Next Article in Journal
A Review on Comprehensive Utilization of Red Mud and Prospect Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Measurement of Process Conditions Present in Pilot Scale Iron Ore Sintering
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Diagenesis in Carbonate Rocks as Identified in Fault Damage Zones in the Northern Tarim Basin, NW China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Mineralogy of Iron Ore Sinters Using a Range of Techniques
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/min9060361
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermodynamic Modelling of Iron Ore Sintering Reactions

by
Chunlin Chen
1,*,
Liming Lu
1 and
Kexin Jiao
2
1
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
2
School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(6), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9060361
Submission received: 20 May 2019 / Revised: 7 June 2019 / Accepted: 7 June 2019 / Published: 13 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineralogy of Iron Ore Sinters)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) is one of the most commonly-produced phases in fluxed iron-ore sintering, and has long been regarded as an important bonding phase in industrial sinters. It is thus considered to have a significant effect on sinter quality. In this study, a solid solution model and database has been developed for the SFCA phase, and has been incorporated into the thermodynamic software, Multi-Phase Equilibrium (MPE). MPE calculations were compared with the in situ X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) observations of the formation of SFCA phase during sintering. The effects of the raw material composition, temperature and the oxygen partial pressure on the formation of mineral phases in the sinter, as well as the viscosity of the melt formed during sintering under equilibrium conditions, were modelled using MPE. The results show that the formation of SFCA phase can be promoted by increasing oxygen partial pressure and basicity of the raw material. Increases of Al2O3 and MgO content have no significant effect on the SFCA formation under equilibrium condition. The increase of oxygen partial pressure (10−3 atm or above) and basicity also leads to a decrease in melt viscosity, which enhances the fluidity of the melt, and hence, the assimilation of the sinter. However, increases of Al2O3 and MgO result in the increase of melt viscosity.

1. Introduction

During the iron ore sintering process, the loose raw materials, mixtures of fine ore, limestone flux and coke breeze, are converted into a porous but physically strong cake, which is generally composed of four main phases: iron oxides, ferrites, most of which are a complex silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA), glasses and dicalcium silicate. The properties of iron ore sinter are controlled by the composition and distribution of these mineral phases. In particular, the SFCA is the major bonding phase in iron ore sinter, and plays an important role in influencing key sinter quality parameters such as mechanical strength, reducibility and reduction degradation.
Two types of SFCA phases, SFCA and SFCA-I, were identified in studies on the structure and composition of the SFCA phase [1,2,3]. Pownceby and Patric [4,5] systematically measured the phase relationship and thermal stability of silico-ferrite of calcium (SFC) and SFCA phases in air within the Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2 and Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 systems, respectively, under equilibrium conditions. Scarlett et al. [6] investigated the reaction sequences in the SFCA phase formation during heating of a sinter from room temperature up to 1533 K under partially vacuum using in situ XRD technique.
In industrial iron ore sintering, the raw material is heated in a reducing and cooled in an oxidizing atmosphere. Numerous experimental studies have confirmed that the oxygen partial pressure and the raw material composition have significant impact on the composition and quantity of the mineral phases present in the sinter [7,8,9,10]. Webster and his coworkers [11,12,13,14,15,16] investigated the SFCA and SFCA-I dynamic formation during heating and cooling of sinter with various compositions under various oxygen partial pressure using the in situ XRD technique.
Some thermodynamic modelling work has been carried out to generate the phase relationships in the FeOx-CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 system [17,18,19,20], which provides useful information for understanding the behavior of the melt. However, thermodynamic modelling of the SFCA phase formation during sintering has not been attempted. A thermodynamic model of SFCA phase was developed in the frame work of compound energy formalism by Murao et al. [21].
Multi-Phase Equilibrium (MPE) is a thermodynamic software developed by CSIRO for calculating the multi-phase, multi-components equilibrium. It contains a variety of solution models such as slag, alloy and various solid solutions. It can also estimate the physical properties of the melt, such as the liquidus temperature, primary phase, viscosity and electrical conductivity of the slag [22].
In a previous study [19], MPE was used to predict the effects of sinter composition and the oxygen partial pressure on the liquidus of the melt formed during sintering. In this study, a solid solution model for describing SFCA phase was developed and has been incorporated in MPE.
In this paper, the continued verification of the model on predicting the SFCA stability using experimental data was presented. The MPE software was used to model the reaction sequences in the formation of SFCA phase during iron ore sintering. The modelling results were compared with the data of in situ XRD observations from laboratory studies. Furthermore, the effects of the composition of the raw material, temperature and the oxygen partial pressure on the formation of the mineral phases in the iron ore sinter, as well as the viscosity of the melt formed during sintering, have been modelled.

2. Modelling of the SFCA Phase

The name SFCA was initially proposed by Hancart et al. [1] in 1967 for a complex ferrite occurring in iron-ore sinter assemblages with a composition represented by the formula xFe2O3·ySiO2·zAl2O3·5CaO with x + y + z = 12. The substitution trend for the SFCA solid solution in the Fe2O3-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 system was subsequently proposed and confirmed to follow the plane defined by the end members: 4CaO·3SiO2-CaO·3Fe2O3-CaO·3Al2O3 (C4S3-CF3-CA3) and with M14O20 stoichiometry [2,3,4,5].
Studies on SFCA morphology have identified two different types of SFCA: one is a low-Fe form that is simply referred to as SFCA, and which exhibits a prismatic morphology; the second is a high-Fe, low-Si form called SFCA-I with platy morphology [3]. SFCA-I is the most desirable bonding phase in iron ore sinter, since it yields higher sinter strength and better reducibility [23].
Despite the importance of the SFCA-I phase in iron ore sinter, the mechanism of its formation, thermal stability and phase boundary are not fully understood. Thermodynamic data on the stability of SFCA-I phase and the relationships of the SFCA-I and its surrounding phases is very limited, and not sufficient for developing a thermodynamic solution model for SFCA-I. Therefore, the phase diagram of SFCA was only assessed in this study, and a solid solution model was developed to describe the SFCA phase.
As confirmed in the literature [2,3,4], SFCA phase can be defined by 4CaO·3SiO2 (C4S3), CaO·3Fe2O3 (CF3) and CaO·3Al2O3 (CA3) end members. A compound energy formalism [24] with three sub-lattices (Ca+2)1 (CaSi+6,FeFe+6,AlAl+6)3 (O−2)10 was adopted for describing the SFCA phase in this study.

3. Model Validation

3.1. Validation on the Stability of SFC Phase

Pownceby and Patrick [4] investigated the thermal stability, solid solution limits and phase relationships of SFC phase (Al2O3 free SFCA phase) in air under equilibrium conditions within the Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2 system using the drop-quench technique. SFC forms a solid solution along a trend line between the theoretical end-members CF3 and C4S3. Figure 1 shows that the maximum solid solution range occurs between compositions containing approximately 6.0 through to 11.7 mass% C4S3 component. The solid solution is stable between 1333 K and 1513 K. Above 1513 K, the compositional range narrows until the liquidus is reached. As shown in Figure 1, The SFC compositional range was slightly overestimated in the high temperature area and underestimated in the low temperature area by the MPE model. However, the results show that the experimentally determined SFC stability and phase boundary can be adequately described.
Pownceby and Clout [23] found that the SFC phase is stable and coexists with the liquid phase at the FeOx corner at 1513 K in air and oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm. As illustrated in Figure 2a,b, the stability of CaSiO3 at 1513 K in air and oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm was slightly overestimated by the model. However, the results suggest the experimental measured melt region and SFC composition at the FeOx corner at 1513 K in air and oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm can be represented.

3.2. Validation on the Stability of SFCA Phase

Patrick and Pownceby [5] expanded their SFC work [4] by introducing Al2O3 into the system to investigate the solid solution range and thermal stability of SFCA in air within the four components Fe2O3-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 system under equilibrium condition. It was found that the chemical substitution in SFCA phase follows the coupled substitution mechanism: 2(Fe3+, Al3+) ↔ (Ca2+, Fe2+) + Si4+ with the greatest range in chemical substitution occurring in the direction of the Al3+ ↔ Fe3+ exchange (ranging from 0 mass% Al2O3 to ~31.5 mass% Al2O3). The range of Al3+ ↔ Fe3+ substitution decreases with increasing temperature. Similar to what was found for the SFC phase, the coupled Ca2+ and Si4+ substitution for 2M3+ is relatively narrow and has a maximum range of between 3 and 11 mass% C4S3 components. Figure 1 shows that the SFC phase (Al2O3 free SFCA phase) is only stable up to about 1523 K, above that, it will decompose and melt. However, it was reported that the SFCA phase could be stable up to above 1633 K, which demonstrates that Al2O3 greatly improves the stability of the SFCA phase. As an example, the stability of SFCA at 1513 and 1573 K predicted by MPE was plotted along with experimental data in Figure 3. There is a good fit of the measured Al3+ ↔ Fe3+ substitution range at 1513 and 1573K by the model. It can also be seen that the gap between the predicted and measured SiO2 solubility range in the SFCA is relatively large. Considering the narrow range of SiO2 solubility (2~5 mass%) in SFCA [5], this gap is not expected to cause considerable errors in sintering reaction modelling.
Figure 4 shows that due to the increasing solubility of Al2O3 in the melt with increasing temperature, the minimum content of Al2O3 in SFCA solid solution also increases, while the maximum Al2O3 solubility remains roughly constant. As shown in Figure 4, there is good agreement between the model calculation and the experimental measurements on the minimum Al2O3 solubility in SFCA phase.

4. Reaction Sequences in the Iron Ore Sintering

The reaction sequences involved in the formation of SFCA phase during heating of a sinter with a composition of 77.26 mass% Fe2O3, 14.08 mass% CaO, 3.56 mass% SiO2 and 5 mass% Al2O3 was investigated by Scarlett et al. [6] using an in situ X-ray diffraction technique under partially vacuum and by Webster et al. [11] at oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm. Starting material compositions were designed to lie within a plane that connects the SFCA end members CF3, CA3 and C4S3. Thermodynamic modelling of the chemical reactions which occur during heating of the same sample was carried out using MPE.
The modelling results in Figure 5 show that the SFCA phase is formed at 1273 K, which is close to the experimental observation from in situ XRD analysis by Scarlett et al. [6]. The Formation of SFCA phase was observed at 1437 K by Webster et al. [11]. Webster also heated the sample at 1323 K for 24 h and quenched and the resulting sample did not contain the SFCA phase. The results suggest that the stability of SFCA was overestimated by model at oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm. Both experimental studies [6,11] show that C2F started to form at 923 to 1044 K through lime and hematite solid reaction, while the calculated stable phase is CF. This is probably because the system was not reach equilibrium. The presence of C2F between 923 K and 1323 K suggests that C2F is formed first through lime and hematite solid reaction due to its larger driving force compared to the CF reaction at low temperature. Subsequently, C2F reacts with the excess hematite to form CF. Modelling results also show that below 1323 K, the SiO2 reacted with lime to form dicalcium silicate, while C2S was not observed in the experiment. This indicates that CaO-SiO2 solid reaction is slow at low temperatures, and C2S quantity is probably too low to be detected in the experiment. Above 1273 K, experimental results by Scarlett et al. [6] show that SFCA started to increase, and CF decreases with increasing temperature. This also reflects the deviation from equilibrium condition in the experiment due to its high heating rate and slow reaction rate of SFCA through solid-solid reaction. The modelling results show that Al2O3 reacts with CaO to form CA2 under 1273 K. At 1273 K, SFCA phase starts to form through solid reaction between the C2S, CA2, CF and Hematite. The modelling results also show that the liquid phase was formed at 1473 K, which agrees with experimental observations [6,11].

5. Modelling of the Iron Ore Sintering

Although the practical sintering reactions do not reach steady-state or equilibrium conditions [25], the phase relations of the sinter from the thermodynamic equilibrium calculation is very useful in sinter composition design for predicting the favorable or likely phases which form, which plays a key role in determining the sinter quality.
MPE was used to calculate the equilibrium position of the reactions occurred in the iron ore sintering process. The quantity of the equilibrated phases such as melt, SFCA and other solid phases under specified sintering condition was obtained. It is well known that the formation of the melt during sintering plays an important role in determining the sinter quality. Therefore, the importance of melt property particularly melt fluidity is generally recognized. The viscosity of the melt formed during sintering was also calculated by using MPE.
Though the oxygen partial pressure and the temperature corresponding to the iron ore sintering process are not well defined and vary in different zone, it is expected that the oxygen partial pressure will be in the range of 10−8 to 10−3 atm [23]. Therefore, these two levels of oxygen partial pressure (10−8 and 10−3 atm) were used in the modelling to represent the conditions of sintering process. The modelling conditions are summarized in Table 1.

5.1. Effect of the Temperature

The calculated phase assemblages under varied temperatures at oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 and 10−3 atm are shown in Figure 6a,b, respectively. The results show that silicate solid phase decreases and liquid melt increases with increasing temperature under two oxygen partial pressures. SFCA phase is not stable at 10−8 atm due to the decreased Fe3+ stability at low oxygen partial pressure. With an oxygen partial pressure of 10−3 atm, the SFCA phase is stable at the temperature range of 1273 to 1573 K. Figure 6a,b show that at fixed oxygen partial pressure, the change of iron oxide oxidization state with increasing temperature follows hematite to magnetite, and magnetite to wüstite. This agrees with the phase relationships on Fe-O phase diagram.

5.2. Effect of the Oxygen Partial Pressure

The variation of the quantity of each phase vs oxygen partial pressure is illustrated in Figure 7. Figure 7a shows that at 1573 K, SFCA phase is only stable at oxygen partial pressure of 10−2 atm and above. It also shows the relationships of the transition of iron oxide from wüstite (FeO) to magnetite (Fe3O4) and hematite (Fe2O3) with increasing oxygen partial pressure. Due to the higher melting point of magnetite than wüstite and hematite, the melt quantity reaches minimum level at oxygen partial pressure of 10−5 to 10−6 atm, where the stability of magnetite reaches maximum. It can also be seen that at the oxygen partial pressure range of 10−3 to 10−7 atm, the dicalcium silicate precipitates from the melt.
As shown in Figure 7b, the quantities of SFCA and silicate phases are pretty constant at 1373 K and oxygen partial pressure range of 0.21 to 10−4 atm, which are about 40 and 10 mass%, respectively. Below 10−4 atm, the SFCA phase decreases with decreasing oxygen partial pressure due to the destabilization of ferric oxide, which is the dominant species of SFCA phase. Below 10−6 atm of oxygen partial pressure, the SFCA phase will be decomposed to dicalcium silicate and magnetite.
The calculated compositions of the melt formed at 1573 K under varied oxygen partial pressure are illustrated in Figure 8. Figure 8a shows that the melt composition changes significantly with the oxygen partial pressure. Since the stability of the magnetite reaches a maximum at oxygen partial pressure of 10−5 to 10−6 atm, the FeOx in the melt reaches minimum point, and the CaO and SiO2 contents in the melt reach maximum. Figure 8b shows the variation of the melt viscosity with varied oxygen partial pressure. It is clear that the melt viscosity reaches a maximum at the oxygen partial pressure of 10−5 to 10−6 atm. That is because the viscosity generally increases with increasing of SiO2 in the melt, since SiO2 is a network former in the oxide melt.
As shown in Figure 8b, the Al2O3 reaches 3 mass% in the melt at oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm. As oxygen partial pressure increases, Al2O3 in the melt decreases and more Al2O3 reports to the magnetite phase, which reaches a maximum point at oxygen partial pressure of 10−6 atm. Above 10−6 atm oxygen partial pressure, the quantity of magnetite decreased and the SFCA quantity increased as Al2O3 is transported from the magnetite to SFCA phase. The Al2O3 concentration in the melt was kept quite constant at about 1 mass% at the oxygen partial pressure of 10−6 to 0.21 atm.

5.3. Effect of Basicity

During the calculation, only the CaO content of sinter was varied to change the basicity (CaO/SiO2) of the raw material. FeOx was allowed to change accordingly to keep all the other species constant. A similar condition is applied in cases of modelling the effect of Al2O3 and MgO on the mineral phases present in sinter.
Figure 9a shows that the magnetite quantity decreases slightly with increasing basicity in the sinter mixture at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm. The quantity of the liquid melt increases, and wüstite decreases with increasing basicity. This is expected since the composition of the raw material is in the wüstite saturation region at oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm. Increasing of CaO content (basicity) moves the sinter mixture composition closer to the melt/wüstite phase boundary, and therefore, increases the melt and decrease the wüstite quantity. Figure 9b shows that at 1373 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−3 atm, the silicates decrease and the SFCA phase increases with increasing of basicity in the raw material. This is because the more CaO will react with hematite and silica in the silicates to form SFCA phase, causing the hematite and silicates decreases.
Figure 10a illustrates that the contents of SiO2 and CaO in the melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm decreases, and FeOx increases with increasing basicity. Figure 10b shows that the increase of the replacement of SiO2 and CaO with FeOx causes the viscosity of the melt decreases considerably.

5.4. Effect of Al2O3

Figure 11 shows the variation of the sinter phase composition vs Al2O3 content at 1573 K and 1373 K, respectively. As shown in Figure 11a, the melt quantity remains almost constant with differing of Al2O3 content in the sinter mixture. Patrick and Pownceby’s study [5] shows that the presence of Al2O3 in the SiO2-FeOx-CaO system can stabilize the SFCA phase up to 1663 K in the air. However, the modelling results show that the SFCA phase is not stable at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm. Due to the higher stability of FeAl2O4 than Fe3O4, the addition of Al2O3 stabilizes magnetite, and hence, increases its quantity. Figure 11b shows that as temperature decreases to 1373 K and oxygen partial pressure increases to 10−3 atm, the SFCA phase precipitates from the system, and the quantities of solid phases presented in the sinter do not change with the Al2O3 content in the sinter mixture. This minimal effect of the Al2O3 content on the SFCA quantity was supported by the findings by Choudhary et al [26]. It was reported that the number of phases in final sinter for ores containing 1.4 and 2.2 mass% Al2O3 was almost the same, but that the composition and morphology of the phases were markedly different [26].The modelling results reveals that the Al2O3 solubility in the SFCA phase increases from 7 to 17 mass% with Al2O3 content in the raw material increases from 1 to 7 mass%, while the SFCA phase quantity remains almost constant under equilibrium condition. This result generally agrees with the experimental findings by Patrick and Pownceby [5], which shows that the Al2O3 solubility in SFCA could reach about 35 mass% at 1573 K in the air. However, it was observed that alumina will promote and stabilize SFCA and the SFCA quantity increased with increasing Al2O3 content [25,27,28]. The discrepancy between the modelling results and sintering experiment observation could be caused by the non-equilibrium behavior of the sinter. During the cooling stage, the higher quantity of SFCA phase with relative lower Al2O3 content could be formed through melt-hematite reaction and melt-magnetite-oxygen reaction at first. The SFCA phase does not reach equilibrium with other phases, and is preserved in the sinter due to its higher cooling rate. Further experiments on quantifying the effect of Al2O3 content in the raw material on the SFCA quantity under equilibrium is desired for solving the discrepancy.
Since the SFCA phase is not stable at oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm, all the charged Al2O3 will be distributed between melt and magnetite. As shown in Figure 12a, the increased Al2O3 content in the sinter mixture leads to the increase of Al2O3 content in the melt. Figure 12b shows that the viscosity of the melt increases with increasing Al2O3 content in the melt, which suggests that the Al2O3 behaves like an acidic oxide and network former such as SiO2, rather than as a basic oxide.

5.5. Effect of MgO

Figure 13 illustrates that the melt formed at 1573 K decreases with increasing MgO in raw material. That is because the addition of MgO stabilizes the wüstite phase at oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm, and therefore suppresses the melt and magnetite formation. As shown in Figure 13a, addition of MgO promotes the reaction of MgO with hematite to form MgFe2O4 spinel at the oxygen partial pressure of 10−3 atm, while the SFCA and silicate phases were kept pretty constant.
The formation of MgFe2O4 spinel resulted in the stabilization of the magnetite, and therefore, had a negative impact on the SFCA formation. It also needs to be mentioned that MgO was not defined as a component member in the solid solution model for SFCA phase in MPE. As a result, the predicted effect of MgO on the SFCA content at is small. However, it was reported from Sugiyama’s study [29] that MgO can be dissolved in the SFCA phase by partially substituting CaO. It was also found that SiO2 solubility increases with increasing of (MgCa)O in the SFCA. Therefore, it is also possible that the addition of MgO in the sinter may promote the formation of SFCA, lock more SiO2 in SFCA, and suppress the formation of the silicates.
Figure 14a shows that addition of MgO leads to the increase of SiO2, CaO, Al2O3 and MgO, and decrease of FeOx in the melt by taking away the wüstite to form wüstite-magnesia halite. As a result, as shown in Figure 14b, the viscosity of the melt increases considerably with increasing MgO in the raw material.

6. Implication for the Sintering Process

The volume and properties of the melt formed during sintering depend heavily on temperature, which determines the fuel requirement for sintering. Generally, a greater melt content results in higher degree of assimilation of the ore. However, excess melt formation also leads to poor sintering productivity [30]. At fixed oxygen partial pressure, the stabilities of iron oxides increase in the order of hematite, magnetite and wüstite with increasing temperature. Therefore, lower sintering temperatures favor the solid transition of wüstite to magnetite and hematite, and hence, the formation of SFCA thermodynamically, which was supported by the findings by Yang and Matthews [9]. But due to the high melting point of the magnetite, a high sintering temperature is required to promote the melt formation and ore assimilation for magnetite ore sintering [31]. Hematite ore can be sintered at relative low temperature to generate the required melt [31]. The optimum sintering temperature based on the ore type can be achieved by optimizing the fuel ratio in the sinter mixture.
As illustrated in Figure 7a,b, the stability of SFCA phase increases with increasing of oxygen partial pressure, which is principally controlled by the coke rate in the sinter. Therefore, controlling the coke rate to enhance the oxidation of the sinter and promote the formation of the SFCA phase. Particularly for the magnetite ore sintering, oxidizing of the magnetite to hematite at high oxygen partial pressure would encourage the formation of the SFCA phase. Increasing of Fe3+ level in the raw material by blending of magnetite ore with hematite ore is expected to improve the formation of SFCA phase [10].
Increasing the basicity of the raw material will increase the amount of the melt and decrease its viscosity during the heating stage, and therefore, enhance the assimilation reaction of the sinter and the formation of the SFCA bonding phase, which was supported by experimental studies [8,14]. However, as mentioned above, excess melt has detrimental effect on the sinter property, and the optimum basicity of the raw material needs to be carefully chosen.

7. Conclusions

A solid solution model for describing the SCFA phase during iron or sintering was developed. The phase stability of the SFCA, and the phase boundary between the SFCA and its surrounding phases, can be represented reasonably well by the model.
MPE calculation was compared with the data from the in situ XRD observation on the formation of SFCA phase during sintering. The observed increase of the stability range of the SFCA phase and the decrease of the temperature at which it begins to form with increasing Al2O3 in the sinter can be reproduced by the model. The deviation of the sintering reactions from the equilibrium under experimental conditions contributes to the difference between model calculations and experimental observations.
The effects of the composition of the sintering mixture and the oxygen partial pressure on the formation of the melt and its viscosity, and the formation of the SFCA phase under specified sintering conditions, were modelled by using MPE. It was found that under equilibrium conditions, the formation of the SFCA phase can be promoted by increasing the oxygen partial pressure and the basicity of the raw material. An increase of Al2O3 and MgO content does not have a significant effect on the SFCA formation. The modelling results also show that an increase of the oxygen partial pressure (10−3 atm or above) and basicity lead to a decrease of melt viscosity, which enhance the fluidity of the melt, and hence, the assimilation of the sinter. However, an increase of Al2O3 and MgO results in an increase of melt viscosity.

Author Contributions

Methodology: C.C., L.L.; software, validation and writing: C.C.; visualization: K.J.; funding acquisition: L.L.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the helpful discussions with L. Zhang and S. Jahanshahi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hancart, J.; Leroy, V.; Bragard, A. A study of the phases present in blast furnace sinter. Some considerations on the mechanism of their formation. CNRM Metall Rep. 1967, /DS 24/67, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamilton, J.D.G.; Hoskins, B.F.; Mumme, W.G.; Borbidge, W.E.; Montague, M.A. The crystal structure and crystal chemistry of Ca2.3Mg0.8Al1.5Si1.1Fe8.3O20 (SFCA): Solid solution limits and selected phase relationships of SFCA in the SiO2-Fe2O3-CaO(-Al2O3) system. N. Jb. Miner. Abh. 1989, 161, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mumme, W.G.; Clout, J.M.F.; Gable, R.W. The crystal structure of SCFA-I, Ca3.18Fe3+14.66Al1.34Fe2+0.82O28, a homologue of the aenigmatite structure type, and new crystal structure refinements of β-CFF, Ca2.99Fe3+14.30Fe2+0.55O25 and Mg-free SFCA, Ca2.45Fe3+9.04Al1.74Fe2+0.16Si0.6O20. N. Jb. Miner. Abh. 1998, 173, 93–117. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pownceby, M.I.; Patrick, T.R.C. Stability of SFC (silico-ferrite of calcium): Solid solution limits, thermal stability and selected phase relationships within the Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2 (FCS) system. Eur. J. Min. 2000, 12, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patrick, T.R.C.; Pownceby, M.I. Stability of silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) in air-solid solution limits between 1240 °C and 1390 °C and phase relationships within the Fe2O3-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 (FCAS) system. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2002, 33B, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scarlett, N.V.Y.; Pownceby, M.I.; Madsen, I.C.; Christensen, A.N. Reaction sequences in the formation of silico-ferrites of calcium and aluminum in iron ore sinter. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2004, 35B, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hsieh, L.; Whiteman, J. Effect of oxygen potential on mineral formation in lime-fluxed iron ore sinter. ISIJ Int. 1989, 29, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hsieh, L.; Whiteman, J. Effect of raw material composition on the mineral phases in lime-fluxed iron ore sinter. ISIJ Int. 1993, 33, 33–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, L.X.; Matthews, E. Oxidation and sintering of magnetite ore under oxidising conditions. ISIJ Int. 1997, 37, 854–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, L.X.; Matthews, E. Sintering reactions of magnetite concentrates under various atmospheres. ISIJ Int. 1997, 37, 1057–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.I.; Madsen, I.C.; Kimpton, J.A. Silico-ferrite of Calcium and Aluminum (SFCA) iron ore sinter bonding phases: New insight into their formation during heating and cooling. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2012, 43B, 1344–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.I.; Madsen, I.C.; Kimpton, J.A. Effect of oxygen partial pressure on the formation mechanisms of complex Ca-rich ferrites. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.I.; Madsen, I.C. In Situ X-ray Diffraction investigation of the formation mechanisms of silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum and aluminum-I-type (SFCA-I-type) complex calcium ferrites. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 1334–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Webster, N.A.S.; Pownceby, M.I.; Madsen, I.C.; Studer, A.J.; Manuel, J.R.; Kimpton, J.A. Fundamentals of silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) and SFCA-I iron ore sinter bonding phase formation: Effects of CaO:SiO2 ratio. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2014, 45B, 2097–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Webster, N.A.S.; Churchill, J.G.; Tufaile, F.; Pownceby, M.I.; Manuel, J.R.; Kimpton, J.A. Fundamentals of silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) and SFCA-I iron ore sinter bonding phase formation: Effects of titanomagnetite-based ironsand and titanium addition. ISIJ Int. 2016, 56, 1715–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Webster, N.A.S.; Odea, D.P.; Ellis, B.G.; Pownceby, M.I. Effects of gibbsite, kaolinite and Al-rich goethite as alumina sources on silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) and SFCA-I iron ore sinter bonding phase formation. ISIJ Int. 2017, 57, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kongoli, F.; Yazawa, A. Liquidus surface of FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2-CaO slag containing Al2O3, MgO, and Cu2O at intermediate oxygen partial pressures. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2001, 32B, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Henao, H.M.; Ohno, H.; Itagaki, K. Effect of Al2O3 or MgO addition on liquidus of FeOx corner in FeOx-SiO2-CaO slag at 1250 and 1300 °C. In Proceedings of the Sohn International Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, 27–31 August 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, C.; Zhang, L.; Lu, L.; Sun, S. Thermodynamic Calculation of Liquidus Surface of FeOx–CaO–SiO2 System. ISIJ Int. 2010, 50, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hidayat, T.; Shishin, D.; Decterov, S.A.; Jak, E. Critical thermodynamic re-evaluation and re-optimization of the CaO-FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2 system. CALPHAD 2017, 56, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Murao, R.; Harano, T.; Kimura, M.; Jung, I. Thermodynamic modeling of the SFCA phase Ca2(Fe,Ca)6(Fe,Al,Si)6O20. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.; Jahanshahi, S.; Sun, S.; Chen, C.; Bourke, B.; Wright, S.; Somerville, M. CSIRO’s multiphase reaction models and their industrial applications. JOM 2002, 54, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pownceby, M.I.; Clout, J.M.F. The importance of fine ore chemical composition and high temperature phase relations. In Proceedings of the Iron Ore 2002, Perth, Australia, 9–11 September 2002; pp. 209–215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hillert, M. The compound energy formalism. J. Alloys Compd. 2001, 320, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Loo, C.E.; Williams, R.P.; Matthews, L.T. Influence of material properties on high temperature zone reactions in sintering of iron ore. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. C 1992, 101, c7–c16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Choudhary, M.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Bannerjee, P.; Lahiri, A. Effect of variation of alumina on development of phases during iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int. 2008, 48, 1804–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hessien, M.M.; Kashiwaya, Y.; Ishii, K.; Nasr, M.I.; El-Geassy, A.A. Sintering and heating reduction processes of alumina containing iron ore samples. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2008, 35, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, L.; Holmes, R.J.; Manuel, J.R. Effects of Alumina on Sintering Performance of Hematite Iron Ores. ISIJ Int. 2007, 47, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sugiyama, K.; Monkawa, A.; Sugiyama, T. Crystal Structure of the SFCAM Phase Ca2(Ca,Fe,Mg,Al)6(Fe,Al,Si)6O20. ISIJ Int. 2005, 45, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Otomo, T.; Takasaki, Y.; Sato, H. Granule design for the sintering with less amount of liquid phase formation. ISIJ Int. 2009, 49, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clout, J.; Manuel, J. Fundamental investigations of differences in bonding mechanisms in iron ore sinter formed from magnetite concentrates and hematite ores. Powder Technol. 2003, 130, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 09 00361 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of the calculated and experimental measured phase stability [4] in the pseudo-binary CaO·3Fe2O3-4CaO·3SiO2 system in air.
Figure 1. Comparison of the calculated and experimental measured phase stability [4] in the pseudo-binary CaO·3Fe2O3-4CaO·3SiO2 system in air.
Minerals 09 00361 g001
Minerals 09 00361 g002 550
Figure 2. The comparison of the calculated and experimental measured phase stability of FeOx-CaO-SiO2 system [23] at 1513 K and oxygen partial pressure of (a) 0.21 atm and (b) 5 × 10−3 atm.
Figure 2. The comparison of the calculated and experimental measured phase stability of FeOx-CaO-SiO2 system [23] at 1513 K and oxygen partial pressure of (a) 0.21 atm and (b) 5 × 10−3 atm.
Minerals 09 00361 g002
Minerals 09 00361 g003 550
Figure 3. The comparison of the calculated and experimental measured SFCA stability [5] within the CCC plane at (a) 1513 K and (b) 1573 K.
Figure 3. The comparison of the calculated and experimental measured SFCA stability [5] within the CCC plane at (a) 1513 K and (b) 1573 K.
Minerals 09 00361 g003
Minerals 09 00361 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison of the calculated and experimental measured minimum solubility of Al2O3 in SFCA [5].
Figure 4. Comparison of the calculated and experimental measured minimum solubility of Al2O3 in SFCA [5].
Minerals 09 00361 g004
Minerals 09 00361 g005 550
Figure 5. Calculated mineral composition of the sinter at oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm under various temperature.
Figure 5. Calculated mineral composition of the sinter at oxygen partial pressure of 5 × 10−3 atm under various temperature.
Minerals 09 00361 g005
Minerals 09 00361 g006 550
Figure 6. Phase composition of sinter under varied temperature at oxygen partial pressure of (a) 10−8 atm and (b) 10−3 atm.
Figure 6. Phase composition of sinter under varied temperature at oxygen partial pressure of (a) 10−8 atm and (b) 10−3 atm.
Minerals 09 00361 g006
Minerals 09 00361 g007 550
Figure 7. Mineral composition of sinter under varied oxygen partial pressure at temperature of (a) 1573 K and (b) 1373 K.
Figure 7. Mineral composition of sinter under varied oxygen partial pressure at temperature of (a) 1573 K and (b) 1373 K.
Minerals 09 00361 g007
Minerals 09 00361 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various oxygen partial pressure.
Figure 8. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various oxygen partial pressure.
Minerals 09 00361 g008
Minerals 09 00361 g009 550
Figure 9. Mineral composition of sinter under varied basicity at temperature of (a) 1573 and (b) 1373 K.
Figure 9. Mineral composition of sinter under varied basicity at temperature of (a) 1573 and (b) 1373 K.
Minerals 09 00361 g009
Minerals 09 00361 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various sinter basicity.
Figure 10. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various sinter basicity.
Minerals 09 00361 g010
Minerals 09 00361 g011 550
Figure 11. Mineral composition of sinter under varied Al2O3 at temperature of (a) 1573 and (b) 1373 K.
Figure 11. Mineral composition of sinter under varied Al2O3 at temperature of (a) 1573 and (b) 1373 K.
Minerals 09 00361 g011
Minerals 09 00361 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various Al2O3 content.
Figure 12. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various Al2O3 content.
Minerals 09 00361 g012
Minerals 09 00361 g013 550
Figure 13. Mineral composition of sinter under varied MgO at temperature of (a) 1573 K and (b) 1373 K.
Figure 13. Mineral composition of sinter under varied MgO at temperature of (a) 1573 K and (b) 1373 K.
Minerals 09 00361 g013
Minerals 09 00361 g014 550
Figure 14. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various MgO content.
Figure 14. (a) Composition of the liquid melt formed at 1573 K and oxygen partial pressure of 10−8 atm and (b) the viscosity of the melt under various MgO content.
Minerals 09 00361 g014
Table
Table 1. Modelling Conditions.
Table 1. Modelling Conditions.
T,
K		PO2
Atm		SiO2,
Mass%		CaO, Mass%Al2O3, Mass%MgO,
Mass%		Fe2O3,
Mass%
~162310−8~10−36103378

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Lu, L.; Jiao, K. Thermodynamic Modelling of Iron Ore Sintering Reactions. Minerals 2019, 9, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9060361

AMA Style

Chen C, Lu L, Jiao K. Thermodynamic Modelling of Iron Ore Sintering Reactions. Minerals. 2019; 9(6):361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9060361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chunlin, Liming Lu, and Kexin Jiao. 2019. "Thermodynamic Modelling of Iron Ore Sintering Reactions" Minerals 9, no. 6: 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9060361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop