Bird Functional Diversity and Ecosystem Services in Forests

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Ecology and Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2023) | Viewed by 3074

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA
Interests: forest community ecology; ecosystem services, and conservation and restoration, with emphasis on high elevation; five-needle white pine ecosystems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
Interests: avian ecology; cancer ecology; ecosystem services; evolutionary ecology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
Interests: agroecology; trophic cascades; urban ecology; conservation biology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Forests cover 30% of the land surface globally but support the highest terrestrial biodiversity. Birds are important components of community trophic interactions, with roles ranging from apex predators to secondary producers and scavengers. In this sense, many avian species contribute significant ecosystem services to forests and to the human economic enterprise.

The term “ecosystem services” was originated by P.R. Ehrlich and H.A. Mooney in 1983, and the number of papers published on the subject since has since grown exponentially.  The United Nations Millenium Ecosystem Assessment categorized ecosystem services into four categories: “provisioning services such as food, water, timber, and fiber; regulating services that affect climate, floods, disease, wastes, and water quality; cultural services that provide recreational, aesthetic, and spiritual benefits; and supporting services such as soil formation, photosynthesis, and nutrient cycling.”

For this Special Issue, we invite you to submit work highlighting the different functional roles of birds in forest communities as well as the important ecosystem services they provide to wildland, urban, and agri-forest systems. The role of birds in forest communities is at great risk due to population declines resulting from factors including habitat conversion, over-exploitation, and climate change, with implications for future community functionality and human well-being.

Dr. Diana F. Tomback
Dr. Christopher J. Whelan
Dr. Megan B. Garfinkel
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • forest birds
  • ecosystem services
  • functional diversity
  • agroforestry

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1704 KiB  
Article
Bird Community Composition and Functional Guilds Response to Vegetation Structure in Southwest Ethiopia
by Gelaye Gebremichael, Kitessa Hundera, Lindsay De Decker, Raf Aerts, Luc Lens and Anagaw Atickem
Forests 2022, 13(12), 2068; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122068 - 4 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2477
Abstract
Shade coffee farms in southwest Ethiopia are known to host high levels of avian biodiversity. However, these farms vary in terms of forest management, which affects their understory, mid-story, crown cover, and canopy closure, and hence their structural complexity. Such differences in vegetation [...] Read more.
Shade coffee farms in southwest Ethiopia are known to host high levels of avian biodiversity. However, these farms vary in terms of forest management, which affects their understory, mid-story, crown cover, and canopy closure, and hence their structural complexity. Such differences in vegetation structure can potentially affect the survival of specialist bird species, and shade coffee farms may not equally contribute to avian biodiversity conservation. This study aimed to investigate how avian community composition, richness, and the relative abundance of different bird functional guilds relate to structural differences in vegetation shaped by forest management. Bird guild classification was based on bird species forest dependence, diet type, migration status, nest type, foraging, and nesting strata, and bird communities were surveyed using the Timed Species Counts (TSCs) method. Species turnover in bird communities was evaluated using detrended correspondence analysis and redundancy analysis, whereby multiple regression models were used to examine bird guild responses to vegetation structure. Total bird species richness and relative abundance did not respond to vegetation structure. However, the richness of forest specialists and understory foragers, and the relative abundance of mid-high foragers, all positively related to tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and crown cover, whereas the relative abundance of species with medium levels of forest dependency, mid-high/canopy foragers, and open-nesters were positively related to basal area and canopy cover. This study demonstrates that the relative value of shade coffee farms for avian biodiversity conservation depends on the type of forest management, and that bigger trees with larger crown cover provide a habitat of higher quality to habitat specialist birds. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bird Functional Diversity and Ecosystem Services in Forests)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop