Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
An Adaptive Downsampling FPGA-Based TDC Implementation for Time Measurement Improvement
Previous Article in Journal
The Integrated Circuit Industry at a Crossroads: Threats and Opportunities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Smart IC Design and Sensing Technologies”

by
George Floros
* and
Athanasios Tziouvaras
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Thessaly, 38334 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chips 2022, 1(3), 172-174; https://doi.org/10.3390/chips1030011
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart IC Design and Sensing Technologies)

Abstract

:
Smart sensing technologies and their inherent data-processing techniques have drawn considerable research and industrial attention in recent years. Recent developments in nanometer CMOS technologies have shown great potential to deal with the increasing demand of processing power that arises in these sensing technologies, from IoT applications to complicated medical devices. Moreover, circuit implementation, which could be based on a full analog or digital approach or, in most cases, on a mixed-signal approach, possesses a fundamental role in exploiting the full capabilities of sensing technologies. In addition, all circuit design methodologies include the optimization of several performance metrics, such as low power, low cost, small area, and high throughput, which impose critical challenges in the field of sensor design. This Special Issue aims to highlight advances in the development, modeling, simulation, and implementation of integrated circuits for sensing technologies, from the component level to complete sensing systems.

Introduction

The latest advances in electronic circuits and sensing technologies indicate that there is a shift in interest to low power and energy efficient designs. On the electronic design side, several works focus on voltage regulation, timing speculation and near-data processing methodologies to achieve the envisioned energy-related goals. Authors in [1] propose a voltage regulation technique for IoT processors, under which the chip operates in near-threshold voltage values to decrease its energy consumption. In [2], the concept of an event-driven voltage regulator is introduced which manages the circuit power and trades power consumption with control latency by considering the slack and clock frequency. This approach is feasible since different instruction types depict distinct timing requirements, and thus the clock frequency of a circuit can be dynamically scaled accordingly to the instruction types occupying the pipeline [3]. Following this concept, the authors in [4] employ an architectural-oriented approach to combine near-data execution with a dynamic clock scaling mechanism. By employing a hybrid memory cube DRAM to execute instructions closer to the DRAM die and by leveraging the timing requirements of each instruction separately, the design manages to achieve significant efficiency levels. Recently, near-data instruction execution, also known as in-memory processing, is gaining ground since it achieves high performance and lower power consumption compared with the standard execution paradigm. On the other hand, near-data architectures require refined control logic in order to designate which instructions will execute on the DRAM side and which instructions will execute on the processor side [5]. Previous works in near-data processing depict significant improvements in the domains of IoT [6], big data applications [7] and machine learning [8].
Another popular approach is the adoption of application specific design which focus on the intricacies and requirements of specific application types. Contrary to the general-purpose approach, application specific designs are built to optimize their computation and functional characteristics with respect to application requirements. This design paradigm depicts significant gains on security [9], neural network [10], video processing [11] and signal processing [12] domains. The wide accessibility of the Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to the research community is one of the key factors that led to the popularization of the application specific circuit designs. FPGAs are reconfigurable platforms which consist of programmable hardware cells that can adapt their circuit logic according to the application requirements. Today, FPGAs are used as prototypes and microcontroller for a wide range of applications such as radar systems [13], deep neural networks [14] and wireless communications [15].
As a result, digital signal processing algorithms are nowadays massively applied on IC designs for deep learning, computer vision, 5G/6G communications, automotive systems, health monitoring, and video processing applications. All of the above require an increased data rate [16] as well as low power consumption [17] techniques for an embedded environment. Frequently, computation-intensive signal processing algorithms need to be implemented in dedicated VLSI designs in order to be capable for real-time processing operations [18]. Therefore, due to strict power and performance requirements it is very challenging to realize different digital signal processing algorithms into efficient VLSI design [19]. Designers are required to meet several constraints on power consumption, clock rate, die area, cost, and reconfigurability while also achieving balanced trade-offs between the above characteristics [20,21].
In order to achieve this challenge designers, need to apply several CAD tool design methodologies [22]. IC optimization techniques and novel CAD tools are applied in parallel for the realization of efficient ICs and for reducing the resource consumption [23,24,25]. Another important issue is that dedicated CAD tool methodologies are required for a diverse range of applications, in which application specific designs are expected to be employed. For example, novel CAD tools need to be integrated into modern IC design flows for hardware security purposes [26], as well as, for long-term reliability and circuit aging factors [27,28], which are crucial for the automotive and the aeronautics industry. Finally, along with the different CAD tool methodologies, designers develop mathematical modeling and simulation techniques in order to gain insights for different IC and sensing designs [29,30], before these are applied in real world applications.
For the aforementioned reasons, a very strong effort is required by the IC design research community for proposing new efficient chips and CAD tools methodologies in order to deal with the increased demand of the industry. The final aim of this editorial and of the whole Special Issue is to stimulate and highlight the advancements in the development, modeling, simulation, and implementation of smart ICs for sensing technologies, from the component level to complete sensing systems, along with novel CAD tool design methodologies that will accompany the corresponding designs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gautschi, M.; Schiavone, P.D.; Traber, A.; Loi, I.; Pullini, A.; Rossi, D.; Flamand, E.; Gurkaynak, F.K.; Benini, L. Near-threshold RISC-V core with DSP extensions for scalable IoT endpoint devices. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 2017, 25, 2700–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kim, D.; Seok, M. A fully integrated digital low-dropout regulator based on event-driven explicit time-coding architecture. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 2017, 52, 3071–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tziouvaras, A.; Dimitriou, G.; Dossis, M.; Stamoulis, G. Instruction-flow-based timing analysis in pipelined processors. Panhellenic Conf. Electron. Telecommun. 2019, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Athanasios, T.; Georgios, D.; Georgios, S. Low-power near-data instruction execution leveraging opcode-based timing analysis. ACM Trans. Arch. Code Optim. 2022, 19, 19–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Papalekas, D.; Tziouvaras, A.; Floros, G.; Dimitriou, G.; Dossis, M.; Stamoulis, G. Near data processing performance improvement prediction via metric-based workload classification. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST), Bremen, Germany, 8–10 June 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, X.; Hou, Y.; He, H. A Processing-in-memory architecture programming paradigm for wireless internet-of-things applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Aqib, M.; Mehmood, R.; Alzahrani, A.; Katib, I.; Albeshri, A.; Altowaijri, S.M. Smarter traffic prediction using big data, in-memory computing, deep learning and GPUs. Sensors 2019, 19, 2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Verma, N. In-memory computation of a machine-learning classifier in a standard 6T SRAM array. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 2017, 52, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Z.; Yao, Y.; Tong, X.; Luo, Q.; Chen, X. Dynamically reconfigurable encryption and decryption system design for the internet of things information security. Sensors 2019, 19, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Louliej, A.; Jabrane, Y.; Gil Jiménez, V.P.; Armada, A.G. Practical guidelines for approaching the implementation of neural networks on FPGA for PAPR reduction in vehicular networks. Sensors 2018, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Aguilar-González, A.; Arias-Estrada, M.; Berry, F. Depth from a motion algorithm and a hardware architecture for smart cameras. Sensors 2018, 19, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chaurasiya, R.B.; Shrestha, R. Hardware-efficient and fast sensing-time maximum-minimum-eigenvalue-based spectrum sensor for cognitive radio network. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2019, 66, 4448–4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tudose, M.-L.; Anghel, A.; Cacoveanu, R.; Datcu, M. Pulse radar with field-programmable gate array range compression for real time displacement and vibration monitoring. Sensors 2018, 19, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fowers, J.; Ovtcharov, K.; Papamichael, M.; Massengill, T.; Liu, M.; Lo, D.; Alkalay, S.; Haselman, M.; Adams, L.; Ghandi, M.; et al. A Configurable cloud-scale DNN processor for real-time AI. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 45th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1–6 June 2018; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vieira, J.; Malkowsky, S.; Nieman, K.; Miers, Z.; Kundargi, N.; Liu, L.; Wong, I.; Owall, V.; Edfors, O.; Tufvesson, F. A flexible 100-antenna testbed for massive MIMO. IEEE Globecom Workshops 2014, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cheng, C.; Parhi, K.K. High-speed VLSI implementation of 2-D discrete wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2008, 56, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shim, B.; Shanbhag, N. Energy-efficient soft error-tolerant digital signal processing. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 2006, 14, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bauer, F.C.; Muir, D.R.; Indiveri, G. Real-time ultra-low power ECG anomaly detection using an event-driven neuromorphic processor. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2019, 13, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chen, T.-S.; Hou, K.-N.; Beh, W.-K.; Wu, A.-Y. Low-complexity compressed-sensing-based watermark cryptosystem and circuits implementation for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 2019, 27, 2485–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cardarilli, G.C.; Di Nunzio, L.; Fazzolari, R.; Nannarelli, A.; Petricca, M.; Re, M. Design space exploration based methodology for residue number system digital filters implementation. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 2020, 10, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tragoudaras, A.; Stoikos, P.; Fanaras, K.; Tziouvaras, A.; Floros, G.; Dimitriou, G.; Kolomvatsos, K.; Stamoulis, G. Design space exploration of a sparse mobilenetv2 using high-level synthesis and sparse matrix techniques on FPGAs. Sensors 2022, 22, 4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Budak, A.F. CAD for analog/mixed-signal integrated circuits. Adv. Semicond. Technol. Sel. Top. Beyond Conv. CMOS 2022, 43–60. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gubbi, K.I.; Beheshti-Shirazi, S.A.; Sheaves, T.; Salehi, S.; Pd, S.M.; Rafatirad, S.; Sasan, A.; Homayoun, H. Survey of machine learning for electronic design automation. In Proceedings of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2022 (GLSVLSI ′22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6–8 June 2022; pp. 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kahng, A.B. Machine learning for CAD/EDA: The road ahead. IEEE Des. Test 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lourenco, N.; Rosa, J.; Martins, R.; Aidos, H.; Canelas, A.; Povoa, R.; Horta, N. On the exploration of promising analog IC designs via artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD), Prague, Czech Republic, 2–5 July 2018; pp. 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, H.; He, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, Y. Security-driven placement and routing tools for electromagnetic side-channel protection. IEEE Trans. Comput. Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020, 40, 1077–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Axelou, O.; Floros, G.; Evmorfopoulos, N.; Stamoulis, G. Accelerating electromigration stress analysis using low-rank balanced truncation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD), Sardinia, Italy, 12–15 June 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Floros, G.; Evmorfopoulos, N.; Stamoulis, G. Efficient IC hotspot thermal analysis via low-rank model order reduction. Integration 2019, 66, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, R.B.; Kumar, S.S.; Mukhiya, R. Design and simulation of capacitive pressure sensor for blood pressure sensing application. In Recent Trends in Communication, Computing, and Electronics. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Khare, A., Tiwary, U., Sethi, I., Singh, N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 524, pp. 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pal, P.; Pratap, Y.; Gupta, M.; Kabra, S. Modeling and simulation of AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT for biosensor applications. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 19, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Floros, G.; Tziouvaras, A. Special Issue “Smart IC Design and Sensing Technologies”. Chips 2022, 1, 172-174. https://doi.org/10.3390/chips1030011

AMA Style

Floros G, Tziouvaras A. Special Issue “Smart IC Design and Sensing Technologies”. Chips. 2022; 1(3):172-174. https://doi.org/10.3390/chips1030011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Floros, George, and Athanasios Tziouvaras. 2022. "Special Issue “Smart IC Design and Sensing Technologies”" Chips 1, no. 3: 172-174. https://doi.org/10.3390/chips1030011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop