remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Lidar for Forest Parameters Retrieval

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Remote Sensing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 September 2024 | Viewed by 2263

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Interests: data science; computer science; LiDAR; earth observation; SAR; forest disturbances

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Forest Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Interests: LiDAR; forest measurement; forest ecology; photogrammetry; multi and hyperspectral imagery; earth observation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Sweden
Interests: airborne laser scanning; LiDAR; radar; multi-spectral imagery; forest mapping; forest disturbances
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

LiDAR technology has played a significant role in forest research for decades, facilitating the retrieval of important forest parameters, including biomass, leaf area index, and individual tree health classification. Nevertheless, LiDAR-derived metrics often exhibit site- or sensor-specific characteristics, which can present a challenge when extending the application of evaluated approaches to diverse geographical areas and/or sensor platforms such as spaceborne, airborne, UAV, MLS, and TLS systems. The acquisition of dense point clouds and their computational processing at a large scale can be exceedingly demanding, in terms of both acquisition time and processing power. Recent studies have further shed light on the carbon emissions associated with the computational and storage requirements of Earth observation data. It is, therefore, important to implement adaptable, scalable, and computationally inexpensive approaches for tackling forest-related problems.

Furthermore, with the advancement of artificial intelligence approaches, there are still questions about the best approaches, including traditional machine learning approaches, deep neural networks and more recent developments because, as the network architecture changes, the estimations significantly change as well, along with computational complexity. It will, therefore, be interesting to see how artificial intelligence has evolved and its applicability to LiDAR and forest-related research.

This Special Issue aims to address these critical challenges. Our objective is to evaluate traditional and emerging AI methodologies through the use of benchmarking LiDAR data for forest variables retrieval. We also welcome comprehensive literature review articles, the release of new benchmarking datasets, and the development of open-source tools. Additionally, we are open to relevant contributions that are not explicitly mentioned here.

  • Harmonization of LiDAR Data: We invite research that evaluates LiDAR data harmonization techniques by employing benchmarking datasets to ensure consistency and reliability in parameter retrieval across different geographical regions and forest types.
  • Open Source Tools: Contributions focusing on the development and release of new open-source tools for LiDAR data processing and analysis.
  • Literature Reviews: Comprehensive literature reviews that trace the historical development of LiDAR technology.
  • Fusion with different Earth Observation Data: Exploration of innovative approaches that combine LiDAR data with earth observation datasets to extend spatial coverage.
  • Benchmarking Datasets: The release of new benchmarking datasets or use of existing ones as they serve as invaluable resources for method evaluation and advancement.
  • Comparison of Artificial Intelligence approaches: evaluation and comparison of various machine learning algorithms and/or deep learning models to determine their effectiveness in forest variables retrieval.
  • Evaluation of computational complexity of models for deriving forest variables.

Dr. Milto Miltiadou
Dr. Rorai Pereira Martins-Neto
Dr. Henrik J. Persson
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • LiDAR remote sensing
  • harmonisation of LiDAR data
  • benchmarking datasets
  • artificial intelligence
  • fusion with earth observation data
  • computational complexity
  • forest inventory and modelling
  • forest ecology

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 5390 KiB  
Article
Combining LiDAR and Spaceborne Multispectral Data for Mapping Successional Forest Stages in Subtropical Forests
by Bill Herbert Ziegelmaier Neto, Marcos Benedito Schimalski, Veraldo Liesenberg, Camile Sothe, Rorai Pereira Martins-Neto and Mireli Moura Pitz Floriani
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(9), 1523; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091523 - 25 Apr 2024
Viewed by 229
Abstract
The Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest presents great diversity of flora and stand structures, making it difficult for traditional forest inventories to collect reliable and recurrent information to classify forest succession stages. In recent years, remote sensing data have been explored to save time and [...] Read more.
The Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest presents great diversity of flora and stand structures, making it difficult for traditional forest inventories to collect reliable and recurrent information to classify forest succession stages. In recent years, remote sensing data have been explored to save time and effort in classifying successional forest stages. However, there is a need to understand if any of these sensors stand out for this purpose. Here, we evaluate the use of multispectral satellite data from four different platforms (CBERS-4A, Landsat-8/OLI, PlanetScope, and Sentinel-2) and airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) to classify three forest succession stages in a subtropical ombrophilous mixed forest located in southern Brazil. Different features extracted from multispectral and LiDAR data, such as spectral bands, vegetation indices, texture features, and the canopy height model (CHM) and LiDAR intensity, were explored using two conventional machine learning methods such as random trees (RT) and support vector machine (SVM). The statistically based maximum likelihood (MLC) algorithm was also compared. The classification accuracy was evaluated by generating a confusion matrix and calculating the kappa index and standard deviation based on field measurements and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data. Our results show that the kappa index ranged from 0.48 to 0.95, depending on the chosen dataset and method. The best result was obtained using the SVM algorithm associated with spectral bands, CHM, LiDAR intensity, and vegetation indices, regardless of the sensor. Datasets with Landsat-8 or Sentinel-2 information performed better results than other optical sensors, which may be due to the higher intraclass variability and less spectral bands in CBERS-4A and PlanetScope data. We found that the height information derived from airborne LiDAR and its intensity combined with the multispectral data increased the classification accuracy. However, the results were also satisfactory when using only multispectral data. These results highlight the potential of using freely available satellite information and open-source software to optimize forest inventories and monitoring, enabling a better understanding of forest structure and potentially supporting forest management initiatives and environmental licensing programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lidar for Forest Parameters Retrieval)
18 pages, 7401 KiB  
Article
Retrieval of Tree Height Percentiles over Rugged Mountain Areas via Target Response Waveform of Satellite Lidar
by Hao Song, Hui Zhou, Heng Wang, Yue Ma, Qianyin Zhang and Song Li
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(2), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020425 - 22 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1335
Abstract
The retrieval of tree height percentiles from satellite lidar waveforms observed over mountainous areas is greatly challenging due to the broadening and overlapping of the ground return and vegetation return. To accurately represent the shape distributions of the vegetation and ground returns, the [...] Read more.
The retrieval of tree height percentiles from satellite lidar waveforms observed over mountainous areas is greatly challenging due to the broadening and overlapping of the ground return and vegetation return. To accurately represent the shape distributions of the vegetation and ground returns, the target response waveform (TRW) is resolved using a Richardson–Lucy deconvolution algorithm with adaptive iteration. Meanwhile, the ground return is identified as the TRW component within a 4.6 m ground signal extent above the end point of the TRW. Based on the cumulative TRW distribution, the height metrics of the energy percentiles of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% are determined using their vertical distances relative to the ground elevation in this study. To validate the proposed algorithm, we select the received waveforms of the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar over the Pahvant Mountains of central Utah, USA. The results reveal that the resolved TRWs closely resemble the actual target response waveforms from the coincident airborne lidar data, with the mean values of the coefficient of correlation, total bias, and root-mean-square error (RMSE) taking values of 0.92, 0.0813, and 0.0016, respectively. In addition, the accuracies of the derived height percentiles from the proposed algorithm are greatly improved compared with the conventional Gaussian decomposition method and the slope-adaptive waveform metrics method. The mean bias and RMSE values decrease by the mean values of 1.68 m and 2.32 m and 1.96 m and 2.72 m, respectively. This demonstrates that the proposed algorithm can eliminate the broadening and overlapping of the ground return and vegetation return and presents good potential in the extraction of forest structure parameters over rugged mountainous areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lidar for Forest Parameters Retrieval)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop