Recent Advances in Facial Palsy Management

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery/Aesthetic Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2024 | Viewed by 1416

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Plastic Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trustdisabled, East Grinstead RH19 3DZ, UK
Interests: facial palsy; supermicrosurgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Facial palsy is a debilitating symptom arising from a variety of etiologies. These range from Bell’s palsy and the Ramsay–Hunt syndrome to strokes and sometimes cancers. Since the time of Sir Charles Bell, we now have a greater understanding of nerve anatomy and physiology, which has improved our understanding of this condition. The advent of plastic surgery has further improved our ability to manage facial palsy, but this is one-dimensional as it only offers a treatment alternative for those with flaccid paralysis using static slings and muscle transfers.

Nevertheless, the explosion of knowledge in the 21st century in the fields of supermicrosurgery, nanotechnology, robotics, transplantation surgery and the coming cybernetic age have opened new vistas in facial palsy. A greater collaborative effort across multiple specialties and the inclusion of allied heath specialties, such as facial therapy and psychology, has also significantly contributed to better treatment paradigms. In this Special Issue, we explore the next set of challenges in the field of facial palsy. These are as follows:

(i) While early recovery after Bell’s palsy presents with no long-term sequelae, delayed recovery increases the risk of synkinesis and the development of non-flaccid facial paresis. How can we mitigate this with better medication and what are the prognosticators that we can use to identify late responders?

(ii) Do motor endplates completely degenerate beyond 18 to 24 months post-onset, and if not, what aspect of these specific organs can regenerate with the help of an external neural source?

(iii) Motor endplate innervation (MEPI) is the key to understanding the way that facial mimetic muscles work. More detailed anatomical studies are necessary to look at innervation patterns within these muscles.

(iv) Is there a role for the use of regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) or direct muscle neurotization in augmenting the motor endplates within facial muscles?

(v) What is the future for facial reanimation surgery: transplantation or cybernetics? Do these have implications in parallel components of facial functions such as eye transplantations?

In this Special Issue, we look at the exciting prospects in the field of facial surgery. Thank you.

Dr. Ruben Yap Kannan
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • facial palsy
  • transplantation
  • facial cybernetics
  • facial therapy
  • nerve supermicrosurgery

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 5440 KiB  
Article
A Novel Approach to Facial Reanimation and Restoration Following Radical Parotidectomies
by Lucia Pannuto, Jun Yi Soh, Kwaku Duah-Asante, Shazrinizam Shaharan, Joseph Ward, Brian S. Bisase, Paul Norris, Isao Koshima, Charles Nduka and Ruben Yap Kannan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2269; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082269 - 14 Apr 2024
Viewed by 576
Abstract
Background: Parotidectomies are indicated for a variety of reasons. Regardless of the indication for surgery, facial reanimation may be required because of facial nerve sacrifice or iatrogenic damage. In these cases, facial restoration performed concurrently with ablative surgery is considered the gold [...] Read more.
Background: Parotidectomies are indicated for a variety of reasons. Regardless of the indication for surgery, facial reanimation may be required because of facial nerve sacrifice or iatrogenic damage. In these cases, facial restoration performed concurrently with ablative surgery is considered the gold standard, and delayed reanimation is usually not attempted. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent parotidectomies from 2009 to 2022 in a single institution was performed. Indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes of an algorithmic template were applied to these cases using the Sunnybrook, Terzis scores, and Smile Index. A comparison was made between immediate vs. late repairs. Results: Of a total of 90 patients who underwent parotidectomy, 17 (15.3%) had a radical parotidectomy, and 73 (84.7%) had a total or superficial parotidectomy. Among those who underwent complete removal of the gland and nerve sacrifice, eight patients (47.1%) had facial restoration. There were four patients each in the immediate (n = 4) and late repair (n = 4) groups. Surgical techniques ranged from cable grafts to vascularized cross facial nerve grafts (sural communicating nerve flap as per the Koshima procedure) and vascularized nerve flaps (chimeric vastus lateralis and anterolateral thigh flaps, and superficial circumflex perforator flap with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve). Conclusions: The algorithm between one technique and another should take into consideration age, comorbidities, soft tissue defects, presence of facial nerve branches for reinnervation, and donor site morbidity. While immediate facial nerve repair is ideal, there is still benefit in performing a delayed repair in this algorithm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Facial Palsy Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1998 KiB  
Article
Eyelid Skin Grafting in Young Patients with Facial Nerve Palsy
by Yinon Shapira, Katja Ullrich, Sundas Masqood, Linda Okafor and Raman Malhotra
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2142; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072142 - 08 Apr 2024
Viewed by 364
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to report outcomes of eyelid full-thickness skin grafting augmentation in facial nerve palsy (FNP) patients younger than 50 years of age. Methods: In a retrospective, consecutive case series, nine eyelid skin grafts performed on [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of this study is to report outcomes of eyelid full-thickness skin grafting augmentation in facial nerve palsy (FNP) patients younger than 50 years of age. Methods: In a retrospective, consecutive case series, nine eyelid skin grafts performed on eight FNP patients with skin contraction (five females; median age 42 years [range, 17–47]) are presented. In most cases, upper eyelid skin grafting was combined with levator recession and anterior lamellar repositioning. Lower eyelid skin grafting was combined with lower retractors recession in all cases. Functional and cosmetic outcomes were measured preoperatively and at early (1–3 months), intermediate (3–6 months), and late (≥12 months) follow-up. Results: The corneal score improved at early follow-up (p = 0.03) and remained improved at late follow-up (p = 0.042). The gentle closure lagophthalmos was improved at late follow-up (p = 0.042). (p = 0.048). The grades of graft color, edge/skin interface, and size improved at 3–6 months post-grafting and remained improved at late follow-up (p < 0.05). Over the follow-up, four patients (50%) were recommended to have further surgical procedures. Conclusions: The preliminary results from this small cohort suggest that eyelid skin grafting is a viable option for young patients prioritizing cosmesis. This technique warrants consideration for its functional benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Facial Palsy Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop