Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science

A special issue of Plants (ISSN 2223-7747). This special issue belongs to the section "Plant Protection and Biotic Interactions".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 10874

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
Interests: biological control; agroecology; IPM; biodiversity conservation; crop protection

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institut Sophia Agrobiotech, Université Côte d'Azur, INRAE, CNRS, 06000 Nice, France
Interests: multi-trophic interactions; arthropod ecology; community ecology; ecotoxicology; biological control; integrated pest management; sublethal effects
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Interests: plant-insect-enemy interaction; population dynamics; chemical ecology; biological control; pest management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
USDA Agricultural Research Service, Charleston, SC 29414, USA
Interests: arthropod-plant interactions; plant response to herbivory; chemical ecology; biological control; sustainable agriculture; soil-borne arthropods
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since the mid-1900s, synthetic pesticides have become the default tool for managing a suite of both invasive and endemic pests, weeds and pathogens in farmland around the world. Though pesticides have secured copious amounts of food for a swelling human population, they have done so at non-negligible societal costs. Overreliance on chemical toxins now drives biodiversity loss, undermines the integrity of natural and man-made ecosystems, enlarges agriculture’s carbon footprint and jeopardizes human health. Only recently were pesticides termed a key determinant of global change. 

To mitigate these pervasive social–environmental problems, scientists have repeatedly called for a major overhaul of crop protection science by advocating more holistic ‘systems approaches’, a close integration of natural and social science disciplines and increasing the attention paid to ecosystem services. Scientists have repeatedly been challenged to consider the farming system as a ‘whole’ instead of as the sum of its parts, and to employ this ‘systems lens’ to remediate problems caused by pests, weeds or disease without resorting to chemical tools. Preventative, non-chemical measures also make up the foundation of integrated pest management (IPM)—an approach that has gained prominence since the 1970s. However, more often than not, scientists and practitioners alike continued to pursue easy, simplistic and pesticide-based solutions. For decades, all calls for wholeness-oriented science and a further harnessing of biodiversity for crop protection fell on deaf ears.

In recent years, this call for system-centric vs. pest-centric approaches has finally been heeded, with a surging momentum within fields such as agroecology, ecological intensification or regenerative agriculture. Additionally, agroecological and biodiversity-based measures are increasingly built into efforts to bolster resilience, shrink the environmental footprint of agriculture or attain more sustainable food systems. In all of those domains, scientists consciously reach out beyond their own disciplinary boundaries, consider a broader suite of social, ecological, above- and below-ground system strata and make smart use of the myriad natural functionalities that exist within farmland ecosystems. Agronomists, pollination ecologists, breeders, economists, plant pathologists and entomologists now join hands in pursuit of greater goals. One wonders: may disciplinary ‘silos’ across the vast crop protection spectrum at last disintegrate? Might they bring about transformative change in the world’s farming systems? Can one truly redesign agriculture so as to feed humanity without jeopardizing Planetary Health?     

In this Special Issue, we invite scientists to contribute manuscripts that embody the true spirit of ‘systems-centric’ crop protection. We aim to showcase case studies in which scientists look out of their traditional disciplinary ‘boxes’ in order to achieve a drastic phase-down (or an all-out phase-out) of synthetic pesticides in agri-food production systems. Specifically, we look forward to reading more about ways to mobilize, e.g., soil health, biological control, agroecological tactics, behavior-modifying semio-chemicals, microbial inoculants or plant x plant facilitation at field, farm and agro-landscape scales. We hope that this Special Issue will help drive a new wave of interdisciplinary crop protection science and ultimately result in an enhanced uptake of resilient, resource-frugal and pest-suppressive farming systems, all while curbing agro-chemical pollutants, shielding biodiversity and knowingly preserving our Common Future. 

Prof. Dr. Kris A.G. Wyckhuys
Dr. Nicolas Desneux
Dr. Yanhui Lu
Dr. Livy Williams
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Plants is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

18 pages, 10253 KiB  
Article
Silica and Selenium Nanoparticles Attract or Repel Scale Insects by Altering Physicochemical Leaf Traits
by Siyi Gao and Midori Tuda
Plants 2024, 13(7), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070952 - 25 Mar 2024
Viewed by 708
Abstract
Although nanoparticles have gained attention as efficient alternatives to conventional agricultural chemicals, there is limited knowledge regarding their effects on herbivorous insect behavior and plant physicochemistry. Here, we investigated the effects of foliar applications of nano-silica (SiO2NPs) and nano-selenium (SeNPs), and [...] Read more.
Although nanoparticles have gained attention as efficient alternatives to conventional agricultural chemicals, there is limited knowledge regarding their effects on herbivorous insect behavior and plant physicochemistry. Here, we investigated the effects of foliar applications of nano-silica (SiO2NPs) and nano-selenium (SeNPs), and bulk-size silica (SiO2) on the choice behavior of the arrowhead scale insect on mandarin orange plants. One leaf of a bifoliate pair was treated with one of the three chemicals, while the other was treated with water (control). The respective SiO2, SeO2, calcium (Ca), and carbon (C) content levels in the leaf epidermis and mesophyll were quantified using SEM–EDX (or SEM–EDS); leaf toughness and the arrowhead scale density and body size were measured. First-instar nymphs preferred silica-treated leaves and avoided SeNP-treated leaves. SiO2 content did not differ between control and SiO2NP-treated leaves, but was higher in bulk-size SiO2-treated leaves. The SiO2 level in the control leaves was higher in the SiO2NP treatment compared with that in the control leaves in the bulk-size SiO2 treatment. Silica-treated leaves increased in toughness, but SeNP-treated leaves did not; leaf toughness increased with mesophyllic SiO2 content. The insect density per leaf increased with leaf toughness, SiO2 content and, in the SiO2NP treatment, with epidermal C content. There was no correlation between SeO2 content and insect density. This study highlights the potential uses of SeNPs as an insect deterrent and of silica for enhancing leaf toughness and attracting scale insects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3238 KiB  
Article
Device Structure, Light Source Height, and Sunset Time Affect the Light-Trap Catching of Tea Leafhoppers
by Lei Bian, Huihua Ji, Xiaoming Cai, Guo Cheng, Xiaoqun Xie, Xiaofeng Duan and Zongmao Chen
Plants 2024, 13(2), 241; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020241 - 15 Jan 2024
Viewed by 621
Abstract
Device structure, light source height, and climatic factors can potentially affect the catching of target pests in light traps. In this study, the installation of an anti-escape cover in a newly designed light trap significantly increased the number of catches of tea leafhoppers, [...] Read more.
Device structure, light source height, and climatic factors can potentially affect the catching of target pests in light traps. In this study, the installation of an anti-escape cover in a newly designed light trap significantly increased the number of catches of tea leafhoppers, Empoasca onukii, an economically significant pest of tea gardens, and it prevented 97.95% of leafhoppers from escaping. A series of assessments were performed in the field and showed that the optimal trapping window of the light trap was between 1.5 and 2.5 h (2 ± 0.35 h) after sunset, and the starting time of the window was positively correlated with the sunset time. The number of leafhopper catches decreased sharply when the height of the light source was above the flight height range of E. onukii adults. The height of the light source was optimal between 20 and 40 cm above the tea canopy. The efficacy of the light traps for capturing leafhoppers decreased in the autumn peak period. High numbers of leafhopper catches by the newly designed light trap in the summer could reduce E. onukii population sizes in the autumn. Overall, the newly designed light trap can be used to reduce E. onukii adult populations in tea gardens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1628 KiB  
Article
Prior Infection by Colletotrichum spinaciae Lowers the Susceptibility to Infection by Powdery Mildew in Common Vetch
by Faxi Li, Rui Zhu, Feng Gao and Tingyu Duan
Plants 2024, 13(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010052 - 22 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 730
Abstract
Anthracnose (Colletotrichum spinaciae) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) are important diseases of common vetch (Vicia sativa) and often co-occur in the same plant. Here, we evaluate how C. spinaciae infection affects susceptibility to E. pisi, using [...] Read more.
Anthracnose (Colletotrichum spinaciae) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) are important diseases of common vetch (Vicia sativa) and often co-occur in the same plant. Here, we evaluate how C. spinaciae infection affects susceptibility to E. pisi, using sterilized and non-sterilized field soil to test the effect of resident soil microorganisms on the plant’s immune response. Plants infected with C. spinaciae (C+) exhibited a respective 41.77~44.16% and 72.37~75.27% lower incidence and severity of powdery mildew than uninfected (C) plants. Moreover, the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance were higher in the C plants than in the C+ plants prior to infection with powdery mildew. These differences were not recorded following powdery mildew infection. Additionally, the activities of superoxide dismutase, polyphenol oxidase, and catalase were higher in the C+ plants than in the C plants. The resident soil microbiota did not affect the plant responses to both pathogens. By uncovering the mechanistic basis of plant immune response, our study informs integrated disease management in a globally important forage crop. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3110 KiB  
Article
Institutional Context of Pest Management Science in the Global South
by Kris A. G. Wyckhuys and Buyung A. R. Hadi
Plants 2023, 12(24), 4143; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244143 - 12 Dec 2023
Viewed by 935
Abstract
The natural sciences are receiving increasing attention in the Global South. This timely development may help mitigate global change and quicken an envisioned food system transformation. Yet in order to resolve complex issues such as agrochemical pollution, science ideally proceeds along suitable trajectories [...] Read more.
The natural sciences are receiving increasing attention in the Global South. This timely development may help mitigate global change and quicken an envisioned food system transformation. Yet in order to resolve complex issues such as agrochemical pollution, science ideally proceeds along suitable trajectories within appropriate institutional contexts. Here, we employ a systematic literature review to map the nature of inquiry and institutional context of pest management science in 65 low- and middle-income countries published from 2010 to 2020. Despite large inter-country variability, any given country generates an average of 5.9 publications per annum (range 0–45.9) and individual nations such as Brazil, Kenya, Benin, Vietnam, and Turkey engage extensively in regional cooperation. International development partners are prominent scientific actors in West Africa but are commonly outpaced by national institutions and foreign academia in other regions. Transnational institutions such as the CGIAR represent a 1.4-fold higher share of studies on host plant resistance but lag in public interest science disciplines such as biological control. Despite high levels of scientific abstraction, research conducted jointly with development partners shows real yet marginal improvements in incorporating the multiple (social–ecological) layers of the farming system. Added emphasis on integrative system-level approaches and agroecological or biodiversity-driven measures can extend the reach of science to unlock transformative change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 9852 KiB  
Article
Antagonistic Activity of Streptomyces alfalfae 11F against Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon and Transcriptome Analysis Provides Insights into the Synthesis of Phenazine-1-Carboxamide
by Dan Dong, Maoying Li, Taotao Zhang, Zhenfeng Niu, Guoping Xue, Hongmei Bai, Wenyu Zhao, Jiajia Yu, Wei Jiang and Huiling Wu
Plants 2023, 12(22), 3796; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12223796 - 08 Nov 2023
Viewed by 909
Abstract
Streptomyces alfalfa strain 11F has inhibitory effects on many phytopathogenic fungi and improves the establishment and biomass yield of switchgrass. However, the antagonistic effects of strain 11F on Fusarium wilt of watermelon and its secondary metabolites that contribute to its biocontrol activity are [...] Read more.
Streptomyces alfalfa strain 11F has inhibitory effects on many phytopathogenic fungi and improves the establishment and biomass yield of switchgrass. However, the antagonistic effects of strain 11F on Fusarium wilt of watermelon and its secondary metabolites that contribute to its biocontrol activity are poorly understood. We evaluated the antagonistic and growth-promoting effects of strain 11F and conducted a transcriptome analysis to identify the metabolites contributing to antifungal activity. Strain 11F had marked inhibitory effects on six fungal pathogens. The incidence of Fusarium wilt of watermelon seedlings was decreased by 46.02%, while watermelon seedling growth was promoted, as indicated by plant height (8.7%), fresh weight (23.1%), and dry weight (60.0%). Clean RNA-sequencing data were annotated with 7553 functional genes. The 2582 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected in the Control vs. Case 2 comparison were divided into 42 subcategories of the biological process, cellular component, and molecular function Gene Ontology categories. Seven hundred and forty functional genes (55.47% of the DEGs) were assigned to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes metabolic pathways, reflecting the complexity of the strain 11F metabolic regulatory system. The expression level of the gene phzF, which encodes an enzyme essential for phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) synthesis, was downregulated 3.7-fold between the 24 h and 48 h fermentation time points, suggesting that strain 11F can produce phenazine compounds. A phenazine compound from 11F was isolated and identified as phenazine-1-carboxamide (PCN), which contributed to the antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. PCA was speculated to be the synthetic precursor of PCN. The downregulation in phzF expression might be associated with the decrease in PCA accumulation and the increase in PCN synthesis in strain 11F from 24 to 48 h. Streptomyces alfalfae 11F protects watermelon seedlings from Fusarium wilt of watermelon and promotes seedling growth. The transcriptome analysis of strain 11F provides insights into the synthesis of PCN, which has antifungal activity against F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum of watermelon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1428 KiB  
Communication
Antifungal Activity of Rue Essential Oil and Commercial Chitosan on Native Corn Foliar Diseases
by Luis Fernando Ceja-Torres, Sigifredo López-Díaz, María Guadalupe Silva-Ramos, José Teodoro Silva-García, José Roberto Medina-Medrano and Germán Fernando Gutiérrez-Hernández
Plants 2023, 12(19), 3416; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193416 - 28 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1074
Abstract
Native corn in Cherán, Michoacán, southwestern Mexico, represents a high-impact economic, social, and religious support, although its yield is low due to fungal diseases. Fungicides are mainly used for their control, but the fungi involved create resistance. The aims of this study are [...] Read more.
Native corn in Cherán, Michoacán, southwestern Mexico, represents a high-impact economic, social, and religious support, although its yield is low due to fungal diseases. Fungicides are mainly used for their control, but the fungi involved create resistance. The aims of this study are to determine the incidence of foliar diseases in the field, isolate the causal fungi, evaluate the in vitro effect of the essential oil of rue (Ruta graveolens) on them, and identify the secondary metabolites. The essential oil was obtained using the steam distillation technique on fresh plants. Also used was an industrial-grade chitosan, and the commercial fungicide benomyl was used as a positive control. Rue essential oil was characterized by mass spectrometry with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization (UHPLC-ESI). The highest incidence of disease was obtained for leaf rust (35%), followed by gray leaf spot (GLS) (24%) and leaf blight (19%). Rue essential oil inhibited 100% of the mycelial growth of Coniothyrium phyllachorae and 96% of the mycelium of Exseroilum turcicum. The benomyl fungicide effectively inhibited C. phyllachorae (86 to 91%), but not E. turcicum, with the opposite effect when using chitosan by inhibiting 89 to 90% of the latter’s mycelial development. The majority compound of the essential oil of R. graveolens was 2-(3-phenylprop-2-enoyl)chromen-4-one; however, fatty acids were also detected: linoleic, palmitic, and retinoic acid. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3667 KiB  
Article
Regional Pollination Activity by Moth Migration in Athetis lepigone
by Huiru Jia, Yuchao Chen, Xiaokang Li, Yunfei Pan, Dazhong Liu, Yongqiang Liu and Kongming Wu
Plants 2023, 12(19), 3406; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193406 - 27 Sep 2023
Viewed by 646
Abstract
Nocturnal moths (Lepidoptera) are important pollinators of a wide range of plant species. Understanding the foraging preferences of these insects is essential for their scientific management. However, this information is lacking for most moth species. The present study was therefore conducted to delineate [...] Read more.
Nocturnal moths (Lepidoptera) are important pollinators of a wide range of plant species. Understanding the foraging preferences of these insects is essential for their scientific management. However, this information is lacking for most moth species. The present study was therefore conducted to delineate the host plant feeding and pollination ranges of an agriculturally important nocturnal moth species Athetis lepigone by identifying the pollen species adhering to their bodies during long-distance migration. Pollen grains were dislodged from 1871 A. lepigone migrants captured on Beihuang Island in the Bohai Strait between 2020 and 2021. This region is a key seasonal migration pathway for A. lepigone in northern China. Almost 20% of all moths sampled harbored pollens, providing direct evidences that this moth species may serve as pollinators. Moreover, at least 39 pollen taxa spanning 21 plant families and 31 genera were identified, with a preference for Asteraceae, Amaranthaceae, and Pinaceae. Additionally, the pollen adherence ratios and taxa varied with moth sex, inter-annual changes, and seasonal fluctuations. Most importantly, the pollen taxa were correlated with insect migration stages and indicated that A. lepigone bidirectionally migrates between central China (Shandong, Hebei, and Henan Provinces) and northeastern China (Liaoning Province). Overall, the findings of the present work provide valuable information on the pollination behavior, geographical origins, and pollination regions of A. lepigone moths and could facilitate the design and optimization of efficacious local and regional management strategies for this important insect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2055 KiB  
Article
Generalist Predators Shape Biotic Resistance along a Tropical Island Chain
by Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, Johanna Audrey Leatemia, Muhammad Zainal Fanani, Michael J. Furlong, Baogen Gu, Buyung Asmara Ratna Hadi, Jeffij Virgowat Hasinu, Maria C. Melo, Saartje Helena Noya, Aunu Rauf, Johanna Taribuka and Yubak Dhoj Gc
Plants 2023, 12(18), 3304; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183304 - 18 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1204
Abstract
Islands offer exclusive prisms for an experimental investigation of biodiversity x ecosystem function interplay. Given that species in upper trophic layers, e.g., arthropod predators, experience a comparative disadvantage on small, isolated islands, such settings can help to clarify how predation features within biotic [...] Read more.
Islands offer exclusive prisms for an experimental investigation of biodiversity x ecosystem function interplay. Given that species in upper trophic layers, e.g., arthropod predators, experience a comparative disadvantage on small, isolated islands, such settings can help to clarify how predation features within biotic resistance equations. Here, we use observational and manipulative studies on a chain of nine Indonesian islands to quantify predator-mediated biotic resistance against the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) and the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Across island settings, a diverse set of generalist lacewing, spider and ladybeetle predators aggregates on P. manihoti infested plants, attaining max. (field-level) abundance levels of 1.0, 8.0 and 3.2 individuals per plant, respectively. Though biotic resistance—as imperfectly defined by a predator/prey ratio index—exhibits no inter-island differences, P. manihoti population regulation is primarily provided through an introduced monophagous parasitoid. Meanwhile, resident predators, such as soil-dwelling ants, inflict apparent mortality rates up to 100% for various S. frugiperda life stages, which translates into a 13- to 800-fold lower S. frugiperda survivorship on small versus large islands. While biotic resistance against S. frugiperda is ubiquitous along the island chain, its magnitude differs between island contexts, seasons and ecological realms, i.e., plant canopy vs. soil surface. Hence, under our experimental context, generalist predators determine biotic resistance and exert important levels of mortality even in biodiversity-poor settings. Given the rapid pace of biodiversity loss and alien species accumulation globally, their active conservation in farmland settings (e.g., through pesticide phasedown) is pivotal to ensuring the overall resilience of production ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3026 KiB  
Article
Bottom-Up Effects of Drought-Stressed Cotton Plants on Performance and Feeding Behavior of Aphis gossypii
by Jinping Liu, Chen Wang, Huatong Li, Yu Gao, Yizhong Yang and Yanhui Lu
Plants 2023, 12(15), 2886; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152886 - 07 Aug 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1077
Abstract
Drought, a major stress for crop plants, is expected to increase in frequency due to climate change. Drought can alter crop growth and levels of secondary plant metabolites, which in turn can affect herbivores, but this latter point is still controversial. This study [...] Read more.
Drought, a major stress for crop plants, is expected to increase in frequency due to climate change. Drought can alter crop growth and levels of secondary plant metabolites, which in turn can affect herbivores, but this latter point is still controversial. This study used three different polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) levels (0%, 1%, and 3%) to simulate drought stress and evaluated their effects on cotton plants and the impacts on the performance of the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii. Cotton plants under drought stress showed decreased water content, above-ground biomass, and nitrogen content and increased soluble protein, soluble sugar, and tannin contents. Based on analysis of the developmental time and fecundity data from individuals and at the population level, a significantly lower fecundity and population abundance of A. gossypii were detected on cotton plants with drought stress, which supports the “plant vigor hypothesis”. The poor development of A. gossypii is possibly related to lower xylem sap and phloem ingestion under drought stress. In addition, the increased tannin content of cotton plants induced by drought and lower detoxification enzyme activities of A. gossypii may have affected the responses of aphids to drought-stressed plants. Overall, the results showed that drought stress altered the physiological characteristics of the cotton plants, resulting in adverse bottom-up effects on cotton aphid performances. This implies that the adoption of drip irrigation under plastic film that can help alleviate drought stress may favor the population growth of cotton aphids. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

29 pages, 5262 KiB  
Review
Unveiling the Genetic Symphony: Harnessing CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing for Effective Insect Pest Management
by J. Komal, H. R. Desai, Ipsita Samal, Andrea Mastinu, R. D. Patel, P. V. Dinesh Kumar, Prasanta Kumar Majhi, Deepak Kumar Mahanta and Tanmaya Kumar Bhoi
Plants 2023, 12(23), 3961; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12233961 - 24 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1518
Abstract
Phytophagous insects pose a significant threat to global crop yield and food security. The need for increased agricultural output while reducing dependence on harmful synthetic insecticides necessitates the implementation of innovative methods. The utilization of CRISPR-Cas (Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) technology [...] Read more.
Phytophagous insects pose a significant threat to global crop yield and food security. The need for increased agricultural output while reducing dependence on harmful synthetic insecticides necessitates the implementation of innovative methods. The utilization of CRISPR-Cas (Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) technology to develop insect pest-resistant plants is believed to be a highly effective approach in reducing production expenses and enhancing the profitability of farms. Insect genome research provides vital insights into gene functions, allowing for a better knowledge of insect biology, adaptability, and the development of targeted pest management and disease prevention measures. The CRISPR-Cas gene editing technique has the capability to modify the DNA of insects, either to trigger a gene drive or to overcome their resistance to specific insecticides. The advancements in CRISPR technology and its various applications have shown potential in developing insect-resistant varieties of plants and other strategies for effective pest management through a sustainable approach. This could have significant consequences for ensuring food security. This approach involves using genome editing to create modified insects or crop plants. The article critically analyzed and discussed the potential and challenges associated with exploring and utilizing CRISPR-Cas technology for reducing insect pest pressure in crop plants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

12 pages, 286 KiB  
Perspective
Crop Diversity in Agroecosystems for Pest Management and Food Production
by Jillian Lenné and David Wood
Plants 2024, 13(8), 1164; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13081164 - 22 Apr 2024
Viewed by 312
Abstract
During the past 30 years, there has been a growing belief in and promotion of agroecosystem diversity for pest management and future food production as an agroecological or nature-based approach. Monoculture agriculture, which produces most of our food, is considered to be highly [...] Read more.
During the past 30 years, there has been a growing belief in and promotion of agroecosystem diversity for pest management and future food production as an agroecological or nature-based approach. Monoculture agriculture, which produces most of our food, is considered to be highly vulnerable to pests in contrast to plant species-diverse agroecosystems which may possess a greater abundance of natural enemies, keeping pest populations under control. In this paper, we question the role of crop diversity for pest management and explore the relationship between crop and associated diversity and pests through the following processes: environmental stresses that favor monodominance; evolutionary adaptations that resist insect herbivores (genetic resistance response); mechanisms of spatial escape from insect herbivores (escape response); and the role of crop-associated biodiversity. We present strong evidence that not only questions the high vulnerability of monocultures to pest damage but also supports why monocultures continue to produce most of the world’s food. Reference is made to the importance of targeted plant breeding and the role of trans-continental crop introduction supported by efficient quarantine for pest management. We conclude that—with the exception of irrigated rice—much more research is needed to better understand the role of crop diversity in agroecosystems for pest management and food production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Embracing Systems Thinking in Crop Protection Science)
Back to TopTop