sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Implementation and Future Perspectives

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2024 | Viewed by 1149

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
InnoRenew Centre of Excellence (CoE), 6310 Izola-Isola, Slovenia
Interests: life cycle thinkingș life cycle assessment; bio-based materials; wooden construction

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centro de Tecnologías Físicas Acústica, Materiales y Astrofísica, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
Interests: LCSA; social-LCA; sustainable architecture; circular economy; architectural acoustics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the last few decades, life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) has become the staple methodology for sustainability studies. LCSA is a comprehensive methodology that encompasses the three pillars of sustainability: the environmental (environmental LCA), the social (social LCA), and the economic (life cycle costing) [1–3]. In a context in which policymakers, companies, and society as a whole try to discover ways of being sustainable, LCSA is the only methodology that can provide accurate estimations of the impact of measures taken by decision makers due to its holistic approach.

Despite the undeniable growing popularity of life-cycle-oriented tools, the methodological progress made in academia has often not reached the industry. There is an urgent need to implement LCSA practices across all scales of society. At a political level, LCSA should be included in the decision-making process and the implementation of new policies from a local to an international level. This would ensure that the long-lasting effects of those decisions are tailored to have a positive economic, social, and environmental impact [4]. Intergovernmental and supranational entities (such as the United Nations) are making great efforts in fostering the implementation of sustainability approaches. The new European Green Deal and the Sustainable Development Goals are probably the most notable examples of this. At the industry level, LCSA should be used as a decision-supporting tool in the design process of products and services. Similarly, governmental decisions influence sustainability, and the choices made at the design stage of products and services have significant implications on all three sustainability pillars [5].

This Special Issue aims to explore the current state of the art and the emerging trends in LCSA, with a particular emphasis on integrating the three perspectives on sustainability and implementation in the industry, especially in high-impacting industries such as the building sector, which greatly influences society on an environmental, societal, and economic level. In general, the implementation of LCSA in all areas of society needs to be prioritized. The idea is to foster the implementation of this methodology in real-world applications. Contributions are sought from researchers, practitioners, and policymakers with expertise in developing and implementing LCSA methodologies and frameworks. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) LCSA methodologies and frameworks; the integration of environmental, social, and economic dimensions; case studies and applications; data availability; and stakeholder engagement and communication.

References

[1] Klöpffer W. Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2003;8:157–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978462/METRICS.

[2] Zamagni A. Life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2012;17:373–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11367-012-0389-8/METRICS.

[3] Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2010;2:3309–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309.

[4] Sala S, Reale F, Cristobal GJ, Marelli L, Pant R. Life cycle assessment for the impact assessment of policies. Jt Res Cent 2016;28380:53. https://doi.org/10.2788/318544.

[5] Pryshlakivsky J, Searcy C. Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: Practitioner and managerial considerations. J Clean Prod 2021;309:127344. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127344.

Dr. Erwin M. Schau
Dr. Alberto Quintana Gallardo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)
  • environmental LCA
  • social LCA
  • life cycle costing
  • sustainability
  • decision-making
  • industry
  • implementation

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

0 pages, 2813 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Cleaning Services in Civil Environments: Microbiological and Life Cycle Analysis Comparing Conventional and Sustainable Methods
by Riccardo Fontana, Mattia Buratto, Anna Caproni, Chiara Nordi, Mariangela Pappadà, Beatrice Bandera, Luciano Vogli, Cesare Buffone and Peggy Marconi
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 487; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020487 - 05 Jan 2024
Viewed by 852
Abstract
In response to the growing global concern for environmental sustainability, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study was conducted to evaluate the environmental benefits of the “Formula Servizi” GREEN protocol compared to a conventional cleaning protocol, as mandated by the updated Criteria for Environmental [...] Read more.
In response to the growing global concern for environmental sustainability, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study was conducted to evaluate the environmental benefits of the “Formula Servizi” GREEN protocol compared to a conventional cleaning protocol, as mandated by the updated Criteria for Environmental Sustainability (CAM—Criteri Ambientali Minimi) for cleaning services. The CAM, effective on 19 June 2021, requires companies to demonstrate the environmental advantages of their cleaning protocols over traditional methods. This study aligns with the new CAM guidelines and employs UNI EN ISO 14040–14044 technical standards for a comprehensive comparative analysis. The study highlights the significance of maintaining hygiene to ensure safety in various contexts, emphasizing the importance of environmental sampling and monitoring to prevent contamination and infection transmission. Despite the complexity and expenses associated with microbiological monitoring, this research affirms its crucial role in validating cleaning procedures, particularly in healthcare facilities, food service areas, and industrial settings. The findings reveal that both the “Traditional” and “GREEN” cleaning protocols demonstrate satisfactory effectiveness in controlling microbiological contamination according to established guidelines. Moreover, the LCA results indicate that the “GREEN” protocol, while exhibiting higher water consumption and wastewater treatment, showcases a strategic use of more sustainable cleaning and laundry detergents. Despite the increased water usage in certain phases, the significantly lower environmental impact per unit of weight demonstrates the potential for optimizing both environmental sustainability and operational efficiency in future Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) endeavors. The comparative LCA further reveals that the “GREEN” protocol enables an annual avoidance of 260 g of CO2-e emissions per square meter of cleaned surface. The most significant reduction in absolute terms is associated with the use of eco-labeled detergents in the laundry system, resulting in the avoidance of 654.1 kg of CO2-e per year of service (−77% compared to traditional laundry detergents). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop