Topic Editors

Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, College of Forest Resources, Mississippi State University, 775 Stone Boulevard, Starkville, MS 39762, USA
Geomatics Program, Department of Built Environment, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA

Spatial Patterns of Disaster Risk Assessment via Remote Sensing

Abstract submission deadline
20 July 2024
Manuscript submission deadline
20 September 2024
Viewed by
2362

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Remote sensing has become an important tool for assessing disaster risk and identifying areas vulnerable to natural hazards such as floods, earthquakes, and landslides. By using satellite imagery and other remote sensing data, scientists can analyze the spatial patterns of risk factors such as land cover, topography, and infrastructure and create maps on this basis to inform disaster management strategies. One of the ways that remote sensing is used to assess disaster risk is by mapping the land cover of an area. Land cover maps can identify areas prone to flooding or landslides, as well as areas at high risk of wildfire. These maps can be used to create early warning systems that alert communities to potential hazards and identify areas where mitigation efforts, such as reforestation or flood control measures, may be needed. Another way in which remote sensing is used to assess disaster risk is by mapping the topography of an area. By creating digital elevation models (DEMs) from satellite data, scientists can identify areas prone to landslides or flash floods. DEMs can also be used to identify areas that are at risk from sea level rise or storm surge. Infrastructure is another important factor in assessing disaster risk, and remote sensing can map roads, buildings, and other infrastructure that may be vulnerable to natural hazards. This information can identify areas where evacuation routes may be needed, or infrastructure upgrades may be necessary to improve resilience. One recent advance in the field of spatial patterns of disaster risk assessment via remote sensing is the use of machine learning algorithms to analyze large volumes of satellite imagery and identify patterns of risk factors. These algorithms can be used to detect changes in land cover or infrastructure that may indicate increased risk of natural hazards. Another advance is in the use of high-resolution satellite imagery to create detailed maps of infrastructure and land cover that can then be used to identify areas that are vulnerable to specific types of natural hazards. Additionally, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and other airborne sensors is allowing for more precise and targeted assessments of disaster risk at the local level. Overall, these advances in remote sensing technology and analysis techniques are helping to improve our understanding of disaster risk and inform more effective disaster management strategies. Overall, remote sensing is a powerful tool for assessing disaster risk and identifying areas vulnerable to natural hazards. By analyzing the spatial patterns of risk factors, scientists can create maps that can be used to inform disaster management strategies and improve resilience in vulnerable communities. This topic is aimed at providing selected contributions on advances in the synthesis, characterization, and applications of most recent advancements in the field of spatial patterns of disaster risk assessment via remote sensing. Potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Remote sensing with natural hazard assessment
  • Natural disaster risk analysis
  • Most advance applications in natural hazards
  • Natural disaster risk early warning
  • Urban, community, and infrastructure disaster resilience assessment
  • Disaster prevention and mitigation capability assessment
  • Geomatics and natural hazards risk management
  • Natural disaster risk survey

Dr. Aqil Tariq
Dr. Leila Hashemi Beni
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • GIS and remote sensing
  • vulnerability assessment
  • decision making for natural disaster risk
  • spatial data
  • big data
  • multi-hazards
  • hazard assessment
  • exposure evaluation
  • risk assessment
  • risk management
  • integrated natural disaster risk
  • natural disaster risk early warning
  • multisource remote sensing data
  • natural disaster insurance
  • disaster resilience

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Forests
forests
2.9 4.5 2010 16.9 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Land
land
3.9 3.7 2012 14.8 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Remote Sensing
remotesensing
5.0 7.9 2009 23 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.9 5.8 2009 18.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Water
water
3.4 5.5 2009 16.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 1785 KiB  
Article
The Construction of a Crop Flood Damage Assessment Index to Rapidly Assess the Extent of Postdisaster Impact
by Yaoshuai Dang, Leiku Yang and Jinling Song
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(9), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091527 - 26 Apr 2024
Viewed by 273
Abstract
Floods are among the most serious natural disasters worldwide; they cause enormous crop losses every year and threaten world food security. Many studies have focused on flood impact assessments for administrative districts, but fewer have focused on postdisaster impact assessments for specific crops. [...] Read more.
Floods are among the most serious natural disasters worldwide; they cause enormous crop losses every year and threaten world food security. Many studies have focused on flood impact assessments for administrative districts, but fewer have focused on postdisaster impact assessments for specific crops. Therefore, this study used remote sensing data, including the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), elevation data, slope data, and precipitation data, combined with crop growth period data to construct a crop flood damage assessment index (CFAI). First, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to assign weights to the impact parameters; then, the Weighted Composite Score Method was used to calculate the CFAI; and finally, the impact was classified as sub-slight, slight, moderate, sub-severe, or severe based on the magnitude of the CFAI. This method was used for the Missouri River floods of 2019 in the United States and the Henan flood of 2021 in China. Due to the lack of measured data, the disaster vegetation damage index (DVDI) was used to compare the results. Compared with the DVDI, the CFAI underestimated the evaluation results. The CFAI can respond well to the degree of crop impact after flooding, providing new ideas and reference standards for agriculture-related departments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7816 KiB  
Article
Incorporating the Results of Geological Disaster Ecological Risk Assessment into Spatial Policies for Ecological Functional Areas: Practice in the Qilian Mountains of China
by Xu Long, Qing Xiang, Rongguang Zhang and Hong Huang
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2976; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072976 - 03 Apr 2024
Viewed by 463
Abstract
Geological hazards cause changes in the quality of the ecological environment, affect the function and stability of ecosystems, and negatively impact the maintenance and restoration of ecological functions in ecological functional areas (EFAs). This study integrates machine learning, geographic information technology, and multivariate [...] Read more.
Geological hazards cause changes in the quality of the ecological environment, affect the function and stability of ecosystems, and negatively impact the maintenance and restoration of ecological functions in ecological functional areas (EFAs). This study integrates machine learning, geographic information technology, and multivariate statistical analysis modeling to develop a technical framework for quantitative analysis of ecological risk assessment (ERA) based on the causal logic between geological hazards and ecosystems. The results of the geological disaster ERA are mapped to EFAs, effectively identifying and quantifying the risk characteristics of different EFAs. The results show that: (1) The hazard–vulnerability–exposure ERA framework effectively identifies the distribution characteristics of high ecological risk around the Qilian Mountains, with high risk in the east and low risk in the west. (2) In high ecological risk areas, high hazard–high vulnerability–low exposure is the main combination pattern, accounting for 83.3%. (3) Overall, hazard and vulnerability have a greater impact on geological disaster ecological risk than exposure, with path coefficients of 0.802 (significant at p = 0.01 level) and 0.438 (significant at p = 0.05 level), respectively, in SEM. The random forest model (R2 = 0.748) shows that social factors such as human density and road density contribute significantly more to extreme high risk than other factors, with a contribution rate of up to 44%. (4) Thirty-five ecological functional units were systematically grouped into four clusters and used to formulate a “layered” spatial policy for EFAs. The results of the research are expected to provide support for maximizing the policy impact of EFAs and formulating management decisions that serve ecological protection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 13001 KiB  
Article
Global Drought-Wetness Conditions Monitoring Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data
by Wei Wei, Jiping Wang, Libang Ma, Xufeng Wang, Binbin Xie, Junju Zhou and Haoyan Zhang
Land 2024, 13(1), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010095 - 15 Jan 2024
Viewed by 923
Abstract
Drought is a common hydrometeorological phenomenon and a pervasive global hazard. To monitor global drought-wetness conditions comprehensively and promptly, this research proposed a spatial distance drought index (SDDI) which was constructed by four drought variables based on multisource remote sensing (RS) data, including [...] Read more.
Drought is a common hydrometeorological phenomenon and a pervasive global hazard. To monitor global drought-wetness conditions comprehensively and promptly, this research proposed a spatial distance drought index (SDDI) which was constructed by four drought variables based on multisource remote sensing (RS) data, including the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land surface temperature (LST), soil moisture (SM), and precipitation (P), using the spatial distance model (SDM). The results showed that the consistent area of SDDI with the 1-month and 3-month standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI1 and SPEI3), and the self-calibrating Palmer drought severity index (scPSDI) accounted for 85.5%, 87.3%, and 85.1% of the global land surface area, respectively, indicating that the index can be used to monitor global drought-wetness conditions. Over the past two decades (2001–2020), a discernible spatial distribution pattern has emerged in global drought-wetness conditions. This pattern was characterized by the extreme drought mainly distributed deep within the continent, surrounded by expanding moderate drought, mild drought, and no drought areas. On the annual scale, the global drought-wetness conditions exhibited an upward trend, while on the seasonal and monthly scales, it fluctuated steadily within a certain cycle. Through this research, we found that the sensitive areas of drought-wetness conditions were mainly found on the east coast of Australia, the Indus Basin of the Indian Peninsula, the Victoria and Katanga Plateau areas of Africa, the Mississippi River Basin of North America, the eastern part of the Brazilian Plateau and the Pampas Plateau of South America. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop