sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning in the Biomechanics of Human Movement

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Wearables".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 8592

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, 181 Esslinger Hall, 1525 University St., Eugene, OR 97403, USA
Interests: wearable sensors; machine learning; running biomechanics; injury prevention; mechanical efficiency; metabolic economy; footwear; prosthetics; sport

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Physical Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
Interests: wearable sensors; dynamical systems; machine learning; prosthetics; clinical outcomes; simulation; modelling

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Wearable sensors have become ubiquitous for the monitoring of human motion. Machine learning has become one of the major tools for identifying the mathematical relationships between wearable sensor data and biomechanical variables. These tools have been changing the way researchers and clinicians have collected and analyzed biomechanical data in the past decade. The techniques recently developed will have a large impact on how human locomotion biomechanics are approached by both researchers and clinicians as wearable technology continues to develop and machine learning algorithms become more powerful. 

We are pleased to invite you to submit your research to this Special Issue titled "Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning in Human Motion Biomechanics". The scope of this Special Issue includes the monitoring of human locomotion with wearable sensors, including the following areas:

  • Novel techniques in the development of sensor systems;
  • Machine learning applications to biomechanics;
  • Human–machine interactions;
  • Analysis of sport performance and clinical applications.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. 

Prof. Dr. Michael E. Hahn
Dr. Seth Donahue
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • wearable sensors
  • machine learning
  • human gait
  • clinical applications
  • robotics
  • balance
  • clinical gait analysis
  • sport performance

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 791 KiB  
Article
Using Deep Learning Models to Predict Prosthetic Ankle Torque
by Christopher Prasanna, Jonathan Realmuto, Anthony Anderson, Eric Rombokas and Glenn Klute
Sensors 2023, 23(18), 7712; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187712 - 06 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1055
Abstract
Inverse dynamics from motion capture is the most common technique for acquiring biomechanical kinetic data. However, this method is time-intensive, limited to a gait laboratory setting, and requires a large array of reflective markers to be attached to the body. A practical alternative [...] Read more.
Inverse dynamics from motion capture is the most common technique for acquiring biomechanical kinetic data. However, this method is time-intensive, limited to a gait laboratory setting, and requires a large array of reflective markers to be attached to the body. A practical alternative must be developed to provide biomechanical information to high-bandwidth prosthesis control systems to enable predictive controllers. In this study, we applied deep learning to build dynamical system models capable of accurately estimating and predicting prosthetic ankle torque from inverse dynamics using only six input signals. We performed a hyperparameter optimization protocol that automatically selected the model architectures and learning parameters that resulted in the most accurate predictions. We show that the trained deep neural networks predict ankle torques one sample into the future with an average RMSE of 0.04 ± 0.02 Nm/kg, corresponding to 2.9 ± 1.6% of the ankle torque’s dynamic range. Comparatively, a manually derived analytical regression model predicted ankle torques with a RMSE of 0.35 ± 0.53 Nm/kg, corresponding to 26.6 ± 40.9% of the ankle torque’s dynamic range. In addition, the deep neural networks predicted ankle torque values half a gait cycle into the future with an average decrease in performance of 1.7% of the ankle torque’s dynamic range when compared to the one-sample-ahead prediction. This application of deep learning provides an avenue towards the development of predictive control systems for powered limbs aimed at optimizing prosthetic ankle torque. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3081 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of a Restoration Algorithm Applied to Clipped Tibial Acceleration Signals
by Zoe Y. S. Chan, Chloe Angel, Daniel Thomson, Reed Ferber, Sharon M. H. Tsang and Roy T. H. Cheung
Sensors 2023, 23(10), 4609; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104609 - 10 May 2023
Viewed by 1290
Abstract
Wireless accelerometers with various operating ranges have been used to measure tibial acceleration. Accelerometers with a low operating range output distorted signals and have been found to result in inaccurate measurements of peaks. A restoration algorithm using spline interpolation has been proposed to [...] Read more.
Wireless accelerometers with various operating ranges have been used to measure tibial acceleration. Accelerometers with a low operating range output distorted signals and have been found to result in inaccurate measurements of peaks. A restoration algorithm using spline interpolation has been proposed to restore the distorted signal. This algorithm has been validated for axial peaks within the range of 15.0–15.9 g. However, the accuracy of peaks of higher magnitude and the resultant peaks have not been reported. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the measurement agreement of the restored peaks using a low-range accelerometer (±16 g) against peaks sampled using a high-range accelerometer (±200 g). The measurement agreement of both the axial and resultant peaks were examined. In total, 24 runners were equipped with 2 tri-axial accelerometers at their tibia and completed an outdoor running assessment. The accelerometer with an operating range of ±200 g was used as reference. The results of this study showed an average difference of −1.40 ± 4.52 g and −1.23 ± 5.48 g for axial and resultant peaks. Based on our findings, the restoration algorithm could skew data and potentially lead to incorrect conclusions if used without caution. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3106 KiB  
Article
How Accurately Can Wearable Sensors Assess Low Back Disorder Risks during Material Handling? Exploring the Fundamental Capabilities and Limitations of Different Sensor Signals
by Cameron A. Nurse, Laura Jade Elstub, Peter Volgyesi and Karl E. Zelik
Sensors 2023, 23(4), 2064; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042064 - 12 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1746
Abstract
Low back disorders (LBDs) are a leading occupational health issue. Wearable sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs) and/or pressure insoles, could automate and enhance the ergonomic assessment of LBD risks during material handling. However, much remains unknown about which sensor signals to [...] Read more.
Low back disorders (LBDs) are a leading occupational health issue. Wearable sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs) and/or pressure insoles, could automate and enhance the ergonomic assessment of LBD risks during material handling. However, much remains unknown about which sensor signals to use and how accurately sensors can estimate injury risk. The objective of this study was to address two open questions: (1) How accurately can we estimate LBD risk when combining trunk motion and under-the-foot force data (simulating a trunk IMU and pressure insoles used together)? (2) How much greater is this risk assessment accuracy than using only trunk motion (simulating a trunk IMU alone)? We developed a data-driven simulation using randomized lifting tasks, machine learning algorithms, and a validated ergonomic assessment tool. We found that trunk motion-based estimates of LBD risk were not strongly correlated (r range: 0.20–0.56) with ground truth LBD risk, but adding under-the-foot force data yielded strongly correlated LBD risk estimates (r range: 0.93–0.98). These results raise questions about the adequacy of a single IMU for LBD risk assessment during material handling but suggest that combining an IMU on the trunk and pressure insoles with trained algorithms may be able to accurately assess risks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 11408 KiB  
Article
A Quantitative Assessment Grading Study of Balance Performance Based on Lower Limb Dataset
by Fei Wang, Anqi Dong, Kaiyu Zhang, Dexing Qian and Yinsheng Tian
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010033 - 20 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1311
Abstract
Balance ability is one of the important factors in measuring human physical fitness and a common index for evaluating sports performance. Its quality directly affects the coordination ability of human movements and plays an important role in human productive activities. In the field [...] Read more.
Balance ability is one of the important factors in measuring human physical fitness and a common index for evaluating sports performance. Its quality directly affects the coordination ability of human movements and plays an important role in human productive activities. In the field of sports, balance ability is an important indicator of athletes’ selection and training. How to objectively analyze balance performance becomes a problem for every non-professional sports enthusiast. Therefore, in this paper, we used a dataset of lower limb collected by inertial sensors to extract the feature parameters, then designed a RUS Boost classifier for unbalanced data whose basic classifier was SVM model to predict three classifications of balance degree, and, finally, evaluated the performance of the new classifier by comparing it with two basic classifiers (KNN, SVM). The result showed that the new classifier could be used to evaluate the balanced ability of lower limb, and performed higher than basic ones (RUS Boost: 72%; KNN: 60%; SVM: 44%). The results meant the established classification model could be used for and quantitative assessment of balance ability in initial screening and targeted training. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2674 KiB  
Article
Ambulation Mode Classification of Individuals with Transfemoral Amputation through A-Mode Sonomyography and Convolutional Neural Networks
by Rosemarie Murray, Joel Mendez, Lukas Gabert, Nicholas P. Fey, Honghai Liu and Tommaso Lenzi
Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9350; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239350 - 01 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1739
Abstract
Many people struggle with mobility impairments due to lower limb amputations. To participate in society, they need to be able to walk on a wide variety of terrains, such as stairs, ramps, and level ground. Current lower limb powered prostheses require different control [...] Read more.
Many people struggle with mobility impairments due to lower limb amputations. To participate in society, they need to be able to walk on a wide variety of terrains, such as stairs, ramps, and level ground. Current lower limb powered prostheses require different control strategies for varying ambulation modes, and use data from mechanical sensors within the prosthesis to determine which ambulation mode the user is in. However, it can be challenging to distinguish between ambulation modes. Efforts have been made to improve classification accuracy by adding electromyography information, but this requires a large number of sensors, has a low signal-to-noise ratio, and cannot distinguish between superficial and deep muscle activations. An alternative sensing modality, A-mode ultrasound, can detect and distinguish between changes in superficial and deep muscles. It has also shown promising results in upper limb gesture classification. Despite these advantages, A-mode ultrasound has yet to be employed for lower limb activity classification. Here we show that A- mode ultrasound can classify ambulation mode with comparable, and in some cases, superior accuracy to mechanical sensing. In this study, seven transfemoral amputee subjects walked on an ambulation circuit while wearing A-mode ultrasound transducers, IMU sensors, and their passive prosthesis. The circuit consisted of sitting, standing, level-ground walking, ramp ascent, ramp descent, stair ascent, and stair descent, and a spatial–temporal convolutional network was trained to continuously classify these seven activities. Offline continuous classification with A-mode ultrasound alone was able to achieve an accuracy of 91.8±3.4%, compared with 93.8±3.0%, when using kinematic data alone. Combined kinematic and ultrasound produced 95.8±2.3% accuracy. This suggests that A-mode ultrasound provides additional useful information about the user’s gait beyond what is provided by mechanical sensors, and that it may be able to improve ambulation mode classification. By incorporating these sensors into powered prostheses, users may enjoy higher reliability for their prostheses, and more seamless transitions between ambulation modes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop