide in the flame of a flash smelter. Miner. Eng. 2011, 24, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Speight, J. Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry; McGraw-Hill Education: Columbus, OH, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pang, J.M.; Guo, P.M.; Zhao, P.; Cao, C.Z.; Zhang, D.W. Influence of Size of Hematite Powder on Its Reduction Kinetics by H2 at Low Temperature. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2009, 16, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jozwiak, W.K.; Kaczmarek, E.; Manieecki, T.P.; Ignaczak, W.; Maniukiewicz, W. Reduction behavior of iron oxides in hydrogen and carbon monoxide atmospheres. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007, 326, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stopic, S.; Polat, B.; Chung, H.W.; Emil-Kaya, E.; Smiljanic, S.; Gurmen, S.; Friedrich, B. Recovery of Rare Earth Elements through Spent NdFeB Magnet Oxidation (First Part). Metals 2022, 12, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luo, S.Y.; Yi, C.J.; Zhou, Y.M. Direct reduction of mixed biomass-Fe2O3 briquettes using biomass-generated syngas. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 3332–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, F.; Mohassab, Y.; Zhang, S.Q.; Sohn, H.Y. Kinetics of the Reduction of Hematite Concentrate Particles by Carbon Monoxide Relevant to a Novel Flash Ironmaking Process. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2015, 46, 1716–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.L.; Liu, X.R. Carbon-Thermal Reduction of Neodymium Iron Boron Scrap. J. Chin. Soc. Rare Earths 2020, 37, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bang, Y.Y.; Guo, S.Q.; Xu, Y.L.; Tang, K.; Lu, X.G.; Ding, W.Z. Recovery of rare earth elements from permanent magnet scraps by pyrometallurgical process. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 1697–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bang, Y.Y.; Guo, S.Q.; Tang, K.; Jiang, L.; Lu, C.Y.; Lu, X.G.; Ding, W.Z. Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from NdFeB Magnet Scraps by Pyrometallurgical Processes. In Rare Metal Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, J.W.; Li, Y.F.; Lv, Y.; Han, Y.X.; Gao, P. Recovery of iron from high-iron red mud using suspension magnetization roasting and magnetic separation. Miner. Eng. 2022, 178, 107394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ozawa, S.; Sato, H.; Saito, T.; Motegi, T.; Yu, J. Production of Nd-Fe-B alloys by the glass slag method. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 10, 8831–8833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saito, T. Structures and magnetic properties of Nd–Fe alloys produced by the glass slag method. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 414, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumari, A.; Kumar Sahu, S. A comprehensive review on recycling of critical raw materials from spent neodymium iron boron (NdFeB) magnet. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 317, 123527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kumari, A.; Kumar Sinha, M.; Pramanik, S.; Kumar Sahu, S. Recovery of rare earths from spent NdFeB magnets of wind turbine: Leaching and kinetic aspects. Waste Manag. 2018, 75, 486–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD pattern (a) and EMPA analysis (b,c) of the calcined NdFeB.
Figure 1. XRD pattern (a) and EMPA analysis (b,c) of the calcined NdFeB.
Processes 11 02895 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the calcined NdFeB produced via flash reduction and magnetic separation.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the calcined NdFeB produced via flash reduction and magnetic separation.
Processes 11 02895 g002
Figure 3. The diagram of Gibbs free energy as a function of temperature for Reactions (1–7) (a), equilibrium phase compositions for the H2 reduction of FeOx (b).
Figure 3. The diagram of Gibbs free energy as a function of temperature for Reactions (1–7) (a), equilibrium phase compositions for the H2 reduction of FeOx (b).
Processes 11 02895 g003
Figure 4. (a) Effect of temperature and particle size on reduction rate of FeOx (fixed H2 and N2 gas flow rates of 2 and 0.3 L/min), (b) effect of H2 flow rate and particle size on reduction rate of FeOx (fixed reaction temperature of 723 K and N2 gas flow rates of 0.3 L/min).
Figure 4. (a) Effect of temperature and particle size on reduction rate of FeOx (fixed H2 and N2 gas flow rates of 2 and 0.3 L/min), (b) effect of H2 flow rate and particle size on reduction rate of FeOx (fixed reaction temperature of 723 K and N2 gas flow rates of 0.3 L/min).
Processes 11 02895 g004
Figure 5. XRD pattern of the reduction product.
Figure 5. XRD pattern of the reduction product.
Processes 11 02895 g005
Figure 6. EPMA analysis of the product (a) before and (b) after flash reduction.
Figure 6. EPMA analysis of the product (a) before and (b) after flash reduction.
Processes 11 02895 g006
Figure 7. Effect of magnetic field intensity on separation rate of Fe/REOs: yield of first-step magnetic separation; (a) distribution ratio of REOs (b) and Fe (c) in first-step magnetic separation; yield of second-step magnetic separation; (d) distribution ratio of REOs (e) and Fe (f) in second-step magnetic separation.
Figure 7. Effect of magnetic field intensity on separation rate of Fe/REOs: yield of first-step magnetic separation; (a) distribution ratio of REOs (b) and Fe (c) in first-step magnetic separation; yield of second-step magnetic separation; (d) distribution ratio of REOs (e) and Fe (f) in second-step magnetic separation.
Processes 11 02895 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the Fe-rich phase (a) and REOs-rich phase (b).
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the Fe-rich phase (a) and REOs-rich phase (b).
Processes 11 02895 g008
Figure 9. EPMA analysis of the product by magnetic separation: (a) Fe-rich phase, (b) REOs-rich phase.
Figure 9. EPMA analysis of the product by magnetic separation: (a) Fe-rich phase, (b) REOs-rich phase.
Processes 11 02895 g009
Figure 10. Mass balance of the NdFeB calcine in flash reduction-magnetic separation process.
Figure 10. Mass balance of the NdFeB calcine in flash reduction-magnetic separation process.
Processes 11 02895 g010
Table 1. Reactions of the reduction process [23].
Table 1. Reactions of the reduction process [23].
Reaction No.Reactions∆G (kJ/mol) vs. T(K)
(1)1/3Fe2O3(s) + H2(g) = 2/3Fe(s) + H2O(g)∆G = −0.029T + 15.87
(2)3Fe2O3(s)+ H2(g) = 2Fe3O4(s) + H2O(g)∆G = −0.106T − 18.63
(3)Fe3O4 (s) + 4H2(g) = 3Fe(s) + 4H2O(g)∆G = −0.019T + 20.19
(4)Fe3O4(s) + H2(g) = 3FeO(s) + H2O(g)∆G = −0.052T + 40.89
(5)Fe2O3(s) + H2(g) = 2FeO(s) + H2O(g)∆G = −0.070T + 21.05
(6)FeO(s) + H2(g) = Fe(s) + H2O(g)∆G = −0.008T + 13.29
(7)1/3Nd2O3(s) + H2(g) = 2/3Nd(s) + H2O(g)∆G = −0.038T + 343.85
Table 2. The particle size of NdFeB calcine obtained by the different grinding time.
Table 2. The particle size of NdFeB calcine obtained by the different grinding time.
Grinding time (h)416325672
D90 (μm)3730.870.450.40
D50 (μm)252.10.580.340.26
D10 (μm)131.20.310.190.14
Table 3. Comparison for reducing Fe2O3 from hematite or NdFeB scrape to metallic Fe.
Table 3. Comparison for reducing Fe2O3 from hematite or NdFeB scrape to metallic Fe.
Ref.MethodReductantParticle SizeT/KTimeReduction Rate/%
[26]Gas–solid reductionH2 + CO~150 mm137360 min94.7
[27]Flash reductionH2 + CO21 μm16235 s90
[28]Solid–solid reductionC74 μm1473240 min88.08
[29]Solid–solid reductionC150 μm182360 min99.12
[30]Solid–solid reductionC~100 μm1773240 min99.8
This workFlash reductionH20.45 μm7235 s95.2
Table 4. Chemical composition of the calcined NdFeB, reduction product, Fe-rich and REOs-rich phases.
Table 4. Chemical composition of the calcined NdFeB, reduction product, Fe-rich and REOs-rich phases.
CompositionFe wt%REOs wt%Yield %
calcined NdFeB45.930.2/
Reduction product55.636.8/
First step separationFe-rich phase65.229.182.8
REOs-rich phase9.574.017.2
Second step separationFe-rich phase90.23.167.4
REOs-rich phase13.582.832.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Lei, X.; Wen, X.; Li, D.; Liu, F.; Zhou, W.; Xu, S. Separation and Recovery of Rare Earths and Iron from NdFeB Magnet Scraps. Processes 2023, 11, 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102895

AMA Style

Wang H, Wang J, Lei X, Wen X, Li D, Liu F, Zhou W, Xu S. Separation and Recovery of Rare Earths and Iron from NdFeB Magnet Scraps. Processes. 2023; 11(10):2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Houqing, Jinliang Wang, Xiang Lei, Xiaochun Wen, Dewei Li, Fupeng Liu, Wenyue Zhou, and Shengming Xu. 2023. "Separation and Recovery of Rare Earths and Iron from NdFeB Magnet Scraps" Processes 11, no. 10: 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop