Next Article in Journal
Highly Efficient and Magnetically Recyclable Non-Noble Metal Fly Ash-Based Catalysts for 4-Nitrophenol Reduction
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Use of Thermostable Laccase and Xylanase in Optimizing the Pre-Bleaching of Kraft Pulp
Previous Article in Special Issue
CuO/ZnO/CQDs@PAN Nanocomposites with Ternary Heterostructures for Enhancing Photocatalytic Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Photocatalysis and Sonocatalysis for Environmental Applications: Synergy or Competition?

by
Sergey I. Nikitenko
ICSM, University Montpellier, UMR 5257, CEA, CNRS, UM, ENSCM, 30207 Bagnols sur Cèze, France
Catalysts 2024, 14(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010002
Submission received: 21 November 2023 / Revised: 8 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 December 2023 / Published: 19 December 2023
This Editorial refers to the Special Issue entitled “Photocatalysis and Sonocatalysis for Environmental Applications: Synergy or Competition?”, which aimed to highlight the common aspects and challenges of photocatalysis and sonocatalysis for the degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous solutions. Both techniques have been extensively studied in previous decades with regard to potential environmental remediation, and they are sometimes seen as competitors. However, the fundamental mechanisms of these processes leading to the degradation of pollutants are very different. Heterogeneous photocatalysis is based on the photoexcitation of semiconducting particles, typically TiO2, ZnO, CdS and ZnS [1,2]. The semiconductor absorbs photons equal to or higher than that of the band gap to promote an electron from the valence band to the conduction band, leading to electron/hole pair formation. The electron hole enables the oxidization of water molecules, producing strongly oxidizing OH radicals, or the oxidization of the adsorbed organic molecule itself. In addition, the electrons promoted to the CB are able to reduce the oxygen to superoxide radical O2−•. Therefore, the presence of oxygen is essential in photocatalytic oxidation processes. In this view, charge separation is vital for the efficiency of semiconducting photocatalysts. For this reason, a huge number of papers have reported on the synthesis of semiconducting photocatalysts doped with metallic and non-metallic nanoparticles with enhanced electron/hole charge separation [3]. On the other hand, sonocatalysis involves the simultaneous action of heterogeneous catalysts and sonochemistry [4]. Sonochemistry originates from the acoustic cavitation phenomenon: the nucleation, growth, and transient collapse of gas/vapor microbubbles in liquids submitted to power ultrasound. In general, three sites of sonochemical activity can be distinguished: the gas phase inside the collapsing bubble, the overheated liquid reaction zone extending several hundred nm from the bubble surface, and the bulk solution, where secondary chemical processes may occur [5]. In aqueous solutions, drastic conditions inside the cavitation bubble generate nonequilibrium plasma, leading to sonochemical water molecule splitting [6]. Hydrogen atoms mostly recombine inside the bubble, forming hydrogen gas. In contrast, OH radicals can reach a liquid reaction zone where they oxidize organic molecules or recombine, yielding H2O2, which could react in the bulk solution. According to this mechanism, there are multiple impacts of ultrasound on heterogeneous catalysts: (i) the mechanical effects of cavitation may disperse catalyst aggregates, remove the passivating layer from the catalyst surface, and accelerate the mass transfer in the vicinity of the catalyst; (ii) local heating produced by a collapsing bubble could accelerate the catalytic process; and (iii) chemically active species that emerge from a cavitation bubble may promote the catalytic cycle. The effects of ultrasound are strongly influenced by ultrasonic frequency: a low frequency (ca. 20–100 kHz) promotes mechanical effects; however, chemical effects prevail at high frequencies (ca. 100 kHz–1 MHz) [7]. Therefore, choosing an appropriate ultrasonic frequency is a critical point for efficient sonocatalytic processing.
The papers presented in this Special Issue are listed in the List of Contributions.
It is worth mentioning that these contributions highlight the major trends in heterogeneous photocatalysis and sonocatalysis for environmental applications. Contribution 1 focused on the development of photocatalyst morphology to improve the photodegradation of pollutants in aqueous solutions and to enhance the reusability of photocatalysts. The authors reported the synthesis of CuO/ZnO/CQD/PAN nanocomposites with ternary heterostructures (CZC@PAN), where CQD and PAN are the carbon quantum dots and the polyacrylonitrile nanofibers, respectively. It was shown that the photocatalytic degradation rate of methylene blue over CZC@PAN was 99.04% under a mercury lamp for 3 h and 99.56% in natural sunlight for 4 h, respectively. The high photocatalytic activity of CZC@PAN was attributed to the creation of p-n CuO/ZnO heterojunctions and to the loading of carbon dots, which promoted the photo response ability of CZC@PAN and efficient charge separation. It is also important for catalyst morphologies to allow easy recovery and reuse. Contributions 2 and 3 explored the thermal effects in photocatalytic processes with heterogeneous catalysts. Introducing heat into photocatalytic processes has attracted a great deal of attention in the last decade, because it may significantly improve the photoconversion efficiency [8,9]. In addition, self-heating photocatalytic systems can consume lower amounts of energy in the conversion of substrates into desired products [10]. A study of photothermal H2 production from butanol isomers (1-BuOH, 2-BuOH, and t-BuOH) over Ti@TiO2 core–shell nanoparticles (Contribution 2) showed that the photothermal effect shown with 1-BuOH/2-BuOH isomers can be attributed to the thermally induced transfer of photogenerated, shallowly trapped electron holes to highly reactive free holes at the surface of TiO2 and further hole-mediated cleavage of the O-H bond. This conclusion correlates with the photothermal mechanisms of TiO2-based photocatalysts found using photoelectrochemical [11] and isotopic H/D studies [12]. Contribution 3 considered the utilization of a solar light concentrator with a constant radiation intensity of 1000 W/m2 for the photodegradation of Magenta effluent originating from the graphic industry over a TiO2/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. It was shown that at the elevated temperature of about 50–80 °C and pH = 6.5, discoloration efficiency of about 95.6% could be reached. These results indicate that parabolic solar light concentrators represent a promising option for thermally assisted photocatalytic dye degradation at the large scale.
Regarding sonocatalytic processes of organic pollutants’ degradation, the major trend considered in this Special Issue is focused on the combination of sonochemistry with other methods, such as high-voltage plasma discharge coupled with ultrasonic treatment and Fenton reagent (Contribution 4), and the coupling of power ultrasound with photocatalysis, called sonophotocatalysis (Contribution 5). In Contribution 4, it was shown that the addition of FeCl2 greatly enhanced the efficiency of the acoustic cavitation-assisted (20 kHz) plasma decomposition of Rhodamine B. Under the studied experimental conditions, the decomposition efficiency reached almost 80%, which was 20% greater than that in the case without Fenton reactions. In addition, argon injection into the reactor greatly improved Rhodamine B degradation. While argon is not involved in the chemical reaction, it assists plasma generation by lowering the underwater dielectric breakdown voltage. As a result, more chemically active hydrogen and oxygen-containing ions and radicals are generated when argon is introduced into the reactor, providing further promotion of Rhodamine B decomposition. Finally, Contribution 5 discussed the opportunities represented by sonophotocatalysis, as well as its limitations, for environmental remediation. In fact, several studies have reported that low-frequency ultrasound (20–40 kHz) can enhance the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants [13,14]. The thorough study in Contribution 5 revealed a 200–300% synergetic effect between the 20 kHz ultrasound and TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of Bisphenol A in aqueous solutions under UV LED light irradiation (λ = 300 nm). However, it was found that the sonophotocatalytic degradation could not be steadily maximized by ultrasonic energy input. Instead, there is a limiting value providing optimal conditions depending on the TiO2 concentration. Sonophotocatalysis may contribute to the effectiveness of photocatalytic degradation reactions by resolving problems related to the opacity and aggregation of the catalyst. The composition and morphology of TiO2-based photocatalysts are not adversely affected during sonophotocatalytic treatment. In fact, particle disaggregation induced by power ultrasound may actually enhance the surface area of a photocatalyst, making photochemically generated oxidizing species more assessable for organic substrates. In principle, sonophotocatalysis could be considered as a candidate for futuristic environmental applications, but serious technical problems related to the scaling up of such a hybrid process and catalyst-related recycling issues will hinder the development of large-scale applications of sonocatalysis in general and sonophotocatalysis in particular.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions:

  • Xu, H.; Fan, P.; Xu, L. CuO/ZnO/CQDs@PAN Nanocomposites with Ternary Heterostructures for Enhancing Photocatalytic Performance. Catalysts 2023, 13, 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010110.
  • El Hakim, S.; Bathias, M.; Chave, T.; Nikitenko, S. Influence of Butanol Isomerization on Photothermal Hydrogen Production over Ti@TiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121662.
  • Pucar Milidrag, G.; Nikić, J.; Gvoić, V.; Kulić Mandić, A.; Agbaba, J.; Bečelić-Tomin, M.; Kerkez, D. Photocatalytic Degradation of Magenta Effluent Using Magnetite Doped TiO2 in Solar Parabolic Trough Concentrator. Catalysts 2022, 12, 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12090986.
  • Xu, Y.; Komarov, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Kutsuzawa, T. Enhancement and Mechanism of Rhodamine B Decomposition in Cavitation-Assisted Plasma Treatment Combined with Fenton Reactions. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121491.
  • Paustian, D.; Franke, M.; Stelter, M.; Braeutigam, P. Sonophotocatalysis—Limits and Possibilities for Synergistic Effects. Catalysts 2022, 12, 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070754.

References

  1. Ajmal, A.; Majeed, I.; Malik, R.N.; Idriss, H.; Nadeem, M.A. Principles and mechanisms of photocatalytic dye degradation on TiO2 based photocatalysts: A comparative overview. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 37003–37026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, G.-J.; Wu, J.J. Recent developments in ZnS photocatalysts from synthesis to photocatalytic applications—A review. Powder Technol. 2017, 318, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hernández-Ramírez, A.; Medina-Ramírez, I. (Eds.) Photocatalytic Semiconductors. Synthesis, Characterization, and Environmental Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suslick, K.S.; Skrabalak, S.E. Sonocatalysis. In Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis; Ertl, G., Knzinger, H., Schth, F., Weitkamp, J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; Chapter 4; pp. 2006–2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Suslick, K.S.; Hammerton, D.A.; Cline, R.E., Jr. The sonochemical hot spot. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5641–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nikitenko, S.I.; Pflieger, R. Toward a new paradigm for sonochemistry: Short review on nonequilibrium plasma observations by means of MBSL spectroscopy in aqueous solutions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 35, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mason, T.J.; Lorimer, J.P. Applied Sonochemistry. In The Uses of Power Ultrasound in Chemistry and Processing; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mateo, D.; Cerrillo, J.L.; Durini, S.; Gascon, J. Fundamentals and applications of photo-thermal catalysis. Chem. Soc Rev. 2021, 50, 2173–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ma, R.; Sun, J.; Li, D.H.; Wei, J.J. Review of synergistic photo-thermo-catalysis: Mechanisms, materials and applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 30288–30324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, L.; Gao, M.; Peh, C.K.N.; Ho, G.W. Solar-driven photothermal nanostructured materials designs and prerequisites for evaporation and catalysis applications. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5, 323–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, G.; Choi, H.J.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.; Monllor-Satosa, D.; Kim, M. Temperature-boosted photocatalytic H2 production and charge transfer kinetics on TiO2 under UV and visible light. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2016, 15, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. El Hakim, S.; Chave, T.; Nikitenko, S.I. Deciphering the reaction mechanisms of photothermal hydrogen production using H/D kinetic isotope effect. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 5252–5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Joseph, C.G.; Puma, G.L.; Bono, A.; Krishnaiah, D. Sonophotocatalysis in advanced oxidation process: A short review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009, 16, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yap, H.C.; Pang, Y.L.; Lim, S.; Abdullah, A.Z.; Ong, H.C.; Wu, C.H. A comprehensive review on state-of-the-art photo-, sono-, and sonophotocatalytic treatments to degrade emerging contaminants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 16, 601–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikitenko, S.I. Photocatalysis and Sonocatalysis for Environmental Applications: Synergy or Competition? Catalysts 2024, 14, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010002

AMA Style

Nikitenko SI. Photocatalysis and Sonocatalysis for Environmental Applications: Synergy or Competition? Catalysts. 2024; 14(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikitenko, Sergey I. 2024. "Photocatalysis and Sonocatalysis for Environmental Applications: Synergy or Competition?" Catalysts 14, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop