Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Biopolymer Materials and Synthesis Techniques to Develop a Rod-Shaped Biopolymer Surrogate for Legionella pneumophila
Next Article in Special Issue
Macroporous 3D Chitosan Cryogels for Fastac 10EC Pesticide Adsorption and Antibacterial Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Characterizing Mechanical, Heat Seal, and Gas Barrier Performance of Biodegradable Films to Determine Food Packaging Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Antifungal Efficacy and Release Behavior of Fungicide-Loaded Chitosan-Carrageenan Nanoparticles against Phytopathogenic Fungi
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/polym14132570
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Healing Chitosan Hydrogels: Preparation and Rheological Characterization

by
Anda Mihaela Craciun
*,
Simona Morariu
and
Luminita Marin
*
“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Gr. Ghica Voda Alley, 41A, 700487 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(13), 2570; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132570
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 17 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Chitosan-Based Composites II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The paper aims at the preparation of chitosan self-healing hydrogels, designed as carriers for local drug delivery by parenteral administration. To this aim, 30 hydrogels were prepared using chitosan and pyridoxal 5-phosphate (P5P), the active form of vitamin B6 as precursors, by varying the ratio of glucosamine units and aldehyde on the one hand and the water content on the other hand. The driving forces of hydrogelation were investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction, and polarized light microscopy (POM) measurements. NMR technique was also used to investigate the stability of hydrogels over time, and their morphological particularities were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Degradability of the hydrogels was studied in media of four different pH, and preliminary self-healing ability was visually established by injection through a syringe needle. In-depth rheological investigation was conducted in order to monitor the storage and loss moduli, linear viscoelastic regime, and structural recovery capacity. It was concluded that chitosan crosslinking with pyridoxal 5-phosphate is a suitable route to reach self-healing hydrogels with a good balance of mechanical properties/structural recovery, good stability over time, and degradability controlled by pH.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are three-dimensional polymeric networks with high water content, which found a great variety of applications in biomedicine, agriculture, or environmental protection. Recent studies revealed self-healing (SH) hydrogels as a new type of soft matter with a unique ability to recover the structure and function after applying an external stimulus, such as an injection through a needle [1]. Thus, the SH hydrogels are valuable materials, which offer the advantage of simple administration by injection at a certain site of the body, to fill a cavity with an irregular shape or to form a coating on a surface in tissue engineering or wound healing. Moreover, by loading with bioactive compounds, they transform into excellent vehicles for drug delivery systems to be applied for local action, in tumors or on wounds [2,3]. Many efforts were directed toward the development of SH hydrogels. Rationally speaking, the SH hydrogels can be prepared via non-covalent or reversible covalent bonds that break under external stress and reform when the stress is removed. Thus, the SH mechanism is grounded on the dynamic equilibrium between dissociation and recombination of various interactions, which allows the hydrogel to heal damages and reform shapes. Studies on SH hydrogels demonstrated that while physical interactions lead to a fragile and rapid dynamic equilibrium, the dynamic covalent bonds lead to a stable and slow one [4]. Common reversible dynamic bonds used for building SH hydrogels include imine, boronate, oxime, disulfide, and acylhydrazone bonds, or Diels–Alder reactions, whereas non-covalent interaction includes hydrogen bonds, or ionic, host–guest, and hydrophobic interactions [5]. SH hydrogels are often prepared using synthetic polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol, poly(ethylene oxide), poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), polyacrylic acid, polystearyl methacrylate, poly (N,N-dimethylacrylamide) or polyoxyethylene acrylate, which present the main disadvantage of being non-biodegradable, limiting thus the in vivo application [1,3,5]. To overcome this drawback, natural originating polymers are desirable alternatives, chitosan being a promising one [6]. Chitosan is a natural originating polymer with good biocompatibility and biodegradability, which is already broadly used in pharmaceutical and medical fields [7]. From the chemical point of view, chitosan is a polyamine, and its main reaction path is the formation of imine bonds, which are well-recognized reversible bonds with great reaction speed under mild conditions [8,9,10]. The literature survey reveals chitosan self-healing hydrogels prepared via imine bonds with a large variety of crosslinkers: glyoxal [11], glutaraldehyde [12], polyethylene glycol [13], Pluronic-F127 [14], sodium alginate [15], konjac glucomannan [16], and xanthan gum [17]. Nevertheless, the glyoxal and glutaraldehyde were demonstrated as being toxic (mutagenic and neurotoxic) [18,19], while the synthetic polymer crosslinkers are non-biodegradable.
Our studies in the field of chitosan hydrogels demonstrated a new crosslinking route of chitosan with monoaldehydes, based on the formation of imine units and self-assembling into clusters with the role of crosslinking nodes [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The method is promising, giving access to a large variety of multifunctional hydrogels, whose properties can be tuned by a proper choice of the monoaldehyde crosslinker. Moreover, the aldehydes exist in a large variety in nature, having a high potential to be biocompatible. Such an aldehyde is pyridoxal 5-phosphate (P5P), the active form of vitamin B6, approved by the FDA for human usage as a food supplement, which proved preventive tumorigenesis activity [27] and synergistic effect with some antitumor drugs [28]. In this framework, the hydrogels prepared from chitosan and P5P keep the promise of active carriers for antitumor drug delivery in local therapy. The rational question is if these hydrogels based on the reversible imine bonds present a self-healing effect and can be administered at the tumor site by injection. To find the answer to this question, a large series of hydrogels based on chitosan and P5P were prepared, and the influence of their composition on the mechanical and thixotropic properties was investigated by rheological measurements. Moreover, their self-healing ability was verified by laboratory tests. It was demonstrated that hydrogels based on chitosan and P5P have self-healing ability and can be easily applied by injection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Low molecular weight chitosan (Ch) (Mv = 169.9 kDa and DD = 83% established by viscosimetry and NMR methods [29]), pyridoxal 5-phosphate (≥98%), acetic acid (HAc) (≥ 99%), sodium acetate (≥ 99%), disodium hydrogen phosphate (for analysis), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (for analysis), sodium chloride (≥ 99%), potassium chloride (≥ 99%), and sodium hydroxide (≥ 99%) from Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) were used without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis

A large series of 30 hydrogels were prepared by mixing chitosan with pyridoxal 5-phosphate in an aqueous acetic acid solution, varying the molar ratio of glucosamine units of chitosan and P5P (NH2/CHO ratio) on the one hand, and the water content on the other hand (Table 1). Then, 2 mL solution of 3.985–0.455% P5P in 0.35% aqueous HAc was added under vortex shaking to a chitosan solution (3%, 1%, 0.6%, and 0.43%), at 55 °C (Table 1). Hydrogelation instantaneously occurred for the mixtures with high content of P5P and slower for those containing lower content of P5P. All samples were obtained starting from 60 mg chitosan dissolved in: 4 mL of water (1–9); 8 mL of water (1d–5d); 12 mL of water (1t–4t); or 16 mL of water (1q–2q) (Table 1).
The hydrogels were coded with numbers and letters to reflect their composition. Thus, the number indicates the molar ratio between NH2/CHO (from 1 to 9), and the letter indicates the increase in the water content in hydrogel: no letter indicates the use of a 3% solution of chitosan; d: 1% (double water content in hydrogels); t: 0.6% (triple water content in hydrogels); q: 0.43% (four times higher water content in hydrogels), e.g., 2t is the code for the hydrogel with a 2/1 ratio of NH2/CHO, triple diluted compared to the most concentrated hydrogel (3%).

2.3. Equipment and Methods

The solid hydrogel samples (xerogels) were prepared by hydrogel freezing in liquid nitrogen, followed by drying under reduced pressure (1.150 mbar) at 50 °C for 24 h, using a Labconco Free Zone Freeze Dry System equipment (Kansas, MO, USA).
NMR spectra were recorded on a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) BRUKER Advance DRX 400 MHz spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA), at room temperature, on hydrogel samples prepared in the NMR tubes using deuterated water.
FTIR spectra were recorded on Bruker Vertex 70 FTIR Spectrophotometer (Ettligen, Germany) using the ATR module on xerogel samples. OPUS 6.5 and OriginPro 8.5 software (Ettligen, Germany) were involved in the deconvolution of spectra in the 1700–1580 cm−1 region, using the curve fitting method with Lorentzian 50% and Gaussian 50%.
The supramolecular structure of the hydrogel was investigated with a diffractometer Benchtop Miniflex 600 Rigaku (Tokyo, Japan), from 5 to 40°, registered with 0.01 step and 3°/min speed, on the xerogel pellets, and with a Polarized Optical Microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager.A2m, camera Axiocam 208 cc (Wetzlar, Germany)), on thin xerogel slices.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to assess the morphology of the hydrogels by observing the xerogels with an SEM-EDAX–Quanta 200 (Eindhoven, Germany) using a field emission and voltage of 20 keV.
The hydrogels’ stability in media of different pH was investigated by gravimetric method, as follows. The hydrogel samples were weighed to contain 5 mg of dried substances (mi). Each sample was immersed in a 5 mL buffer solution of different pH at 37 °C for 9 days, and the buffer solution was refreshed every 3 days. After 9 days, the samples were taken out, washed three times with distilled water to remove salts residues, and then lyophilized. The obtained xerogels were weighted (mx), and the mass loss was calculated with the equation: mass loss = (mi − mx)/mi × 100, for each pH, at 9 days. The investigation was conducted in buffer media of different pH, as follows: pH = 5.6 (HAc/NaAc), pH = 6.8 (DHP, PDP, NaCl, and KCl), pH = 7.4 (DHP, PDP, NaCl, and KCl),) and pH = 8.0 ((DHP, PDP, NaCl, KCl, and NaOH).
The rheological investigations were carried out on an MCR302 Anton-Paar rheometer (Graz, Austria) with the plane–plane geometry (diameter of 50 mm). The rheometer is equipped with Peltier temperature control, and the solvent evaporation was prevented by using a trap cover (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). The linear viscoelastic regime (LVR) for each sample was determined by an amplitude sweep test at a constant oscillation frequency (ω) of 10 rad s−1 in the shear stress (τ) range of 10−3–2 × 102 Pa. The storage (G′) and the loss (G″) moduli values were determined by a frequency sweep test in the oscillatory frequency (ω) range of 10−1–102 rad s−1 at a strain (γ) value from LVR. Finally, the structural recovery capacity of the investigated samples after applying three consecutive flow steps, 1–100–1%, at 10 rad s−1, was evaluated. The rheological measurements were performed at 37 °C in duplicate to estimate the variability of the results, using a fresh sample for each test. The errors were lower than 13%. For some strongly crosslinked samples, no rheological measurements could be performed due to their brittle properties.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Synthesis and Structural Characterization

A large series of 30 hydrogels was prepared by reacting chitosan with pyridoxal 5-phosphate (P5P) in different molar ratios between glucosamine units of chitosan and P5P aldehyde, and using different concentrations of the chitosan solutions, to reach hydrogels with different water content (Scheme 1, Table 1). The hydrogel formation was determined by tube inversion test and by rheological experiments.
Structural and supramolecular characterization of the hydrogels revealed that hydrogelation took place due to the formation of imine units and the occurrence of physical forces between the chitosan chains and P5P.
The formation of the imine units was confirmed on the one hand through 1H-NMR spectra that displayed the occurrence of the specific chemical shift of imine proton around 9 ppm and on the other hand through FTIR spectra by the occurrence of specific vibration band of imine bond around 1602–1613 cm−1 (Figure 1a–d) [23,30]. It should be mentioned that 1H-NMR spectra also revealed the presence of aldehyde proton, in agreement with an equilibrium state of the imination reaction, shifted to the products when the functional amine units were in excess compared to aldehyde ones [20,22].
Further, the intermolecular forces were confirmed by the shifting of the maximum of the broad band characteristic for the vibration of the hydroxyl, amine, and H-bonds between them, from 3300 cm−1 in chitosan to 3600 cm−1 in hydrogels. This was associated with the modification of the H-bond environment, as well documented for other chitosan hydrogels [20,21,22,23,31]. The occurrence of intermolecular forces was also demonstrated by the X-ray diffraction of the hydrogels when compared to pristine chitosan. Chitosan displayed two broad overlapped diffraction bands from 8 to 14° and from 15 to 27°, corresponding to the inter-chain and intra-molecular distances, respectively, in line with the presence of ordered clusters characteristic for the semicrystalline nature of chitosan [32]. By comparison, the hydrogels showed only a broad diffraction band from 12 to 27°, indicating a larger polydispersity of intermolecular distances (Figure 1e). This is in accordance with the (i) weakening of the intermolecular forces between the chitosan chains caused by the grafting of the imine units and (ii) manifestation of new intermolecular forces, i.e., H-bonds prompted by the hydroxyl groups of phosphate units of P5P. These data indicate that chitosan hydrogelation was driven by the imination and physical forces induced by the newly formed imine units. On the other hand, POM images showed intense birefringence, the signature of an ordering degree (Figure 1f) [20,21,22,23,24,25,33]. Coupling X-ray and POM data, it can be envisaged that intermolecular forces directed a supramolecular arrangement of the imino-chitosan chains.

3.2. Morphology

The morphological appearance of the hydrogels was investigated by SEM analysis of the corresponding xerogels (Figure 2). All hydrogels displayed microporous morphology, with pore dimensions varying as a function of water content and crosslinking degree. Thus, as expected, the increase in the water content in hydrogels was accompanied by the increase in the pore diameter from around 10 μm to approx. 50 μm. Against the rule reported in the literature for the covalent crosslinked hydrogels, according to which the pore dimension increases as the crosslinking degree decreases [34,35], the studied hydrogels indicated the pore dimension increasing along the crosslinking degree increasing. Moreover, the increase in water content led to a less uniform distribution of the pore diameters, most probably due to the diminishing of the intermolecular physical connections amongst the chitosan chains and P5P.

3.3. The Hydrogel Stability over Time

The paper’s aim was to reach self-healing hydrogels that can be easily injected, and to this end, hydrogels with high water content were prepared. As the 1H-NMR spectra indicated an equilibrium of the imination reaction, it is desirable to know how the stability (and implicit properties) of the hydrogels is affected by this equilibrium. 1H-NMR spectra recorded over time (1, 7, 15, and 22 days) evidenced the progressive diminishing of the integrals of imine and aldehyde protons and the appearance of the enol proton (around 6.5 ppm) [23] for the hydrogels with high water content (those prepared with chitosan solutions 0.6% and 0.43%) (Figure 3a). This suggested that a too diluted system favored the shifting of imination to the reagents and the stabilization of the enol form of aldehyde. No such behavior was noticed for the hydrogels with lower water content (those prepared with 3% and 1% chitosan solutions); the hydrogel spectra remained unaffected over 22 days (Figure 3b). The 1H-NMR modification of the hydrogels with higher water content was accompanied by the gel–sol transition, pointing to their limited storage duration at room temperature, less than 22 days.
As the hydrogels were thought as SH hydrogels to be injected at targeted sites in the body, their stability/degradation behavior was investigated in media of different pH: 5.6, 6.8, 7.4, and 8, corresponding to different body fluids (tumors, normal tissue, peritoneal fluid) [36,37]. It is known that hydrogels swell in aqueous media due to their ability to absorb high water content, and their swelling rate is influenced by the pH and the hydrogel porosity. Concurrently, the pH triggers different dissolution patterns of the hydrogels [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,38,39,40]. In this context, the stability of hydrogels was monitored in media of four different pHs (Figure 4). No visual alteration of the hydrogels was seen over 9 days of investigation. Nevertheless, gravimetric monitoring revealed a progressive degradation, reaching a mass loss from 13 to 56%, function of media pH and hydrogel composition (Figure 4). As expected, the hydrogels degraded faster in acidic acetate buffer (pH = 5.6), in agreement with the shifting of imination equilibrium to the reagents and faster dissolution of chitosan under the influence of protons [41,42]. Interestingly, against the expectations, the mass loss decreased as the content of P5P decreased. A possible explanation for this can be the structural similarity of the phosphate group of the P5P unit with the phosphate buffer, which favored the dissolution.

3.4. Visual Testing of Self-Healing Ability of the Hydrogels

As was demonstrated in Section 3.1, the hydrogelation of chitosan with P5P was the result of the formation of reversible imine bonds and intermolecular physical interactions, both of them being favorable for the self-healing process [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The ability of hydrogels to self-heal was preliminarily investigated by the injection of the hydrogels through a syringe needle. As can be seen in Figure 5a–d,f, the hydrogels could easily pass through a needle of 0.6 mm without clogging and reshape the hydrogel. For better visualization of the self-healing, part of the hydrogel has been stained with methylene blue and injected next to a pristine hydrogel (Figure 5e,g), and they instantly connected, forming a single piece. This self-healing behavior points to an easy administration at specific sites, e.g., tumors or wounds.

3.5. Rheological Properties

As the studied hydrogels showed visual self-healing behavior, the next step to obtain more information on the recovery degree and to have an insight into their mechanical stability was to investigate their rheological properties [43,44]. The shear stress dependence of viscoelastic moduli, determined by amplitude sweep measurements, showed the gel-like behavior of the investigated samples (G′ > G″) (Figure 6). G′ and G″ values were constant below the limiting shear stress, τl, which corresponds to a limiting strain, γl. Viscoelastic moduli start to decrease above τl due to the modification of sample structure, and after critical shear stress or strain (where G′ = G″), the network structure was destructed, the sample acquiring liquid-like properties with G′ < G″.
The increase in water content and the decrease in P5P amount led to the shortening of the linear viscoelastic range (LVR) (Figure 6, Table 2). Thereby, a double water amount in hydrogels caused a diminishing of almost one order of magnitude of the interval in which G′ and G″ are constant, i.e., below 40.8 Pa for the sample 2d and below 4.7 Pa for the sample 2q (Figure 6a). The decrease in P5P amount in the starting system (higher NH2/CHO ratio) determined the decrease in the limit stress of LVR, e.g., from 40.8 Pa (sample 2d) to 0.6 Pa (sample 4d) (Figure 6b).
The effect of water content and NH2/CHO ratio on the G′ and G″ values was also investigated by frequency sweep measurements at a strain of 1% from LVR (Figure 7). G′ and G″ decreased when the water content in hydrogels decreased due to the reduced probability of chitosan-P5P-chitosan contacts, which leads to decreased crosslinking capacity (Figure 7a). Thus, a double amount of water inflicted the diminishing of the G′ and G″ values (at 1 rad s−1) from 326 Pa and 28.7 Pa (sample 2d) to 20.2 Pa and 2.8 Pa (sample 2q).
Generally, a lower amount of crosslinker causes the formation of a smaller number of bridges between the chitosan chains and a decrease in the density of the hydrogel network, leading to worsened viscoelastic properties. This general rule also applied to the studied hydrogels, with G′ and G″ reducing by two orders of magnitude from 326 Pa and 28.7 Pa for the sample 2d (NH2/CHO = 2) to 3.4 Pa and 0.9 Pa for the sample 4d (NH2/CHO = 4), confirming a higher crosslinking degree for the hydrogel samples prepared with higher P5P amounts (Figure 7b, Table 2).
Considering the rheological data obtained by the amplitude and frequency sweep tests, in Figure 8, it is illustrated the effect of water content and NH2/CHO ratio of the hydrogels on the γl and the loss tangent (tan δ = G″/G′). The loss tangent, tan δ, gives the information about the viscoelasticity degree of the material in the investigation conditions: tan δ > 1 is characteristic for liquid-like materials, and tan δ < 1 is characteristic for solid-like materials [45]. The widest ranges of linear viscoelasticity were recorded for the hydrogels with NH2/CHO ratios up to 3, with double water amount (Figure 8a). The other samples exhibited the limit of LVR below 10 Pa (Table 2). The samples with NH2/CHO ≤ 2.5, regardless of the water content, exhibit the lowest values of tan δ due to their stronger network (Figure 8b).
The structural recovery ability of the samples was studied at 10 rads−1 by applying three shear steps: 1% (300 s); 100% (300 s); 1% (360 s) [46]. Figure 9a shows the effect of the NH2/CHO ratio on the G′ recovery degree for the samples 2d, 3d, and 4d.
The samples displayed G′ values that remain constant during the measurements at low strain amplitude, and by applying a strain of 100%, G′ immediately decreases. At high deformation amplitude, a decrease in G′ was observed in the first seconds of shear and the constant value was reached after about 150 s. Upon the removal of the high strain pulse, G′ quickly increases, recovering partially or totally the network structure. The structure recovery degrees of investigated samples show values higher than 74.7%, indicating a good thixotropic recovery (Figure 9b, Table 2) [47]. The increase in water content and decrease in the P5P content favored the structural recovery degree of the hydrogel network. The effect of water content on the structural recovery degree was more important for the samples containing a smaller amount of P5P crosslinker (higher NH2/CHO ratio). Thereby, for the sample with NH2/CHO = 2, the structural recovery degree increases from 74.7% for the sample 2d to 80% for the sample 2q. On the other hand, the structural recovery degree of the sample with NH2/CHO = 3 increased from 78.8% for 3d to 94.7% for 3t. The higher structural recovery degree of the samples with lower crosslinker amount and/or higher water content was correlated with the easier restoration of the physical forces in the less viscous hydrogel.
In conclusion, the rheological investigation of the effect of water content and crosslinker amount on the viscoelastic properties of the hydrogels shed light on their gel-like and thixotropic behavior. For all studied samples, it was evidenced the gel-like behavior with G′ greater than G″. The increase in the crosslinker content, on the one hand, widens the range of shear stability and enhances the mechanical properties and, on the other hand, decreases the structural recovery degree (thixotropic behavior). Analyzing both the effect of the amount of crosslinker and water content on the rheological properties, it was found that the optimum experimental conditions to obtain the convenient viscoelastic behavior correspond to NH2/CHO < 3, with a water content corresponding to the hydrogel preparation from chitosan solutions 1%.
Comparing the data with other SH chitosan hydrogels [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,48,49], it should be remarked that chitosan crosslinking with P5P yielded SH hydrogels for a large variety of compositions allowing the fine-tuning of the other properties in view of specific applications.

4. Conclusions

A large series of 30 hydrogels was prepared from chitosan and pyridoxal 5-phosphate, varying the glucosamine/aldehyde ratio from 1 to 9, and the water content by using chitosan solutions of 3, 1, 0.6, and 0.43%. The NMR, FTIR, X-ray, and POM investigation indicated that hydrogelation was guided by the formation of imine bonds and physical forces between chitosan chains and pyridoxal 5-phosphate. The hydrogels had microporous morphology with pore diameter controlled by the water content, degradability in aqueous media controlled by pH, and good stability over 22 days. By visual assessment, the studied hydrogels were capable of passing through a needle of 0.6 mm without clogging and reshaping the hydrogel, indicating self-healing ability. Deeper rheological investigations demonstrated that the viscoelastic properties decreased along with the increase in NH2/CHO ratio and water content, indicating the best mechanical properties for the hydrogels with NH2/CHO ≤ 3, regardless of the water content. On the other hand, the structural recovery degree increased when NH2/CHO and water volume in hydrogel increased, reaching values higher than 70% for the hydrogels with NH2/CHO ≤ 4. From the perspective of the application is injectable hydrogels, the best balance of mechanical properties/structure recovery degree was reached for the hydrogel prepared using an NH2/CHO ratio of 4 and chitosan solution of 1%. These results indicate the studied hydrogels as valuable vehicles for antitumor drug delivery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.C. and L.M.; Data curation, L.M.; Formal analysis, A.M.C. and L.M.; Funding acquisition, A.M.C.; Investigation, A.M.C. and S.M.; Methodology, A.M.C., S.M. and L.M.; Resources, A.M.C.; Software, A.M.C.; Supervision, L.M.; Validation, A.M.C.; Writing—original draft, A.M.C., S.M. and L.M.; Writing—review and editing, L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI–UEFISCDI, grant number PD 197/2020 within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Hsu, S. Synthesis and biomedical applications of self-healing hydrogels. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Balakrishnan, B.; Joshi, N.; Thorat, K.; Kaur, S.; Chandan, R.; Banerjee, R. A tumor responsive self healing prodrug hydrogel enables synergistic action of doxorubicin and miltefosine for focal combination chemotherapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2920–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, A.; Liu, Y.; Qin, D.; Sun, M.; Wang, T.; Chen, X. Research status of self-healing hydrogel for wound management: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2108–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zou, W.; Dong, J.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Xie, T. Dynamic covalent polymer networks: From old chemistry to modern day innovations. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Devi, V.K.A.; Shyam, R.; Palaniappan, A.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Oh, T.-H.; Nathanael, A.J. Self-healing hydrogels: Preparation, mechanism and advancement in biomedical applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ou, Y.; Tian, M. Advances in multifunctional chitosan-based self-healing hydrogels for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 7955–7971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rao, S.B.; Sharma, C. Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: Studies on its safety and hemostatic potential. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 34, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lehn, J.-M. Dynamers: Dynamic molecular and supramolecular polymers. Aust. J. Chem. 2010, 63, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, R.; Petit, E.; Barboiu, M.; Li, S.; Sun, W.; Chen, C. Biobased dynamic hydrogels by reversible imine bonding for controlled release of thymopentin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 127, 112210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belowich, M.E.; Stoddart, J.F. Dynamic imine chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2003–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malik, U.S.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Jahan, Z.; Zafar, M.I.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Sher, F. Nano-structured dynamic Schiff base cues as robust self-healing polymers for biomedical and tissue engineering applications: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 495–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Njoku, D.I.; Cui, M.; Xiao, H.; Shang, B.; Li, Y. Understanding the anticorrosive protective mechanisms of modified epoxy coatings with improved barrier, active and self-healing functionalities: EIS and spectroscopic techniques. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Han, X.; Meng, X.; Wu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Qi, X. Dynamic imine bond cross-linked self-healing thermosensitive hydrogels for sustained anticancer therapy via intratumoral injection. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 93, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lin, S.-H.; Papadakis, C.M.; Kang, J.-J.; Lin, J.-M.; Hsu, S. Injectable phenolic-chitosan self-healing hydrogel with hierarchical micelle architectures and fast adhesiveness. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 3945–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, Z.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Y.M.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Q. Self-healing polysaccharide-based hydrogels as injectable carriers for neural stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, H.; Cheng, J.; Ran, L.; Yu, K.; Lu, B.; Lan, G.; Dai, F.; Lu, F. An injectable self-healing hydrogel with adhesive and antibacterial properties effectively promotes wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 201, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, J.; Deng, Y.; Ren, J.; Chen, G.; Wang, G.; Wang, F.; Wu, X. Novel in situ forming hydrogel based on xanthan and chitosan re-gelifying in liquids for local drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 186, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beauchamp, R.O.; St Clair, M.B.; Fennell, T.R.; Clarke, D.O.; Morgan, K.T.; Kari, F.W. A critical review of the toxicology of glutaraldehyde. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1992, 22, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Andersen, F.A. Final report on the safety assessment of glyoxal. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1995, 14, 348–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iftime, M.-M.; Morariu, S.; Marin, L. Salicyl-imine-chitosan hydrogels: Supramolecular architecturing as a crosslinking method toward multifunctional hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 165, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Olaru, A.-M.; Marin, L.; Morariu, S.; Pricope, G.; Pinteala, M.; Tartau-Mititelu, L. Biocompatible chitosan based hydrogels for potential application in local tumour therapy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 179, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Iftime, M.-M.; Rosca, I.; Sandu, A.-I.; Marin, L. Chitosan crosslinking with a vanillin isomer toward self-healing hydrogels with antifungal activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 205, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Craciun, A.-M.; Mititelu-Tartau, L.; Gavril, G.; Marin, L. Chitosan crosslinking with pyridoxal 5-phosphate vitamer toward biocompatible hydrogels for in vivo applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 1734–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lungu, R.; Paun, M.-A.; Peptanariu, D.; Ailincai, D.; Marin, L.; Nichita, M.-V.; Paun, V.-A.; Paun, V.-P. Biocompatible chitosan-based hydrogels for bioabsorbable wound dressings. Gels 2022, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ailincai, D.; Rosca, I.; Morariu, S.; Mititelu-Tartau, L.; Marin, L. Iminoboronate-chitooligosaccharides hydrogels with strong antimicrobial activity for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 276, 118727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bejan, A.; Doroftei, F.; Cheng, X.; Marin, L. Phenothiazine-chitosan based eco-adsorbents: A special design for mercury removal and fast naked eye detection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1839–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Natera, J.; Massad, W.; García, N.A. The role of vitamin B6 as an antioxidant in the presence of vitamin B2-photogenerated reactive oxygen species. A kinetic and mechanistic study. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2012, 11, 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Krishnamoorthy, S.; Grubbs, R.H. Aldehyde-Functionalized magnetic particles to capture off-target chemotherapeutic agents. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 29121–29126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Andreica, B.-I.; Ailincai, D.; Sandu, A.-I.; Marin, L. Amphiphilic chitosan-g-poly(trimethylene carbonate)—A new approach for biomaterials design. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jarząbek, B.; Hajduk, B.; Domański, M.; Kaczmarczyk, B.; Nitschke, P.; Bednarski, H. Optical properties of phenylene–thiophene-based polyazomethine thin films. High Perform. Polym. 2017, 30, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ailincai, D.; Marin, L.; Morariu, S.; Mares, M.; Bostanaru, A.-C.; Pinteala, M.; Simionescu, B.C.; Barboiu, M. Dual crosslinked iminoboronate-chitosan hydrogels with strong antifungal activity against Candida planktonic yeasts and biofilms. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 152, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Leceta, I.; Guerrero, P.; Ibarburu, I.; Dueñas, M.T.; de la Caba, K. Characterization and antimicrobial analysis of chitosan-based films. J. Food Eng. 2013, 116, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anisiei, A.; Rosca, I.; Sandu, A.-I.; Bele, A.; Cheng, X.; Marin, L. Imination of microporous chitosan fibers—A route to biomaterials with “on demand” antimicrobial activity and biodegradation for wound dressings. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuan, Z.; Han, H.; Li, T.; Li, L.; Guo, X. Chitosan cross-linked poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels: Drug release control and mechanism. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 152, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Stoleru, E.; Dumitriu, R.P.; Ailiesei, G.-L.; Yilmaz, C.; Brebu, M. Synthesis of bioactive materials by in situ one-step direct loading of Syzygium aromaticum essential oil into chitosan-based hydrogels. Gels 2022, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jacquet, P.; Sugarbaker, P.H. Peritoneal-plasma barrier. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: Principles of management. Cancer Treat. Res. 1996, 82, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gerweck, L.E.; Seetharaman, K. Advances in brief cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: Potential exploitation for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 1194–1198. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bratskaya, S.; Skatova, A.; Privar, Y.; Boroda, A.; Kantemirova, E.; Maiorova, M.; Pestov, A. Stimuli-responsive dual cross-linked N-carboxyethylchitosan hydrogels with tunable dissolution rate. Gels 2021, 7, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rusu, A.G.; Chiriac, A.P.; Nita, L.E.; Rosca, I.; Pinteala, M.; Mititelu-Tartau, L. Chitosan derivatives in macromolecular co-assembly nanogels with potential for biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 4231–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiong, S.; Duan, L.; Cheng, X. Novel coumarin-chitosan fluorescent hydrogel for the selective identification of Fe2+ in aqueous systems. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 6066–6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Crugeiras, J.; Rios, A.; Riveiros, E.; Richard, J.P. Substituent effects on the thermodynamic stability of imines formed from glycine and aromatic aldehydes: Implications for the catalytic activity of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15815–15824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ipate, A.M.; Serbezeanu, D.; Bargan, A.; Hamciuc, C.; Ochiuz, L.; Gherman, S. Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-chitosan hydrogels as matrices for controlled drug release. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2021, 55, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, Y.P.; Zhao, X.; Ma, P.X.; Guo, B.L.; Du, Y.P.; Han, X.Z. pH-responsive injectable hydrogels with mucosal adhesiveness based on chitosan-grafted-dihydrocaffeic acid and oxidized pullulan for localized drug delivery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 536, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, J.; Boddu, V.M.; Liu, S.X.; Liu, W.-C. A comparative study of microrheology of nanocellulose produced from corn stover using diffusing wave spectroscopy (DWS) and mechanical rheometry. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2020, 54, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ruiz-Pardo, C.; Silva-Gutiérrez, L.; Lizardi-Mendoza, J.; López-Franco, Y.; Peniche-Covas, C.; Argüelles-Monal, W. Chitosan hydrogels based on the diels–alder click reaction: Rheological and kinetic study. Polymers 2022, 14, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Geisler, I.M.; Schneider, J.P. Evolution-based design of an injectable hydrogel. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Patel, A.R.; Dewettinck, K. Comparative evaluation of structured oil systems: Shellac oleogel, HPMC oleogel, and HIPE gel. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 117, 1772–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, C.; Zhan, W.; Tang, X.; Mo, F.; Fu, L.; Lin, B. Self-healing chitosan/vanillin hydrogels based on Schiff-base bond/hydrogen bond hybrid linkages. Polym. Test. 2018, 66, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sharma, S.; Jain, P.; Tiwari, S. Dynamic imine bond based chitosan smart hydrogel with magnified mechanical strength for controlled drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 02570 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Representation of chitosan hydrogelation with P5P.
Scheme 1. Representation of chitosan hydrogelation with P5P.
Polymers 14 02570 sch001
Polymers 14 02570 g001a 550Polymers 14 02570 g001b 550
Figure 1. (a) NMR spectra of representative hydrogels and pristine aldehyde; (b) FTIR spectra of representative xerogels compared to pristine aldehyde and chitosan; (c,d) deconvolution of 1580–1700 cm−1 domain for chitosan and 1t hydrogel; (e) X-ray diffractograms of representative xerogels and pristine chitosan; (f) Representative POM image of xerogel 1.5t (to be representative, the hydrogels given in figure have different molar ratio of glucosamine/aldehyde units and/or different water volumes).
Figure 1. (a) NMR spectra of representative hydrogels and pristine aldehyde; (b) FTIR spectra of representative xerogels compared to pristine aldehyde and chitosan; (c,d) deconvolution of 1580–1700 cm−1 domain for chitosan and 1t hydrogel; (e) X-ray diffractograms of representative xerogels and pristine chitosan; (f) Representative POM image of xerogel 1.5t (to be representative, the hydrogels given in figure have different molar ratio of glucosamine/aldehyde units and/or different water volumes).
Polymers 14 02570 g001aPolymers 14 02570 g001b
Polymers 14 02570 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images for representative xerogels (scale bar: 50 μm) and corresponding histograms (to be representative, the samples given in figure have different molar ratio of glucosamine/aldehyde units and/or different water volumes).
Figure 2. SEM images for representative xerogels (scale bar: 50 μm) and corresponding histograms (to be representative, the samples given in figure have different molar ratio of glucosamine/aldehyde units and/or different water volumes).
Polymers 14 02570 g002
Polymers 14 02570 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative 1H-NMR spectra of hydrogels (a) with higher water content 1q, 2t and (b) lower water content 3d, 4d, recorded over time (from up to down: 1, 7, 15, and 22 days).
Figure 3. Representative 1H-NMR spectra of hydrogels (a) with higher water content 1q, 2t and (b) lower water content 3d, 4d, recorded over time (from up to down: 1, 7, 15, and 22 days).
Polymers 14 02570 g003
Polymers 14 02570 g004 550
Figure 4. Mass loss of the hydrogel samples in media of different pH, over 9 days.
Figure 4. Mass loss of the hydrogel samples in media of different pH, over 9 days.
Polymers 14 02570 g004
Polymers 14 02570 g005 550
Figure 5. Images revealing the ability of the hydrogels to self-heal and to be injected (a–d,f) represent pristine hydrogels injected through a needle, and (e) and (g) represent hydrogels stained with methylene blue and injected next to pristine hydrogel) (exemplified on the hydrogel 2d).
Figure 5. Images revealing the ability of the hydrogels to self-heal and to be injected (a–d,f) represent pristine hydrogels injected through a needle, and (e) and (g) represent hydrogels stained with methylene blue and injected next to pristine hydrogel) (exemplified on the hydrogel 2d).
Polymers 14 02570 g005
Polymers 14 02570 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of (a) water content in hydrogel and (b) P5P amount on the linear viscoelastic regime at 37 °C and 10 rad s−1.
Figure 6. Effect of (a) water content in hydrogel and (b) P5P amount on the linear viscoelastic regime at 37 °C and 10 rad s−1.
Polymers 14 02570 g006
Polymers 14 02570 g007 550
Figure 7. Variation of G′ and G″ as a function of ω for the samples with different (a) dilutions of the starting system and (b) NH2/CHO ratios at 37 °C and amplitude strain of 1%.
Figure 7. Variation of G′ and G″ as a function of ω for the samples with different (a) dilutions of the starting system and (b) NH2/CHO ratios at 37 °C and amplitude strain of 1%.
Polymers 14 02570 g007
Polymers 14 02570 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of water content in hydrogel and NH2/CHO ratio on (a) limiting shear stress, τl of LVR, and (b) tan δ.
Figure 8. Effect of water content in hydrogel and NH2/CHO ratio on (a) limiting shear stress, τl of LVR, and (b) tan δ.
Polymers 14 02570 g008
Polymers 14 02570 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Effect of NH2/CHO ratio on the structure recovery ability determined by the continuous step strain measurements (1–100–1%) at = 10 rad s−1 and (b) recovery degree of samples with various dilutions and NH2/CHO ratios.
Figure 9. (a) Effect of NH2/CHO ratio on the structure recovery ability determined by the continuous step strain measurements (1–100–1%) at = 10 rad s−1 and (b) recovery degree of samples with various dilutions and NH2/CHO ratios.
Polymers 14 02570 g009
Table
Table 1. The composition of hydrogels and gelation time.
Table 1. The composition of hydrogels and gelation time.
SampleNH2/CHO
Ratio		Chitosan (mg)P5P (mg)Water Volume (mL)Water Content (%)Solid Content (%)Gelation Time
11:16079.7496.633.37i
1d1:16079.7898.281.72i
1t1:16079.71298.851.15i
1q1:16079.71699.130.875′
1.51.5:16053.2497.252.75i
1.5d1.5:16053.2898.601.40i
1.5t1.5:16053.21299.070.93i
1.5q1.5:16053.21699.300.7030′
22:16039.8497.572.43i
2d2:16039.8898.771.23i
2t2:16039.81299.180.825′
2q2:16039.81699.380.6224 h
2.52.5:16031.8497.762.24i
2.5d2.5:16031.8898.871.135′
2.5t2.5:16031.81299.240.7624 h
2.5q2.5:16031.81699.430.57-
33:16026.6497.882.12i
3d3:16026.6898.931.0730′
3t3:16026.61299.280.7224 h
3q3;16026.61699.460.54-
3.53.5:16022.8497.972.03i
3.5t3.5:16022.81299.310.6924 h
3.5q3.5:16022.81699.490.51-
44:16019.9498.041.96i
4d4:16019.9899.010.9930′
4t4:16019.91299.340.6624 h
4q4:16019.91699.500.50-
4.54.5:16017.7498.091.91i
4.5t4.5:16017.71299.360.64-
55:16015.9498.141.86i
5d5:16015.9899.060.9424 h
66:16013.3498.201.805′
77:16011.4498.251.7530′
88:16010.0498.281.725 h
99:1608.9498.311.6924 h
i—instantaneous gelation; -—no hydrogel formation.
Table
Table 2. Rheological parameters of the investigated samples.
Table 2. Rheological parameters of the investigated samples.
Sampleτl a
(Pa)		γl a
(%)		G′ b
(Pa)		G″ b
(Pa)		tan δ b
(=G″/G′)		Structure Recovery c
(%)
1q6.539.715.71.90.1280.1
2d40.815.832628.70.0974.7
2t7.418.938.44.80.1379.1
2q4.725.220.22.80.1480.0
2.5d20.415.8877.30.0876.1
2.5t0.46.316.32.10.1389.3
3d11.715.877.46.30.0878.8
3t0.39.91.10.40.3694.7
3.5t2.139.73.30.50.15-
4d0.625.13.40.90.2697.6
4t0.225.30.40.20.50100
65.9465.62.10.38-
98.839.711.62.10.18-
a τl and γl represent the limit shear stress and strain from which the sample structure starts to change (determined by amplitude sweep measurements at 10 rad s−1); b values provided from the frequency sweep tests at 1 rad s−1; c the percentage of the G′ recovery determined at the end of the three flow steps.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Craciun, A.M.; Morariu, S.; Marin, L. Self-Healing Chitosan Hydrogels: Preparation and Rheological Characterization. Polymers 2022, 14, 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132570

AMA Style

Craciun AM, Morariu S, Marin L. Self-Healing Chitosan Hydrogels: Preparation and Rheological Characterization. Polymers. 2022; 14(13):2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Craciun, Anda Mihaela, Simona Morariu, and Luminita Marin. 2022. "Self-Healing Chitosan Hydrogels: Preparation and Rheological Characterization" Polymers 14, no. 13: 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop