Topic Editors

Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA, Italy
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Dipartimento di Farmacia/DIFARMA, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy

Advances in Separation Methods for Metabolomics and Lipidomics

Abstract submission deadline
31 March 2024
Manuscript submission deadline
31 May 2024
Viewed by
1231

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

The increasing need for novel analytical approaches with higher selectivity, speed and coverage is of utmost importance in metabolomics and lipidomics. The ability to quantify and identify different metabolites and lipids in biospecimes, such as biofluids, tissues and lysates, is crucial for prognostics and diagnostics purposes, and furthermore, high-throughput techniques in the clinical setting are highly desirable. This Topic will be focused on the development, validation and application of original methodologies based on hyphenated methods, such as UHPLC-MS, GC-MS, CE-MS, aimed at the qualitative–quantitative analysis of metabolites and lipids in complex matrices such as cells, plasma, serum, urine and tissue homogenates. Particular attention will be given to method optimization, validation, identification and quantitation of the profiled metabolites and lipids.

Dr. Eduardo Sommella
Dr. Giulia Mazzoccanti
Dr. Emanuela Salviati
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • instrumental methods
  • metabolites
  • method validation
  • identification
  • quantitation
  • chromatography (LC and GC)
  • electrophoresis mass spectrometry (HRMS and MS/MS)

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Analytica
analytica
- - 2020 14.5 Days CHF 1000 Submit
Biomolecules
biomolecules
5.5 8.3 2011 19.2 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Metabolites
metabolites
4.1 5.3 2011 12.9 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Molecules
molecules
4.6 6.7 1996 13.6 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Separations
separations
2.6 2.5 2014 12.9 Days CHF 2600 Submit

Preprints is a platform dedicated to making early versions of research outputs permanently available and citable. MDPI journals allow posting on preprint servers such as Preprints.org prior to publication. For more details about reprints, please visit https://www.preprints.org.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 1287 KiB  
Article
Urinary Free Cortisol Determination and Interferences Studies Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry after On-Line Solid Phase Extraction Based on TurboflowTM Chromatography
Metabolites 2023, 13(10), 1063; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13101063 - 09 Oct 2023
Viewed by 434
Abstract
(1) A 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFF) is one of the first-line exams recommended for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. In a hospital hormonology department, this activity can exceed several hundred dosages per week. The UFF is generally determined via an immunoassay [...] Read more.
(1) A 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFF) is one of the first-line exams recommended for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. In a hospital hormonology department, this activity can exceed several hundred dosages per week. The UFF is generally determined via an immunoassay with an automate using a chemiluminescence or electrochemiluminescence detection system. To increase the cortisol concentration in the analyzed sample, the automated analysis is preceded by urine extraction, which does not prevent there from being some interferences due to other steroids with close structures. (2) This paper describes the development of on-line solid phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry for the analysis of urinary free cortisol. The on-line extraction was based on the TurboflowTM chromatography coupled to the analytical column by two valves, easily available for the laboratories. (3) The choice of the Accucore Polar Premium® analytical column made it possible to avoid analytical interferences with exogenous or endogenous molecules having the same SRM transition (363 → 121) as cortisol. (4) The method was fully validated in the range of clinically relevant concentrations from the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) to 411.75 nmol·L−1. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 496 KiB  
Protocol
Miniaturization and Automation Protocol of a Urinary Organic Acid Liquid-Liquid Extraction Method on GC-MS
Molecules 2023, 28(15), 5927; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155927 - 07 Aug 2023
Viewed by 527
Abstract
The aim of this study was to improve the extraction method for urinary organic acids by miniaturizing and automating the process. Currently, manual extraction methods are commonly used, which can be time-consuming and lead to variations in test results. To address these issues, [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to improve the extraction method for urinary organic acids by miniaturizing and automating the process. Currently, manual extraction methods are commonly used, which can be time-consuming and lead to variations in test results. To address these issues, we reassessed and miniaturized the in-house extraction method, reducing the number of steps and the sample-to-solvent volumes required. The evaluated miniaturized method was translated into an automated extraction procedure on a MicroLab (ML) Star (Hamilton Technologies) liquid handler. This was then validated using samples obtained from the ERNDIM External Quality Assurance program. The organic acid extraction method was successfully miniaturized and automated using the Autosampler robot. The linear range for most of the thirteen standard analytes fell between 0 to 300 mg/L in spiked synthetic urine, with low (50 mg/L), medium (100 mg/L), and high (500 mg/L) levels. The correlation coefficient (r) for most analytes was >0.99, indicating a strong relationship between the measured values. Furthermore, the automated extraction method demonstrated acceptable precision, as most organic acids had coefficients of variation (CVs) below 20%. In conclusion, the automated extraction method provided comparable or even superior results compared to the current in-house method. It has the potential to reduce solvent volumes used during extraction, increase sample throughput, and minimize variability and random errors in routine diagnostic settings. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop