sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Human Rights and Health Equity

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2020) | Viewed by 10346

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Policy Futures, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Interests: Right to health and health equity; Sustainable Development Goals and governance; participatory governance; interdisciplinary research, policy and planning; right based approaches to civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems strengthening; gender and CRVS; health and human rights of people with disabilities, women and girls and gender empowerment, Indigenous populations, minority communities, refugee and displaced communities; determinants of health; qualitative research, legal analysis; policy analysis; stigma and health

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

At the World Government Summit in Dubai in February 2019, the United Nations (UN) Deputy Director General signaled that the UN Executive Committee’s central focus at the high-level sustainable development goal (SDG) Summit in New York in September 2019 will challenge an existing lack of political will and a genuine uptake of governance, policy, and planning initiatives for SDG achievement by 2030. If health equity is to be truly advanced in SDG implementation in the coming decade, then strong governance for goals will be required that, ideally, will take an integrated, participatory, multi-sectoral, and inter-disciplinary systems thinking and planning approach that respects, protects, and promotes human rights. However, the adoption of strong governance models by countries and other SDG actors is one of seven key means of implementation (MOI) for maximizing SDG achievement—finance, partnerships, data and monitoring, capacity building, technology, and trade are critical, too.[1] Monitoring that countries and their development partners integrate rights-based approaches into all facets of SDG MOI will be crucial.

Certainly, some health and human rights practitioners are examining issues at the broader SDG MOI nexus that will surely impact the achievement of health equity and health rights downstream. Others, alternatively, are honing their efforts on tracking SDG 3 achievement and/or the achievement of SDG 3’s nine targets and four means of implementation, or co-efficiencies between SDG 3 achievement and achievement of other goals. Meanwhile, others are investigating or working toward the achievement of the underlying determinants of health found throughout the broader SDG metrics framework—that is, the 17 goals, 169 targets, and 232 individual indicators. However, health and human rights practitioners can be hampered in their efforts by the lack of adequate and overt inclusion of human rights language in SDG metrics. For example, the framing of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHRs) was diluted in the final SDG text: SDG 3.7 proscribes that countries ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services by 2030 (but not SRHR per se); SDG 5.6 proscribes that UN Member States ensure access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights (again, not SRHR explicitly).

The purpose of this Special Issue is to take stock of what research and action is progressing in the SDG and health equity and rights space, whether that be at global, regional, national, or subnational levels, or for certain population segments. How are health and human rights practitioners, or civil society and social justice organizations, meaningfully engaging in MOI activities for SDG achievement, whether to advance health and human rights agendas or other inter-related rights agendas, interests, and issues? What are the partnerships, levers, mechanisms, and opportunities that are enabling this to occur? What are the challenges rights practitioners or advocates are experiencing specifically around SDG 3 implementation, or in progressing the underlying determinants of health in the broader SDG context? How do health and human rights scholars strategically engage in results-based management, ‘governance by indicators’, and metrics speak in the SDG era, yet reconcile or frame their engagement in this complex space, wherein the power of data shapes norms and knowledge but the express language of rights is limited?[2]

[1]     Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie B, Stigson B, Shrivastava P, Leach M, O’Connell D. 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science 12(6):911-919.

[2]     Fukuda-Parr S, McNeill D. 2019. Knowledge and Politics in Setting and Measuring the SDGs: Introduction to Special Issue. Global Policy 10(Suppl 1): 5-15.

Dr. Claire Brolan
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable development goals
  • SDGs
  • SDG 3
  • human rights
  • right to health
  • health and human rights
  • health equity
  • determinants of health
  • policy
  • governance

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 4325 KiB  
Article
A Simulator to Determine the Evolution of Disparities in Food Consumption between Socio-Economic Groups: A Brazilian Case Study
by Pedro Gerber Machado, Julia Tomei, Adam Hawkes and Celma de Oliveira Ribeiro
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6132; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156132 - 30 Jul 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2618
Abstract
Food is a fundamental right that deserves attention but is usually dealt with from the supply side in aggregated models that use macroeconomic variables to forecast the demand and the required supply. This study challenges this paradigm by developing a simulator to analyze [...] Read more.
Food is a fundamental right that deserves attention but is usually dealt with from the supply side in aggregated models that use macroeconomic variables to forecast the demand and the required supply. This study challenges this paradigm by developing a simulator to analyze food consumption from the demand side and estimate the evolution of disparity in food consumption over time with respect to region, sex, ethnicity, education, and income. This novel approach was applied to Brazil using household expenditure surveys to feed serial neural networks. Results show that the ‘poorer’ north and northeast of Brazil encounter the lowest consumption of food and are therefore the most food vulnerable regions. This trend continues to 2040. The ‘richer’ south and southeast regions have higher food consumption, which varies according to sex, ethnicity, education, and income. Brazil has contrasting issues with some groups having considerably higher food consumption, while other groups still have less than the threshold for healthy consumption. Now, the country not only has to deal with the food access by the most vulnerable due to the latest economic declines but also to deal with excess consumption, the so-called “double burden of malnutrition”. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 682 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Diversity Outcomes in American Medical School Admissions: Applying the Grutter Legitimacy Principles
by Aaron Baugh and Reginald F. Baugh
Sustainability 2020, 12(12), 5211; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125211 - 26 Jun 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3422
Abstract
In the last 30 years, except for female participation, the enrollment of Latinx, African Americans, Native Americans, Alaskan natives, and disadvantaged students in medical school has been constant; however, increasing enrollment of these minority populations is feasible, if admissions committees make two changes [...] Read more.
In the last 30 years, except for female participation, the enrollment of Latinx, African Americans, Native Americans, Alaskan natives, and disadvantaged students in medical school has been constant; however, increasing enrollment of these minority populations is feasible, if admissions committees make two changes in approach. First, the traditional belief that matriculation merit is a linear function of past academic performance must be rejected. Second, once the threshold needed to complete medical school in four years and to pass licensing examinations at the first attempt has been met, all candidates are equally qualified, and matriculation decisions must be based, in part, on societal interests. In Grutter vs. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court determined that graduate admission committees can and should consider societal interests. Each admission decision represents a substantial government investment in each student, as the Medicare Act directly subsidizes much of the cost of medical education. As Grutter explained, there is a societal interest in the public having confidence in, and access to, the medical school training that will prepare tomorrow’s medical, professional, and political leaders. Our analysis suggests that medical school admissions are biased towards academic achievement in matriculants, beyond acceptable thresholds for graduation and licensure. We believe medical schools must shift their admissions strategies and consider noncognitive factors in all candidates as determinative once minimum acceptable academic standards have been met. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 206 KiB  
Article
The Politicization of Women’s Health and Wellbeing
by Udi Sommer and Aliza Forman-Rabinovici
Sustainability 2020, 12(9), 3593; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093593 - 29 Apr 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3766
Abstract
The framers and advocates of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals face a unique challenge when it comes to the goals of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3, good health and wellbeing, as it concerns women’s health. The health of women, and in particular [...] Read more.
The framers and advocates of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals face a unique challenge when it comes to the goals of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3, good health and wellbeing, as it concerns women’s health. The health of women, and in particular reproductive rights, have been politicized in the work of the UN. Forums of the UN have become a battleground between those who would frame reproductive rights as a morality policy versus those who frame them as a feminist policy. This problem is not new to the organization’s work. Indeed, it has been a challenge to the UN’s ability to promote women’s health for years. This article explores how the framing of women’s reproductive rights poses a unique challenge to implementing some of the goals of SDG3, and in particular targets 3.1, 3.7, and 3.8. It also offers strategies to surmount the challenge with an example of a different intergovernmental organization that managed to overcome this issue. Full article
Back to TopTop