Urban Resilience and Heritage Management

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Planning and Landscape Architecture".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 September 2024 | Viewed by 4881

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Architecture and Design, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: public and private feasibility of urban transformation; economic evaluation of environmental and cultural assets; real estate market; economic valuation of real estate investment projects; environmental economics; sustainability; multi-criteria decision analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
History, Theory and Architectural Composition Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Interests: urban and architectural history; urban planning; architectural intervention; heritage management; heritage values preservation; historic centres

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of History, Theory and Architectural Composition, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
Interests: heritage; museums; contemporary architecture; urban studies; urban landscape

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The multiple dynamics that our cities, infrastructures, and territories are currently experiencing have an environmental, technological, and social base in constant transformation. The research framework is claimed to produce new indicators, tools, and methodologies for the purpose of implementing new policies.

In this sense, there is a more developed awareness of the risks our cities face, and the challenges set out in the UN Sustainable Development Goals. These inputs force knowledge to ensure urban resilience as a component of growing and grant it inexcusable relevance.

For these reasons, cultural and natural heritage has become an indispensable factor of social cohesion for the achievement of more resilient cities, territories, and landscapes. The evolution of its management models with a clear social and environmental impact has been transformed into various demands for the scientific and research community.

The goal of this Special Issue is to collect papers (original research articles and review papers) to provide insights about the capacities of heritage to increase the resilience of our cities, territories, and landscapes, representing a wide field of possibilities, in particular, the search for balances between small and medium cities, with respect to large metropolitan areas. It is worth noting the patrimonial plurality of identity factors and cultural assets of a very varied type and entity. The combination of the traditional and permanent urban legacy, with new realities of urban growth and the assimilation by cities of extraordinary events, even of an ephemeral nature (Olympic Games, International Exhibitions), outline the diversity of urban contexts and their multifunctionality.

This richness can become an essential component to reduce the impact of and overcome land-related risks and threats that are complex to manage. Thus, those derived from climate change, depopulation in rural areas, or tourist pressure, among other issues, should be highlighted, particularly in historic centres and coastal areas. They affect especially significant assets that can become qualified actors in more resilient cities, territories, and landscapes.

The methodological advances produced in the processes of generating knowledge about heritage stand out for their innovative potential in their tangible and also intangible definition. Advances supporting using new technologies and in particular geomatics, GIS, and data management in an interdisciplinary framework that provides new keys to urban planning and heritage management are especially valued.

This Special Issue will welcome manuscripts that link the following themes:
  • Theoretical proposals for a renewed concept of resilience;
  • New alliances in the management of cultural heritage and natural heritage to achieve the SDGs and improve the resilience of cities and communities;
  • Initiatives that improve living conditions in urban and rural areas in the face of the deterioration of nature and the proliferation of natural disasters ;
  • Historical urban and production landscapes: culture, heritage, and infrastructures as factors in favour of resilient territories;
  • Cultural and natural heritage in the face of depopulation in rural areas, in search of a liveable and sustainable future;
  • Contributions of traditional architecture to improving urban resilience;
  • The interurban social imbalance and the qualified experiences of contemporary urbanism (garden cities, Athens Charter, CIAM) as heritage;
  • The aptitude of modern urban forms to generate more resilient cities;
  • Alternative uses and resistance of heritage to tourist pressure: sustainability versus touristification and gentrification in urban centres and coastal areas;
  • Development of emerging cultural resources, heritage typologies, and renewal of cultural infrastructure (museums, visitor centres, and other cultural spaces) as tools for intercultural cohesion, inclusiveness, and better urban governance;
  • The incorporation of territories resulting from large ephemeral events (Olympics, International Exhibitions, other singular events): adaptation capacities, urban renewal, and resilience;
  • Challenges and opportunities for World Heritage Sites to guide universally shared practices in heritage management for a sustainable use of culture;
  • The shared land: management of historical memories and controversial heritage as tools for the promotion of an inclusive and resilient citizenship;
  • Stakeholders and actors from heritage towards a scenario of collaborative participation of agents in urban planning, land ordinance, and landscape design;
  • Intelligent planning and management of the city and territory with the use of artificial intelligence, geomatics, GIS, and big data: analysis and monitoring of urban risks and vulnerability;
  • The formation of a catalogue of good practises in terms of heritage management of more resilient cities: indicators, tools, and methodologies;
  • The use of cost–benefit analysis to convenience judgment development procedures for enhancing urban resilience and heritage management;
  • The ability to use methodologies and tools of a multicriteria nature to compare different urban intervention possibilities;
  • The necessity of capturing the interests of several suitable stakeholders while designing urban and historic assets projects.

We look forward to receiving your original research articles and reviews.

Dr. Maria Rosaria Guarini
Prof. Dr. Eduardo Mosquera-Adell
Prof. Dr. Clara Mosquera-Pérez
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cities recovery
  • cultural property potentials
  • good practices
  • heritage stakeholders and actors
  • heritage values and indicators
  • information technologies and systems
  • resilient cities and territories
  • sustainable development goals
  • urban planning and politics
  • withstanding risks and vulnerability

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 2454 KiB  
Article
Resilience Assessment of Historical and Cultural Cities from the Perspective of Urban Complex Adaptive Systems
by Tianyu Chen, Guangmeng Bian and Ziyi Wang
Land 2024, 13(4), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040483 - 09 Apr 2024
Viewed by 474
Abstract
Due to the increasingly complex global climatic environment and the rapid development of China’s urban construction, China’s historical and cultural cities are experiencing an external impact as well as internal fragility. Representing the capacity of the urban system to address impact and pressure, [...] Read more.
Due to the increasingly complex global climatic environment and the rapid development of China’s urban construction, China’s historical and cultural cities are experiencing an external impact as well as internal fragility. Representing the capacity of the urban system to address impact and pressure, resilience can effectively guarantee the sustainable development of historical and cultural cities. A scientific and reasonable resilience assessment system can guide the resilience construction of historical and cultural cities in an effort to effectively counter the impact and pressure they face. Therefore, it is necessary to research the resilience of historical and cultural cities. On the basis of the complex adaptive system (CAS), and by applying multiple assessment indicators, this paper established a resilience assessment system for China’s historical and cultural cities, comprising 38 indicators in six dimensions, to analyze the characteristics and the influencing mechanisms of the resilience of the historical and cultural cities and to reveal the inherent logic underlying their complex presentation. Using six historical and cultural cities in east China as an example, the study applied the assessment system to assess and analyze the different resilience levels of the cities. The comprehensive resilience of Changzhou City obtained the highest score at 0.64, indicating a higher degree of resilience; the scores of Yantai City, Huzhou City, and Nantong City were 0.59, 0.54, and 0.50, respectively, representing moderate degrees of resilience; the scores of Zhongshan City and Quzhou City were 0.44 and 0.40, respectively, exhibiting a lower degree of resilience. Moreover, the factors that result in an unbalanced development of urban resilience were explored from the perspectives of economy, system, and culture. The paper contains some significance in guiding the development of the resilience of historical and cultural cities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Resilience and Heritage Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 17737 KiB  
Article
Bridges over the River Turia: Genesis of the Urban History of Valencia
by María-Montiel Durá-Aras, Eric Gielen, José-Sergio Palencia-Jiménez and Josep Lluís Miralles-García
Land 2023, 12(12), 2175; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122175 - 16 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1023
Abstract
The foundation of the city of Valencia was created by the Romans on an island formed by the River Turia, strategically located between Carthago Nova (Cartagena) and Tarraco (Tarragona), and is directly connected to the sea. This raises the question of how the [...] Read more.
The foundation of the city of Valencia was created by the Romans on an island formed by the River Turia, strategically located between Carthago Nova (Cartagena) and Tarraco (Tarragona), and is directly connected to the sea. This raises the question of how the elements of access to the city came about and how the river and its bridges might have affected its evolution. This article delves into the study of the origins of the city, with a time frame that extends into the 11th century, the time at which an event took place that confirms one of the major changes in the city’s urban morphology: when it stopped being an island. The intrinsic relationship that exists between bridges and main communication routes as fundamental elements to the access of an island is the driving force behind this article, which is based on research, until now undone, on the existence and construction of the first bridges in the city of Valencia and their influence on the city’s subsequent development. This paper will start by studying the founding and location of this city and will then analyze the communication routes existing at the time. It will also study the communication routes that were created later and how all of them were forced to cross a fluvial accident, the River Turia. For this purpose, the number of bridges built until the city ceased to be an island have been identified, and analyses of their typology, location and who was responsible for them has been carried out to study how they may have affected the normal flow and evolution of the riverbed and their possible influence on the city’s development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Resilience and Heritage Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3050 KiB  
Article
Survey of Residents of Historic Cities Willingness to Pay for a Cultural Heritage Conservation Project: The Contribution of Heritage Awareness
by Hongyu Li, Jie Chen, Konomi Ikebe and Takeshi Kinoshita
Land 2023, 12(11), 2058; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112058 - 12 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1403
Abstract
The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage (ARCH) is an innovative, sustainable approach to architectural heritage conservation; however, current research on the subject lacks public awareness surveys from the bottom-up, and the non-use value of ARCH buildings has not been clarified. We investigated the [...] Read more.
The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage (ARCH) is an innovative, sustainable approach to architectural heritage conservation; however, current research on the subject lacks public awareness surveys from the bottom-up, and the non-use value of ARCH buildings has not been clarified. We investigated the willingness to pay for ARCH among 1460 residents of the Nara Prefecture using a contingent valuation method and clarified the factors affecting the willingness to pay through an ordered logistic regression model. The results of this study showed that 75.1% of the respondents were willing to pay for ARCH projects, which were valued at JPY 6036.13 (USD 41.15) per person per year excluding zero payments and JPY 4531.23 (USD 30.89), including zero payments. In addition, residents’ attitudes toward ARCH and heritage awareness positively influenced both the willingness to pay and its magnitude, while the degree of place attachment was a positive predictor of willingness to pay. This study demonstrates the role of public participation in cultural heritage conservation, emphasizes the importance of heritage awareness, and provides a reference point for policy makers in promoting public participation in ARCH buildings, which contributes to the implementation of a recycling approach to heritage conservation in a sustainable context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Resilience and Heritage Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 71469 KiB  
Article
Patterns of Public Spaces in Spanish Mediterranean Touristified Historic Centres Based on Their Activities: Case Study of Malaga
by Francisco Conejo-Arrabal, Carlos Rosa-Jiménez and Nuria Nebot-Gómez de Salazar
Land 2023, 12(8), 1546; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081546 - 04 Aug 2023
Viewed by 919
Abstract
Historic centres are undergoing a series of urban transformations as a consequence of the processes of touristification, and they are mainly located in pedestrianised public spaces. The consequences of the touristification of public space are manifested in its privatisation via the occupation of [...] Read more.
Historic centres are undergoing a series of urban transformations as a consequence of the processes of touristification, and they are mainly located in pedestrianised public spaces. The consequences of the touristification of public space are manifested in its privatisation via the occupation of catering locals and changes to the uses of adjacent buildings. Recent literature has studied the touristification of the neighbourhood unit in an exhaustive way, but it has only studied specific variables of the public space unit. Therefore, an exhaustive study is needed to bring these variables together regarding the public space unit. This study proposes a methodology for categorising public space in terms of use, with the aim of identifying different patterns of activities with respect to touristification. To this end, a system of use indicators is defined according to the public space and adjacent buildings. This methodology has been tested in the Historic Centre of Malaga, analysing a sample of 54 public spaces and categorising them into five different patterns. This categorisation could facilitate the planning and regulation by local administrations of activities in the public space of the Historic Centre. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Resilience and Heritage Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop