Next Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of Optimized Step-Wise Depressurization for Enhanced Natural Gas Hydrate Production in the Nankai Trough of Japan
Previous Article in Journal
A Feasible Route for Preparation of Calcium Sulfate Whiskers from FGD Gypsum via Filtrate Recycle under Hydro-Thermal Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Steel Slag Decorated with Calcium Oxide and Cerium Oxide as a Solid Base for Effective Transesterification of Palm Oil

1
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
2
Energy Research Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250013, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(6), 1810; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061810
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Chemical and Biochemical Processes for Energy Sources)

Abstract

:
For further resource utilization of solid waste steel slag and the reduction in biodiesel production costs, this study used steel slag as a carrier to synthesize a CaO-CeO2/slag solid base catalyst for the effective transesterification of palm oil into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). The synthesis involved a two-step impregnation of steel slag with nitrate of calcium and cerium and thermal activation at 800 °C for 180 min. Then, the catalysts’ textural, chemical, and CO2 temperature-programmed desorption properties were characterized. The catalytic activity depended highly on the ratio of Ca-Ce to steel slag mass; the CaO-CeO2/slag-0.8 catalyst showed outstanding performance. Characterization showed that the surface area and total basicity of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst were 3.66 m2/g and 1.289 mmol/g, respectively. The reactivity results showed that FAMEs obtained using 7 wt.% catalyst, 9:1 of methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio, 180 min reaction duration, and 70 °C reaction temperature was optimum (i.e., 95.3% yield). In addition, the CaO-CeO2/slag-0.8 catalyst could be reused for at least three cycles, retaining 91.2% of FAMEs yield after n-hexane washing. Hence, the catalyst exhibits an excellent potential for cost-effective and environmentally friendly biodiesel production.

1. Introduction

The energy shortage and pollutant emission crisis have prompted researchers to develop new energy sources to replace traditional fossil fuels. Biofuel refers to solid, liquid, or gas fuel made of or extracted from biomass, and is an essential direction in developing and using renewable energy. Biodiesel has become one of the clean energy substitutes for ordinary petrochemical diesel because of its reproducibility, high calorific value, and environmental friendliness. Biodiesel is chemically classified as fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) [1]. It is usually obtained by the transesterification of triglycerides (e.g., vegetable oil, animal fat, microalgae oil, and waste oil) and alcohol (typically methanol) in the presence of a catalyst (Figure 1) [2].
Catalysis is crucial to biodiesel technology. Homogeneous acid and base catalysts have high catalytic efficiencies, but they portend recycling and pH-neutral wastewater challenges. Solid acid catalysts can synergistically catalyze the esterification and transesterification of waste oil. However, they usually require a much higher reaction temperature or longer reaction time. Solid base catalysts are easy to separate, and the transesterification conditions are mild, conducive to biodiesel’s continuous and large-scale sustainable production with in-depth research value.
Several types of solid bases (such as alkali earth metal oxides, alkali metal-supported catalysts, solid base catalysts supported by molecular sieves, hydrotalcite, anion-exchange resins, and so on) can be used in transesterification catalysis to prepare biodiesel [3]. Popular among them are the alkaline earth metal oxides (such as CaO, MgO, SrO, and BaO). They are solid base catalysts whose basic sites mainly come from oxygen with negative electric lattice and hydroxyl group generated by water adsorption on the surface. CaO is considered one of the most promising solid base catalysts for biodiesel production due to its high basicity, availability, and economy. Yaşar et al. [4] used CaO derived from calcinated waste eggshell to catalyze rapeseed oil and methanol under the optimized reaction conditions of 4% catalyst, 1 h reaction time at 60 °C, to achieve 95.12% biodiesel yield. However, in the reaction system with only a CaO catalyst, the leaching of Ca2+ species into the reaction media was a crucial problem affecting the stability of the catalyst [5]. Pandit et al. [6] confirmed that in the catalytic transesterification of microalgal oil and methanol by CaO catalyst, Ca2+ leaching would reduce the availability of the active site of reactants, reducing the conversion from 89.7% to 78.2% after three cycles.
Currently, CeO2 is the most widely used rare earth metal oxide, capable of forming oxygen vacancies. It has excellent catalytic oxidation performance due to its unique crystal structure and high capacity for storing and releasing oxygen. Meanwhile, Ce exhibits acid-base dual properties, which can improve the catalyst’s stability. Dehghani et al. [7] synthesized an active and stable catalyst of CaO-loaded Ce-MCM-41 to transform waste vegetable oil into biodiesel. A 96.8% conversion of triglycerides can be achieved at a methanol-to-oil molar ratio of 9 with 5 wt.% of catalyst loading at 60 °C and for 6 h. Elsewhere, Zhang et al. [8] prepared a novel CeO2@CaO catalyst via a hydrothermal method, achieving 98% biodiesel yield after 6 h. Repeated tests indicated that >80% of biodiesel yield could be obtained after nine reaction cycles, establishing the stability of CeO2@CaO. These studies showed that catalyst stability could be improved after complexing CaO with CeO2. Yet, the catalytic activity of this catalyst type should be further optimized to shorten the reaction time.
China is the leading steel producer and supplier nation, accounting for over half of the global steel production [9]. As a by-product of steel production, steel slag accounts for 10–20% of crude steel. China’s annual output of steel slag is about 70 million tons; the cumulative inventory exceeds 1 billion tons, and the utilization rate of steel slag is only about 30% [10]. Unutilized steel slag occupies a large amount of industrial land and causes excellent pressure on the atmosphere, soil, and water. Therefore, seeking comprehensive utilization of steel slag conforms to the requirement of sustainable development. Additionally, it is a basis for developing a circular economy and building green homes.
The steel slag contains majorly CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, MnO, MgO, Fe2O3, P2O5, and free calcium oxide (f-CaO) [11]. For resource utilization of steel slag, Liu et al. [12] studied the synthesis of hydrotalcite-type mixed oxide catalysts from waste steel slag for transesterification. Casiello et al. [13] verified the feasibility of steel slag as a catalyst for synthesizing fames from soybean oil. Elsewhere, Kang et al. [14] prepared a novel CeO2-loaded porous alkali-activated steel slag-based photocatalyst used for photocatalytic water-splitting for hydrogen production. Lin et al. [15] used acid leaching–electrolyzation–calcination to treat steel slag in preparing catalytic H2O2 degradation of dye wastewater as a catalyst. The above studies fully demonstrated the effective use of steel slag in catalyst research.
The present study introduced steel slag as a carrier to combine the active components of CaO and CeO2 to prepare a solid base catalyst. We investigated the effect of the mass ratio of CaO-CeO2 to steel slag on the catalytic performance of CaO-CeO2/slag catalysts. Various technologies, including N2 adsorption–desorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field-emission scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and CO2-temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) clarified the physical and chemical properties of the catalysts. Reaction parameters (such as catalyst dosage, methanol-to-oil molar ratio, reaction temperature, and duration) were optimized for catalytic transesterification to achieve the highest biodiesel yield. Finally, the acid resistance and reusability of the CaO-CeO2/slag catalyst were conducted to evaluate the catalyst’s feasibility for biodiesel production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The analytical grade reagents of cerium(III) nitrate hexahydrate (Ce(NO3)3·6H2O) (>99.0% purity), calcium(II) nitrate tetrahydrate (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O) (>98.5% purity), anhydrous methanol (>99.5% purity), anhydrous ethanol (>99.7% purity) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The chromatographic grade reagents n-hexane (>99.9% purity) and methyl salicylate (>99.5% purity) were supplied by Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Steel slag was collected from a steel mill at Yanshan City located in Hebei Province, China. The chemical composition of the original steel slag (Table 1) was analyzed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). The palm oil was procured from Guangdong Province, China, which was native to Malaysia. Its compositions were quantitatively analyzed with myristic acid (C14:0, 1.2%), palmitic acid (C16:0, 39.51%), lauric acid (C17:0, 0.27%), stearic acid (C18:0, 7.8%), arachidic acid (C20:0, 0.33%), oleic acid (C18:1, 39.71%), and linoleic acid (C18:2, 11.13%). Its acid value (AV) and saponification value (SV), seen in Table 2, were determined through GB 5009.229-2016 and GB/T 5534-2008 criteria, respectively. Besides, the palm oil’s average relative molecular weight (M, g/mol) can be estimated using Equation (1).
M = 1000 × 3 × 56.1 S V A V

2.2. Catalyst Synthesis and Evaluation of Activity

The steel slag was ground into a fine powder using a pulverizer, and sieved using a 125 μm standard sieve. Ca(NO3)2·4H2O and Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, which provided the active site components, and the steel slag as their carriers were successively dissolved in deionized water in a particular proportion and impregnated at room temperature for 120 min using a magnetic agitator. After soaking, it was dried in a water bath at 90 °C. Afterward, the dried catalyst precursors were placed in a muffle furnace and heated to 800 °C for 180 min at a 5 °C/min heating rate to obtain the Ca-Ce/slag-x catalyst. Here, x represents the mass ratio of CaO to steel slag, calculated from the mass of Ca(NO3)2·4H2O. During the experiment, x was 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0. Here, the mass ratio of CaO to CeO2 was fixed at 1:1.
The synthesized Ca-Ce/slag-x catalyst catalyzed the transesterification of palm oil and methanol, and the catalytic activity was evaluated. The entire experimental flow chart is exhibited in Figure 2. A total of 20 g of palm oil was first poured into a 250 mL three-necked flask. Then, the Ca-Ce/slag-x catalyst and methanol (in proportion to palm oil) were transferred to the flask. The reaction flask was placed in the microwave reactor. A thermocouple was inserted to measure the reaction temperature, while magnetic stirring ensured the homogeneity of the reactants. After the transesterification, the Ca-Ce/slag-x catalyst and liquid products were separated via centrifugation. The liquid products were transferred into a separatory funnel to realize the layering of crude biodiesel and glycerin. Then, the crude biodiesel was dried at 105 °C to remove the unreacted methanol before gas chromatographic (GC) analysis.
The FAMEs were assessed using an 8890 gas chromatograph (Agilent, California, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and an HP-5 (30 m × 320 μm × 0.25 μm) column and determined by internal standardization. n-hexane was the solvent used to prepare the GC sample, while methyl salicylate served as the internal standard. The injector and FID temperatures were 250 and 300 °C, respectively. The programmed temperature of the column oven was set as follows: start at 140 °C (keep for 4 min) and ramp at 10 °C/min to 260 °C (keep for 12 min). High-purity nitrogen was the carrier gas with a split ratio of 25:1. FAMEs’ yield of the products was analyzed according to the reference method with methyl salicylate, and calculated using the following Equation (2) [16]:
F A M E s   y i e l d % = Σ f e s t e r A e s t e r A i n t e r n a l × m i n t e r n a l m s a m p l e × 100 %
where Aester is the peak area of FAME, Ainternal is the peak area of internal standard, minternal is the mass of methyl salicylate, msample is the mass of the sample used, and fester is the correction factor of the FAME.

2.3. Catalyst Characterization

The XPS analyses were carried out on a Thermo escalab 250Xi (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) with Al Kα radiation (hν = 1486.6 eV). The test results were corrected with C1s as 284.8 eV. Further, XRD spectra were obtained using a SmartLab apparatus (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) to investigate the crystalline phases in the 2θ range from 5° to 90° with a step size of 0.02° and at a scanning speed of 5°/min. The tube voltage and electricity current were 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively. Additionally, the average crystalline size of the catalyst was evaluated using the Debye–Scherrer equation, expressed as D = Kγ/βcosθ, where K is the Scherrer constant, γ is the wavelength of the X-ray, β is the half-peak width of the diffraction peak of the measured sample, and θ is the Bragg angle. The catalyst’s morphology was inspected by SUPRA™ 55 FE-SEM (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. Additionally, the elemental distribution of the catalyst was synchronously detected by the EDS instrument. Here, the sample was sprayed with Au to enhance its electrical conductivity. In addition, the textural properties of the catalyst were determined by N2 adsorption and desorption using ASAP 2460 surface area and a porosity analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, Georgia, USA) at -196 °C. Before the adsorption test, the sample was degassed at 100 °C for 3 h under a vacuum. The Brunauer–Emmer–Teller (BET) absorption curve and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model determined the catalyst’s surface area and pore size distribution. The FTIR spectroscopy evaluated the functional groups of the catalyst on an iS50/6700 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a wavenumber of 400 to 4000 cm−1. The basic strength and basicity of the catalysts were quantitated by CO2-TPD, using a TP-5080 (Xianquan, Tianjin, China) chemical adsorption instrument. Briefly, helium gas (pre-treated) first purged the sample at 300 °C (ramping rate of 10 °C/min) for 60 min before lowering it to 50 °C. Then, the carrier /reference gas was switched to CO2 and adsorbed at a flow rate of 30 mL/min for 30 min before the carrier gas was switched back to helium at 50 °C for 60 min. After the baseline was stabilized, the temperature was raised to 900 °C at 10 °C/min. Ten signals were recorded every 1 s.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization of the Ca-Ce/Slag Catalyst Synthesis

We studied the effect of the Ca-Ce-to-slag mass ratio on the catalytic capability of the Ca-Ce/slag-x in the transesterification of palm oil and methanol under the following conditions: catalyst dosage = 7 wt.%, methanol-to-oil molar ratio = 15, reaction temperature = 65 °C, and reaction duration = 120 min. The results are illustrated in Figure 3. No FAMEs’ yield was obtained when steel slag was used as catalyst. A 36.7% FAMEs’ yield was only attained when the Ca-Ce-to-slag mass ratio was 0.4, probably due to insufficient active component content on the catalyst surface, leading to poor catalytic activity. When the mass ratio increased from 0.6 to 0.8, the FAMEs’ yield gradually optimized (from 55.0%) to 85.2%, attributed to available basic sites for transesterification. However, the yield reduced significantly to 76.2% when the mass ratio was >0.8. This occurrence may be due to excess CaO and CeO2 agglomeration and the tethering of active sites onto clusters. Thus, the Ca-Ce/slag-1.0 catalytic performance was severely hindered [17]. Borah et al. [18] also observed excess loading of Zn on CaO, which decreased the conversion because of the structural distortion of the parent catalyst. Thus, the 0.8 mass ratio of Ca-Ce-to-slag was selected as optimum for the catalyst synthesis.

3.2. Catalyst Characterization

3.2.1. XRD Analysis

The XRD patterns of slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts are shown in Figure 4. The slag shows a considerably broad peak at 2θ of 20–40°, ascribed to aromatic carbon sheets [19], indicating the presence of uncombined carbon. For the Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts, the peaks at 2θ = 32.18°, 37.34°, 53.84°, 64.12°, 67.34°, and 79.62° are attributable to the crystal faces of (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), and (400) for CaO, whereas the peaks at 2θ =28.52°, 33.08°, 47.48°, 56.30°, 59.06°, 69.36°, 76.68°, 79.00°, and 88.42° are assigned to the crystal faces of (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331), (420), and (422) for CeO2 [20]. We observed that the diffraction peak intensity of CaO and CeO2 increased correspondingly with the Ca and Ce loading. Moreover, using the Debye–Scherrer equation, the average crystalline sizes of CaO and CeO2 in the catalyst were calculated as 55.63, 63.41, 69.89, and 14.01, 14.98, 16.47 nm for the Ca-Ce/slag-0.4 catalyst, Ca-Ce/slag-0.6, and Ca-Ce/slag-1.0 catalysts, respectively. The small average crystalline size enhances the specific surface area and pore volume of the catalyst, thus guaranteeing the catalytic activity. For the Ca-Ce/slag-1.0 catalyst, numerous accumulations, and agglomerations of CaO and CeO2 resulted in a large average crystalline size, explaining the excessive addition of active Ca and Ce components that lowered the catalyst’s activity (Figure 3).

3.2.2. N2 Adsorption–Desorption Analysis

The microstructural properties of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts are listed in Table 3. The BET surface area of the slag, Ca-Ce/slag-0.4, and Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalysts are 0.27, 1.29, and 3.66 m2/g, respectively. These values indicate that CaO and CeO2 determine the BET surface area of the catalysts within a specific numerical range. Moreover, the pore volume for the slag, Ca-Ce/slag-0.4, and Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalysts are 0.00049, 0.022, and 0.043 cm3/g, respectively. In general, the microstructural properties of Ca-Ce/slag-x are superior to those of the steel slag carrier. However, those of Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 are better than Ca-Ce/slag-0.4 catalyst, especially the average pore diameter (39.27 nm for the former; 22.19 nm for the latter). The molecular size of typical triglycerides is 5 nm [21]; hence, larger average pore sizes are more conducive to their transportation, providing better accessibility to the catalysts’ active sites and favoring transesterification. The N2 adsorption–desorption curve and pore size distribution plot of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst are depicted in Figure 5. The catalyst exhibits a type V isotherm, having H3-type hysteresis loops, confirming the slit formed by the accumulation of flake particles [22]. The pore size distribution of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 extends from 10 to 100 nm, showing the predominance of mesopores (2–50 nm) and macrospores (>50 nm). As previously established, these pore size distributions could be crucial to the catalytic biodiesel production process, conducive to mass transfer and diffusion [23].

3.2.3. SEM-EDS Analysis

The SEM characterized the morphologies of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. As illustrated in Figure 6a, the catalyst appears as uneven and irregular strips or blocks. These strip or block structures pile on each other, with a few accumulated slit pores in between. Figure 6b depicts the images of the catalyst’s local surface magnified 30,000×. We observed that the catalyst’s surface contains some fine particles with pores. These pores facilitate efficient contact between the reactants and the active sites of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst.
Additionally, the EDS spectrum (Figure 6c) reflects the elemental composition and proportion of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. Due to the nature of metal oxide on the steel slag carrier of the catalyst, oxygen exhibited the highest atomic percentage in the catalyst. The weight ratio of Ca and Ce was 34.82% and 34.47%, respectively, consistent with the parameter setting in the catalyst preparation, thereby confirming the homogeneity of the catalyst. Meanwhile, we identified minute amounts of Mg, Al, Si, and Cl in the catalyst, arising from the steel slag carrier.

3.2.4. FTIR Analysis

The change in the chemical functional groups between slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts was characterized by FTIR (Figure 7). For steel slag carrier, the bands at 1435 and 875 cm−1 were assigned to the in-plane bending and out-of-plane bending of the carbonate groups, respectively [24]. For Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts, a new band at 3641 cm−1 belonging to the stretching of the -OH groups can be observed in the FTIR spectra due to the water-absorbing characteristics of the CaO and CeO2 components. Significantly, the –OH groups of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst showed a sharper band, indicating more water-absorbing potential. In addition, the bands at 800–400 cm−1 belonged to Ca–O and Ce–O vibration bonds.

3.2.5. XPS Analysis

The XPS was deduced from a chemical state of the metal species of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst (Figure 8). Figure 8a shows the XPS survey with photoelectron peaks of Ce 3d, O 1s, Ca 2p, C 1s, and Si 2p at the binding energies of 930.1, 545.1, 360.1, 298.1, and 110.1 eV, respectively, reflecting the primary elements of the catalyst. Further, high-resolution XPS spectra of O 1s (Figure 8b) can be deconvoluted into two peaks. One peak centered at 531.4 eV corresponded to the oxygen species of surface hydroxyl or carbonate groups; the other peak centered at 528.7 eV was ascribed to the O2- in the lattice of metal oxides [25]. Moreover, the high-resolution XPS spectra in Figure 8c confirmed the presence of Ca, evidenced by the bands assigned to Ca 2p 1/2 at 350.5 eV and Ca 2p 3/2 at 347.0 eV. Compared to the CaO peak (Ca 2p 1/2 at 349.9 eV and Ca 2p3/2 at 346.6 eV) reported in the literature, the binding energies of Ca 2p in the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst shifted towards a higher values, suggesting the interaction between Ca and other elements (such as Ce), enhancing the stability of active components [26]. The Ce 3d spectrum of the catalyst is shown in Figure 8d. The peaks at 916.2, 907.1, 900.4, 897.8, 888.7, and 881.9 eV are typically assigned to the Ce4+ species. In contrast, other peaks at 902.6 and 883.9 eV were attributed to the Ce3+ species [27]. More Ce3+ species could generate more oxygen vacancies because of the unsaturated chemical bonds and charge imbalance [28], further increasing the active sites and, eventually, the activity on the catalyst. Hence, the concentration ratio of Ce3+/(Ce3+ + Ce4+) of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst was estimated as 27.9%, confirming its catalytic performance.

3.2.6. CO2-TPD Analysis

The CO2-TPD measurement studied the surface basicity of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts and the results are exhibited in Figure 9 and Table 4. Typically, surface basicity is a crucial index in determining the catalytic activity of solid base catalysts. The TPD profile of the steel slag exhibited three desorption peaks, with a basicity of 0.009, 0.110, and 0.069 mmol/g during the temperature intervals of 50–530, 530–745, and 745–900 °C, respectively. The total basicity of the slag added up to 0.188 mmol/g. It was challenging to support catalytic transesterification based on this low value. The Ca-Ce/slag-0.4 and Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalysts exhibited no desorption peak at 50–340 °C, demonstrating the negligible weak basic sites. For the Ca-Ce/slag-0.4 catalyst, two distinct desorption peaks were revealed at temperature intervals of 350–540 and 540–750 °C, correlating to the moderate and strong base sites, with respective basicities of 0.235 and 0.193 mmol/g. For the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst, the corresponding temperature intervals of the moderate and strong base sites were shown at 340–560 and 560–800 °C, with corresponding basicities of 0.758 and 0.509 mmol/g. With the increased additive of active components Ca and Ce, the temperature range of desorption peaks moved to the high-temperature region, and the basicity increased correspondingly. The total basicity of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.4 and Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalysts was 0.445 and 1.289 mmol/g, respectively. In summary, the adequate basicity of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst can guarantee a high catalytic performance in transesterification. This finding compares with the HNTS-La /Ca catalyst, whose total basicity is 0.809 mmol/g [29].

3.3. Catalytic Activity

3.3.1. Transesterification Parameters Optimization

Using the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst, the transesterification of palm oil with methanol to obtain the corresponding FAMEs’ yields was investigated by studying the reaction parameters: catalyst dosage, methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio, reaction temperature, and reaction duration. The optimization results are shown in Figure 10.
The optimization study of the catalyst dosage was performed using 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 wt.% dosages for 120 min at 65 °C with a methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio of 15. As depicted in Figure 10a, the catalyst dosage dramatically affects the FAMEs yield. When the catalyst dosage was 3 wt.%, the concentration in the reaction system was sparse, making the reaction incomplete, achieving a mere 7.5% yield. The number of O2- anion sites is proportional to the catalyst dosage. Higher dosages can provide more sites for adsorbing H+ from methanol to form active centers [30], thus improving the contact of the reactants with the active centers, ultimately improving the transesterification efficiency. So, the FAMEs’ yield was optimized (from 32.7%) to 85.2% as the catalyst dosage ranged from 5 to 7 wt.%. However, the yield started to decrease with further catalyst dosing. Figure 10a depicts that the FAMEs’ yield depreciated to 75.5% when the catalytic dosage was further increased to 11 wt.%. This result could be attributed to excessive catalyst dosage causing saponification, affecting the main reaction’s transesterification, thereby lowering the reaction yield [31]. In summary, a 7 wt.% catalyst dosage was selected as optimum.
The methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio optimization was carried out under 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 ratios for 120 min at 65 °C with 7 wt.% catalyst dosage. The methanol-to-oil molar ratio is vital in transesterification, where the stoichiometric ratio of transesterification between palm oil and methanol is at least 1:3 [16]. Higher positive FAMEs’ yield can be obtained by increasing methanol dosage due to the reversible nature of transesterification. As shown in Figure 10b, when the molar ratio of methanol to palm oil is on a 3-to-9 scale, the increase in the molar ratio was beneficial in improving the FAMEs yield, where the FAMEs yield increased from 60.1% to 90.3%. Increasing the methanol content is conducive to reducing the viscosity of the reaction system, thereby reducing the mass transfer resistance between reactants, and further improving the conversion efficiency of reactants. However, a depressing trend of FAMEs yield was observed when the molar ratio exceeded 9. Excessive methanol lowers the contact between the catalyst and palm oil, leading to a reduced yield.
Furthermore, the reaction temperature was optimized under 50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 °C at 120 min duration using a 7 wt.% catalyst dosage and a methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio of 9. When the temperature was held at 50 °C (Figure 10c), the reaction between methanol and palm oil in the presence of the catalyst resulted in the lowest FAMEs’ yield because the temperature was lower than that required for conversion reaction into methyl ester molecules [32]. In the transesterification of macromolecular triglycerides, sufficient temperature is needed to provide enough energy to overcome the threshold. On the other hand, increasing the temperature can reduce the reactant viscosity and improve the miscibility, thus decreasing the mass-transfer resistance [33]. The FAMEs’ yield increased substantially from 26.3% to 90.3% by raising the reaction temperature from 50 to 65 °C. Further increasing the reaction temperature to 70 °C improved the FAMEs yield to 92.9%. At 70 °C, the molecular movement rate of the reaction system was fast enough to enhance the effective collision chance between the reactants and the catalyst, thus obtaining a higher FAMEs’ yield.
To optimize the reaction duration within 30–240 min, we set other conditions at their optimized values, i.e., 7 wt.% catalyst dosage, nine methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio, and 70 °C. The transesterification rate is slow, especially the solid catalysts. Palm oil and methanol are immiscible, and the whole reaction system is a catalyst–methanol–palm oil three-phase state, cumbersome to homogenize. At the same time, the FAMEs’ yield of transesterification was low in the initial reaction stage due to the palm oil and methanol needing to be mixed and diffused for a long duration to adsorb to the active center on the catalyst. As evidenced in Figure 10d, a 16.4% FAMEs’ yield was attained after the initial 30 min of transesterification. It increased significantly to 92.9% when the reaction reached the 120 min mark. When the reaction duration was extended to 180 min, the FAMEs’ yield slowly enhanced to 95.3%. After that, a puny increase of 1.3% FAMEs’ yield was achieved upon increasing the duration to 240 min. We opine that the transesterification reached equilibrium when the reaction duration exceeded 180 min.
Table 5 presents the catalytic performance in the transesterification compared with some recent reports on solid base catalysts. These studies considered the production conversion (or yield) and transesterification operating parameters. A >90% conversion or biodiesel yield was obtained from various types of solid base catalysts under different transesterification conditions. Based on the scientific literature, our results revealed that the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst has satisfactory catalytic performance and relatively moderate transesterification conditions compared to other heterogeneous base catalysts. Moreover, the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst optimizes the steel slag waste, saving preparation costs, and making it highly applicable industrially.

3.3.2. Effect of FFAs Content

To verify the acid resistance effect of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst, we added 2, 5, and 8 wt.% of oleic acid to the palm oil under optimal conditions: 7 wt.% catalyst dosage, 9 methanol-to-oil molar ratio, and reaction at 70 °C for 180 min. With 2 and 5 wt.% oleic acid added to the palm oil, the FAMEs’ yield decreased from 95.3% to 84.8% and 78.9%, respectively (Figure 11). However, a 63.1% FAMEs’ yield was still achieved even when up to 8 wt.% oleic acid was added. We found that the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst has specific acid resistance in transesterification, but the oil’s free fatty acids’ content should not be higher than 5 wt.%.
The Ca/slag-0.8 catalyst was synthesized under the same preparation conditions for comparison, and its acid resistance was studied (Figure 11). With the addition of oleic acid, the FAMEs’ yield of Ca/slag-0.8 catalyst decreased faster than that of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. Only 42.4% of the FAMEs’ yield could be obtained when 8 wt.% of oleic acid was added to the transesterification reaction. This finding indicates that the acid resistance of Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 was more enhanced than that of Ca/slag-0.8.

3.4. Catalyst Reusability

The reusability of solid catalysts is an attractive property relative to homogeneous catalysts. Transesterification was conducted at optimized conditions for three recycling tests. During each cycle, the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst was reused by processing in two different ways: (1) Separated from the transesterification mixture by filtration and dried at 105 °C for 5 h; (2) Separated from the transesterification mixture by centrifugation and washed thrice with n-hexane to remove polar and non-polar adsorbed compounds before drying at 105 °C for 5 h. As depicted in Figure 12, for the direct drying method, the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst exhibited good stability for the first two cycles, achieving 95.3% and 90.1% FAMEs’ yields. After that, the yield depreciated with the recycling number. Only 82.1% of the FAMEs’ yield was achieved in the third cycle. In contrast, the FAMEs’ yield slowly decreased from 95.3% to 93.8%, and 91.2% after the three cycles, with the one washed with n-hexane. This observation indicated that the active site on the catalyst was covered by organic matter, which hindered the catalytic activity of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8. Lee et al. [41] reported that the palm oil conversion was reduced to 70% after the third cycles catalyzed by waste obtuse horn shell-derived CaO catalyst. In summary, the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst synthesized in the present study exhibited an appreciable FAMEs’ yield.

4. Discussion

This study synthesized a newly cost-effective base catalyst of Ca-Ce/slag to generate biodiesel from palm oil. The effect of the mass ratio of Ca-Ce to steel slag on the transesterification activity was investigated. Moreover, diversified characterization techniques were employed to analyze the catalyst properties (such as crystalline phases, microscopic pore structure, morphology, functional groups, and surface basicity). The results showed that the mass ratio of Ca-Ce to steel slag at 0.8 (i.e., Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst) exhibited excellent physical and chemical properties. According to the range of transesterification conditions selected in this study, the optimal transesterification conditions are as follows: methanol: oil molar ratio of 9, catalyst dosage of 7 wt.%, and reaction at 70 °C for 180 min, yielding 95.3% of FAMEs. Moreover, the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst exhibited stable catalytic performance after three cycles with >90% FAMEs’ yield. Consequently, this study provides a new view on the resource utilization of steel slag and an excellent prospect for developing low-cost solid biodiesel catalysts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and H.Y.; methodology, G.Q.; software, G.Q. and P.Z.; validation, P.Z., J.S. and X.C.; formal analysis, X.L.; investigation, H.Y.; resources, J.S.; data curation, H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.; writing—review and editing, J.S.; visualization, H.S.; supervision, X.C.; project administration, H.Y. and H.S; funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Open Project of Shandong Key Laboratory of Biomass Gasification Technology [BG-KFX-08], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [52206262], the Science, Education and Industry Training New Project of Qilu University of Technology [2022PX091], the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2020QE210], “20 New Universities” Funding Project of Jinan [2021GXRC053] and Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program of Shandong Province.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woranuch, W.; Ngaosuwan, K.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Wongsawaeng, D.; Appamana, W.; Powell, J.; Rokhum, S.L.; Assabumrungrat, S. Fine-tuned fabrication parameters of CaO catalyst pellets for transesterification of palm oil to biodiesel. Fuel 2022, 323, 124356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Guo, M.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Cui, P.; Zhou, S.; Yu, M. Synthesis of CaO/ZrO2 based catalyst by using UiO–66(Zr) and calcium acetate for biodiesel production. Renew. Energy 2022, 185, 970–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zul, N.A.; Ganesan, S.; Hamidon, T.S.; Oh, W.D.; Hussin, M.H. A review on the utilization of calcium oxide as a base catalyst in biodiesel production. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yaşar, F. Biodiesel production via waste eggshell as a low-cost heterogeneous catalyst: Its effects on some critical fuel properties and comparison with CaO. Fuel 2019, 255, 115821–115828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teo, S.H.; Rashid, U.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Heterogeneous catalysis of transesterification of jatropha curcas oil over calcium-cerium bimetallic oxide catalyst. RSC. Adv. 2014, 4, 48836–48847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pandit, P.R.; Fulekar, M.H. Biodiesel production from microalgal biomass using CaO catalyst synthesized from natural waste material. Renew. Energy 2019, 136, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dehghani, S.; Haghighi, M.; Vardast, N. Structural/texture evolution of CaO/MCM nanocatalyst by doping various amounts of cerium for active and stable catalyst: Biodiesel production from waste vegetable cooking oil. Int. J. Energy. Res. 2019, 43, 3779–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, N.; Xue, H.; Hu, R. The activity and stability of CeO2@CaO catalysts for the production of biodiesel. RSC. Adv. 2018, 8, 32922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shu, K.; Sasaki, K. Occurrence of steel converter slag and its high value-added conversion for environmental restoration in China: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 373, 133876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gan, Y.; Li, C.; Ke, W.; Deng, Q.; Yu, T. Study on pavement performance of steel slag asphalt mixture based on surface treatment. Case. Stud. Constr. Mat. 2022, 16, e1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, B.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Ma, Y. Preparation and electrocatalytic properties of kaolin/steel slag particle electrodes. Catal. Commun. 2021, 148, 106177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, G.; Yang, J.; Xu, X. Synthesis of hydrotalcite-type mixed oxide catalysts from waste steel slag for transesterification of glycerol and dimethyl carbonate. Sci. Rep-UK 2020, 10, 10273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Casiello, M.; Losito, O.; Aloia, A.; Caputo, D.; Fusco, C.; Attrotto, R.; Monopoli, A.; Nacci, A.; D’Accolti, L. Steel Slag as New Catalyst for the Synthesis of Fames from Soybean Oil. Catalyst 2021, 11, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kang, L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, K. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of novel CeO2 loaded porous alkali-activated steel slag-based binding material. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2017, 42, 17341–17349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, S.; Zhang, T.; Cao, X.; Liu, X. Recovery of converter steel slag to prepare catalytic H2O2 degradation of dye wastewater as a catalyst. J. Mater. Sci-Mater. El. 2021, 32, 24889–24901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, L.; Teng, G.; Xiao, G.; Wei, R. Biodiesel from palm oil via loading KF/Ca–Al hydrotalcite catalyst. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 1283–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kesserwan, F.; Ahmad, M.N.; Khalil, M.; El-Rassy, H. Hybrid CaO/Al2O3 aerogel as heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Borah, M.J.; Das, A.; Das, V.; Bhuyan, N.; Deka, D. Transesterification of waste cooking oil for biodiesel production catalyzed by Zn substituted waste egg shell derived CaO nanocatalyst. Fuel 2019, 242, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ning, Y.; Niu, S. Preparation and catalytic performance in esterification of a bamboo-based heterogeneous acid catalyst with microwave assistance. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 153, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qu, T.; Niu, S.; Zhang, X.; Han, K.; Lu, C. Preparation of calcium modified Zn-Ce/Al2O3 heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production through transesterification of palm oil with methanol optimized by response surface methodology. Fuel 2021, 284, 118986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yadav, M.; Sharma, Y.C. Process optimization and catalyst poisoning study of biodiesel production from kusum oil using potassium aluminum oxide as efficient and reusable heterogeneous catalyst. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 199, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Niu, S.; Kan, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, C. Synthesis of the SrO–CaO–Al2O3 trimetallic oxide catalyst for transesterification to produce biodiesel. Renew. Energy 2021, 168, 981–990. [Google Scholar]
  23. Foroutan, R.; Mohammadi, R.; Razeghi, J.; Ramavandi, B. Biodiesel production from edible oils using algal biochar/CaO/K2CO3 as a heterogeneous and recyclable catalyst. Renew. Energy 2021, 168, 1207–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Murguía-Ortiz, D.; Cordova, I.; Manriquez, M.E.; Ortiz-Islas, E.; Cabrera-Sierra, R.; Contreras, J.L.; Alcantar-Vazquez, B.; Trejo-Rubio, M.; Vazquez-Rodriguez, J.T.; Castro, L.V. Na-CaO/MgO dolomites used as heterogeneous catalysts in canola oil transesterification for biodiesel production. Mater. Lett. 2021, 291, 129587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Niu, S.; Zhang, X.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, T.; Hu, X.; Gong, Z.; Lu, C. Dolomite incorporated with cerium to enhance the stability in catalyzing transesterification for biodiesel production. Renew. Energy 2020, 154, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Luo, W.; Yang, G.; Miao, C.; Fu, J.; Xing, S.; Fan, P.; Lv, P.; Wang, Z. Sustainable biodiesel production via transesterification by using recyclable Ca2MgSi2O7 catalyst. Fuel 2017, 196, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, S.; Tan, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhu, Y. Excellent low-temperature NH3-SCR NO removal performance and enhanced H2O resistance by Ce addition over the Cu0.02Fe0.2CeyTi1−yOx (y = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) catalysts. Chemosphere 2019, 243, 125309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Wen, J.; Xu, S.; Tian, X.; Gao, L.; Hou, Z.; Zhang, Q. Enhanced performance of iron-cerium NOx reduction catalysts by sulfuric acid treatment: The synergistic effect of surface acidity and redox capacity. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2021, 621, 118200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, T.; Zhao, S.; Niu, S.; Lyu, Z.; Hu, X. Halloysite nanotube functionalized with La-Ca bimetallic oxides as novel transesterification catalyst for biodiesel production with molecular simulation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 220, 113138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dahdah, E.; Estephane, J.; Haydar, R.; Youssef, Y.; Khoury, B.E.; Gennequin, C.; Aboukais, A.; Abi-Aad, E.; Aouad, S. Biodiesel production from refined sunflower oil over Ca–Mg–Al catalysts: Effect of the composition and the thermal treatment. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 1242–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.; Niu, S.; Lu, C.; Liu, M.; Huo, M. Transesterification catalyzed by industrial waste—Lime mud doped with potassium fluoride and the kinetic calculation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 86, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Osman, A.I.; Jamil, F.; Mehta, N.; Al-Haj, L.; Coulon, F.; Al-Maawali, S.; Al Nabhani, A.; Kyaw, H.H.; Myint, M.T.Z.; et al. Integrating life cycle assessment and characterisation techniques: A case study of biodiesel production utilising waste Prunus Armeniaca seeds (PAS) and a novel catalyst. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 304, 114319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Farooq, M.; Ramli, A.; Naeem, A. Biodiesel production from low FFA waste cooking oil using heterogeneous catalyst derived from chicken bones. Renew. Energy 2015, 76, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Osman, A.I.; Kumar, P.S.M.; Jamil, F.; Al-Haj, L.; Al Nabhani, A.; Kyaw, H.H.; Myint, M.T.Z.; Mehta, N.; Rooney, D.W. Circular economy approach of enhanced bifunctional catalytic system of CaO/CeO2 for biodiesel production from waste loquat seed oil with life cycle assessment study. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 236, 114040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Salimi, Z.; Hosseini, S.A. Study and optimization of conditions of biodiesel production from edible oils using ZnO/BiFeO3 nano magnetic catalyst. Fuel 2019, 239, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Junior, E.S.; Perez, V.H.; Reyero, I.; Serrano-Lotina, A.; Justo, O.R. Biodiesel production from heterogeneous catalysts based K2CO3 supported on extruded γ-Al2O3. Fuel 2019, 241, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Helmi, M.; Hemmati, A. Synthesis of magnetically solid base catalyst of NaOH/Chitosan-Fe3O4 for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: Optimization, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 248, 114807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abukhadra, M.R.; Mohamed, A.S.; El-Sherbeeny, A.M.; Soliman, A.T.A.; Elgawad, A.E.E.A. Sonication induced transesterification of castor oil into biodiesel in the presence of MgO/CaO nanorods as a novel basic catalyst: Characterization and optimization. Chem. Eng. Process. 2020, 154, 108024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, M.; Jiang, W.; Ding, J.; Lu, J. Highly active and recyclable CuO/ZnO as photocatalyst for transesterification of waste cooking oil to biodiesel and the kinetics. Fuel 2022, 315, 123254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mares, E.K.L.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Lourenço, E.K.; Luz, P.T.S.; Filho, G.N.R.; Zamian, J.R.; Conceição, L.R.V. Acai seed ash as a novel basic heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel synthesis: Optimization of the biodiesel production process. Fuel 2021, 299, 120887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, S.L.; Wong, Y.C.; Tan, Y.P.; Yew, S.Y. Transesterification of palm oil to biodiesel by using waste obtuse horn shell-derived CaO catalyst. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 93, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of transesterification reaction.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of transesterification reaction.
Processes 11 01810 g001
Figure 2. The experimental flow chart of catalyst synthesis and transesterification.
Figure 2. The experimental flow chart of catalyst synthesis and transesterification.
Processes 11 01810 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Ca-Ce-to-slag mass ratio.
Figure 3. Effect of Ca-Ce-to-slag mass ratio.
Processes 11 01810 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Processes 11 01810 g004
Figure 5. N2 adsorption–desorption curve of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst.
Figure 5. N2 adsorption–desorption curve of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst.
Processes 11 01810 g005
Figure 6. The SEM-EDS images of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. (a) SEM image with a 10,000× magnification, (b) SEM image with a 30,000× magnification, (c) EDS element spectrum.
Figure 6. The SEM-EDS images of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. (a) SEM image with a 10,000× magnification, (b) SEM image with a 30,000× magnification, (c) EDS element spectrum.
Processes 11 01810 g006
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Processes 11 01810 g007
Figure 8. XPS spectra of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. (a) XPS survey; (b) O 1s; (c) Ca 2p; (d) Ce 3d.
Figure 8. XPS spectra of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst. (a) XPS survey; (b) O 1s; (c) Ca 2p; (d) Ce 3d.
Processes 11 01810 g008aProcesses 11 01810 g008b
Figure 9. CO2-TPD profiles of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Figure 9. CO2-TPD profiles of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Processes 11 01810 g009
Figure 10. Effects of transesterification parameters on FAMEs yield: (a) Catalyst dosage; (b) Methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio; (c) Reaction temperature; (d) Reaction duration.
Figure 10. Effects of transesterification parameters on FAMEs yield: (a) Catalyst dosage; (b) Methanol-to-palm-oil molar ratio; (c) Reaction temperature; (d) Reaction duration.
Processes 11 01810 g010
Figure 11. Effect of oleic acid dosage on the FAMEs yield.
Figure 11. Effect of oleic acid dosage on the FAMEs yield.
Processes 11 01810 g011
Figure 12. Effect of recycling of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst on the FAMEs’ yield.
Figure 12. Effect of recycling of the Ca-Ce/slag-0.8 catalyst on the FAMEs’ yield.
Processes 11 01810 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition of the original steel slag/%.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the original steel slag/%.
CaOSiO2Al2O3MgOSO3TiO2P2O5Fe2O3MnOK2ONa2OOther
41.3631.0913.348.852.301.110.400.380.360.340.340.13
Table 2. Basic indices of the palm oil used in the current study.
Table 2. Basic indices of the palm oil used in the current study.
ReagentAV
mgKOH/g
SV
mgKOH/g
M
g/mol
Palm oil0.42182.60923.98
Table 3. Microstructural properties of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Table 3. Microstructural properties of the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
SamplesBET Surface
Area (m2/g)
Pore Volume
(cm3/g)
Average Pore
Diameter (nm)
slag0.270.00049-
Ca-Ce/slag-0.41.290.02222.19
Ca-Ce/slag-0.83.660.04339.27
Table 4. CO2-TPD data for the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
Table 4. CO2-TPD data for the slag and Ca-Ce/slag-x catalysts.
SamplesTemperature Interval/°CPeak Temperature/°CBasicity
/(mmol/g)
Total Basicity/(mmol/g)
Slag50–530476 0.0090.188
530–745656 0.110
745–9007450.069
Ca-Ce/slag-0.450–3502060.017 0.445
350–5404460.235
540–7506490.193
Ca-Ce/slag-0.850–3401680.022 1.289
340–5604690.758
560–8006640.509
Table 5. Comparison of performance efficiencies of various base catalysts.
Table 5. Comparison of performance efficiencies of various base catalysts.
CatalystOil FeedstockTransesterification ParametersCon. or Yield 4/%Ref.
C. Dosage 1
/wt.%
Molar
Ratio 2
Temp 3
/°C
Time
/min
CaO/CeO2Waste seed oil49709090.14[34]
ZnO/BiFeO3Canola oil4156536095.43[35]
K2CO3/γ-Al2O3Sunflower oil5128024099.3[36]
Ca-Mg-AlSunflower oil2.5156036095[30]
NaOH/Chitosan-Fe3O4Waste cooking oil0.562527092[37]
biochar/CaO-K2CO3Waste edible oil4186520098.83[23]
MgO/CaO nanorodsCastor oil615707096.2[38]
CuO/ZnOWaste cooking oil596512093.5[39]
Acai seed ashSoybean oil12181006098.5[40]
Ca-Ce/slag-0.8Palm oil797018095.3This study
1 C. dosage—catalyst dosage; 2 Molar ratio—alcohol-to-oil molar ratio; 3 Temp—temperature; 4 Con. or yield—conversion or yield.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, P.; Qi, G.; Chen, X.; Liang, X.; Si, H. Steel Slag Decorated with Calcium Oxide and Cerium Oxide as a Solid Base for Effective Transesterification of Palm Oil. Processes 2023, 11, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061810

AMA Style

Sun J, Yu H, Zhang P, Qi G, Chen X, Liang X, Si H. Steel Slag Decorated with Calcium Oxide and Cerium Oxide as a Solid Base for Effective Transesterification of Palm Oil. Processes. 2023; 11(6):1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061810

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Jichao, Hewei Yu, Peisen Zhang, Gaoyu Qi, Xiuxiu Chen, Xiaohui Liang, and Hongyu Si. 2023. "Steel Slag Decorated with Calcium Oxide and Cerium Oxide as a Solid Base for Effective Transesterification of Palm Oil" Processes 11, no. 6: 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061810

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop