Lynch Syndrome

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Biomarkers".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2021) | Viewed by 27094

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology and CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Interests: Lynch syndrome; FAP; MAP; Cowden syndrome; aldolase; hemoglobinopathies; ZNF224; WT-1chronic myeloid leukemia; tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology and CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Interests: Lynch syndrome; FAP; MAP; Cowden syndrome; PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome; epithelial–mesenchymal transition; study of low risk-alleles; functional assay of unclassified MMR variants
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The carriers of pathogenic mutations in these genes have an increased risk of developing a colorectal cancer and/or LS-associated cancer. The LS-associated cancer types include carcinomas of the endometrium, small intestine, stomach, pancreas and biliary tract, ovary, brain, upper urinary tract, and skin. The criteria for the clinical diagnosis of LS and the procedures of the genetic testing for the identification of pathogenetic mutations carriers in MMR genes have long been known. A crucial point in mutation detection analysis is the correct definition of the pathogenicity associated with MMR genetic variants, especially in order to include the mutation carriers in the endoscopy surveillance programs more suited to them. Therefore, defining the pathogenicity of these MMR variants may help to improve the management of LS-associated cancers. Moreover, in this Issue we would also like to report the recent discoveries in the molecular genetics of LS, such as the new roles of MMR protein as well miRNAs involved in LS tumorigenesis. Finally, we would like to discuss new therapeutic approaches such as immunotherapy available for patients that have developed LS-associated colorectal cancer.

Prof. Dr. Paola Izzo
Dr. Francesca Duraturo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Lynch syndrome
  • genotype–phenotype correlation
  • highly immunogenic frame-shift neo-peptides
  • immunotherapy
  • mismatch repair genes
  • unclassified genetic variants
  • new role MMR proteins, miRNAs
  • functional assay MMR deficiency

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 569 KiB  
Article
Identification of Lynch Syndrome Carriers among Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma
by Ariadna Sánchez, Luis Bujanda, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Alex Bofill, Cristina Alvarez-Urturi, Goretti Hernandez, Lara Aguilera, Sabela Carballal, Joan Llach, Cristina Herrera-Pariente, Mar Iglesias, Liseth Rivero-Sánchez, Gerhard Jung, Lorena Moreno, Teresa Ocaña, Carolina Bayarri, Maria Pellise, Antoni Castells, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Francesc Balaguer and Leticia Moreiraadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2021, 13(24), 6378; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246378 - 20 Dec 2021
Viewed by 2499
Abstract
Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare disease which can be associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). LS tumors are characterized by the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or the loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression. In SBA, the frequency of MMR [...] Read more.
Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare disease which can be associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). LS tumors are characterized by the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or the loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression. In SBA, the frequency of MMR deficient (MMRd) tumors varies from 5% to 35%. This study aims to describe the prevalence of LS carriers among patients with MMRd small bowel adenocarcinomas. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study with identification and MMR testing of all consecutive SBA between 2004 and 2020 in a multicenter Spanish study. Demographical data, tumor characteristics, follow-up and survival information were collected. Germline testing was driven by identification of MMRd tumors. Results: A total of 94 individuals diagnosed with SBA were recruited. We observed 20 (21.3%) MMRd tumors. In 9/15 (60%) patients with MMRd tumors, a pathogenic variant was identified (three MLH1, four MSH2, one MSH6 and one PMS2). Accordingly, the prevalence of LS among all SBA cases was 10.1%. Conclusions: More than one-fifth of SBA display MMRd and in more than a half is due to LS. Our data supports the implementation of universal MMR tumor testing among SBA for the identification of LS families. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 8682 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning for Recurrence Prediction of Gynecologic Cancers Using Lynch Syndrome-Related Screening Markers
by Byung Wook Kim, Min Chul Choi, Min Kyu Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Min Tae Kim, Joseph J. Noh, Hyun Park, Sang Geun Jung, Won Duk Joo, Seung Hun Song and Chan Lee
Cancers 2021, 13(22), 5670; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225670 - 12 Nov 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2273
Abstract
To support the implementation of genome-based precision medicine, we developed machine learning models that predict the recurrence of patients with gynecologic cancer in using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on clinical and pathologic characteristics, including Lynch syndrome-related screening markers such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) [...] Read more.
To support the implementation of genome-based precision medicine, we developed machine learning models that predict the recurrence of patients with gynecologic cancer in using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on clinical and pathologic characteristics, including Lynch syndrome-related screening markers such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite instability (MSI) tests. To accomplish our goal, we reviewed the patient demographics, clinical data, and pathological results from their medical records. Then we identified seven potential characteristics (four MMR IHC [MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2], MSI, Age 60, and tumor size). Following that, predictive models were built based on these variables using six machine learning algorithms: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), naive Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), and extreme gradient boosting (EGB) (XGBoost). The experimental results showed that the RF-based model performed best at predicting gynecologic cancer recurrence, with AUCs of 0.818 and 0.826 for the 5-fold cross-validation (CV) and 5-fold CV with 10 repetitions, respectively. This study provides novel and baseline results about predicting the recurrence of gynecologic cancer in patients using ICI by using machine learning methods based on Lynch syndrome-related screening markers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2225 KiB  
Article
MiR-137 Targets the 3′ Untranslated Region of MSH2: Potential Implications in Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer
by Raffaella Liccardo, Raffaele Sessa, Silvia Trombetti, Marina De Rosa, Paola Izzo, Michela Grosso and Francesca Duraturo
Cancers 2021, 13(18), 4662; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184662 - 17 Sep 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2433
Abstract
Mismatch Repair (MMR) gene dysregulation plays a fundamental role in Lynch Syndrome (LS) pathogenesis, a form of hereditary colorectal cancer. Loss or overexpression of key MMR genes leads to genome instability and tumorigenesis; however, the mechanisms controlling MMR gene expression are [...] Read more.
Mismatch Repair (MMR) gene dysregulation plays a fundamental role in Lynch Syndrome (LS) pathogenesis, a form of hereditary colorectal cancer. Loss or overexpression of key MMR genes leads to genome instability and tumorigenesis; however, the mechanisms controlling MMR gene expression are unknown. One such gene, MSH2, exerts an important role, not only in MMR, but also in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle control. In this study, we explored the functions and underlying molecular mechanisms of increased MSH2 expression related to a c.*226A>G variant in the 3′untranslated (UTR) region of MSH2 that had been previously identified in a subject clinically suspected of LS. Bioinformatics identified a putative binding site for miR-137 in this region. To verify miRNA targeting specificity, we performed luciferase gene reporter assays using a MSH2 3′UTR psiCHECK-2 vector in human SW480 cells over-expressing miR-137, which showed a drastic reduction in luciferase activity (p > 0.0001). This effect was abolished by site-directed mutagenesis of the putative miR-137 seed site. Moreover, in these cells we observed that miR-137 levels were inversely correlated with MSH2 expression levels. These results were confirmed by results in normal and tumoral tissues from the patient carrying the 3′UTR c.*226A>G variant in MSH2. Finally, miR-137 overexpression in SW480 cells significantly suppressed cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner (p < 0.0001), supporting a role for MSH2 in apoptosis and cell proliferation processes. Our findings suggest miR-137 helps control MSH2 expression via its 3′UTR and that dysregulation of this mechanism appears to promote tumorigenesis in colon cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1095 KiB  
Article
Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions during Endoscopy Surveillance in Patients with Lynch Syndrome: A Multicentre Cohort Study
by Romain Chautard, David Malka, Elia Samaha, David Tougeron, Didier Barbereau, Olivier Caron, Gabriel Rahmi, Thierry Barrioz, Christophe Cellier, Sandrine Feau and Thierry Lecomte
Cancers 2021, 13(7), 1657; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071657 - 1 Apr 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1787
Abstract
Background: Patients with Lynch syndrome are at increased risk of gastric and duodenal cancer. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surveillance is generally proposed, even though little data are available on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with Lynch syndrome are at increased risk of gastric and duodenal cancer. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surveillance is generally proposed, even though little data are available on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of gastrointestinal lesions following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination in Lynch patients. Methods: A large, multicentre cohort of 172 patients with a proven germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes and at least one documented upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening was assessed. Detailed information was collected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings and the outcome of endoscopic follow-up. Results: Seventy neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions were diagnosed in 45 patients (26%) out of the 172 patients included. The median age at diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal lesions was 54 years. The prevalence of cancer at initial upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was 5% and the prevalence of precancerous lesions was 12%. Upper gastrointestinal lesions were more frequent after 40 years of age (p < 0.001). Helicobacter pylori infection was associated with an increased prevalence of gastric, but not duodenal, lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Neoplastic upper gastrointestinal lesions are frequent in patients with Lynch syndrome, especially in those over 40 years of age. The results of our study suggest that Lynch patients should be considered for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic and Helicobacter pylori screening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 373 KiB  
Article
Gynecological Surveillance and Surgery Outcomes in Dutch Lynch Syndrome Carriers
by Ellis L. Eikenboom, Helena C. van Doorn, Winand N. M. Dinjens, Hendrikus J. Dubbink, Willemina R. R. Geurts-Giele, Manon C. W. Spaander, Carli M. J. Tops, Anja Wagner and Anne Goverde
Cancers 2021, 13(3), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030459 - 26 Jan 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1941
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is caused by pathogenic germline variants in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predisposing female carriers for endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Since gynecological LS surveillance guidelines are based on little evidence, we assessed its outcomes. Data regarding gynecological [...] Read more.
Lynch syndrome (LS) is caused by pathogenic germline variants in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predisposing female carriers for endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Since gynecological LS surveillance guidelines are based on little evidence, we assessed its outcomes. Data regarding gynecological tumors, surveillance, and (risk-reducing) surgery were collected from female LS carriers diagnosed in our center since 1993. Of 505 female carriers, 104 had a gynecological malignancy prior to genetic LS diagnosis. Of 264 carriers eligible for gynecological management, 164 carriers gave informed consent and had available surveillance data: 38 MLH1, 25 MSH2, 82 MSH6, and 19 PMS2 carriers (median follow-up 5.6 years). Surveillance intervals were within advised time in >80%. Transvaginal ultrasound, endometrial sampling, and CA125 measurements were performed in 76.8%, 35.9%, and 40.6%, respectively. Four symptomatic ECs, one symptomatic OC, and one asymptomatic EC were diagnosed. Endometrial hyperplasia was found in eight carriers, of whom three were symptomatic. Risk-reducing surgery was performed in 73 (45.5%) carriers (median age 51 years), revealing two asymptomatic ECs. All ECs were diagnosed in FIGO I. Gynecological management in LS carriers varied largely, stressing the need for uniform, evidence-based guidelines. Most ECs presented early and symptomatically, questioning the surveillance benefit in its current form. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1612 KiB  
Article
Molecular Basis of Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency in Tumors from Lynch Suspected Cases with Negative Germline Test Results
by Alisa Olkinuora, Annette Gylling, Henrikki Almusa, Samuli Eldfors, Anna Lepistö, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Taina Tuulikki Nieminen and Päivi Peltomäki
Cancers 2020, 12(7), 1853; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071853 - 9 Jul 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4992
Abstract
Some 10–50% of Lynch-suspected cases with abnormal immunohistochemical (IHC) staining remain without any identifiable germline mutation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MMR proteins form heterodimeric complexes, giving rise to distinct IHC patterns when mutant. Potential reasons for not finding a germline mutation [...] Read more.
Some 10–50% of Lynch-suspected cases with abnormal immunohistochemical (IHC) staining remain without any identifiable germline mutation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MMR proteins form heterodimeric complexes, giving rise to distinct IHC patterns when mutant. Potential reasons for not finding a germline mutation include involvement of an MMR gene not predicted by the IHC pattern, epigenetic mechanism of predisposition, primary mutation in another DNA repair or replication-associated gene, and double somatic MMR gene mutations. We addressed these possibilities by germline and tumor studies in 60 Lynch-suspected cases ascertained through diagnostics (n = 55) or research (n = 5). All cases had abnormal MMR protein staining in tumors but no point mutation or large rearrangement of the suspected MMR genes in the germline. In diagnostic practice, MSH2/MSH6 (MutS Homolog 2/MutS Homolog 6) deficiency prompts MSH2 mutation screening; in our study, 3/11 index individuals (27%) with this IHC pattern revealed pathogenic germline mutations in MSH6. Individuals with isolated absence of MSH6 are routinely screened for MSH6 mutations alone; we found a predisposing mutation in MSH2 in 1/7 such cases (14%). Somatic deletion of the MSH2-MSH6 region, joint loss of MSH6 and MSH3 (MutS Homolog 3) proteins, and hindered MSH2/MSH6 dimerization offered explanations to misleading IHC patterns. Constitutional epimutation hypothesis was pursued in the MSH2 and/or MSH6-deficient cases plus 38 cases with MLH1 (MutL Homolog 1)-deficient tumors; a primary MLH1 epimutation was identified in one case with an MLH1-deficient tumor. We conclude that both MSH2 and MSH6 should be screened in MSH2/6- and MSH6-deficient cases. In MLH1-deficient cases, constitutional epimutations of MLH1 warrant consideration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 1834 KiB  
Article
Comprehensive Constitutional Genetic and Epigenetic Characterization of Lynch-Like Individuals
by Estela Dámaso, Maribel González-Acosta, Gardenia Vargas-Parra, Matilde Navarro, Judith Balmaña, Teresa Ramon y Cajal, Noemí Tuset, Bryony A. Thompson, Fátima Marín, Anna Fernández, Carolina Gómez, Àngela Velasco, Ares Solanes, Sílvia Iglesias, Gisela Urgel, Consol López, Jesús del Valle, Olga Campos, Maria Santacana, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Conxi Lázaro, Laura Valle, Joan Brunet, Marta Pineda and Gabriel Capelláadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2020, 12(7), 1799; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071799 - 5 Jul 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4117
Abstract
The causal mechanism for cancer predisposition in Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) remains unknown. Our aim was to elucidate the constitutional basis of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in LLS patients throughout a comprehensive (epi)genetic analysis. One hundred and fifteen LLS patients harboring MMR-deficient tumors and [...] Read more.
The causal mechanism for cancer predisposition in Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) remains unknown. Our aim was to elucidate the constitutional basis of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in LLS patients throughout a comprehensive (epi)genetic analysis. One hundred and fifteen LLS patients harboring MMR-deficient tumors and no germline MMR mutations were included. Mutational analysis of 26 colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated genes was performed. Pathogenicity of MMR variants was assessed by splicing and multifactorial likelihood analyses. Genome-wide methylome analysis was performed by the Infinium Human Methylation 450K Bead Chip. The multigene panel analysis revealed the presence of two MMR gene truncating mutations not previously found. Of a total of 15 additional MMR variants identified, five -present in 6 unrelated individuals- were reclassified as pathogenic. In addition, 13 predicted deleterious variants in other CRC-predisposing genes were found in 12 probands. Methylome analysis detected one constitutional MLH1 epimutation, but no additional differentially methylated regions were identified in LLS compared to LS patients or cancer-free individuals. In conclusion, the use of an ad-hoc designed gene panel combined with pathogenicity assessment of variants allowed the identification of deleterious MMR mutations as well as new LLS candidate causal genes. Constitutional epimutations in non-LS-associated genes are not responsible for LLS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

37 pages, 540 KiB  
Review
How Should We Test for Lynch Syndrome? A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Strategies
by Richard Gallon, Peter Gawthorpe, Rachel L. Phelps, Christine Hayes, Gillian M. Borthwick, Mauro Santibanez-Koref, Michael S. Jackson and John Burn
Cancers 2021, 13(3), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030406 - 22 Jan 2021
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 5821
Abstract
International guidelines for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) recommend molecular screening of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to identify patients for germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene testing. As our understanding of the LS phenotype and diagnostic technologies have advanced, there is a need to [...] Read more.
International guidelines for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) recommend molecular screening of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to identify patients for germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene testing. As our understanding of the LS phenotype and diagnostic technologies have advanced, there is a need to review these guidelines and new screening opportunities. We discuss the barriers to implementation of current guidelines, as well as guideline limitations, and highlight new technologies and knowledge that may address these. We also discuss alternative screening strategies to increase the rate of LS diagnoses. In particular, the focus of current guidance on CRCs means that approximately half of Lynch-spectrum tumours occurring in unknown male LS carriers, and only one-third in female LS carriers, will trigger testing for LS. There is increasing pressure to expand guidelines to include molecular screening of endometrial cancers, the most frequent cancer in female LS carriers. Furthermore, we collate the evidence to support MMR deficiency testing of other Lynch-spectrum tumours to screen for LS. However, a reliance on tumour tissue limits preoperative testing and, therefore, diagnosis prior to malignancy. The recent successes of functional assays to detect microsatellite instability or MMR deficiency in non-neoplastic tissues suggest that future diagnostic pipelines could become independent of tumour tissue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lynch Syndrome)
Back to TopTop