On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks

A special issue of Journal of Intelligence (ISSN 2079-3200).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 8838

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 19071 Granada, Spain
Interests: developmental cognitive neuroscience; attention; cognitive development; experimental psychology; EEG/ERP

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada
Interests: human perception; attention; cognition & performance; cognitive neuroscience; applied cognitive psychology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Attention is a central cognitive function that is key to many other cognitive skills (e.g., perception, learning, reasoning, memory, consciousness, self-regulation). Given this central role in cognition, attention is involved in many aspects of life, such as academic achievement, socio-emotional adjustment (Rueda, Checa, and Rothbart, 2010), physical and emotional health, and wealth in the adult life (Moffit et al., 2011).

In recent decades, Posner and colleagues developed a network theory of attention greatly backed by the analysis of brain-damaged patients and neuroimaging studies in the field of Cognitive Neuroscience (Posner and Petersen, 1990; Petersen and Posner, 2012). This model describes attention as the combined function of brain systems supporting alerting (i.e., reaching and maintaining an optimal activation level), orienting (i.e., selecting a primary source of stimulation for conscious processing among the many reaching our senses), and executive control (i.e., tuning responses to goals and instructions, which often requires inhibiting automatic but non-appropriate courses of actions). Alerting is associated with the function of the locus coeruleus, the brainstem source of norepinephrine, in connection with areas of the frontal and parietal cortices that become activated by warning cues or during sustained attention tasks (Aston-Jones and Cohen, 2005). The orienting network involves differentiated ventral and dorsal parieto-frontal pathways, respectively, for bottom-up (stimulus-driven) and top-down (goal-directed) selection of the sensory input (Corbetta, Patel, and Shulman, 2008). Finally, executive attention is supported by a frontal cingulo-opercular circuit involved in detecting targets and maintaining the task set, in coordination with a fronto-parietal circuit involved in adjusting responses to targets (Dosenbach et al., 2008).

Compelling evidence suggest that intelligence largely relies on the attention-based capacity to regulate mental activity and behavior according to goals and intentions, allowing for the flexible adaptation to changing contextual conditions (see Rueda, 2018). For instance, individual differences in fluid intelligence are associated with a more proactive, strategic deployment of attention and more efficient network function in both children (Rico-Picó et al., 2021) and adults (Burgess and Braver, 2010; Hilger et al., 2017).

The brain network framework of the Posner’s attention model confers a number of advantages, besides the understanding of neural mechanisms underpinning attention functions. Among other interesting questions such as the analysis of psychopathology and the impact of interventions to palliate attentional difficulties, the attention network theory provides a model for studying changes in the functioning and architecture of the circuitry that occur in connection with individual and group differences in efficacy of attention, as those occurring with age or during evolution. An increasing number of studies have examined changes in attentive behavior and underlying neural mechanisms that happen during childhood development (Rueda, 2014). This is achieved by studies comparing individuals of different ages (cross-sectional studies) or following the development of a particular cohort in time (longitudinal studies). Analyzing changes during phylogeny involves comparisons across species sharing more or less recent common ancestors (e.g., Patel et al., 2015; Fjell et al., 2015), or analyzing the possible brain behavior changes inferred by the study of fossils and cultural material of extinct species (i.e., cognitive archeology; e.g., Bruner et al., 2018). 

The current Special Issue aims at expanding the understanding of both the development and evolution of attention networks. Commonalities between changing processes in ontogeny and phylogeny have been long observed, and recent evidence also suggests the existence of similarities between maturational mechanisms of change during evolution and development (Hill et al., 2010; Fjell et al., 2015). Therefore, an increased comprehension of both processes will nourish each other and contribute to our understanding of the origins and emergence of human intelligent behavior.

Consequently, for the current Special Issue, we are interested in receiving the following types of papers:

  • Papers reviewing existing and/or presenting new research expanding on the development of attention functions of alerting, selection, and control along the lifespan (ontogenetic development);
  • Papers reviewing existing and/or presenting new research expanding on the understanding of changes in brain and/or behavior processes related to attention occurring during evolution;
  • Papers presenting grounded theories of evolution and/or development of attention networks;
  • Papers that connect evolution and/or development intelligence with the evolution and/or development attention networks.

Prof. Dr. M. Rosario Rueda
Prof. Dr. Raymond M. Klein
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Intelligence is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

15 pages, 930 KiB  
Article
The Development of Cognitive Control in Preschoolers and Kindergarteners: The Case of Post-Error Slowing and Delayed Disinhibition
by Maor Yeshua and Andrea Berger
J. Intell. 2024, 12(4), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12040041 - 01 Apr 2024
Viewed by 616
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate two specific behavioral manifestations of the executive attention systems in preschoolers and kindergarteners, beyond the unique contribution of intelligence. We tested post-error slowing [ [...] Read more.
This study aimed to investigate two specific behavioral manifestations of the executive attention systems in preschoolers and kindergarteners, beyond the unique contribution of intelligence. We tested post-error slowing [RT¯Post-error trialRT¯Not post-error trial] as a marker of reactive control and delayed disinhibition as a novel marker for proactive control. One hundred and eighty preschool- and kindergarten-aged children, as well as their mothers (final sample: 155 children and 174 mothers), performed an adapted task based on Go/NoGo and Stroop-like paradigms—the emotional day-night task. The children showed reliable post-error slowing and delayed disinhibition (mean size effects of 238.18 ms and 58.31 ms, respectively), while the adult size effects were 40–50% smaller. The post-error slowing effect was present for both sexes in all the tested ages, while the delayed disinhibition effect was present only for girls. Both effects showed large individual differences that became smaller in adulthood. Our findings emphasize the earlier maturation of reactive control compared to proactive control, and the earlier maturation of proactive cognitive control in girls compared to boys. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1500 KiB  
Article
The ANTI-Vea-UGR Platform: A Free Online Resource to Measure Attentional Networks (Alertness, Orienting, and Executive Control) Functioning and Executive/Arousal Vigilance
by Tao Coll-Martín, Rafael Román-Caballero, María del Rocío Martínez-Caballero, Paulina del Carmen Martín-Sánchez, Laura Trujillo, Luis Cásedas, M. Concepción Castellanos, Klara Hemmerich, Greta Manini, María Julieta Aguirre, Fabiano Botta, Andrea Marotta, Elisa Martín-Arévalo, Fernando G. Luna and Juan Lupiáñez
J. Intell. 2023, 11(9), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11090181 - 08 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1086
Abstract
The Attentional Networks Test for Interactions and Vigilance—executive and arousal components (ANTI-Vea) is a computerized task of 32 min duration in the standard format. The task simultaneously assesses the main effects and interactions of the three attentional networks (i.e., phasic alertness, orienting, and [...] Read more.
The Attentional Networks Test for Interactions and Vigilance—executive and arousal components (ANTI-Vea) is a computerized task of 32 min duration in the standard format. The task simultaneously assesses the main effects and interactions of the three attentional networks (i.e., phasic alertness, orienting, and executive control) and two dissociated components of vigilance with reasonable reliability (executive and arousal vigilance). We present this free and publicly accessible resource (ANTI-Vea-UGR; https://anti-vea.ugr.es/) developed to easily run, collect, and analyze data with the ANTI-Vea (or its subtasks measuring some attentional and/or vigilance components embedded in the ANTI-Vea). Available in six different languages, the platform allows for the adaptation of stimulus timing and procedure to facilitate data collection from different populations (e.g., clinical patients, children). Collected data can be freely downloaded and easily analyzed with the provided scripts and tools, including a Shiny app. We discuss previous evidence supporting that attention and vigilance components can be assessed in typical lab conditions as well as online and outside the laboratory. We hope this tutorial will help researchers interested in measuring attention and vigilance with a tool useful to collect data from large sample sizes and easy to use in applied contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

21 pages, 2663 KiB  
Review
Changes in the Networks of Attention across the Lifespan: A Graphical Meta-Analysis
by Raymond M. Klein, Samantha R. Good and John J. Christie
J. Intell. 2024, 12(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12020019 - 10 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1259
Abstract
Three Posnerian networks of attention (alerting, orienting, and executive control) have been distinguished on the bases of behavioural, neuropsychological, and neuroscientific evidence. Here, we examined the trajectories of these networks throughout the human lifespan using the various Attention Network Tests (ANTs), which were [...] Read more.
Three Posnerian networks of attention (alerting, orienting, and executive control) have been distinguished on the bases of behavioural, neuropsychological, and neuroscientific evidence. Here, we examined the trajectories of these networks throughout the human lifespan using the various Attention Network Tests (ANTs), which were specifically developed to measure the efficacy of these networks. The ANT Database was used to identify relevant research, resulting in the inclusion of 36 publications. We conducted a graphical meta-analysis using network scores from each study, based on reaction time plotted as a function of age group. Evaluation of attentional networks from childhood to early adulthood suggests that the alerting network develops relatively quickly, and reaches near-adult level by the age of 12. The developmental pattern of the orienting network seems to depend on the information value of the spatial cues. Executive control network scores show a consistent decrease (improvement) with age in childhood. During adulthood (ages 19–75), changes in alerting depend on the modality of the warning signal, while a moderate increase in orienting scores was seen with increasing age. Whereas executive control scores, as measured in reaction time, increase (deterioration) from young adulthood into later adulthood an opposite trend is seen when scores are based on error rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

18 pages, 1904 KiB  
Perspective
Cognitive Archeology and the Attentional System: An Evolutionary Mismatch for the Genus Homo
by Emiliano Bruner
J. Intell. 2023, 11(9), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11090183 - 12 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2008
Abstract
Brain evolution is a key topic in evolutionary anthropology. Unfortunately, in this sense the fossil record can usually support limited anatomical and behavioral inferences. Nonetheless, information from fossil species is, in any case, particularly valuable, because it represents the only direct proof of [...] Read more.
Brain evolution is a key topic in evolutionary anthropology. Unfortunately, in this sense the fossil record can usually support limited anatomical and behavioral inferences. Nonetheless, information from fossil species is, in any case, particularly valuable, because it represents the only direct proof of cerebral and behavioral changes throughout the human phylogeny. Recently, archeology and psychology have been integrated in the field of cognitive archeology, which aims to interpret current cognitive models according to the evidence we have on extinct human species. In this article, such evidence is reviewed in order to consider whether and to what extent the archeological record can supply information regarding changes of the attentional system in different taxa of the human genus. In particular, behavioral correlates associated with the fronto-parietal system and working memory are employed to consider recent changes in our species, Homo sapiens, and a mismatch between attentional and visuospatial ability is hypothesized. These two functional systems support present-moment awareness and mind-wandering, respectively, and their evolutionary unbalance can explain a structural sensitivity to psychological distress in our species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 951 KiB  
Opinion
Contributions of Lower Structures to Higher Cognition: Towards a Dynamic Network Model
by William Saban and Shai Gabay
J. Intell. 2023, 11(6), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060121 - 14 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1120
Abstract
Researchers often attribute higher cognition to the enlargement of cortical regions throughout evolution, reflecting the belief that humans sit at the top of the cognitive pyramid. Implicitly, this approach assumes that the subcortex is of secondary importance for higher-order cognition. While it is [...] Read more.
Researchers often attribute higher cognition to the enlargement of cortical regions throughout evolution, reflecting the belief that humans sit at the top of the cognitive pyramid. Implicitly, this approach assumes that the subcortex is of secondary importance for higher-order cognition. While it is now recognized that subcortical regions can be involved in various cognitive domains, it remains unclear how they contribute to computations essential for higher-level cognitive processes such as endogenous attention and numerical cognition. Herein, we identify three models of subcortical–cortical relations in these cognitive processes: (i) subcortical regions are not involved in higher cognition; (ii) subcortical computations support elemental forms of higher cognition mainly in species without a developed cortex; and (iii) higher cognition depends on a whole-brain dynamic network, requiring integrated cortical and subcortical computations. Based on evolutionary theories and recent data, we propose the SEED hypothesis: the Subcortex is Essential for the Early Development of higher cognition. According to the five principles of the SEED hypothesis, subcortical computations are essential for the emergence of cognitive abilities that enable organisms to adapt to an ever-changing environment. We examine the implications of the SEED hypothesis from a multidisciplinary perspective to understand how the subcortex contributes to various forms of higher cognition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1375 KiB  
Opinion
The Evolution and Future Development of Attention Networks
by Michael I Posner
J. Intell. 2023, 11(6), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060098 - 23 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1665
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to examine how the development of attention networks has left many important issues unsolved and to propose possible directions for solving them by combining human and animal studies. The paper starts with evidence from citation mapping that [...] Read more.
The goal of this paper is to examine how the development of attention networks has left many important issues unsolved and to propose possible directions for solving them by combining human and animal studies. The paper starts with evidence from citation mapping that indicates attention has played a central role in integrating cognitive and neural studies into Cognitive Neuroscience. The integration of the fields depends in part upon similarities and differences in performance over a wide variety of animals. In the case of exogenous orienting of attention primates, rodents and humans are quite similar, but this is not so with executive control. In humans, attention networks continue to develop at different rates during infancy and childhood and into adulthood. From age four on, the Attention Network Test (ANT) allows measurement of individual differences in the alerting, orienting and executive networks. Overt and covert orienting do overlap in their anatomy, but there is evidence of some degree of functional independence at the cellular level. The attention networks frequently work together with sensory, memory and other networks. Integration of animal and human studies may be advanced by examining common genes involved in individual attention networks or their integration with other brain networks. Attention networks involve widely scattered computation nodes in different brain areas, both cortical and subcortical. Future studies need to attend to the white matter that connects them and the direction of information flow during task performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On the Origins and Development of Attention Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop