Agroecosystem Modeling

A special issue of Plants (ISSN 2223-7747). This special issue belongs to the section "Plant Modeling".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 October 2021) | Viewed by 7733

Special Issue Editor

1. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
2. PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Punjab , Pakistan
Interests: agronomy; agroecosystems modeling; cropping systems; farm modeling; crop physiology; nutrients cycling; climate change; impact assessments; adaptation and mitigation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Agroecosystem is a human-induced ecosystem managed for the production of food, fuel and fiber. It covers 1/4th of the global land surface area. In a quantitative way, it is an area where almost 30% of the land is dedicated to croplands or intensively managed pastures. The complexity of this system is different across the globe. Presently, around 7.5 billion people live on planet Earth, and in future, this number might be in the range of 8.5 to 12 billion. Thus, to feed the billions of people around the world, we need to manage our agroecosystem. In the past, intensification/overexploitation of agroecosystems with irrigation, agronomic managements, improved crop varieties, agrochemicals and agricultural machinery resulted in enhanced food production. However, no climate-smart agricultural options were available in the past that resulted in the degradation of this whole ecosystem. Problems such as greenhouse gas emissions, smog, erosion, salinization, water pollution, eutrophication, loss in biodiversity, and insect and pest prevalence are predominantly due to inaccurate agroecosystem management. Therefore, if these problems are not to be addressed on an urgent basis at ground scale, they might jeopardize the development possibilities of future generations. The understanding of the mechanisms/processes responsible for the degradation of the agroecosystem could reverse these negative trends and can help to develop new strategies from gene to field scale. Models are a good tool to describe the response of agroecosystems under different sets of biotic and abiotic scenarios. At present, there are different process-based agroecosystem models available that can be used to solve “what if” questions in this era of climate change. These models are helpful in ideotype designing, phenotyping, understanding of Genotype (G) x Environment (E) x Management (M) interactions, crop physiological mechanisms, water and nutrient management, conservation and precision agriculture, insect, pest, and disease forecasting, soil organic carbon dynamics, socioeconomic analysis, and climate impact assessments. However, to get reliable information from all these models, we need to have a good-quality data set.

Dr. Ahmed Mukhtar
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Plants is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • agroecosytems modeling
  • cropping systems
  • climate change
  • genotype (G) x environment (E) x management (M)
  • conservation agriculture
  • intercropping
  • remote sensing

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 2494 KiB  
Article
Modeling of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Yield and Control Insecticide Exposure in a Semi-Arid Region
by Messias de Carvalho and Wiktor Halecki
Plants 2021, 10(6), 1074; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061074 - 27 May 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3015
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptability of different genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) in the edaphoclimatic conditions of a semi-arid region. In the experimental design, a completely randomized split-plot (2 × 8), with 3 repetitions (blocks) [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the adaptability of different genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) in the edaphoclimatic conditions of a semi-arid region. In the experimental design, a completely randomized split-plot (2 × 8), with 3 repetitions (blocks) was used. The experiment comprised 7 new genotypes and 1 local genotype as the first main factor and application of insecticide as a secondary factor. Two-factor analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) determined the differences between the treated and untreated plots. The results obtained in the experiment showed that the introduced genotypes V3 (IT07K-181-55), V7 (H4), and V5 (IT97K-556-4M) adapted well to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the study area and their yields were respectively 1019, 1015, and 841 kg/ha of grains in treated plots and 278, 517 and 383 kg/ha in untreated plots. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most important parameter was the germination rate. Finally, the best yield was obtained with the genotype V3 (IT07K-181-55), subjected to the use of insecticide, and with the V7 (H4) genotype in untreated plants. The findings presented in this research should be useful in crop system agricultural programs, particularly in the terms of selection of cultivating systems suitable for high-yielding cowpea. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agroecosystem Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3396 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Phenology Algorithms of the Spring Barley Model in APSIM 7.9 and APSIM Next Generation: A Case Study for High Latitudes
by Uttam Kumar, Julien Morel, Göran Bergkvist, Taru Palosuo, Anne-Maj Gustavsson, Allan Peake, Hamish Brown, Mukhtar Ahmed and David Parsons
Plants 2021, 10(3), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030443 - 26 Feb 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2971
Abstract
Phenology algorithms in crop growth models have inevitable systematic errors and uncertainties. In this study, the phenology simulation algorithms in APSIM classical (APSIM 7.9) and APSIM next generation (APSIM-NG) were compared for spring barley models at high latitudes. Phenological data of twelve spring [...] Read more.
Phenology algorithms in crop growth models have inevitable systematic errors and uncertainties. In this study, the phenology simulation algorithms in APSIM classical (APSIM 7.9) and APSIM next generation (APSIM-NG) were compared for spring barley models at high latitudes. Phenological data of twelve spring barley varieties were used for the 2014–2018 cropping seasons from northern Sweden and Finland. A factorial-based calibration approach provided within APSIM-NG was performed to calibrate both models. The models have different mechanisms to simulate days to anthesis. The calibration was performed separately for days to anthesis and physiological maturity, and evaluations for the calibrations were done with independent datasets. The calibration performance for both growth stages of APSIM-NG was better compared to APSIM 7.9. However, in the evaluation, APSIM-NG showed an inclination to overestimate days to physiological maturity. The differences between the models are possibly due to slower thermal time accumulation mechanism, with higher cardinal temperatures in APSIM-NG. For a robust phenology prediction at high latitudes with APSIM-NG, more research on the conception of thermal time computation and implementation is suggested. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agroecosystem Modeling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop