sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Environmental Impact Assessment of Agricultural and Food Production Systems Using the Life Cycle Assessment Methodology

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Products and Services".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2023) | Viewed by 8074

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 10, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Interests: biomass quality; bioenergy; biofuel; sustainability assessment; residues; biosystem engineering; life cycle assessment; standardization; circular economy; environmental impact; wood processing; food processing; renewable energy; energy conversion
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 10, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Interests: biomass quality; bioenergy; biofuel; sustainability assessment; residues; biosystem engineering; life cycle assessment; standardization; circular economy; environmental impact; wood processing; food processing; renewable energy; energy conversion; precision agriculture; remote sensing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Currently, the international consensus is broad and in agreement on identifying the causes of significant environmental impacts in the food supply chains. Global warming is an especially crucial issue in this context, related to energy and materials use (e.g., fertilizers, refrigerants, plastics, fossil fuels). The environmental impact is generally attributable to the inefficient use of production inputs (materials and energy), losses related to food loss in the upstream stage, food waste downstream, and waste management linked to packaging. For the reasons mentioned, there is a growing interest in the study of these supply chains to identify specific critical points for proposing measures to reduce their environmental impact. These studies are, in most cases, conducted using the LCA method, a standardized procedure recognized globally and used both in the academic field and increasingly also by legislators. Although the procedure is based on ISO standards, the method gives practitioners flexibility in choosing some relevant elements, particularly the system boundaries, specific impact categories and LCIA methods (for calculating the impact), and allocation procedures. Therefore, it is useful to develop a wide range of studies that apply this methodology to different agri-food chains to increase the case studies and fill the knowledge gaps on the variability of the results to assist policymakers, industries, and consumers in making better environmental decisions. This implies that LCI and LCA studies would be needed focusing on: agricultural production aimed at human and animal consumption; the production of non-food products starting from agri-food chain wastes; the logistics of transport, storage and processing and packaging of the raw output, semi-finished ingredients and final products; food waste management options and technologies; production of electricity or biofuels starting from waste or agri-food waste. This Special Issue aims to promote the implementation of LCA analysis, mainly for the agricultural and agri-food sector.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • LCA of food products;
  • LCA of non-food agricultural products (e.g., energy from biomasses, feed production, active ingredients);
  • Comparative LCA of different options of food residue valorization;
  • Comparison of different production systems of similar/same product;
  • Cradle to grave, cradle to gate or gate to gate LCA analysis of agricultural production;
  • Primary production and elaboration ecodesign;
  • Life cycle inventory for food products and services;
  • Comparison of different life cycle impact assessment methods;
  • Single and multi-issue LCIA methods analysis;
  • Midpoint and endpoint LCA analysis;
  • LCA applied to crop production, transportation systems, food processing, different packaging systems, retail and food waste management;
  • Analysis on different allocation procedures in LCA.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Daniele Duca
Dr. Alessio Ilari
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • LCA
  • carbon footprint
  • global warming
  • water footprint
  • waste management
  • food sustainability
  • residue valorization
  • bioenergy
  • feed sustainability

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

29 pages, 1294 KiB  
Review
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Life Cycle Assessment on the Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens L.)
by Kofi Armah Boakye-Yiadom, Alessio Ilari and Daniele Duca
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10456; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610456 - 22 Aug 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 7330
Abstract
The black soldier fly (BSF) is recognised as a valuable insect for mitigating feed and organic waste management challenges. Thus, concerted efforts are being directed toward the promotion of the BSF. Despite the numerous advantages of BSF larvae, there are several critical environmental [...] Read more.
The black soldier fly (BSF) is recognised as a valuable insect for mitigating feed and organic waste management challenges. Thus, concerted efforts are being directed toward the promotion of the BSF. Despite the numerous advantages of BSF larvae, there are several critical environmental aspects, particularly its global warming potential, that need to be considered before large-scale adoption due to the complexity of the insect’s value chain. The direct assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia emissions from BSF larvae biotreatment is crucial for conducting a life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the insect products’ environmental performance. This article reviews the emissions of GHG from BSF larvae bioconversion activities based on different gas sensing techniques while highlighting the factors that influence these emissions. Generally, low gas emissions were reported. However, the influence of various factors influencing emissions remains unclear, especially for nitrous oxide. We also analysed LCA studies on BSFL products while emphasising the uncertainties and variabilities among the studies. The wide variation of impact scores reported in the studies suggests that standardised guidelines should be developed to streamline methodical approaches for impact assessments pertaining to system boundaries, functional units, allocation, and system expansion assumptions. We identified several aspects for future improvements to harmonise studies in order to enhance the comparative assessment of the BSFL products. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop