Diagnosis and Treatment of Maxillofacial Trauma

A special issue of Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 December 2023) | Viewed by 1928

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
APHM, Laboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Service de chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
Interests: trauma care; biomechanics; maxillofacial surgery; CAD CAM surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Bioengineering aims to gather high-quality original research articles, reviews, and technical notes on the diagnosis and treatment of maxillofacial injuries

The management of maxillofacial trauma remains a daily challenge. Maxillofacial surgeons have always sought to reach results that were anatomically, functionally, and aesthetically satisfactory for their patients; maxillofacial surgeons  now benefit from the help of technology at all stages of treatment. Over the past ten years, we have witnessed an acceleration and improvement in reconstruction techniques, particularly thanks to the development of digital solutions and computer-assisted surgery. The rise of these promising techniques still requires the dissemination, standardization, and evaluation of practices. Furthermore, due to the widening of care options, some aspects of maxillofacial trauma care remain controversial and are still debated, i.e., the timing of surgery, the choice of approaches, and the materials used for osteosynthesis and reconstruction. The long-term behaviour of implants in patients’ bodies and the risk of facial trauma recidivism are questioned.

I would like to invite you to submit articles exploring your recent work, experimental research or case studies. The special interests of this Special Issue include but are not limited to the following topics:

  • Acute maxillofacial trauma care;
  • Preoperative planning;
  • CAD CAM for trauma management;
  • Patient-specific implant;
  • 3D Printing;
  • Peroperative imaging and navigation;
  • Research & Development in maxillofacial trauma.

I also encourage you to send a short abstract outlining the purpose of your research and the principal results obtained in order to verify if the contribution you intend to submit suits with the objectives of this Special Issue at an early stage.

Dr. Jean-Marc Foletti
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Bioengineering is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • maxillofacial injuries
  • computer-assisted surgery
  • prostheses and implants
  • fracture osteosynthesis
  • biomechanics
  • peroperative procedures
  • computer simulation
  • patient-specific modeling

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 3764 KiB  
Article
Off-Label Use of an External Hand Fixator for Craniomaxillofacial Fractures—An Anatomical Feasibility Study
by Florian Wichlas, Marco Necchi, Teresa Gruber, Valeska Hofmann, Susanne Deininger, Sebastian Hubertus Markus Deininger, Amelie Deluca, Eva Steidle-Kloc, Jan Pruszak, Jörn Wittig and Christian Deininger
Bioengineering 2024, 11(3), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11030279 - 15 Mar 2024
Viewed by 683
Abstract
Background: The lack of resources limits the treatment of craniomaxillofacial fractures (CMF) in low-income countries (LIC). Therefore, Barton bandages and/or interdental wiring are considered in these regions. Fracture reduction is maintained by permanent occlusion for 6 weeks, which often leads to limited compliance [...] Read more.
Background: The lack of resources limits the treatment of craniomaxillofacial fractures (CMF) in low-income countries (LIC). Therefore, Barton bandages and/or interdental wiring are considered in these regions. Fracture reduction is maintained by permanent occlusion for 6 weeks, which often leads to limited compliance and dissatisfying results. The aim of this cadaver-based study is to evaluate the feasibility of the use of an external face fixator (EFF) for the treatment of CMF, its biomechanical values and to define the optimal pin insertion points and angles. Materials and Methods: An AO hand fixator was used. CMF of types Le Fort 1–3 with split fractures of the hard palate were treated with EFF on 13 anatomical specimens. Fractures were created using a chisel, and pins were placed in specific anatomical regions. The maximal pull-out force [N] of pins was analysed by a tensile force gauge, and Fmax of the mandibular pins was evaluated. Computer tomography scans were performed on the healthy, fractured and EFF-treated skulls. Results: The pull-out forces for the single pins were mandibular pins (n = 15, median 488.0 N), supraorbital pins (n = 15, median 455.0 N), zygomatic pins (n = 14, median 269.1 N), medial hard palate pins (n = 12, median 208.4 N) and lateral hard palate pins (n = 8, median 49.6 N). Conclusions: The results indicate that the operation technique is feasible, and the stability of the EFF is sufficient for maintaining the reduction. The required pins can safely be inserted into the described areas with good reduction results. Using EFF offers a feasible alternative to the non-surgical treatment of CMF in LIC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Maxillofacial Trauma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 8378 KiB  
Article
Mandibular Titanium Miniplates Change the Biomechanical Behaviour of the Mandible in the Case of Facial Trauma: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
by Nicolas Graillon, Jean-Marc Foletti, Yves Godio-Raboutet, Laurent Guyot, Andrea Varazzani and Lionel Thollon
Bioengineering 2023, 10(9), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10090994 - 22 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 919
Abstract
Our study aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviour of mandibles with or without titanium miniplates when subjected to an impact after bone healing using a finite element model (FEM) of the human mandible. We simulated mandibular trauma on an FEM of a human [...] Read more.
Our study aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviour of mandibles with or without titanium miniplates when subjected to an impact after bone healing using a finite element model (FEM) of the human mandible. We simulated mandibular trauma on an FEM of a human mandible carrying or not two parasymphyseal miniplates and applying a concentrated force of 2000 N to four different areas, including the insertion area, the area straddling the edge of the miniplates and the adjacent bone, at a distance from the miniplates on the symphysis, and on the basilar border of the mandible below the miniplates. Then, we compared the Von Mises stress distributions between the two models. In the case of an impact on the miniplates, the maximum Von Mises stress occurred in two specific areas, on the cortical bone at the posterior border of the two miniplates at a distance from the impact, while in the model without miniplates, the Von Mises stresses were homogenously distributed in the impact area. The presence of titanium miniplates in the case of trauma affects the biomechanical behaviour of the mandible and could cause more complex fractures. We recommend informing patients of this potential risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Maxillofacial Trauma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop