Perinatal Depressive and Affective Disorders: Assessment, Screening and Treatment

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychiatric, Emotional and Behavioral Disorders".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 4349

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
Interests: attachment; father; psychosomatics; perinatally; psychotherapy; mentalization; perinatal affective disorders

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The birth of a child is an event that triggers significant changes on an emotional, relational, and existential level, which can expose both parents to adaptation problems and psychological difficulties. Although the scientific literature on post-partum maternal depression has been extensive for decades, only recently has research been dedicated to paternal perinatal depression with the aim of evaluating its clinical manifestations, epidemiology, relationship with maternal depression and its influence on the psychophysical development of the child.

Despite the methodological difficulties encountered in research on men, meta-analyses in this area have shown that fathers suffer from perinatal depression almost as much as mothers but tend to express their difficulties differently. Contemporary research, in fact, has highlighted the need to assess perinatal distress using gender-specific tools for mothers and fathers [1,2]. It is essential to develop new instruments to evaluate a broad range of depressive equivalents in order to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the screening.

Furthermore, given the frequent comorbidity of anxiety disorders with depressive disorders in both parents and the frequent onset of symptoms in the prenatal period, the correct diagnostic definitions should be Paternal Perinatal Affective Disorder (PPAD) in the father and Maternal Perinatal Affective Disorder (MPAD) in the mother.

Prevention and treatment protocols for these disorders are still poorly explored within the field, especially in fathers. In these cases, it is necessary to consider not only the individual difficulties, but also the couple dynamics and the attachment relationship between the partners.

This Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences, entitled “Perinatal Depressive and Affective Disorders: Assessment, Screening and Treatment”, aims to present the latest research in this area.

[1] Walsh, T.B.; Davis, R.N.; Garfield, C. A Call to Action: Screening Fathers for Perinatal Depression. Pediatrics 2020, 145, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1193.

[2] Baldoni, F.; Giannotti, M. Perinatal Distress in Fathers: Toward a Gender-Based Screening of Paternal Perinatal Depressive and Affective Disorders. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01892.

Prof. Dr. Franco Baldoni
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • perinatal
  • father
  • mother
  • parents
  • depression
  • affective disorders
  • attachment
  • pregnancy
  • screening
  • assessment
  • treatment
  • prevention

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

16 pages, 285 KiB  
Article
Perinatal Loss and Parents’ Grief Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Research
by Ciro De Vincenzo, Loredana Cena, Alice Trainini, Chiara Nieddu, Erika Iacona, Lucia Ronconi and Ines Testoni
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(4), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040339 - 18 Apr 2024
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Losing a child is a traumatic event, disrupting life’s natural cycle, profoundly affecting the family system, and causing enduring grief. Perinatal death, including ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths, exacerbates this distress. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems and supporting [...] Read more.
Losing a child is a traumatic event, disrupting life’s natural cycle, profoundly affecting the family system, and causing enduring grief. Perinatal death, including ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths, exacerbates this distress. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems and supporting services available to individuals in need. Thus, this research explores experiences of parents facing perinatal loss in 2020–2021, further focusing on the pandemic’s impact. Using a mixed-methods design with self-reports and qualitative interviews, this paper presents results from the quantitative protocol, involving an update and follow-up of a previous study. It compares measurements across scales: COVID-19: The Impact of Event Scale-Revised; The Prolonged Grief-13; The Parental Assessment of Paternal/Maternal Affectivity; The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (short version); The Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale; and The Inventory of Complicated Spiritual Grief. In the baseline measurement, 45 parents participated (37 mothers and 8 fathers), with 20 (13 mothers and 7 fathers) contributing to the follow-up and 9 engaging in interviews. Baseline results showed higher scores for mothers compared to fathers, with effect sizes ranging from small to medium (ranging from −0.02 to 0.29), though statistical significance was limited due to the small sample size. Multiple regression analysis for distress measures at baseline identified two significant predictors: maternal/paternal affectivity and gestational week. Additionally, positive support from healthcare professionals emerged as a mitigating factor, particularly in relation to Avoidance. A significant reduction in stress measures and parental affectivity was observed at the 6-month follow-up. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: Shifts in Self-Perception and Post-Loss Growth; Conflicted Relationship with One’s Body; and Negative Impact of COVID-19 vs. Unexpectedly Positive Aspects. In conclusion, the findings emphasize the significance of psychological and psychosocial interventions based on meaning-making processes, along with the importance of spiritual care and empowerment for those navigating perinatal loss. Full article
14 pages, 673 KiB  
Article
The Association between Cesarean Section Delivery and Child Behavior: Is It Mediated by Maternal Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Maternal Postpartum Depression?
by Marie-Andrée Grisbrook, Deborah Dewey, Colleen Cuthbert, Sheila McDonald, Henry Ntanda and Nicole Letourneau
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010061 - 17 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1290
Abstract
Cesarean sections (C-sections) account for up to 21% of births worldwide. Studies have linked delivery via C-section with an increased risk of child behavior problems, such as internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Maternal postpartum depression (PPD) is also linked to child behavioral problems and [...] Read more.
Cesarean sections (C-sections) account for up to 21% of births worldwide. Studies have linked delivery via C-section with an increased risk of child behavior problems, such as internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Maternal postpartum depression (PPD) is also linked to child behavioral problems and may play a mediating role in the association between the mode of delivery and child behavior. Mixed findings between mode of delivery and PPD may be due to a failure to distinguish between C-section types, as unplanned/emergency C-sections are linked to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which has been linked to PPD. The objectives of this study were to determine whether, (1) compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and planned C-section, unplanned/emergency C-sections are associated with increased child behavior problems at two to three years of age and (2) maternal PTSD and PPD mediate the association between delivery type and child behavior problems. A secondary data analysis was conducted on 938 mother–child dyads enrolled in the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) study. Conditional process modeling was employed. Child behavior was assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 1.5–5 years, and maternal PPD and PTSD were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ), respectively. No associations were found between delivery type and child behaviors; however, the indirect effect of emergency C-section on child behaviors was significant via the mediating pathway of maternal PTSD on PPD symptoms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

17 pages, 724 KiB  
Review
Skin-to-Skin Care and Spontaneous Touch by Fathers in Full-Term Infants: A Systematic Review
by Laura Cordolcini, Annalisa Castagna, Eleonora Mascheroni and Rosario Montirosso
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010060 - 17 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1214
Abstract
A series of studies have shown that mothers’ early tactile behaviors have positive effects, both on full-term and preterm infants, and on mothers alike. Regarding fathers, research has focused mostly on paternal skin-to-skin care with preterm infants and has overlooked the tactile behavior [...] Read more.
A series of studies have shown that mothers’ early tactile behaviors have positive effects, both on full-term and preterm infants, and on mothers alike. Regarding fathers, research has focused mostly on paternal skin-to-skin care with preterm infants and has overlooked the tactile behavior effects with full-term newborns on infants’ outcomes and on fathers themselves. The current systematic review considered the evidence regarding paternal tactile behaviors with full-term infants, including skin-to-skin care (SSC) and spontaneous touch (ST), during parent–infant interactions, and differentiated biophysiological, behavioral and psychological variables both in fathers and in infants. We also compared fathers’ and mothers’ tactile behaviors for potential differences. The few available studies suggest that paternal touch—SSC and ST—can have positive effects on fathers and infants alike. They also show that, despite some intrinsic differences, paternal touch is as pleasant as maternal touch. However, given the paucity of studies on the topic, we discuss why this field of research should be further explored. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

13 pages, 469 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advanced Maternal Age: A Scoping Review about the Psychological Impact on Mothers, Infants, and Their Relationship
by Monica Ahmad, Cristina Sechi and Laura Vismara
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030147 - 20 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1162
Abstract
The mean age at childbirth in Europe has gradually increased, and it is now around 29 years of age. It has been shown that older maternal age is associated with problems of fertility; in fact, with increasing age, the chance of conceiving diminishes, [...] Read more.
The mean age at childbirth in Europe has gradually increased, and it is now around 29 years of age. It has been shown that older maternal age is associated with problems of fertility; in fact, with increasing age, the chance of conceiving diminishes, and fetal and obstetric complications grow. Research has focused particularly on the biological risks associated with late pregnancy, both for the child and the woman. Less space has been dedicated to the potential psychological and relational benefits of motherhood at an advanced age. The aim of this review was to summarize the existing literature on this issue. Qualitative and quantitative studies were sourced from Pubmed, Science Direct, PsycINFO, and SciELO. The selected works highlight that advanced maternal age can be associated with some advantages for both mothers and their offspring in terms of physical healthcare, parenting styles, and child developmental outcomes. Specifically, the review suggests that older mothers have greater emotional maturity and feel more prepared for motherhood; also, advanced maternal age appears to exert a protective influence on children’s behavioral, social, and emotional functioning, compensating for the biological risks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: Preventive intervention for parents' perinatal affective disorders and for the promotion of the child's neuromental development. An Italian multicentre study for the application of Dialogic Book-Sharing training
Authors: Cena Loredana1, Trainini Alice1, Murray Lynne2, Cooper Peter2, Belluardo Mauro3, Buizza Chiara4
Affiliation: 1 Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Section of Neuroscience, Observatory of Perinatal Clinical Psychology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 2 School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. 3 Unit of Neuroscience, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. 4 Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Section of Neuroscience, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Background: Neuroscience has highlighted how the experiences in the first thousand days of life are important for the child's constructing mind and how this occurs mainly in parent-child relationships. In the perinatal period, the good quality of these relationships represents a protective factor for the child’s neuromental development. Perinatal affective disorders such as anxiety, depression and distress are frequent among parents in the prenatal and postnatal period. These disorders can represent an obstacle to promoting good primary relationships, with a negative impact on the child's development. Preventive interventions to support parent-child cognitive and emotional communication are therefore essential. The Dialogic Book-Sharing (DBS) developed by Lynne Murray and Peter Cooper is an international evidence-based intervention that has been applied in several countries (e.g. South Africa, Brazil, England). The DBS is based on a dyadic intersubjective communication through an interactive form of using books with children. The Observatory of Perinatal Clinical Psychology of the University of Brescia promoted the application of the DBS for the first time in Italy with the aim to assess the effects of this intervention on the quality of the parent-child relationships and on child’s language, communication and attention development. Methods: It was conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 12 health, educational and maternal-child Centres (family centres, nursery schools, mother-child protected communities) on the Italian territory (Brescia, Bergamo, Milan, Mantua, Como, La Spezia, Florence, Rome, Naples, Salerno). Parents of 14–20-month-old infants were involved in the study and randomized in two groups: the experimental group attended 4-weeks training in book sharing and the control group was on the waiting list. The study design used mixed-methods and included questionnaires for parents (Socio-demographic information Form; HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; PSI-SF Parenting Stress Index; CDI MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory and CBCL Child Behavior Checklist) and video recordings of parent-child interactions. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia (reference number NP5205 27.09.2022). The trial was registered on the ISRCTN registry: number ISRCTN11755019. Results: Sixty-eight parent-child dyads (36 experimental group and 32 control group) were involved in the study. Parents' responses to the questionnaires were analyzed and no significant differences were found at baseline between the two groups. Significant differences between the two groups were instead found at the end of the intervention: the experimental group showed a lower level of parents’ anxiety and a lower score in child’s externalizing problems than the control group. Moreover, the results showed pre-post intervention differences in the two groups: after 4 weeks the experimental group had an improvement in the affective states (anxiety and depression) of the parents, a reduction in the children's hyperactivity problems and an improvement in their language (number of words understood and pronounced). In the control group, after 4 weeks, an increase in children's emotional reactivity problems was detected. Conclusions: Preliminary data highlight the positive effect of applying the DBS programme in early childhood. It is simple and inexpensive to deliver and represent an interesting preventive intervention that can be extended to a wider perinatal population. It could enhance the educational resources offered by Italian health, educational and maternal-child centres supporting parental affective states and child’s development.

Back to TopTop