Next Article in Journal
A Modified NLCS Algorithm for High-Speed Bistatic Forward-Looking SAR Focusing with Spaceborne Illuminator
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Remote Sensing in Detecting and Monitoring Water Stress in Forests
Previous Article in Journal
A Real-Time Detecting Method for Continuous Urban Flood Scenarios Based on Computer Vision on Block Scale
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiscale Variability of Hydrological Responses in Urbanizing Watershed
 
 
Technical Note
Peer-Review Record

Going Back to Grassland? Assessing the Impact of Groundwater Decline on Irrigated Agriculture Using Remote Sensing Data

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(6), 1698; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061698
by Haoying Wang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(6), 1698; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061698
Submission received: 6 February 2023 / Revised: 16 March 2023 / Accepted: 20 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

General comment:

The author studied the impact of groundwater decline on propensity of cropland switching back to grassland at circular irrigated fields. The research is very interesting at field scale and will be attractive to the readers. In all, I suggest the authors make  minor revision of the MS. 

Specific comments:

1. The author should provide us the geographic coordinate of the study area in 2.1. Study Area and Data.

2. I suggest the author show the location of weather station and 111 wells in figure 1.

3.The author include the growing season (April – October in the study region) the average monthly mean temperature and the total growing season precipitation as control variables. What is cropping system and specific growing period for winter wheat, corn and sorghum in New Mexico? Is there two or three harvests of diverse crop varieties within one year? 

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Please see the attached point-by-point responses.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

This document does not have the quality to be considered an article, it is in the form of a technical report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Please see the attached point-by-point responses.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please find the attached PDF for detailed comments and suggestions. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Please see the attached point-by-point responses.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

(1) The purpose of the study should be clearly stated in the last paragraph of introduction.

(2) In Figure 1., it is necessary to show the relative position of the study area in the country, you can add a thumbnail. In addition, the names of major towns need to be marked.

(3) In the section of ‘Study Area and Data’, it is suggested to add a table to show the details of the data used. For example, it can include data source, collection time, format and size, etc.

(4) Please add the specific problems and challenges of the findings (or what should be done in future) in the conclusion.

(5) Thematic maps (Appendix A: Sumpplmental Figures) need to be further standardized, such as the integrity of cartographic elements such as the north arrow, scale, legend, etc.

(6) There are some type of typos in your MS. Please double check your text and correct them all.

Author Response

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Please see the attached point-by-point responses.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The adjustments were made in the document.

Author Response

Thank you. Following your and other reviewers' suggestions, the manuscript has been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors and mistakes. As shown by tracked changes in the "RS_Wang_2023_v3_marked.pdf" file, over three dozen corrections have been made in the revised version. Again, thank you for your time and help to improve my work.

 

Best Regards,

Haoying

Reviewer 3 Report

The author has resolved all of my previous concerns and therefore I recommend the publication of this manuscript in its current form. 

Author Response

Thank you. Following your and other reviewers' suggestions, the manuscript has been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors and mistakes. As shown by tracked changes in the "RS_Wang_2023_v3_marked.pdf" file, over three dozen corrections have been made in the revised version. Again, thank you for your time and help to improve my work.

 

Best Regards,

Haoying

Reviewer 4 Report

It seems that the authors have revised it according to their comments.

Author Response

Thank you. Following your and other reviewers' suggestions, the manuscript has been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors and mistakes. As shown by tracked changes in the "RS_Wang_2023_v3_marked.pdf" file, over three dozen corrections have been made in the revised version. Again, thank you for your time and help to improve my work.

 

Best Regards,

Haoying

Back to TopTop