Current Trends and Innovations in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 July 2024 | Viewed by 1204

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
2. Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Interests: shoulder joint; scapula; shoulder dislocation; acromioclavicular joint instability; arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; arthroscopy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sports Orthopeadics, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
Interests: elbow joint; shoulder joint; orthopedic trauma; rotator cuff injury; arthroscopic surgery

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sports Orthopeadics, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
Interests: shoulder joint; elbow joint; orthopedic surgery; arthroscopic surgery; traumatology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past two decades, reconstructive procedures of the shoulder and adjacent joints have become increasingly popular worldwide and are currently predominantly carried out arthroscopically or via minimally invasive procedures. This was made possible in particular by the better understanding of pathomorphological changes in various shoulder diseases and the development of novel implants, instruments and surgical techniques.

The focus of rotator cuff surgery has primarily been on biomechanical and clinical studies that have examined the value of various reattachment techniques. Despite the establishment of highly stable constructs, clinical outcomes have not improved significantly. The level of primary stability has probably been reached or even exceeded here and the future will involve the biological enhancement of the reconstruction in order to further reduce the rate of re-tears. New approaches exist primarily in the joint-preserving treatment of irreparable or partially repairable ruptures. Different superior capsular reconstruction techniques and modern muscle transfer options to replace or augment the insufficient musculotendinous units of the rotator cuff are currently being tested in clinical research and are increasingly transitioning to clinical practice. Modern methods of capsular labrum reconstruction in the treatment of shoulder instability are now part of the standard arthroscopic repertoire and it is hoped that if the indication is correct, the recurrence rates can be further reduced in the long term. The quantification and consideration of significant bony defects in the shoulder joint make a decisive contribution to the success of the surgical treatment of shoulder instability.

Huge progress has also been made in traumatological shoulder surgery in recent years. While the treatment of glenoid and greater tuberosity fractures has long been carried out arthroscopically with very good clinical results, the range of indications for minimally invasive techniques has also been expanded to include more complex fracture situations of the scapula. The same applies to the the treatment of lateral clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint sprains. Arthroscopic or arthroscopic-assisted techniques avoid extensive soft tissue preparation with relevant access morbidity, and allow for the simultaneous treatment of accompanying glenohumeral pathologies. Obligatory second interventions can also be avoided.

The aim of this Special Issue is to give you an overview of established approaches and current innovations in reconstructive shoulder surgery.

With this in mind, we hope you enjoy reading through the following articles.

Prof. Dr. Markus Scheibel
Prof. Dr. Sebastian Siebenlist
Dr. Lucca Lacheta
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • shoulder and adjacent joints
  • arthroscopic surgery
  • rotator cuff surgery
  • reconstructive shoulder surgery
  • minimally invasive surgery

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 643 KiB  
Article
Concomitant Glenohumeral Pathologies in Patients with Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: How Do Acute and Chronic Instabilities Differ?
by Philipp Vetter, Manije Massih, Frederik Bellmann, Larissa Eckl, Philipp Moroder, Asimina Lazaridou and Markus Scheibel
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1723; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061723 - 17 Mar 2024
Viewed by 526
Abstract
Background: Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies may be present in patients with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. This study aims to record and compare the prevalence and treatment of CGP in cases with acute and chronic ACJ dislocations. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional binational, bicentric study included [...] Read more.
Background: Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies may be present in patients with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. This study aims to record and compare the prevalence and treatment of CGP in cases with acute and chronic ACJ dislocations. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional binational, bicentric study included patients that underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute (group A) and chronic (group C) ACJ dislocations. Intraoperatively, CGPs and eventual treatments (debridement and reconstructive measures) were recorded. Results: The study included 540 patients (87% men; mean age 39.4 years), with 410 (75.9%) patients in group A and 130 (24.1%) in group C. Patients in group C were older (p < 0.001). The CGP prevalence was 30.7%, without a difference between groups A and C (p = 0.19). Supraspinatus tendon (SSP) and labral lesions were most common. Within group C, CGPs were more prevalent in surgery-naïve patients (p = 0.002). Among 49 patients with previous surgical treatment, CGPs tended to be more common in patients with prior open surgery than arthroscopically assisted surgery (p = 0.392). Increased CGP prevalence was associated with higher age (r = 0.97; p = 0.004) (up to 63% in the oldest age group, but also 17% for youngest age group) and higher in cases with Rockwood type-IIIB injuries compared to type-V injuries (p = 0.028), but type-IIIB injuries included more group C cases (p < 0.001). The most frequently found CGPs were treated by debridement rather than reconstructive interventions (SSP and labrum: p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: This study shows that one in three patients with ACJ instabilities has a CGP, especially elderly patients. Most of the CGPs were treated by debridement rather than constructive interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends and Innovations in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3447 KiB  
Article
All-Suture Anchor vs. Knotless Suture Anchor for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability—A Prospective Cohort Study
by Marvin Minkus, Annette Aigner, Julia Wolke and Markus Scheibel
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(5), 1381; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051381 - 28 Feb 2024
Viewed by 486
Abstract
All-suture or soft-anchors (SA) represent a new generation of suture anchor technology with a completely suture-based system. This study’s objective was to assess Juggerknot® SA, for arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder instability (RSI), and to compare it to a commonly performed [...] Read more.
All-suture or soft-anchors (SA) represent a new generation of suture anchor technology with a completely suture-based system. This study’s objective was to assess Juggerknot® SA, for arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder instability (RSI), and to compare it to a commonly performed knotless anchor (KA) technique (Pushlock®). In a prospective cohort study, 30 consecutive patients scheduled for reconstruction of the capsulolabral complex without substantial glenoid bone loss were included and operated on using the SA technique. A historical control group was operated on using the KA technique for the same indication. Clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RSI and WOSI at 24 months were the co-primary endpoints, evaluated with logistic and linear regression. A total of 5 out of 30 (16.7%) patients suffered from RSI in the SA group, one out of 31 (3.2%) in the KA group (adjusted odds ratio = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89–115.35), and 13.3% in the SA group and 3.2% in the KAgroup had a revision. The median WOSI in the SA group was lower than in the KA group (81% vs. 95%) (adjusted regression coefficient = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89–115.35). Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for RSI using either the SA or KA technique led to satisfying clinical outcomes. However, there is a tendency for higher RSI and lower WOSI following the SA technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends and Innovations in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop