Next Article in Journal
Using Radar Imagery Data to Determine Mixed Forests’ Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

GIS-AHP Approach to Select the Most Suitable Extraction System in Mediterranean Oak Coppices under Environmental Constraints †

1
Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62-035 Kórnik, Poland
3
Regional Natural Reserve Selva del Lamone, 01010 Farnese, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Forests—Exploring New Discoveries and New Directions in Forests, 15–31 October 2022; Available online: https://iecf2022.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13077
Published: 21 October 2022

Abstract

:
The selection of the most suitable alternative for harvesting operations is a challenging activity which is manageable via precision forest harvesting. In this study, an approach based on a combination of GIS (Geographic Information System) and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), which rely on geospatial data and opinions of forest engineers with a good expertise on this topic, was applied in the Natural Reserve of Lamone (Latium, Italy) to select the most suitable extraction system in the oak coppice forests of the study area. The developed approach allowed for the selection among forwarder, forestry-fitted farm tractors equipped with winch and all-terrain cable yarder. The obtained results suggested that forwarder and all-terrain cable yarder were the most suitable extraction systems. The former can be applied to the major part of the study area while the application of winch was limited to forest parcel with high forest road density. The latter can be applied as the most suitable solution only in areas with low soil-bearing capacity and on steep terrain.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECF2022-13077/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.T.; methodology, D.T. and F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.T., F.L., P.G., R.V.; writing—review and editing, R.P; supervision, R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tocci, D.; Latterini, F.; Venanzi, R.; Gaglioppa, P.; Picchio, R. GIS-AHP Approach to Select the Most Suitable Extraction System in Mediterranean Oak Coppices under Environmental Constraints. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13077

AMA Style

Tocci D, Latterini F, Venanzi R, Gaglioppa P, Picchio R. GIS-AHP Approach to Select the Most Suitable Extraction System in Mediterranean Oak Coppices under Environmental Constraints. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 22(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tocci, Damiano, Francesco Latterini, Rachele Venanzi, Pierluca Gaglioppa, and Rodolfo Picchio. 2022. "GIS-AHP Approach to Select the Most Suitable Extraction System in Mediterranean Oak Coppices under Environmental Constraints" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 22, no. 1: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13077

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop