Next Article in Journal
Research on Dual-Technology Fusion Biosensor Chip Based on RNA Virus Medical Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Geometric Error Analysis and Compensation in Spherical Generating Grinding of Hemispherical Shell Resonators
Previous Article in Journal
Low Buffer Trapping Effects above 1200 V in Normally off GaN-on-Silicon Field Effect Transistors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction and Optimization of Surface Roughness for Laser-Assisted Machining SiC Ceramics Based on Improved Support Vector Regression
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of Machining Conditions on Micro-Geometric Accuracy Elements of Complex Helical Surfaces Generated by Thread Whirling

Micromachines 2022, 13(9), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091520
by Vasile Merticaru 1,*, Gheorghe Nagîț 1, Oana Dodun 1, Eugen Merticaru 2, Marius Ionuț Rîpanu 1, Andrei Marius Mihalache 1 and Laurențiu Slătineanu 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Micromachines 2022, 13(9), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091520
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultra-Precision Manufacturing Technology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This work study the complex helical surface generated by thread whirling through theoretical model, numerical simulation and experiment. It provides a comprehensive analysis to help understanding and controlling the complex machine process. I have no questions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The manuscript is poorly presented. Although it has vital information, the authors fail to define the current problem, and evidence to prove the accuracy of the proposed model.

Here are a few comments for improvement

1. L 14, remove 'the'

2. Introduction - please take off the figures. It looks like a thesis introduction. The introduction should set the background (literature). If there are any research inputs to set the story (including any extra inputs to the figures), should be under a separate heading. 

3. Headings 1 & 2 should be modified. 

4. Heading 2.1 - again sounds like setting up the need of this research, which should be under Introduction

5. The hypotheses - L304 and L305 sound general. What made such a broad hypothesis? Any references?

6. Please leave a space after L307 for better understanding.

7. Why choose trapezoidal thread? 

8. L640 - how can you conclude this is a more precise model? have you done any experimental comparison study with the existing mathematical models?

89.  L642 -643 re-write - Contraditing with the previous sentences.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have made necessary corrections

Back to TopTop