sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

In the Wake of One Belt One Road: Transplanting and Translating Chinese Planning and Policy Laws, Standards and Ideas to Belt and Road Nations

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Engineering and Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2021) | Viewed by 15892

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Rotterdam School of Management & Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2. Institute for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Interests: urban development; eco cities; inclusive cities; smart cities; city branding; public policy; governance; policy transfer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, the Chinese government has, inspired by the historical role its nation played as a central hub in the Silk Road, adopted a very extensive One Belt One Road investment programme, aimed at improving its transport links over land, sea, and the internet to strengthen relationships with certain nations—the so-called Belt and Road (B&R) countries, many of which can be found in Asia, Africa, and Europe. These investments aim to improve the quality of urban and infrastructure development and to contribute to both economic growth figures and the sustainable use of natural resources. Because China acts as a donor of finance and knowledge, this also increases its grasp and impact on these B&R nations. One of the ways in which this impact is felt is through the export of planning and policy ideas and institutions. This Special Issue is aimed at delineating the impact these Chinese investments have on B&R countries in general and examining their organizational and institutional effects in particular. It aims to collect theoretical and empirical studies that contribute to developing a better understanding of the institutional impact of adopting Chinese policy and planning institutions and ideas in Belt and Road countries. What are the goals underlying the transplantation and translation of such laws, standards, and ideas outside China? How does the adoption process work and what are the social, economic, environmental, political, institutional, and organizational effects of these adoption processes?

Until fairly recently, it was Western countries that exported their institutions, standards, and ideas globally. Much of that process and the consequences have been examined in the literature on policy transfer, legal transplantation, policy translation, and institutional bricolage. Much less is known on the stakes and impact of the more recent developments leading to increasing Chinese planning and policy impact on the world.

For this Special Issue, researchers are encouraged to submit papers that contribute to the literature by proposing theoretical and empirical insights into the following topics:

  • Theoretical state-of-the-art contributions on policy transfer, legal transplantation, policy translation, institutional bricolage, and similar approaches and their relevance to the export of Chinese planning and policy institutions;
  • Empirical state-of-the art contributions on the objectives, stakes, and implementation of One Belt One Road policies outside China (both from Chinese and B&R nations’ perspectives) and their social, economic, and environmental impacts;
  • Empirical descriptions of B&R investment programmes, their implementation, and their effects;
  • Empirical descriptions of transplantation, transfer, translation, and bricolage processes in which Chinese institutions, standards, and ideas are imported to B&R nations;
  • Evaluative assessment of B&R investment programmes, seen in light of their broader sustainability goals, such as GDP growth, ecological civilization, carbon emissions, and ecological footprint;
  • Theoretical and empirical reflections on how the regime shift from a Washington consensus to a Beijing consensus on recipes for economic development affects the geopolitics of urban and infrastructure development.

Prof. Dr. Martin De Jong
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • One Belt One Road investment
  • China, Belt & Road nations
  • institutional transplantation
  • policy translation
  • regulation
  • policy frameworks

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 2956 KiB  
Article
The Current Status and Challenges of China Railway Express (CRE) as a Key Sustainability Policy Component of the Belt and Road Initiative
by Kyoung-Suk Choi
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 5017; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095017 - 29 Apr 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 8364
Abstract
Under the auspices of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China has been expanding the operation of its CRE (China Railway Express) system that links China and Europe. The CRE is today regarded as an important measure of progress by which BRI-related goals [...] Read more.
Under the auspices of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China has been expanding the operation of its CRE (China Railway Express) system that links China and Europe. The CRE is today regarded as an important measure of progress by which BRI-related goals are achieved, and it has the potential to become the most sustainable mode of long-range transport. The system has been growing rapidly thanks to the active support of the Chinese government. As the Eurasian trade and logistics environment changes, CRE will become increasingly important as a third option that complements air and sea transport, with the demand continuing to accelerate among shippers for CRE service. Despite the expanding role and potential importance of the CRE system, few academic studies have been undertaken on the relevant CRE policies and status, especially in international academic journals. Thus, this study comprehensively reviewed the specific operation status of CRE system by route and region, and identified specific challenges that need to be addressed in order to continue its sustainable development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1565 KiB  
Article
Borrowing Hong Kong’s International Standards: A Steppingstone for the Chinese “Belt and Road” Going Out?
by Zhiwen Gong, Fung Chan and Yan Wu
Sustainability 2021, 13(6), 3485; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063485 - 22 Mar 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3006
Abstract
When the Chinese government proposed the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)in 2015, Hong Kong was positioned as a “super-connector” responsible for bridging the mainland and global markets and was planned to integrate into the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area. The objective of this [...] Read more.
When the Chinese government proposed the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)in 2015, Hong Kong was positioned as a “super-connector” responsible for bridging the mainland and global markets and was planned to integrate into the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area. The objective of this article is to analyze the Chinese designs to promote its BRI collaboration through Hong Kong to enhance foreign confidence and ensure that the related institutional transplantation is sustainable in other countries and that it is on par with international standards. However, the rise of neighboring cities and the changing Sino–American relationship in recent years has provided uncertainties for the future development of Hong Kong. Due to these factors, this article argues that Hong Kong may not effectively share the functions in the BRI planning designed by the Chinese authorities. Because Hong Kong’s role and how it influences the policy outcomes within the BRI framework have not been thoroughly studied, this article will supplement the current literature vacuum on this specific issue and its future development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
The Role of Confucius Institutes and One Belt, One Road Initiatives on the Values of Cross-Border M&A: Empirical Evidence from China
by Jin-Young Jung, Wei Wang and Sung-Woo Cho
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10277; https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410277 - 09 Dec 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3520
Abstract
This study examines how national cultural policies such as Confucius Institutes and One Belt, One Road initiatives (BRI) affect the post-acquisition returns of Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitions based on data from a sample of 192 transactions covering 2011 to 2015. We find [...] Read more.
This study examines how national cultural policies such as Confucius Institutes and One Belt, One Road initiatives (BRI) affect the post-acquisition returns of Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitions based on data from a sample of 192 transactions covering 2011 to 2015. We find that the cultural export of Chinese Confucius Institutes and the BRI exert a significantly positive impact on long-term acquirer returns, while cultural/institutional distance exerts a negative impact. Further evidence shows that Confucius Institutes and BRI mitigate the negative effect of cultural distance between merging firms. These results offer the first evidence that national cultural translation has substantial impacts on the long-run acquirer financial performance of cross-border mergers that decrease cultural institutional heterogeneity between countries. Full article
Back to TopTop