Next Article in Journal
Remission Is Maintained after Switch from Dose-Optimised Intravenous Treatment to Subcutaneous Treatment with Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Quality of Life of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Narrative Review of Recent Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Ambulatory Care in Tanzania: Findings and Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emergence and Genomic Characterization of a spa Type t4407 ST6-SCCmec Type IVa Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain Isolated from Al-Karak Hospital, Jordan

by
Yasser Gaber
1,2,*,
Heba M. TumAllah
1,
Nourhan H. AbdelAllah
2,3,
Wael A. Al-Zereini
4,
Mohammad A. Abu-Lubad
5,
Amin A. Aqel
5,
Walid F. Elkhatib
6,7,
Richard V. Goering
8 and
Ahmed M. Soliman
9
1
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
3
Clinical Trials Department, Central Administrative of Biological, Innovative Products and Clinical Trials, Egyptian Drug Authority, Giza 12654, Egypt
4
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan
5
Department of Microbiology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan
6
Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, African Union Organization St., Abbassia, Cairo 11566, Egypt
7
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Galala University, New Galala City, Suez 43713, Egypt
8
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68178, USA
9
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kafr-Elsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(2), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020295
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 28 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 January 2024 / Published: 9 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance, and Stewardship)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major concern in Jordanian hospitals in terms of infection control. The purpose of this study was to identify the resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from surfaces of critical locations within the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital in 2019. Additionally, the study aimed to conduct whole-genome sequencing on the isolates. Materials and Methods: In February 2019, fourteen S. aureus strains were isolated from surfaces in critical sites in the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital. These isolates underwent antibiogram testing to determine their resistance profile. Genome sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform was applied to the extracted DNA from these isolates. The genomic data, including coding sequences, were analyzed to identify lineage, resistance genes, and plasmids. Results: The antibiogram results revealed that 11 of the 14 isolates were resistant to oxacillin, 6 to linezolid, and 1 to rifampicin, while none showed resistance to chloramphenicol. Eleven isolates were identified as MRSA, with a novel spa type (t4407) not previously reported in Jordan. High-quality sequencing data were obtained for only one isolate, i.e., A29, the genome showed 2,789,641 bp with a 32.7% GC content and contained 2650 coding sequences. Genomic analysis indicated the ST6 lineage, mecA gene (SCCmec type IVa(2B)), and a hybrid plasmid (pJOR_blaZ) carrying the blaZ gene for β-lactam resistance. Genomic data were deposited in NCBI (CP104989). The A29 genome closely resembled an MRSA genome isolated from a Danish hospital in 2011. The SNP analysis revealed identical antimicrobial resistance genes in these two genomes. Conclusions: This study unveils the first genomic sequence of an MRSA isolate from Jordan, marked by distinctive genotypic traits. The findings enhance our understanding of the MRSA types circulating in Jordan and the region and substantiate the phenomenon of intercontinental MRSA transmission.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive bacterium that primarily infects humans and animals, can cause minor skin diseases such as scalded skin, impetigo, boils, pimples, and abscesses [1]. It also causes fatal diseases such as endocarditis, bacteremia, meningitis, pneumonia, and sepsis [1]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a growing global health threat and was recognized by the WHO as a priority 2 ‘high’ pathogen on its first list of priority pathogens [2]. In the United States, in 2017, MRSA was estimated to cause 323,700 infections in hospitalized patients with 10,600 estimated deaths and USD 1.7 billion as an estimate of the healthcare cost [3]. MRSA is also among ESKAPE pathogens that can spread antimicrobial resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) via mobile genetic elements (MGEs) [4]. One of the most important examples of MGEs in MRSA is the Staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) carrying the mec gene (mecA, mecB, and mecC) that encodes a specific penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) leading to the β-lactam resistance, and site-specific recombinase genes ccrAB or/and ccrC mediating correct excision and integration of SCCme [5].
Despite enhanced preventive measures and surveillance, MRSA remains an enduring challenge in Jordanian healthcare settings. Limited published reports exist to unveil the genotypes of MRSA in Jordan, indicating a significant gap in our understanding of the specific genetic characteristics of circulating strains [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Alzoubi et al. (2014) investigated 210 nasal swabs from children aged 6–11 years and predominantly identified SCCmec type IV, with t223 as the primary spa type [18]. Bazzoun et al. (2014) studied 60 hospital isolates and found t044 to be the most common spa type of isolated MRSA strains, although the specific type of SCCmec was not determined [19]. Another study by Aqel et al. examined 716 nasal swabs from healthcare workers, adults, and children, primarily discerning SCCmec types IVa and Vc and highlighting t223 as the dominant MRSA spa type [13]. Focusing on the health implications in diabetic patients, Al-Bakri et al. examined 87 diabetic foot ulcer samples, identifying SCCmec type IVe as the predominant type of MRSA, and the percentage distribution of spa types among isolates as t9519 (76%), t223 (14·7%), and t044 (5·9%) [9]. Khalil et al. analyzed S. aureus isolates from children in Jordan using genotyping techniques such as MLST. Their findings highlighted the predominance of the ST80 type in MRSA strains. Specifically, ST80-SCCmec type IV emerged as the dominant strain [20].
The use of SCCmec and spa typing has been in use for the last two decades for MRSA classification and epidemiological studies [5,21,22]. However, advancements in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) technology and the continuous reduction in its cost have made it an attractive alternative to conventional typing methods. WGS not only enhances precision but also provides a comprehensive understanding of genetic relatedness in MRSA and other bacteria. While admitting the importance of WGS, PCR-based methods will still play a role in molecular epidemiology due to their simplicity and cost effectiveness. Adhering to nomenclature rules for SCCmec, especially for diverse isolates, ensures a seamless transition to advanced technologies. Whole-genome sequencing of MRSA isolates will improve diagnosis, management, and infection reduction of MRSA [21,23,24,25,26].
In order to better understand the genetic traits and epidemiology of MRSA strains in Jordan, it is crucial to conduct whole-genome sequencing on a larger scale to characterize MRSA isolates. The aim of the current study was to analyze MRSA strains that were found on critical surfaces within the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital. This involved conducting antibiogram testing on the isolated S. aureus strains, followed by whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Our main goal was to identify strain typing, resistance, and virulence genes. The broader objective of this research was to enhance our understanding of the genetic characteristics and resistance mechanisms of MRSA in the region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Media

Blood agar, mannitol salt agar, and antibiotic susceptibility discs were obtained from Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK. MacConkey’s Agar was obtained from Conda SA laboratories, Pronadisa, Spain. The brain-heart infusion broth was obtained from Alpha Chemika, Mumbai, India. The Muller Hinton broth and Muller Hinton agar were purchased from Biolab, Budapest, Hungary. Lastly, lysostaphin was sourced from Sigma-Aldrich, Eschenstrasse 5, D-82024 TAUFKIRCHEN, Germany.

2.2. Sample Collection

The surveillance of the MRSA cohort was conducted in February 2019 at the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital. Samples were collected from hospital surfaces, including door handles from the doors of the intensive care unit, basin handles in the outpatient clinics, blood bank, and elevator surfaces. The samples were obtained by rubbing and rotating sterile swabs moistened with nutrient broth. Then, they were immediately inoculated on the surface of 5% blood agar, MacConkey agar plates, and Mannitol salt agar (MSA) plates, and incubated at 37 °C for at least 48 h. The preliminary identification of the Staphylococcal isolates was based on the yellow colonies obtained on MSA, the positive catalase test, and the Gram staining showing Gram-positive cocci [27]. A total of 14 preliminary identified S. aureus isolates were recorded.

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disc diffusion method following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [28]. Fresh S. aureus isolates were prepared by inoculating a loopful of bacterial suspension in sterile Mueller–Hinton broth and incubating at 37 °C for 2–4 h until the turbidity was consistent with a 0.5 McFarland standard. The bacterial suspension was then evenly spread on Mueller–Hinton agar plates. The antibiotic discs tested included ampicillin (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), linezolid (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), rifampicin (5 μg), and chloramphenicol (30 μg). The diameter of the inhibition zone of each antimicrobial was measured and classified as susceptible, intermediate, and resistant. S. aureus ATCC25923 was used as a control for the experimental conditions [29].

2.4. DNA Isolation and Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS)

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed for the 14 isolates; however, high-quality data were obtained for only one isolate, i.e., A29. The DNeasy kit obtained from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) and containing buffers solution labeled as lysis buffer, AL, AW1, AW2, and AE was used to extract the DNA, and all staphylococcal isolates were cultured in brain-heart infusion broth at an optical density (OD) of 1.0 to ensure an adequate concentration of bacterial cells for downstream processing. The culture obtained was centrifuged, and the bacterial pellets were collected. Bacterial cells, approximately equivalent to 2 × 109 cells or ~1.0 mL of OD 1.0 culture, were harvested for the cell harvesting and lysis step. These cells were transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and subsequently centrifuged for 10 min at 5000× g. The supernatant was discarded following this centrifugation, ensuring that the bacterial pellet was left undisturbed. The obtained pellet was then resuspended in 180 μL of a freshly prepared lysis buffer. This buffer consisted of 2.25 mL of TE buffer (10 mM Tris HCl and 1 mM EDTA), 30 μL Triton X-100, 250 μL Lysostaphin (0.05 μg/mL), and 50 mg of Lysozyme (20 mg/mL final concentration). The obtained mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, with vortexing performed every 15 min to promote thorough mixing. At the end of the incubation period, 200 μL of AL buffer from the Qiagen DNeasy kit was added to the mixture. The solution was then vortexed for around 15 s. After ensuring a uniform mixture, the tube was placed in a 56 °C water bath for 30 min, with a vortex at the midpoint to guarantee consistent exposure to the heat. Following this step, 200 μL of ethanol (99% purity) was added to the mixture. This mixture was then thoroughly mixed using a vortex. The entire solution, including any precipitates, was transferred to a labeled DNeasy mini-column located within a 2 mL collection tube. Centrifugation was followed for 1 min at 6000× g. After centrifugation, the flow-through was discarded, and the DNeasy mini-column was transitioned to a fresh 2 mL collection tube. To the column, 500 μL of buffer AW1 was added, which was followed by 1-min centrifugation at 6000× g. This flow-through was also discarded, and the column was transferred to a new collection tube. The exact process was repeated using 500 μL of buffer AW2, but this time centrifuged at 20,000× g for 3 min to ensure the membrane was sufficiently dried. In the DNA elution phase, the column was moved to a microcentrifuge tube. Directly to the DNeasy membrane, 200 μL of buffer AE was added and allowed to sit at room temperature for one minute. After incubation, centrifugation at 6000 ×g for 1 min was performed to elute DNA. Care was taken while discarding the column to prevent the transfer of any flow-through. Finally, the successfully isolated DNA was securely stored at −20 °C, ready for shipping to the USA for sequencing.
For WGS, we prepared the DNA library using a Nextera XT library preparation kit and a Nextera XT index kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq instrument in compliance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Bioinformatic analysis of raw sequencing reads, including quality control measures to filter out low quality, was performed using BioNumerics v8.1 (BioMerieux, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), genome assembly using the SPAdes algorithm, and subsequent analysis was performed using default BioNumerics parameters.

2.5. Genome Annotation

The final draft genome sequence was annotated using RAST [30,31] and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [32]. The annotated genes from the RAST server were downloaded as a Microsoft Excel sheet, and their genomic characteristics were compared. The RAST server was used to retrieve antibiotic-resistant genes for S. aureus A29, after which a comparison was performed. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes associated with their genomic location were detected using ResFinder 4.4.2 [33], VirulenceFinder 2 [34,35,36,37], and MobileElementFinder tools [38]; these tools are available from the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology (www.genomicepidemiology.org/services/), accessed on 1 November 2023. By default, the analyzed genome was uploaded with the default settings. The plasmid Inc groups, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), spa typing, and SCCmec typing were identified using the PlasmidFinder, MLST 2.0 software, spaTyper [39], and SCCmecFinder-1.2, respectively. These tools are also available at the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology (www.genomicepidemiology.org/services/), accessed on 1 November 2023. To compare the complete sequence of the plasmid carrying the bla-Z gene, the BRIG tool was used [40].

2.6. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Analysis

The CSIPhylogeny tool, developed by the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology (www.genomicepidemiology.org/services/), accessed on 14 January 2024, at DTU in Lyngby, Denmark, was employed for the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the A29 genome to the CP047021 reference genome [41]. The tool default settings were used: a minimum depth of 10, a relative depth of 10, and a minimum SNP quality of 30. This comparative analysis involved aligning the genomic sequence of the A29 isolate with the established Danish reference genome (CP047021). The resultant SNP calls, formatted in variant call format (VCF), were acquired and subsequently juxtaposed with the cataloged antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes within the CP047021 genomes.

3. Results

3.1. Sources and Antibiograms of the Isolates

The current study was conducted in a cohort sampling in February 2019 at Al-Karak Hospital, Karak Governorate, Jordan. In the study, we isolated 14 S. aureus strains from surfaces of critical areas located within the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital. The study sampled various surfaces including the handles of water taps, doors, and drawers inside the ICU, blood bank unit, and the microbiology lab. The 14 S. aureus strains exhibited varying resistance patterns against several antibiotics. The resistance patterns for the 14 isolates were as follows: ampicillin (100%), cefotaxime (71.4%), oxacillin (78.5%), ceftazidime (92.9%), clindamycin (50%), linezolid (42.9%), amikacin (50%), gentamicin (35.7%), and rifampicin (7%). Nine out of twelve isolates showed resistance to cefoxitin (0.69%), while all isolates demonstrated susceptibility to chloramphenicol (Figure 1). The isolate A29 showed multidrug resistance phenotypes resistant to ampicillin, amikacin, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, gentamicin, linezolid, and methicillin. It showed susceptibility to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and rifampicin.

3.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing Results and A29 Genome Annotation

The preliminary evaluation of the WGS data for the 14 isolates of S. aureus showed that 9 (50%) were mecA positive (Figure 1); also, 13 isolates (92.9%) were shown to be spa type t4407. The study aimed to sequence the entire genome of all isolates. However, high-quality sequencing data were only obtained for A29, which was deposited in NCBI under the accession number CP104989 (Table 1). The genomic sequence consisted of 2,789,641 bp, with a GC content of 32.7%. The number of coding and RNA sequences was 2650 and 67, respectively. The quality assessment revealed an N50 value of 53,762 bp, signifying that half of the genome is represented by contigs of this length or longer. The low L50 value of 19 bp indicates the high quality of the obtained genomic data, reflecting the average contig length needed to cover half of the genome. The quality criteria were N50: 53,762 and L50 of 19 bp length. BLAST analysis (blastn) of the A29 genome to nucleotides database at NCBI identified the nearest hit, a strain M2024 (accession number CP047021.1), isolated from a skin infection, (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN13612188), accessed on 1 January 2024, of a patient in a Danish hospital in 2011 [42]. Genome annotation was performed using the RAST server. It showed 1243 genes divided into 27 subsystems, including cofactors, cell wall, virulence, and phages, as illustrated in Figure S1. The strain carried two antibiotic resistance genes against β-lactams, i.e., mecA and blaZ; Furthermore, it incorporated 12 virulence genes, i.e., aur: aureolysin; lukD: leukocidin D component; lukE: leukocidin E component; splA: serine protease SplA; splB: serine protease SplB; splE: serine protease SplE; hlgA: gamma-hemolysin chain II precursor; hlgB: gamma-hemolysin component B precursor; hlgC: gamma-hemolysin component C; sak: staphylokinase; scn: staphylococcal complement inhibitor; sea: enterotoxin A (Table S1, Supplementary Information).

3.3. Typing Results of A29 and Plasmids

Multilocus type sequencing (MLST) was performed by uploading the obtained WGS FASTA file to the MLST-2.0 server. The results indicated that the strain belonged to ST6 (arcC 12, aroE 4, glpF 1, gmk 4, pta 12, tpi 1, and yqiL 3). The spa type of our strain was detected using the spatyper [39]. The strain has spa type t4407 (Table 2). The acquisition of mobile SCCmec is a defining feature of MRSA that exhibits β-lactam resistance [22]. The strain was positive for SCCmec type IVa (2B) (Table 2). The prediction of SCCmec in the A29 genome according to homology with the database sequences is shown in Table 2. SCCmecFinder-1.2 identified that this SCCmec contained ccrA2 and ccrB2 as a ccr gene complex and mecA, dmecR1, and IS1272 as a mec gene complex. The expected whole SCCmec element in A29 has a 99.99% identity with 100% coverage to SCCmec type IVa identified in (i) an MRSA strain M2024 identified from a patient in Denmark in 2011 (GenBank: CP047021.1), (ii) the MRSA strain ER02947.3 identified from human blood sample in the USA in 2015 (GenBank: CP030412), and (iii) the S. warneri strain DY39 detected in China from milk of dairy cow with mastitis in 2012 (GenBank: KU170612) (Figure 2).

3.4. Identification of Plasmids in the A29 Genome

The PlasmidFinder 2.1 tool identified one hybrid plasmid (rep5a and rep16) named pJOR_blaZ. The blastn results of the plasmid to the nucleotide NCBI database showed almost identical hits as follows: (i) plasmid pl1_M2024 identified in the human clinical strain M2024 in Denmark in 2011 (CP047022.1); (ii) unnamed plasmid in the human clinical strain NAS_AN_099 in the USA (CP062377.1). The alignment of the pJOR_blaZ to these hits is shown in Figure 3. The plasmid replicons of isolate A29 obtained from PlasmidFinder 2.1 demonstrated two different replicons, rep5a and rep16, belonging to the replicon families Rep3 and Inc18, respectively (Table 2). The blaZ gene is located in position 2694466 to 2695311 of the A29 genome (Table 2).

3.5. SNP Analysis

The detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the A29 genome were systematically aligned with the positions of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in the Danish reference genome (CP047021). Intriguingly, all identified SNPs were located outside the annotated AMR genes, as shown in Table S2 (Supplementary Information). A notable exception (position 2771818 in CP047021, SNP A to G) was observed, where an SNP occurred within the collagen adhesin cna gene, recognized as a virulence factor (Table S2).

3.6. Comparison of Current Findings to Previous Reports

Table 3 presents a comparison between the genotypes of MRSA that were reported in Jordan over the past decade and the results of the current study. There have been very few studies on the genotypes present in the Jordanian environment. A literature search showed reports of only two MLST lineages (ST80 and ST997) in a study published in 2014 [20,43]. Interestingly, the comparison revealed a new spa type, t4407, which was not previously recorded in published studies. Table 3 displays the spa types reported in Jordan over the past decade [9,13,15,16,43].

4. Discussion

In February 2019, a sampling campaign was conducted to investigate the presence of MRSA on the surfaces of the critical sites inside Al-Karak Hospital, Al-Karak Governorate, Jordan. Among the 14 isolates identified, 11 were confirmed as MRSA through antibiograms. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on all 14 isolates, which revealed a novel spa type t4407. However, only one isolate (A29) produced high-quality sequencing results. This A29 isolate was collected from the surface of the tap water handle in the blood bank unit. A29 was found to be multidrug resistant and was resistant to all antimicrobials tested except chloramphenicol, rifampicin, and clindamycin.
The MLST of A29 showed that the profiles of the seven detected alleles belong to ST6, and its spa type was t4407, which is very similar to the t304/ST6 MRSA isolates reported in northern Europe (e.g., Denmark, Norway, and Iceland) [42]. This spa type t304/ST6 was identified in the DK2011-01 isolate (accession number: CP047021). The spa type t4407 is related to t304 but missing repeats 34 and 24 in the middle of the sequence. The A29 and CP047021 comparison exhibited 99% query coverage and 99.96% identity. The SNP analysis indicates a strong correlation between the A29 genome and CP047021 genome, with the conservation of AMR genes. This provides evidence of intercontinental spread of MRSA strains. Indeed, Bartels et al. illustrated the common description of this MRSA clone (spa type t304/ST6) and indicated its European emergence because of the influx of Syrian refugees to Europe from the civil war [42].
The Staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec), a mobile element that carries the main genetic factor for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance, is a characteristic feature of MRSA. SCCmec typing is a helpful method for assessing MRSA strain relatedness and issues related to the genomic basis of methicillin resistance. Staphylococcal lineages resistant to methicillin have emerged due to the acquisition and insertion of the SCCmec element on the chromosomes of some susceptible strains [22]. SCCmec contained mainly (i) the mec gene (mecA, mecB, and mecC) that encodes a specific penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a) and (ii) site-specific recombinase genes (ccrAB and/or ccrC) mediating excision and integration. It is widely recognized that SCCmec types IV and V are familiar types of community-acquired MRSA. In contrast, SCCmec types I, II, and III are commonly associated with hospital-acquired MRSA [24]. A29 harbored SCCmec type IVa (containing ccrA2/ccrB2 and mecA); this type was often detected in infection with community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA). SCCmec type IVa MRSA was the most prevalent strain in a study performed by Khalil et al.; samples were collected from Jordan University Hospital in Amman, Jordan, in the period between August and October 2008 [20]. Previous reports of MRSA isolated in Jordan showed that the prevalent SCCmec was type IVe, specifically among diabetic foot ulcer infections [9]. Another study reported the prevalence of type IV and V among MRSA strains [13]. Tabaja et al. have shown that CC6 was detected in some infective MRSA isolates from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and Kuwait. In KSA, CC6 represented 13% of Riyadh-infectious isolates and was associated with SCCmec type IV, typically found in community-acquired MRSA. In Kuwait, CC6 represented 4% of Kuwait City infective isolates and was associated with SCCmec type IV [45].
A few studies have reported MRSA genotypes circulating in Jordan (Table 3). In a major hospital in Amman, spa type t044 was identified as the most common among MRSA strains [19]. Furthermore, Harastani et al. showed in the heterogenicity among the type IV MRSA clonal complex (CC80-MRSA-IV) in Jordan and Lebanon and noted the dominance of the spa type t044 [43]. More recently, attention has been shifted to MRSA in livestock, particularly cattle suffering from subclinical mastitis. A new spa type (t17158) was identified as a significant cause of mastitis in Jordanian dairy cows, signaling a potential new reservoir for MRSA [16]. These findings show the different settings in which MRSA is found in Jordan and emphasize the importance of continuous surveillance to understand the changing epidemiology of MRSA, which is crucial for effective infection prevention and control.
Our data showed the presence of mecA on the chromosome and blaZ on the hybrid plasmid (rep5a and rep16) pJOR_blaZ. The two genes mediating the β-lactam resistance phenotype have been reported to be common determinants of antibiotic resistance in MRSA strains worldwide [46]. The limited data available in the literature indicate genotypic diversity within MRSA strains in different populations and environments in Jordan (Table 3). However, the current body of work may not fully reflect the entirety of MRSA’s landscape or even other ESKAP members, both in the community and within hospitals in Jordan [47]. It is important to maintain surveillance and conduct further investigation to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the present genotypes.
Isolate A29 contained various virulence factors, including genes hlg(s), lukD/E, sak, scn, sea, and spl(s), that encode hemolysins, leukotoxins, staphylokinase, complement inhibitor, enterotoxin, and serine proteases, respectively. Most of these virulence factors are related to the infection process, except that the scn gene is considered an immune evasion marker, usually found in S. aureus isolated from humans. This gene was previously reported to help distinguish between strains of human origin and those of non-human origin [48]. Furthermore, a hybrid plasmid carrying blaZ, rep5a-rep16, was identified and blasted against the NCBI database. The blaZ-carrying plasmid was identical to that isolated from a Danish MRSA strain. Previous studies demonstrated a link between distinct rep sequences and resistance genotypes [49,50]. The PlasmidFinder detected that the plasmid pJOR_blaZ carried rep5a and rep16, the common plasmid replicon carrying blaZ gene [49].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study aimed to characterize the resistance profiles of 14 S. aureus isolates collected from various surfaces within Al-Karak governmental hospital, Jordan. Our utilization of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on these isolates showed a novel spa type (t4407) that has never reported earlier in Jordan. High-quality data were obtained for only one isolate which is A29. The genomic data obtained for this isolate yielded valuable insights into the genetic traits for this MRSA strain. Notably, our analysis identified a novel MRSA type, spa type t4407 ST6-SCCmec type IVa, which had not been previously reported in Jordan. Furthermore, our bioinformatic analysis revealed a striking resemblance between the genome of isolate A29 and an MRSA isolate reported in Denmark in 2011. It is worth noting that the WGS of isolate A29 has enabled a comprehensive genetic analysis demonstrating the potential of this technology in uncovering the genetic characteristics of pathogens and clarifying their epidemiology. Nevertheless, it is still intriguing to consider what additional insights could be gained if high-quality data were obtained for the remaining isolates.
Therefore, future investigations involving comprehensive WGS of MRSA isolates in Jordan may offer a broader perspective on the genetic characteristics and transmission dynamics of this serious pathogen. Such endeavors hold promise for advancing our understanding of MRSA epidemiology and contributing to more effective strategies for its control and management.

6. Declaration

While preparing this work, the author(s) used ChatGPT to summarize texts. The tool was mainly used to improve the language style and readability not for generating lengthy text. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the publication’s content.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medicina60020295/s1, Figure S1. Annotation summary for MRSA strain Karak2019-A29 using RAST subsystem. Table S1. Virulence factors detected in A29 genome in the current study based on Virulence factor tool VirulenceFinder-2.0 Server (last accessed 14/1/2024). Table S2. SNP analysis of the A29 genome mapped to the antimicrobial resistance genes in CP047022.1 genome (Danish MRSA isolate).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization (Y.G. and M.A.A.-L.); methodology (H.M.T. and W.A.A.-Z.); software (A.M.S.); formal analysis (A.M.S., Y.G. and N.H.A.); resources, whole-genome sequencing (R.V.G.); original writing (N.H.A., A.M.S. and A.A.A.); review and editing (A.M.S., A.A.A., W.F.E. and Y.G.); visualization (A.M.S.); supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition (Y.G.). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research of Mutah University under Grant (2020/360) provided to Yasser Gaber.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/, reference number CP104989, accessed on 1 January 2024.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nandhini, P.; Kumar, P.; Mickymaray, S.; Alothaim, A.S.; Somasundaram, J.; Rajan, M. Recent Developments in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (Mrsa) Treatment: A Review. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. WHO. Who Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed (2017); WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Control, Centers for Disease, and Prevention. Cdc’s Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Soliman, A.M.; Nariya, H.; Tanaka, D.; Yu, L.; Hisatsune, J.; Kayama, S.; Kondo, K.; Sugai, M.; Shimamoto, T.; Shimamoto, T. Vegetable-Derived Carbapenemase-Producing High-Risk Klebsiella Pneumoniae St15 and Acinetobacter Baumannii St2 Clones in Japan: Coexistence of Bla Ndm-1, Bla Oxa-66, Bla Oxa-72, and an Abar4-Like Resistance Island in the Same Sample. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02166-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, J.; Chen, D.; Peters, B.M.; Li, L.; Li, B.; Xu, Z.; Shirliff, M.E. Staphylococcal Chromosomal Cassettes Mec (Sccmec): A Mobile Genetic Element in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 101, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abdelmalek, S.M.A.; Qinna, M.W.; Al-Ejielat, R.; Collier, P.J. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci (Mrs): Carriage and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in College Students. J. Community Health 2022, 47, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abu-Harirah, H.A.; Al Qudah, A.J.; Daabes, E.; Amawi, K.F.; Qaralleh, H. Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Profile and Patterns for Wound Infections in Nongovernmental Hospitals of Jordan. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 1348–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Bakri, A.G.; Al-Hadithi, H.; Kasabri, V.; Othman, G.; Kriegeskorte, A.; Becker, K. The Epidemiology and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci Sampled from a Healthy Jordanian Population. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 2384–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Al-Bakri, A.G.; Bulatova, N.R.; Younes, N.A.; Othman, G.; Jaber, D.; Schleimer, N.; Kriegeskorte, A.; Becker, K. Characterization of Staphylococci Sampled from Diabetic Foot Ulcer of Jordanian Patients. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 2552–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Al-Dmour, O.; Al-Groom, R.; Alsheikh, A.; Mahmoud, S.; Amawi, K.; Yousef, I.; Almaraira, A. Genetic Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Carriage and Its Antibiogram among Kidney Dialysis Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Al-Karak, Jordan. Int. J. Microbiol. 2023, 2023, 9217014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Al-Kharabsheh, R.; Ahmad, M. Skin and Mucous Membranes Colonisation with Staphylococcus Aureus or Mrsa as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infections in Elective Caesarean Section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022, 42, 888–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al-Tamim, M.; Albalawi, H.; Isied, W.; Musallam, A.; Qazzaz, F.; Azab, M.; Abu-Raide, J.; Himsawi, N.; Vaughan, J. Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections and Antibiotics Resistance in Jordan: Current Status and Future Perspective. Jordan Med. J. 2022, 56, 17–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aqel, A.A.; Alzoubi, H.M.; Vickers, A.; Pichon, B.; Kearns, A.M. Molecular Epidemiology of Nasal Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus from Jordan. J. Infect. Public Health 2015, 8, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Daghistani, H.I.; Issa, A.A.; Shehabi, A.A. Frequency of Nasal and Wound Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus Associated with Tsst-1 Production in Jordanian Population. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2000, 27, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Darwish, R.; Abu-Qatouseh, L.; Badran, E. Sources and Risk Factors of a Novel Mrsa Spa Type Circulating in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Jordan. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gharaibeh, M.H.; Abu-Qatouseh, L.F.; Mashaqbah, S.A.; Assaf, S.A.J.; Al Qudsi, F.R. Novel Spa Type and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiles of Staphylococcus Aureus Strains Isolated from Bovine Mastitis in Jordan. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 76, ovad067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jaradat, Z.W.; Khwaileh, M.; Al Mousa, W.; Ababneh, Q.O.; Al Nabulsi, A. Occurrence, Distribution and Pattern Analysis of Methicillin Resistant (Mrsa) and Methicillin Sensitive (Mssa) Staphylococcus Aureus on Fomites in Public Facilities. Pathog. Glob. Health 2021, 115, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alzoubi, H.M.; Aqel, A.A.; Al-Sarayreh, S.A.; Al-Zayadneh, E. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Carriage among Primary School-Aged Children from Jordan: Prevalence, Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Characteristics. J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. 2014, 89, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bazzoun, D.A.; Harastani, H.H.; Shehabi, A.A.; Tokajian, S.T. Molecular Typing of Staphylococcus Aureus Collected from a Major Hospital in Amman, Jordan. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2014, 8, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khalil, W.; Hashwa, F.; Shihabi, A.; Tokajian, S. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus St80-Iv Clone in Children from Jordan. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 73, 228–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Asadollahi, P.; Farahani, N.N.; Mirzaii, M.; Khoramrooz, S.S.; van Belkum, A.; Asadollahi, K.; Dadashi, M.; Darban-Sarokhalil, D. Distribution of the Most Prevalent Spa Types among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant and-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus around the World: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements. Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec (Sccmec): Guidelines for Reporting Novel Sccmec Elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4961–4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. PomPomorska, K.; Jakubu, V.; Malisova, L.; Fridrichova, M.; Musilek, M.; Zemlickova, H. Antibiotic Resistance, Spa Typing and Clonal Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (Mrsa) Isolates from Blood of Patients Hospitalized in the Czech Republic. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 395. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lynch, J.P.; Zhanel, G.G. Escalation of Antimicrobial Resistance among Mrsa Part 1: Focus on Global Spread. Expert. Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2023, 21, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Darwish, R.M.; Matar, S.G.; Snaineh, A.A.A.; Alsharif, M.R.; Yahia, A.B.; Mustafa, H.N.; Hasabo, E.A. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship on Antibiogram, Consumption and Incidence of Multi Drug Resistance. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Uehara, Y. Current Status of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec (Sccmec). Antibiotics 2022, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Almwafy, A. Preliminary Characterization and Identification of Gram Positive Hemolysis Bacteria. Al-Azhar J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 62, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. In Thirty Two-Second Informational Supplement; CLSI: Berwyn, PA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hudzicki, J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2009, 15, 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  30. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The Rast Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Parrello, B.; Shukla, M.; et al. The Seed and the Rapid Annotation of Microbial Genomes Using Subsystems Technology (Rast). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. Ncbi Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. Resfinder 4.0 for Predictions of Phenotypes from Genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Clausen, P.T.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Lund, O. Rapid and Precise Alignment of Raw Reads against Redundant Databases with Kma. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Joensen, K.G.; Scheutz, F.; Lund, O.; Hasman, H.; Kaas, R.S.; Nielsen, E.M.; Aarestrup, F.M. Real-Time Whole-Genome Sequencing for Routine Typing, Surveillance, and Outbreak Detection of Verotoxigenic Escherichia Coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Malberg Tetzschner, A.M.; Johnson, J.R.; Johnston, B.D.; Lund, O.; Scheutz, F. In Silico Genotyping of Escherichia Coli Isolates for Extraintestinal Virulence Genes by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. Blast+: Architecture and Applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Johansson, M.H.K.; Bortolaia, V.; Tansirichaiya, S.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Roberts, A.P.; Petersen, T.N. Detection of Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella Enterica Using a Newly Developed Web Tool: Mobileelementfinder. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bartels, M.D.; Petersen, A.; Worning, P.; Nielsen, J.B.; Larner-Svensson, H.; Johansen, H.K.; Andersen, L.P.; Jarløv, J.O.; Boye, K.; Larsen, A.R.; et al. Comparing Whole-Genome Sequencing with Sanger Sequencing for Spa Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 4305–4308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. Blast Ring Image Generator (Brig): Simple Prokaryote Genome Comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaas, R.S.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Lund, O. Solving the Problem of Comparing Whole Bacterial Genomes across Different Sequencing Platforms. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bartels, M.D.; Worning, P.; Andersen, L.P.; Bes, M.; Enger, H.; Ås, C.G.; Hansen, T.A.; Holzknecht, B.J.; Larssen, K.W.; Laurent, F.; et al. Repeated Introduction and Spread of the Mrsa Clone T304/St6 in Northern Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 284.e1–284.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Harastani, H.H.; Tokajian, S.T. Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Clonal Complex 80 Type Iv (Cc80-Mrsa-Iv) Isolated from the Middle East: A Heterogeneous Expanding Clonal Lineage. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Tamimi, M.; Himsawi, N.; Abu-Raideh, J.; Khasawneh, A.I.; Jazar, D.A.; Al-Jawaldeh, H.; Hawamdeh, H. Phenotypic and Molecular Screening of Nasal S. Aureus from Adult Hospitalized Patients for Methicillin-and Vancomycin-Resistance. Infect. Disord.—Drug Targets 2021, 21, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tabaja, H.; Hindy, J.R.; Kanj, S.S. Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Arab Countries of the Middle East and North African (Mena) Region. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 13, e2021050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Amoako, D.G.; Somboro, A.M.; Abia, A.L.K.; Allam, M.; Ismail, A.; Bester, L.; Essack, S.Y. Genomic Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated from Poultry and Occupational Farm Workers in Umgungundlovu District, South Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 704–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. El-Khatib, L.; Al-Dalain, S.; Al-Matarneh, R.; Al-Bustanji, S.; Al-Dmour, M.; Al-Amarin, Y.; Gaber, Y. Prevalence of Multi-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii (Mdrab) in Amman Jordan During 2018. Infect. Disord.—Drug Targets (Former. Curr. Drug Targets-Infect. Disord.) 2021, 21, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rinsky, J.L.; Nadimpalli, M.; Wing, S.; Hall, D.; Baron, D.; Price, L.B.; Larsen, J.; Stegger, M.; Stewart, J.; Heaney, C.D. Livestock-Associated Methicillin and Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Is Present among Industrial, Not Antibiotic-Free Livestock Operation Workers in North Carolina. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jans, C.; Wambui, J.; Stevens, M.J.A.; Tasara, T. Comparative Genomics of Dairy-Associated Staphylococcus Aureus from Selected Sub-Saharan African Regions Reveals Milk as Reservoir for Human-and Animal-Derived Strains and Identifies a Putative Animal-Related Clade with Presumptive Novel Siderophore. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 923080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mikhaylova, Y.; Shelenkov, A.; Chernyshkov, A.; Tyumentseva, M.; Saenko, S.; Egorova, A.; Manzeniuk, I.; Akimkin, V. Whole-Genome Analysis of Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates from Ready-to-Eat Food in Russia. Foods 2022, 11, 2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates sampled from surfaces within the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital, Jordan (February 2019 cohort sampling).
Figure 1. Antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates sampled from surfaces within the Al-Karak Governmental Hospital, Jordan (February 2019 cohort sampling).
Medicina 60 00295 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of SCCmec type IVa identified in the A29 MRSA strain (this study) along with other closely related sequences (CP047021.1, CP030412, and KU170612) in the GenBank NCBI database. The gray-scale connections indicate the level of sequence homology, with the intensity corresponding to the percentage of similarity.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of SCCmec type IVa identified in the A29 MRSA strain (this study) along with other closely related sequences (CP047021.1, CP030412, and KU170612) in the GenBank NCBI database. The gray-scale connections indicate the level of sequence homology, with the intensity corresponding to the percentage of similarity.
Medicina 60 00295 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of pJOR_blaZ plasmid identified from the MRSA strain A29 compared to the two nearest hits in the NCBI nucleotide database: pl1_M2024 (CP047022.1) and plasmid unnamed (CP062377.1). Red lines denote coding sequence (CDS), the figure was created with the BRIG tool.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of pJOR_blaZ plasmid identified from the MRSA strain A29 compared to the two nearest hits in the NCBI nucleotide database: pl1_M2024 (CP047022.1) and plasmid unnamed (CP062377.1). Red lines denote coding sequence (CDS), the figure was created with the BRIG tool.
Medicina 60 00295 g003
Table 1. The genomic project properties for A29 MRSA isolated from Al-Karak Hospital, Jordan, 2019.
Table 1. The genomic project properties for A29 MRSA isolated from Al-Karak Hospital, Jordan, 2019.
Property
Isolate nameAlkarak2019-A29
Finishing quality34
Libraries usedNextera XT
Sequencing platformsIllumina MiSeq
Fold coverage20
Assembly methodSPAdes
GenBank IDCP104989
GenBank date of release23 February 2023
BIOPROJECTPRJNA879252
BioSampleSAMN30801668
Locus tagN4G46
Source material identifierInanimate object
Project relevanceMedical
Genome properties
Genome size (bp)2,789,696
DNA G + C content33.5%
Number of contigs56
N50136,095
SEED subsystems (RAST annotation)273
No. of coding sequences 2650
No. of RNAs67
Table 2. Comparison of A29 genome to the nucleotide database NCBI, results of strain typing (SCCmec and spa), and identification of the plasmid replicon type.
Table 2. Comparison of A29 genome to the nucleotide database NCBI, results of strain typing (SCCmec and spa), and identification of the plasmid replicon type.
I. Whole-genome BLAST results
Hit no.Query position in A29 genome Closest hit (Acc. Code)Identity (%)Seq. lengthQuery Cover
1Whole genomeCP047021.199.96279194099%
II. SCCmec Typing results
Hit no.Query position in A29 genome Closest hit (Acc. Code)Identity (%)Seq. lengthGene Name
12402…3892AB06317299.931491/1491subtype-IVa (2B)
27844…9193AB096217100.001350/1350ccrA2
39194…10,843AB09767799.941650/1650ccrB2
414,516…15,502AB033763100.00987/987dmecR1
512,685…14,527AM292304100.001843/1843IS1272
615,599…17,608AB505628100.002010/2010mecA
III. Acquired antimicrobial resistance genes
Hit no.Query position in A29 genomeClosest hit (Acc. Code)Identity (%)Seq. lengthGene Name
115,616…17,626BX5718561002010mecA
22,694,466…2,695,311AP004832100846blaZ
IV. Identification of the plasmid replicons
Hit Query position in A29 genome Closest hit (Acc. Code)Identity (%)Seq. lengthReplicon group
rep5A2,682,088…2,682,948AP003139100861/861Rep3
rep162,684,239…2,684,982CP002115100744/744Inc18
V. Spa Typing results
Hit no.Query position in A29 genome Repeats spa Type
12,734,797…2,735,00211-10-21-17-34-22-25t4407
Table 3. Comparative analysis of MRSA genotypic profiles reported in Jordan in the last decade, compared to the isolate currently reported (A29).
Table 3. Comparative analysis of MRSA genotypic profiles reported in Jordan in the last decade, compared to the isolate currently reported (A29).
Reference No.ReferenceSample SourceMLSTSCCmec Type (s)Spa Type
[6]Abdelmalek et al., 2022University settingNDNDND
[9]Al-Bakri et al., 2021Diabetic foot ulcersNDIII, IV, IVc, IVe t044, t386, t267,t223,t018, t1339, t127, t311, t037, t605, t223, t9519
[10]Al-Dmour et al., 2023Hemodialysis patients, Al-Karak hospitalNDNDND
[13]Aqel et al., 2015Healthcare workersNDIVa and Vct223
[15]Darwish et al., 2022Neonates, Healthcare professionals, Amman NDNDt044, t012, t021, t223, t934, t253, t5075, t3534, t3767, t11023, t12492
[16]Gharaibeh et al., 2023Bovine mastitisNDNDt17158
[17]Jaradat et al., 2021Public facilities, Northern JordanNDNDND
[18]Alzoubi et al., 2014Children (6-11 years)NDIVt223
[19]Bazzoun et al., 2014Hospital isolatesNDNDND
[20]Khalil et al., 2012Children in JordanST80IVND
[43]Harastani and Tokajian 2014Clinical isolates, AmmanST80, ST997IVt044, t5849, t5849, t5802, t6438
[44]Al-Tamimi et al., 2021Hospitalized patientsNDNDND
This studyThis study Hospital objects, Al-Karak HospitalST6IVat4407
ND: not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gaber, Y.; TumAllah, H.M.; AbdelAllah, N.H.; Al-Zereini, W.A.; Abu-Lubad, M.A.; Aqel, A.A.; Elkhatib, W.F.; Goering, R.V.; Soliman, A.M. Emergence and Genomic Characterization of a spa Type t4407 ST6-SCCmec Type IVa Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain Isolated from Al-Karak Hospital, Jordan. Medicina 2024, 60, 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020295

AMA Style

Gaber Y, TumAllah HM, AbdelAllah NH, Al-Zereini WA, Abu-Lubad MA, Aqel AA, Elkhatib WF, Goering RV, Soliman AM. Emergence and Genomic Characterization of a spa Type t4407 ST6-SCCmec Type IVa Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain Isolated from Al-Karak Hospital, Jordan. Medicina. 2024; 60(2):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gaber, Yasser, Heba M. TumAllah, Nourhan H. AbdelAllah, Wael A. Al-Zereini, Mohammad A. Abu-Lubad, Amin A. Aqel, Walid F. Elkhatib, Richard V. Goering, and Ahmed M. Soliman. 2024. "Emergence and Genomic Characterization of a spa Type t4407 ST6-SCCmec Type IVa Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain Isolated from Al-Karak Hospital, Jordan" Medicina 60, no. 2: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020295

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop