Next Article in Journal
Thermal Safety of 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide for Construction-Related Safety Process
Previous Article in Journal
Untargeted LC-QTOF-MS Analysis of Metabolites Produced by Penicillium brevicompactum during the Bioconversion of Ganoderic Acid A
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fixed Bed Batch Slow Pyrolysis Process for Polystyrene Waste Recycling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring Tannery Solid Wastes as a Source of Animal Feed

by
Nelly Esther Flores Tapia
1,* and
Hannibal Brito Moina
2
1
Research and Development Directorate, Faculty of Sciences, Food and Biotechnology, Technical University of Ambato, Ambato 180207, Ecuador
2
Grupo de Investigación Avanzada en Dirección Empresarial (GIADE), Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo, Riobamba 060106, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(10), 2965; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102965
Submission received: 15 August 2023 / Revised: 2 October 2023 / Accepted: 7 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Value-Added Products from Waste)

Abstract

:
This review delves into the processing of tannery solid waste, emphasizing fleshings and chromium-tanned leather waste. This paper centers on fat recovery, chromium elimination, and protein preservation, aiming to make them apt for animal consumption. This paper also assesses the potential of introducing such recycled products to the global market. Drawing on the literature from the past two decades, sourced comprehensively from Scopus and Web of Science, 36 articles were selected because of their significant contributions from leather production powerhouses such as India and Brazil. Fleshings have shown immense potential as animal feed, and the extraction of tallow and collagen from rawhide trimmings yields up to 98% and 93%, respectively. Fermented tannery fleshings, notably with Enterococcus faecium HAB01, also demonstrate strong antioxidant capabilities. The overarching consensus emphasizes the need for rigorous purification when dealing with chromium-containing wastes, addressing concerns tied to Cr (III) and Cr (VI). Furthermore, raw tannery fleshings stand out as a sustainable, cost-effective, and globally marketable solution for animal feed production.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The animal food industry boasted a remarkable global trade value of USD 40.9 billion in 2021. Out of 1217 traded products, it secured the 110th spot, meaning that animal food represents a commanding presence, accounting for the top 9% of all traded commodities. From 2020 to 2021, the export value of animal food surged by 17.8%, rising from USD 34.7 billion to USD 40.9 billion. Such a significant increase, almost 18% within a year, underscores a mounting demand for animal food [1]. This surge might be attributed to factors such as an expansion in animal farming and a global uptick in pet ownership. In 2021, the top five leading animal food exporters were Germany (USD 4.43 billion), the Netherlands (USD 3.92 billion), the United States (USD 3.81 billion), France (USD 3.29 billion), and China (USD 2.53 billion). On the import side were countries such as Germany (USD 3.19 billion), the United States (USD 2.55 billion), France (USD 1.9 billion), the Netherlands (USD 1.83 billion), and Poland (USD 1.6 billion). Interestingly, there is a noticeable overlap between top importers and exporters [2]. This overlap hints at the intricate dynamics of the supply chain in this industry. It is worth noting that the industry has an accumulated value of USD 35.7 billion. Recognizing the potential, the sector has innovatively incorporated nutrient-rich waste materials to devise enhanced fattening and growth formulas [3,4,5,6].
While the leading animal exporters dominate discussions due to their significant contributions, it is essential to recognize the broader spectrum of worldwide production. In 2019, global layer feed production experienced a 4% growth, with Asia–Pacific leading at 7%, possibly due to the African swine fever crisis prompting increased egg production. In contrast, the Middle East saw an 11% decline, likely influenced by geopolitical tensions. Broiler feed production is equivalent to 10 million metric tons from the previous year. Africa and Asia–Pacific both marked a 6% growth, while other regions registered a 2–3% increase. This upward trajectory is expected to continue, driven by escalating protein needs [7]. Meanwhile, North America’s ruminant feed production was at 62.3%, and Europe contributed 21.9%. Asia–Pacific dominates in aquaculture feed, holding 30% of the global share, with China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh as major contributors. Additionally, pet feed saw a 4% global growth, especially in regions such as Asia–Pacific, Europe, and Latin America. Countries such as China, Indonesia, Portugal, Hungary, Ecuador, and Argentina were at the forefront of this growth [7,8].
The vast scale of the animal feed industry highlights its dependence on large amounts of both vegetable and animal-derived ingredients [9]. Given the high cost of protein in feed formulas, there is a pressing need to identify more affordable protein sources. One promising solution is the controlled use of edible waste, ensuring the continued quality of animal-derived products [10]. A WWF report about animal feed sources underscores the potential of alternative animal diets, such as those incorporating grocery and bakery waste, as well as black soldier fly larva flour. Their study encourages the integration of waste into animal diets to provide an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional feeds, all while ensuring the safety and well-being of the animals [11].
An estimated 5 billion livestock are earmarked globally for the meat industry and its derivatives [12]. In 2014, global statistics suggested an average meat consumption of 43 kg per person [13]. The meat industry generates large amounts of waste; 46 to 50% of each bovine is waste [14]. Slaughterhouse by-products, such as hides—which comprise 4 to 11% of live cattle weight—find their way to the tanning industry [15]. As reported by the FAO, by 2015, out of the 5,924,823,536 kg of processed raw hides worldwide, 506,662,677 kg were transformed into leather [16]. The tanning industries utilize part of the hides from slaughterhouses and convert these animal hides into leather, enhancing their utility for various products [17]. Yet, per Buljan and Ludvik [18], for every 1000 kg of wet salted hides, only 255 kg emerges as finished leather, turning 75% into waste. The tannery waste includes fleshings, hair, tails, masks, shavings from splitting, dust from buffing wet blue, and highly contaminated liquid effluents [19,20]. Among all these wastes, fleshings and shavings, and the buffing of the wet blue are being recycled to produce animal feed [21] and other valuable products such as carbon sources for steel production [22], adsorbents [23,24], adhesives [25], synthetic leather [26], biodiesel, bioplastics [27], fertilizers [28,29,30], elastin [31], among others [32].
This review paper aims to delve into the recycling processes of tannery solid waste, explicitly focusing on transforming fleshings and chromium-tanned leather waste into safe and nutritious animal feed. The primary objective is to identify and evaluate the most efficient processing techniques that ensure fat recovery and chromium removal while preserving the protein content, making the resulting products suitable for animal consumption. Furthermore, this work seeks to determine the feasibility of introducing these recycled products into the global market, thereby providing a sustainable solution to tannery waste management and contributing to the animal feed industry.

2. Methodology

An extensive literature review was conducted to comprehensively examine the potential use of tannery waste for animal feed production.

2.1. Data Collection

Database and Search Criteria:
Scopus: The initial literature search was conducted on Scopus, targeting the utilization of tannery wastes as feed sources. The specific keywords employed for this search were “tannery”, “wastes”, and “feed”.
Web of Science: A supplementary search was carried out on Web of Science using a combination of keywords “tannery”, “wastes”, “animal”, and “feed”.
Time Frame: The review spanned the literature from the past two decades, resulting in a preliminary collection of 149 documents.
Geographical Distribution: Out of these, the major contributors were India (68 publications), Spain (11 publications), Bangladesh (12 publications), and Brazil (11 publications). The dominance of these countries can be attributed to their significant leather production activities.
Publications per year: Scopus database records since 2004 show a consistent annual publication rate of six to ten papers on tannery waste utilization for animal feed, highlighting a lack of research in this area attributed to manufacturers’ dominance in waste management, limiting broader exploration. Proprietary issues lead to undisclosed conversion processes, potentially obstructing academic advancement; see Figure 1 for visual representation.

2.2. Analysis of Literature

Using the Connected Papers software tool, the literature from the past decade was further dissected into three main topics:
Solid Tannery Waste: The literature focused on solid tannery waste recycling into animal feed. Keywords “animal feed”, “tannery waste”, and “recycling” yielded 41 articles (Figure 2A).
Wet Blue Products: The literature that explored products derived from wet blue with keywords “wet blue” and “recycling”, yielding 38 articles (Figure 2B).
Tannery-Derived Tallow: The literature that investigated the extraction of products with the terms “beef tallow” and “tanneries”. This search resulted in 41 articles (Figure 2C).
The Boolean operator “AND” was used for all searches to narrow down results. The Connected Papers tool visualized the search results with each publication represented as a node; the node’s size correlates with its citation frequency. Furthermore, content-similarity-based connections were made evident through linking lines.
Supplementary Search: Google Scholar was subsequently leveraged to fetch specific statistical data and additional information related to the topic.

2.3. Selection and Filtering Process

After data retrieval, a meticulous selection procedure was initiated. Duplicate entries identified across the different searches were excluded. After this refinement, 36 articles with the same focus that our investigation had were selected as foundational references for this review, as outlined in Table 1, and the rest of the articles were not completely related to the topic.

3. Results

3.1. Solid Waste Tannery Residues

The leather production process generates a diverse array of wastes, each with its unique characteristics and potential environmental ramifications, as detailed in Table 2. Approximately 80% of these wastes are residues from unutilized hides, encompassing tanned solid byproducts such as hair, cow tails, raw hides, fleshings, and hide trimmings. Many of these residues find utility in gelatin factories or are repurposed into distinctive products such as pet toys, fertilizers, collagen, and keratin [33]. Shavings, although collagen-rich, are tainted with chrome. Yet, they hold promise in collagen manufacturing, adhesive production [34,35] and as fillers in composite materials [36].
Liquid wastes pose significant challenges, both in terms of volume—with 50,000 L required to produce just 1 kg of leather [37], and composition, laden with heavy metals [38], sulfides [39] and organic matter. The tanning stage introduces tanning liquors, the composition of which varies with the tanning technique and includes substances such as tannins and chromium salts [40]. Historically, the focus was on lowering the contaminants in wastewater before releasing them back into the environment. However, modern industries recirculate wastewater, aiming to curtail water usage and, finally, decontamination processes [41].
Gaseous emissions are another concern. Compounds such as VOCs are emitted throughout the production process, with hydrogen sulfide and ammonia being especially prominent during beam house operations, also in this industry the odor is a mandatory concern to address [42].
Furthermore, sludges, the byproducts of wastewater treatment, comprise a mix of organic and inorganic substances, demanding meticulous disposal to minimize environmental repercussions [37,43]. In summation, the intricate waste landscape of the leather industry emphasizes the imperative for eco-friendly practices and forward-thinking waste management approaches.
Table 2. Synopsis of wastes resulting from different processes during leather tanning.
Table 2. Synopsis of wastes resulting from different processes during leather tanning.
Type of WasteSources and Possible Uses
Solid WastesRaw Skin and Hide Trimmings: Cuts of hides and skins are protein-rich and sometimes used in animal feeds or for gelatin production [44,45].
Fleshings: These are the fatty tissues removed from the inner side of hides and skins. They are protein-rich and can be processed to extract oils and proteins [45].
Splitting Waste: Generated during the splitting operation to obtain desired leather thickness, they can be used for making suede or other lower-grade leather products [46].
Shavings: Generated when uniforming the leather or wet blue thickness, they are rich in collagen contaminated with chrome, sometimes used in collagen production or as fillers in composite materials [47].
Liquid Wastes
(Effluents)
Soaking Waters: These contain water-soluble proteins, hair, dirt, and dissolved and suspended solids [47]
Lime Liquors: Generated as residues from the unhairing process, these liquors contain dissolved hair, lime, and sulfides [20,48,49]
Tanning Liquors: Depending on the tanning process (vegetable, mineral, or synthetic), the waste liquors contain tannins, chromium salts, or other agents [20,48,49].
Dyeing and Finishing Effluents: These contain residual dyes, pigments, resins, fats, and other finishing agents [20,48,49].
Chemical WastesChromium Compounds: These are particularly relevant in chrome tanning processes. Chromium can be toxic, especially Cr (VI) and concentrations [50].
Organic Solvents: Solvents used in dyeing and finishing processes [51,52].
Tannins: These residues can be of vegetable or synthetic origin, used in the tanning process [51,52].
Sulfides: Sulfides are used in the dehairing process and can be harmful if released into the environment [39,53]
Gaseous EmissionsVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): VOCs are emitted during drying, finishing, and thermal processes [54,55].
Hydrogen Sulfide and Ammonia: Substances released during beam house operations (such as soaking, liming, and unhairing) [54,55].
SludgesThese are by-products of wastewater treatment processes. They contain organic and inorganic materials and need careful handling and disposal [56,57].

3.2. Products for Animal Feed Obtained from Different Solid Tannery Wastes

In the tannery processes, solid wastes primarily derived from raw or tanned cowhide are frequently harnessed to produce animal feed. This inclination can be attributed to their substantial content of fats and proteins, coupled with the ease of procuring materials readily assimilable into animal dietary formulations, as illustrated in Figure 3.

3.2.1. Products Derived from the Residual Fleshings of Tanneries

The fleshings, a blend of skin, muscle, and tallow, are mechanically excised from hides to enhance the permeation of chemicals into the skin during the depilation and tanning processes [59]. The surplus skin and the portions not utilized in the tannery are sold to manufacturing units to produce gelatin/collagen [60] and adhesives [61]. Traditionally, meat remnants with tallow are disposed of in landfills. However, current trends are exploring recycling strategies for these wastes. These include their use in biodiesel production [62], hydrogen generation [63], and soap manufacturing [64]. Furthermore, they undergo processing to yield meals enriched with protein and fat, suitable for animal feed [65], as detailed below.
The composition of rawhide trimmings varies from 70.4 to 82.6% of moisture, 5.1 to 7% protein, and 7.3 to 7.8% of fat [66,67]. Various methods, including acid, basic and enzymatic hydrolysis, can extract the proteins in the form of collagen [68]. In the raw trimmings through innovative acid hydrolysis, using mixes of acids, the collagen extraction yields 85% using acetic acid and 93% with propionic acid. This yield discrepancy was further supported by circular dichroism results, which showed that the collagen extracted with propionic acid solution had a higher ellipticity than collagen extracted with acetic acid at 222 nm, a feature indicative of a triple helical structure. The circular dichroism results confirmed that the collagen derived from trimming waste maintained its native triple helical conformation being a collagen of high quality [69].
Tannery fleshings also serve as a collagen source through mechanical defatting and enzymatic hydrolysis using a trio of enzymes such as (A) an alkaline proteolytic enzyme with exo-activity, (B) alkaline proteolytic enzyme with endo activity, both showing activity of 40,000 LV g−1 and (C) another an alkaline triacylglycerol lipase enzyme with 50,000 TBU g−1 activity. The process demonstrates efficiency, versatility with up to 85% protein recovery from greaves and significantly reduced water and chemical consumption. The resulting hydrolyzed collagen, suitable as a retaining agent and biostimulant, was successfully used in retaining wet blue leathers. Still, as it did not contain chromium, this collagen is helpful for animal feed formulations [70].
Another study explored using tannery fleshings as an alternative to fishmeal in aquaculture. Fermented fleshings replaced varying percentages of fishmeal in the rohu fish (Labeo rohita) diet. The most successful results were observed when fishmeal was replaced by 75% fermented tannery fleshing flour, showing superior growth and nutritional indices in the fish. One of the studies listed in Table 3 concluded that recycling bovine tannery fleshings mitigates environmental issues associated with its disposal and offers a potential solution to reduce production costs in aquafeed processing [71]. Even after these promising results, potential toxicity remains a concern.
Addressing this, D’Agaro embarked on an 88-day seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) growth experiment, encompassing eight isoproteic and isolipidic distinct diets. The diets included a C1 control diet based on fishmeal; diets containing tannery wastes S1 and S2 with 100 and 200 g kg−1, respectively; AV1 and AV2 based on poultry meal; M1 and M2 with alfalfa concentrate; and A1 containing Haematococcus fluvialis meal. Results indicated that diets S2 and AV2, which partially replaced fishmeal with alternative protein sources by up to 40%, significantly reduced fish growth rates and exhibited poor fish conversion ratio values. Furthermore, introducing fleshing wastes to the seabass diet appeared promising but not economically viable [72]. There was no evidence of toxicity or contamination of fishes with diets S1 and S2 containing tannery wastes, which gives hope in using these residues, but more experiments are still necessary to discard future issues.
Allam et al. directly transformed fleshings into flour destined as a dietary supplement for broiler chicks. First, the fleshings were boiled at 100 °C for 4–5 h, then dried and ground. When comparing the three diets, Diet 1 containing 10% protein concentrate, Diet 2 consisting of 5% protein concentrate and 5% tannery wastes, and Diet 3 incorporating 10% tannery waste, the findings show that the basic parameters such as feed intake, live weight, and feed conversion efficiency remain largely unaffected among the groups. Nevertheless, there is a notable variance in the cost of production and profitability, with diets incorporating tannery waste demonstrating enhanced profitability. Specifically, Diet 3 yielded a profitability of USD 0.13 per kilogram of live weight. While most meat yield traits were unaffected by the different diets, some specific characteristics such as gizzard and shank weight improved with increased tannery waste. The study concluded that producers can integrate residual fleshing from tanneries into broiler diets without causing adverse impacts [73].
A fermentation technique for delimed tannery fleshings was established to maximize protein hydrolysis and antioxidant activity using Enterococcus faecium HAB01 (GenBank #FJ418568). Under optimized conditions, which consisted of 12.5% (v/w) inoculum, 17.5% (w/w) glucose, and a fermentation period of 96 h at a temperature of 37 °C, maximal hydrolysis was achieved. The chemical evaluation of the hydrolysate unveiled an abundance of essential amino acids, particularly arginine and leucine when compared to a reference protein. Furthermore, the liquid portion of the hydrolysate exhibited robust antioxidant activities, suggesting its promising role as a high-quality feed ingredient [74]. These methods prove that it is possible to convert fleshing with no chromium content-rich protein sources for animal feed if considering quality and extraction processes.

3.2.2. Products Derived from the Residual Tallow in the Tanning Process

Due to its large volume, tallow has become a significant waste issue for slaughterhouses and tanneries. Most of it ends in landfills, with only a tiny fraction being recycled [75]. Freshly sourced beef tallow, coming directly from the animal’s stomach after slaughter, holds superior quality [76,77,78]. In 2019, global tallow production reached 6,606,876,775 kg [79], positioning it as an economical source of edible fats. Tallow is abundant in polyunsaturated fatty acids, including linoleic and α-linolenic acids, with a higher triacylglycerol concentration in adipose tissue and a significant presence of phospholipids in muscle tissue [80]. Historically, this beef fat was a staple in candle making, lubricants, and even in the industrial preparation of French fries [81]. However, health concerns related to its high saturated fat content have diminished its dietary role, leading to its substitution for unsaturated vegetable oils [81]. Today, tallow is an additive in balanced animal feed [82,83].
Tannery tallow undergoes recycling via solvent extraction [84] and thermal processes, where it is cooked until it separates into fat, flesh, and water [85] despite the thermal methods’ inefficiencies and high energy consumption. One study introduced a more efficient way of using solid-state fermentation. The researchers produced an enzyme (lipase) that effectively breaks down and solubilizes the fats, with 92% recovery when applied to tannery fleshing. This method offers a potential source for biodiesel production and repurposes the remaining residue as a protein-rich feed for animals [86]. A key challenge in fat recovery is achieving a high yield. Devaraj et al. designed an industrially viable process, employing 4% H2SO4 at 120 °C for 1.5 h, successfully extracting 98% of fat from leather fleshing waste. Subsequent analyses indicated that this fat has more potential utility as a biodiesel feedstock [87]. The extraction processes produce low-quality fats; thus, further investigation is required to refine these fats for consumption.
Cunha et al. [88] identified the optimal fat extraction conditions at 155 °C and 550,000 Pa. Under these conditions, 100% of the fat could be collected through simple decantation due to the insolubility between the lipophilic fat phase and the hydrophilic protein-rich phase. Nevertheless, these conditions yielded fat with a low iodine value, approximately 5 kg I2/kg fat, and a high acid number, 5 mg KOH/g, for limed fleshings. The saponification values are also low, likely due to the impurity of the extracted fat. In the case of limed fleshings, Ca(OH)2 acts similar to a cement, reducing the effectiveness of thermal treatment or solvent extraction. Therefore, the process of fat extraction from fleshing presents several challenges that need to be addressed to improve efficiency and product quality.
In addition to the previously described defatting methods, another innovative process has been explored. Instead of using traditional solvents, this method exclusively uses supercritical CO2 in specialized high-pressure view cell equipment to extract fat from double-face lambskins. By optimizing conditions to 2 × 107 Pa, 80 °C temperature, and a duration of 2 h, the researchers achieved a fat yield of 78.57%. The results suggest that supercritical fluid CO2 extraction is a highly efficient and environmentally friendly alternative to fat separation processes [89].
While there is a lack of research on using recycled tallow in animal feed formulas, tallow has been successfully incorporated into feeds for cattle, equines [90], lambs, poultry [91], and other animal species due to its palatability and nutrient content. Okur, N. investigated the effects of soy oil, poultry fat, and tallow in broiler feed at fixed energy: protein ratio on field and slaughter parameters; see Table 4. The research evaluated several parameters; see Table 4. The study was conducted over 41 days with 12,600 Ross 308 broiler chicks. Ten different diets were used, including soy oil in the starter poultry fat, tallow in the grower, and various combinations in the finisher. The results indicated that using tallow instead of Soy oil, especially in grower feed, improved field performance. The study concluded that animal fat instead of soy oil could be an economical alternative if specific ratios are maintained [91].
Research performed by Wickramasuriya et al. involved 384 one-day-old Ross 308 broiler chicks, which were subjected to eight different dietary treatments. These diets were primarily corn–soybean meal-based, with beef tallow as the fat source. The study found that broiler chickens fed a diet supplemented with Polysorbate-20 and Candida rugosa lipases (NC + POL + CRL) exhibited improved growth performance, especially during the grower phase from day 21 to 35. These chickens also showed enhanced gut health, with increased villi height and a higher villi-to-crypt ratio. Furthermore, the NC + POL + CRL diet improved fat and energy digestibility compared to the negative control diet. The study concluded that combining Polysorbate-20 with Candida rugosa lipases can enhance the growth performance of broiler chickens on a low-energy diet without affecting other health parameters [92].
In a study by Ahmed et al., a 63-day experiment with 15 lambs evaluated three dietary treatments: T0 (control without beef tallow), T1 (2% beef tallow), and T2 (4% beef tallow) with five lambs per group; see Table 4. Notably, the T1 group exhibited a marked rise in body weight and improved feed conversion ratio. Meat quality and chemical composition remained consistent across all groups. However, lambs in the T1 group saw an 11.5% surge in cholesterol levels. The findings suggest that introducing 2% beef tallow into lamb diets can boost their performance without any detrimental impacts [93].
Lopez et al. highlighted weight gain in younger lambs, contrasting with Ahmed et al.’s broader approach. Yet, both studies underscored the advantages of adding tallow to the diet [94]. Considering its use in cattle feed requires careful dosing due to bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) risk. In the United States, the FDA’s 2018 decree [95] regulates the use of tallow in animal feed, prohibiting the use of tallow with more than 0.15% insoluble impurities for ruminant meal.
The evidence indicates that incorporating tallow into animal feed is practical and cost-effective. Furthermore, tallow can be sustainably sourced from tannery waste through appropriate recycling, recovery, and purification processes.
Table 4. Overview of research on utilizing tallow in animal feed formulations.
Table 4. Overview of research on utilizing tallow in animal feed formulations.
Authors DateType of StudyMain FindingsResults in AnimalsCite
Okur, N.
2020
This investigation focuses on the effects of using soy oil (SO), poultry fat (PF), and tallow (T) in broiler feed at a fixed energy: protein ratio on field and slaughter parameters. The research evaluated parameters such as average live weight (ALW), feed conversion ratio (FCR), production efficiency factor (PEF), carcass weight (CW), carcass yield (CY), heart–liver weight (HLW), heart–liver yield (HLY), abdominal fat weight (AFW) and abdominal fat yield (AFY)The results indicated that animal fat (PF and T) instead of SO, especially in grower feed, improved field performance parameters except for mortality. However, this improvement was not observed in slaughter performance parameters except for CW, HLW, and HLY. The research determined that substituting SO with animal fat could be cost-effective when adhering to specific proportions.Tallow in feeds at fixed energy protein ratio, during field performance
ALW 2.401
FCR 1.828
PEF 301.54
Mortality 5.88
Tallow in feeds at fixed energy: protein ratio slaughter performance
CW 1682
CY 67.40
AFW 39
AFY 2.35
HLW 60
HLY 3.57
[91]
Wickramasuriya, S.S.; Macelline, S.P.; Cho, H.M.; Hong, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Heo, J.M.
2020
The study aimed to explore the impacts of dietary emulsifiers and lipase supplementation on various parameters in broiler chickens, such as growth performance, blood metabolites, intestinal organ weight, gut morphology, nutrient digestibility, carcass measurements, and meat quality. All diets included the same quantity of tallow.The study concluded that combining Polysorbate-20 with Candida rugosa lipases can enhance the growth performance of broiler chickens on a low-energy diet without affecting other health parameters.Effect of diet NC + POL + CRL on meat quality of broiler chickens NC + POL + CRL, lightness 55.21, redness 5.12, yellowness 15.41, cooking loss 24.17, WHC 79.72%, and pH 6.02
Effect of NC + POL + CRL diet on carcass measurements
Leg 26.27%, breast 9.10%, abdominal fat 0.9%
[92]
Ahmed, S.; Khatun, J.; Manirul, M.; Kabirul, M.; Niaz, S.M.; Abdullah Al Noman, M.; Zohorul M. 2015In this experimental study, three–four-month-old male lambs, averaging 10 kg, were acclimatized for 15 days and divided into three groups: T0 (no tallow), T1 (2% tallow), and T2 (4% tallow) each with five lambs. Diets replaced corn and soy with tallow, maintaining consistent crude protein.Supplementing lamb diets with 2% beef tallow (T1 group) resulted in the highest total weight gain and proved the most cost-effective. However, the highest dressing percentage was observed in the T2 group. The beef tallow treatments did not significantly impact the proportion of various organs.The highest total weight gain, 4.68 kg, was observed in the T1 group, showing higher growth and superior FCR than the control group T0.
The T1 group showed the most cost-effective results, suggesting higher profits when sheep rations are supplemented with 2% beef tallow.
The highest dressing percentage was found in the T2 group, 44.05%.
[93]
López-Aguirre, S.; Pinos-Rodríguez, J.M.; Vicente, J.G.; Rangel, H.L.; de la Cruz, A.; Domínguez-Vara, I.A.
2020
The work analyzes beef tallow dietary variations on lamb growth, rumen activity, and meat/carcass attributes. Subjects: 21 five-month-old male Rambouillet lambs. Diet: 0, 20, 40 g beef tallow/kg DM with consistent energy/protein. Duration: 60 days (15 for adaptation, 45 for evaluation). Metrics: weight, intake, rumen analysis, carcass weight, meat quality.It is possible to conclude that increasing tallow in the diet:
Increases saturated fatty acid contents, daily metabolizable energy intake, carcass dressing, fatness, and intramuscular fat content.
The diets keep similar growth metrics and ruminal fermentation characteristics.
Carcass attributes, such as classification, weight, muscle conformation, longissimus muscle area, and individual fatty acids in meat, remained unaffected.
Tallow addition did not influence meat characteristics post mortem.
Diet 40 g kg−1 amount of tallow.
Growth performance
Final gain 15.80 kg
Ruminal fermentation
pH 5.9, acetate 47.6 mol mol−1
Propionate 35 mol mol−1
Butyrate 17.4 mol mol−1
Carcass characteristics
Weight 23 kg
Dressing 51.9%
Length 67.9%
Leg length 43.8 cm
Fatness degree 4.2
[95]

3.2.3. Recycling of Wet Blue Waste and Its Potential Alternatives for Animal Nutrition

After undergoing the chromium tanning process, the leather is termed wet blue. The skin’s thickness is harmonized during the subsequent finishing stages, producing wastes such as shavings and wet blue sanding dust [96]. These wet blue residues, which contain various levels of chromium-stabilized collagen, have seen research advancements that enable the reduction in chromium content. After chrome removal, theoretically, collagen-based protein is appropriate for feeding poultry, ruminants [97], and pets. It is vital to exclude chromium from the final product due to its notorious toxicity and associated health risks, from allergic reactions to cancer [98].
One noteworthy advancement is the increase in studies for efficient chrome extraction from protein hydrolysates [99,100]. This process leverages collagen of different qualities, which can be converted into valuable products such as gelatin, elastin, and animal feed. The efficiency and Cr (III) recovery depends on extraction methods; see Table 5. Furthermore, the profitability of this process depends on the market demand for these protein-based products. Recycling wet blue waste plays a dual role; it not only aids in reducing waste within the leather industry but also generates substantial economic value, as in the case of Bangladesh, which, in 2022, started exporting wet blue waste, capitalizing on its growing demand and utility worldwide [101].
The environmental challenge posed by chromium-tanned leather waste disposal stems from the potential conversion of trivalent chromium salts to the more soluble and carcinogenic chromium (VI) salts. This conversion can be instigated by factors such as UV light exposure, temperature fluctuations above 353 K, changes in humidity, natural pH shifts in landfills, and the leather hydrolysis process.
-
In an alkaline medium:
2 C r 2 O 3 + 8 O H + 3 O 2 4 C r O 4 + 4 H 2 O Δ G 0 < 0
-
In an acid medium:
2 C r 2 O 3 + 2 H 2 O + 3 O 2 4 C r 2 O 7 2 + 4 H + Δ G 0 < 0
These reactions (1) and (2) are pH sensitive and can be accelerated in metal soils such as those containing cerium and manganese [110,111]. To avert Cr (VI) contamination and ensure premium collagen quality, collagen extraction from chromed wastes involves acid, basic, enzymatic hydrolysis [112], and combined methods [113,114]. These extraction processes require controlling pH and keeping temperatures between 70 °C and boiling. These unique measurements during hydrolysis, as supposed, increase the production costs. In these processes, protein yields vary from 25 to 30%; likewise, high-quality gelatins have been obtained that can compete in price with commercial gelatins [115].
A notable collagen purification method by Chaudhary and Pati [116] involved protease, α-amylase, and lime to treat a 3:1 water–collagen mix at different times and temperatures with a maximum recovery of 12%. Birds fed with diets replacing soybean meals with 20% and 30% protein hydrolysate exhibited more significant weight gain than those on a standard diet. Heavy metal tests further confirmed that the meat’s chromium levels remained within 67.83 and 82.12 ppb, under safe limits.
Another method extracted collagen from dried wet blue remnants using 0.5 M acetic acid and 5 mM EDTA in a 1:10 weight/volume ratio for 24 h. The extracts were filtered and salted with NaCl to a final concentration of 0.9 M. The precipitate was dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid, reprecipitated with 0.9 M NaCl, then dissolved in a minimal volume of 0.1 M acetic acid and lyophilized. This process yielded acetic acid-soluble collagen at a rate of 6.15%. A SDS-PAGE analysis confirmed the collagen purity and identified it as type I, making this optimal for animal consumption [117].

3.3. Evaluation of Security of Recycled Solid Chromed Tannery Wastes for Animal Feed

Trace amounts of Cr (III) are integral to human metabolic functions. While the upper intake level for chromium has not been defined due to the absence of observed toxicities from food and prolonged high-dose supplement intake, recommended doses do vary. The recommendation for women aged 19–50 is 25 micrograms daily, increasing to 45 micrograms during lactation [118]. Meanwhile, the FDA advises an intake of 120 micrograms daily [119], whereas the no observed adverse effect level is 1468 mg kg−1-day−1 recommended by EPA [120]. Nonetheless, an excessive presence of heavy metals can lead to severe adverse impacts on human health [121]. Assuming that Cr (III) is the only contaminant, a 65 kg individual could safely consume up to 285 g of poultry daily. However, the potential conversion of Cr (III) to the more dangerous Cr (VI) during cooking raises genuine concerns about meat chemistry [122].
Hexavalent chromium, or Cr (VI), is particularly hazardous; prolonged exposition to this ion can lead to significant health issues such as skin disorders, respiratory problems, gastrointestinal tract damage, provoking cancer, and severe DNA damage depending on the exposure route [123]. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard has set the maximum allowable dose level for Cr (VI) at 8.2 µg day−1 [124]. However, findings by Mazumder et al. [125] sounded alarm bells. Chickens fed on tannery waste-derived protein showed Cr (VI) levels between 86 and 177 µg kg−1 in over 25% of samples, potentially exceeding the safety threshold [125]. Such findings cast serious doubt on using chromed waste residues in animal feeds.
Interestingly, if present in feed at concentrations below 0.6 mg mL−1 (maximum 0.46 μg Cr mL−1), chrome hydrolysates have no adverse effects on zebrafish embryo development. This safety with zebrafish embryos is consistent across various extraction methods such as alkaline, enzymatic, or combined, even when extracted collagen contains 783 mg kg−1 of chromium [126].
In Bangladesh, chrome-containing constituents such as raw skin trimmings and wet blue scraps are used in poultry feed due to their high protein content. However, there is a rising concern over chromium contamination in poultry, posing potential risks to human consumers. A study by Ahmed et al. revealed that while specific poultry feed components maintained chromium within safe limits, others showcased alarmingly high concentrations. The experiments with broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) fed on chrome-infused feed revealed that raw skin trimmings and several poultry feed samples contained chromium levels below 0.03 mg kg−1. In contrast, wet blue shaving dust, starter feed (FS10), and grower feed (FS11) exhibited significantly elevated chromium concentrations, ranging from 3.02 to a staggering 29,854.4 mg kg−1 [127].
Moreover, processes applied to these tannery wastes did not reduce chromium concentration to safe levels. In the case of chickens consuming these feeds, chromium accumulation ranged between 0.42 and 0.84 mg kg−1 across various body parts. Such levels surpass the daily adequate intake for humans. Crucially, for broiler chicken feed, regulations stipulate that total chromium from supplemental sources should not exceed 0.2 mg kg−1 [128]. This study underlined the need for stricter control measures in feed formulations to safeguard human health. This concern was echoed in the research by Bari et al. [129], where broiler chicken, desi chicken, and free-ranging chicken were fed chromium shavings, with chromium concentrations varying from 0.27 to 0.98 mg/kg and lead concentrations ranging from 10.27 to 10.36 mg kg−1. Given that these chromium concentrations exceeded the recommended dose of 0.2 mg kg−1, the findings highlighted potential risks for humans consuming poultry fed with chromed tannery waste-based concentrates.
Silva et al. investigation further highlighted the risks of using wet blue in animal feeds. Upon feeding 48 Wistar diets containing 0 to 50% of tannery chromed wastes, adverse effects on the animals’ weight gain and kidney impacts were observed. The damage was directly proportional to the concentration of wet blue. The injuries were even worse with diets that replaced 25% to 50% of the weight with previously purified wastes (80% less chrome). The authors recommend removing at least 99% of chrome to consider wet blue for animal feed [130].
However, not all tannery waste derivatives pose risks. A study on delimed tannery fleshing hydrolysates, processed through acid hydrolysis and fermentation, showed promise. The investigation used male Wistar rats fed diets up to 15% of these hydrolysates. The study comprised acute toxicity assessments over 15 days and subacute evaluations spanning 30 days. The biochemical examinations of all serum, liver, and urine samples showed no notable alterations. This consistency was also evident in the liver histology outcomes, comparable to those from the control group. Thus, the study conclusively determined that incorporating up to 15% of delimed tannery fleshing hydrolysates into diets is safe, making them a valuable protein-rich ingredient for livestock feed formulations [131].
Lastly, a study assessing tannery waste protein concentrate as a potential replacement for a commercial protein named Jasoprot in cattle feed revealed optimistic results. Twelve cattle were subjected to various diets. The results indicated that diets with tannery waste protein concentrate significantly improved weight gain and profitability. Notably, the concentrate was free of aflatoxin and met typical beef chemical standards, including safe chromium levels under 24 ng g−1 (2 μg/serving). Organoleptic scores remained consistent across diets, suggesting no compromise in meat quality. Thus, combined with Jasoprot, tannery waste protein concentrate emerged as a cost-effective substitute in the cattle industry without affecting meat or carcass quality [132,133].
In Figure 4, a unanimous agreement among the surveyed authors indicates the benefits of tallow in animal diets. D’Agaro, E. remains the outlier for untanned wastes, not finding compelling evidence to use collagen from these residues in animal feed [72]. The predominant concern with chromed tannery wastes lies in the high chromium levels in extracted collagen, potentially endangering humans eating such meat. While studies by Silva et al. [130], Jini et al. [131], Jahangir-Alam et al. [133], and Zhao et al. [126] saw no issues with tannery wastes, five other researchers identified chromed wastes as dietary risks for animals. This emphasizes the need for effective dechroming before using tannery residues in animal feeds.
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of researchers’ views on recycling untanned and tanned wastes and tallow. The central section lists authors; the right side indicates nonrecommended uses, and the left side shows positive usage recommendations [71,72,73,74,91,92,93,94,95,116,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133].
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of researchers’ views on recycling untanned and tanned wastes and tallow. The central section lists authors; the right side indicates nonrecommended uses, and the left side shows positive usage recommendations [71,72,73,74,91,92,93,94,95,116,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133].
Processes 11 02965 g004

3.4. Analysis of Global Leather Waste Trade Data

According to the United Nations Comtrade database and Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) [134,135], the trade of leather waste, leather dust, and raw animal hides saw steady growth in their business between 2020 and 2021. In global trade, leather waste occupied the 1200th position as the most traded product, with a cumulative trade value of USD 37,500,000 in 2021.
China is the top exporter, primarily due to its manufacturing prowess, with Indonesia as the leading importer, as shown in Figure 5. This highlights the significance of leather waste trade, potential growth, or partnerships based on trade dynamics. While the exact volumes of tannery wastes used for animal feed are unclear, their global economic impact is evident. Bangladesh uses tanning residues for poultry feed for economic reasons, but its safety needs further study. A wealth of waste exists for animal feed, with ample suppliers available [135].

3.5. Economic Implications of Dechroming Tannery Waste Residues

Collagen extraction and chrome recovery from tannery residues are understudied, with most data from older research or being proprietary; see Table 6. Environmental regulations prioritize chromium recovery from wastewater. Untanned collagen-rich residues, typically sent to gelatin manufacturers, are easier to recycle than tanned residues. The latter requires intensive processing compared to simple hydrolysis. Pretreatments help to reduce chromed residue purification costs [136], and after solubilizing the solid wastes, the recovery of chromium can be performed in dechroming plants. Low et al. developed a technology where an imprinted polymer bead can recover chromium from tanning liquor, improving the sustainability and efficiency of the tanning industry by reducing contamination in waterways. The economic analysis, based on an industrial-scale chromium recovery plant designed to process 5000 L of tanning liquor per hour, shows incomes, and the author recommends this plant for medium- or high-throughput enterprises. An alternative solution [137], especially in regions with multiple small tanneries, is establishing a centralized chromium recovery plant.
Buljan [138] stated that a central chrome recovery unit in Santa Croce sull’Arno, Italy, was established, recovering 490 tons of Cr (III) 2000 for USD 1.45 million. While India had about 100 chrome recovery units using magnesium oxide, many ceased operations due to leather quality and cost concerns, similar to China.
Khan et al. deemed the chromium recycling plant at Riaz Tanneries economically and environmentally beneficial. Despite its environmental importance, another study by Khan et al. found the plant’s financial model unviable without adjustments, such as alternative machinery suppliers and better integration with tannery operations [139].
The feasibility of industrial-scale dechroming processes depends on the industry, chosen method, and factors such as regional differences, available technology, and research advancements, as illustrated in Table 6. Some processes may be more profitable in certain countries due to these variables.

4. Conclusions

Collagen, which makes up 21.5% of rawhide trimmings, can be extracted, achieving up to a 75% yield, resulting in products with notable antioxidant properties. Remarkably, replacing traditional fishmeal with 50% fermented tannery fleshing flour in Labeo rohita diets led to promising growth and nutritional outcomes. Additionally, using fleshing-derived flour in broiler chick diets showed no adverse effects and increased profitability by USD 0.13 per kilogram of live weight.
Tallow, extracted from untanned tannery wastes using advanced techniques such as hydrolysis and fermentation, can achieve up to a 98% yield. Feeds enriched with this tallow have demonstrated enhanced growth in broilers and lambs when compared to standard diets. The positive results in animal development suggest the potential of harnessing tallow from untanned tannery residues.
However, a significant concern arises from chromium solid waste. Most experts believe these wastes need rigorous purification to remove residual chromium before being used in animal feed formulations. The challenge lies in the absence of a foolproof process to purify the extracted collagen and concerns about potential human contamination. Therefore, more research is essential before endorsing such residues for animal nutrition.
Untanned tannery residues present more opportunities than tanned ones to serve as animal feed sources. While the potential of tannery-derived tallow is evident, more in-depth exploration is required, especially concerning the purification of chromed residues for animal feed.

5. Future Research Prospects

The utilization of tannery waste in animal feed presents both opportunities and challenges. Critical areas for future research include a more profound economic analysis of this practice, an understanding of its impact on animal productivity, and a thorough cost–benefit assessment. Additionally, the development of cost-effective chromium purification methods and studies on potential chromium conversion during food preparation are essential to ensure the safety and viability of this approach. Addressing these research gaps is crucial for the sustainable and safe adoption of tannery waste in animal feed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.E.F.T.; supervision, N.E.F.T. and H.B.M.; literature search, N.E.F.T. and H.B.M.; material preparation, N.E.F.T. and H.B.M.; methodology, N.E.F.T.; data acquisition, N.E.F.T.; data interpretation, N.E.F.T.; writing—original draft preparation, N.E.F.T.; writing—review and final editing, N.E.F.T. and H.B.M.; supervision, H.B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research and Development Directorate, Technical University of Ambato to support the Investigation Project SFFCIAL07 “Proyecto Reciclaje de Residuos Wet-Blue para Producir un Adhesivo para Zapatos”.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Research and Development Directorate, Technical University of Ambato to fund the Investigation Project SFFCIAL07 “Proyecto Reciclaje de Residuos Wet-Blue para Producir un Adhesivo Para Zapatos”. ChatGPT (GPT-3, 5, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model) and Grammarly have been used to improve writing style and grammar, and maps were created using http://mapinseconds.com/ (accessed on 10 August 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. OEC—The Observatory of Economic Complexity Animal Food. Available online: https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/animal-food (accessed on 6 August 2023).
  2. OEC—The Observatory of Economic Complexity Dog or Cat Food (Retail). Available online: https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/dog-or-cat-food-retail?redirect=true (accessed on 6 August 2023).
  3. OEC—The Observatory of Economic Complexity Food Waste and Animal Feed. Available online: https://oec.world/en/profile/sitc/food-waste-and-animal-feed (accessed on 6 August 2023).
  4. Shurson, G.C. “What a Waste”—Can We Improve Sustainability of Food Animal Production Systems by Recycling Food Waste Streams into Animal Feed in an Era of Health, Climate, and Economic Crises? Sustainability 2020, 12, 7071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rahmani, M.; Azadbakht, M.; Dastar, B.; Esmaeilzadeh, E. Production of Animal Feed from Food Waste or Corn? Analyses of Energy and Exergy. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 20, 101213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dou, Z.; Toth, J.D.; Westendorf, M.L. Food Waste for Livestock Feeding: Feasibility, Safety, and Sustainability Implications. Glob. Food Sec. 2018, 17, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Our World in Data. Feed Required to Produce One Kilogram of Meat or Dairy Product. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/feed-required-to-produce-one-kilogram-of-meat-or-dairy-product (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  8. ALTECH. 2020 Global Feed Survey. 2020. Available online: https://www.alltech.com/sites/default/files/GFS_Brochure_2020.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2023).
  9. Our World in Data. Share of Cereals Allocated to Animal Feed. 2020. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-cereals-animal-feed?time=2020 (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  10. IFIF-FAO. International Feed Industry Federation—IFIF/FAO Manual ‘Good Practices for the Feed Sector’. Available online: https://ifif.org/our-work/project/ifif-fao-feed-manual/ (accessed on 29 September 2023).
  11. Loyola, C.; Papadimitriou, C.; Dettling, J. LCA of Waste-to-Feed Diets for Laying Hens. 2021. Available online: https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/8ddrh2pmtk_WWF_Food_Waste_As_Feed_LCA_Report.pdf?_ga=2.107023367.422577038.1697078295-1311783399.1696051296 (accessed on 2 August 2023).
  12. Clark, M.; Tilman, D. Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Production Systems, Agricultural Input Efficiency, and Food. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 064016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Our World in Data. Number of Cattle, 2016 to 2020. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cattle-livestock-count-heads?tab=table&time=2016.2020 (accessed on 28 September 2022).
  14. Mozhiarasi, V.; Natarajan, T.S. Slaughterhouse and Poultry Wastes: Management Practices, Feedstocks for Renewable energy production, and recovery of value added products. In Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Patel, K.; Munir, D.; Santos, R.M. Beneficial Use of Animal Hides for Abattoir and Tannery Waste Management: A Review of Unconventional, Innovative, and Sustainable Approaches. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 1807–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. UN-FAO. World Statistical Compendium for Raw Hides and Skins, Leather and Leather Footwear. 1993–2012; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013; ISBN 9789251092132. Available online: https://www.fao.org/markets-and-trade/publications/detail/en/c/1438160/ (accessed on 6 August 2023).
  17. Thanikaivelan, P.; Rao, J.R.; Nair, U.; Ramasami, T.; Nair, B.U. Recent Trends in Leather Making: Processes, Problems, and Pathways Recent Trends in Leather Making: Processes, Problems, and Pathways. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 35, 37–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Buljan, J.; Reich, G.; Ludvik, J. Mass Balance in Leather Processing; UNIDO: Vienna, Austria, 2000; Available online: https://leatherpanel.org/sites/default/files/publications-attachments/mass_balance.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2023).
  19. Vinicius, C.; Rigueto, T.; Rosseto, M.; Dal, D.; Krein, C.; Elisangela, B.; Ostwald, P.; Avila Massuda, L.; Zanella, B.B.; Dettmer, A. Alternative Uses for Tannery Wastes: A Review of Environmental, Sustainability, and Science. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2020, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korpe, S.; Rao, P.V. Application of Advanced Oxidation Processes and Cavitation Techniques for Treatment of Tannery Wastewater—A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Guo, R.; Lu, W.; Zhu, D. Research Progress on Resource Utilization of Leather Solid Waste. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2019, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nur-A-Tomal, M.S.; Biswal, S.; Pahlevani, F.; Sahajwalla, V. Recycling Tannery Solid Wastes as an Alternative Carbon Resource for Ironmaking. J. Mater. Cycles Waste. Manag. 2022, 24, 2030–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oliveira, L.C.A.; Gonçalves, M.; Oliveira, D.Q.L.; Guerreiro, M.C.; Guilherme, L.R.G.; Dallago, R.M. Solid Waste from Leather Industry as Adsorbent of Organic Dyes in Aqueous-Medium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 141, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oliveira, D.Q.L.; Gonçalves, M.; Oliveira, L.C.A.; Guilherme, L.R.G. Removal of As(V) and Cr (VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using Solid Waste from Leather Industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Imam, S.; Bilbao-Sainz, C.; Chiou, B.-S.; Glenn, G.; Orts, W. Biobased Adhesives, Gums, Emulsions, and Binders: Current Trends and Future Prospects. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2013, 27, 18–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bufalo, G.; Molino, B.; Ambrosone, L. Selection of Tanned-Leather Waste in Recovering Novel Raw Material for Manufacturing Rubber Artifacts: Towards a Zero-Waste Condition. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Parisi, M.; Nanni, A.; Colonna, M. Recycling of Chrome-Tanned Leather and Its Utilization as Polymeric Materials and in Polymer-Based Composites: A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mikula, K.; Konieczka, M.; Taf, R.; Skrzypczak, D.; Izydorczyk, G.; Moustakas, K.; Kułażyński, M.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Tannery Waste as a Renewable Source of Nitrogen for Production of Multicomponent Fertilizers with Biostimulating Properties. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 8759–8777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Skrzypczak, D.; Szopa, D.; Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; Baśladyńska, S.; Hoppe, V.; Pstrowska, K.; Wzorek, Z.; Kominko, H.; Kułażyński, M.; et al. Tannery Waste-Derived Biochar as a Carrier of Micronutrients Essential to Plants. Chemosphere 2022, 294, 133720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guilherme Esteves Nogueira, F.; Alves de Castro, I.; Amaral de Souza, G.; Nogueira, F.G.; Castro, I.A.; Bastos, A.R.; Souza, G.A.; de Carvalho, J.G.; Oliveira, L.C. Recycling of Solid Waste Rich in Organic Nitrogen from Leather Industry: Mineral Nutrition of Rice Plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 186, 1064–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yoseph, Z.; Gladstone Christopher, J.; Assefa Demessie, B.; Tamil Selvi, A.; Sreeram, K.J.; Raghava Rao, J. Extraction of Elastin from Tannery Wastes: A Cleaner Technology for Tannery Waste Management. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumari, P.; Sen, S.; Suneetha, V. Production of Glue from Tannery Effluent by Physical, Chemical and Biological Methods. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2016, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pan, F.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Wang, C.; Lin, W. Leather Wastes into High-Value Chemicals: Keratin-Based Retanning Agents via UV-Initiated Polymerization. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 383, 135492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, X.; Zhu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.J.; Zhu, X. Novel Gelatin-Based Eco-Friendly Adhesive with a Hyperbranched Cross-Linked Structure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 5500–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Zhao, W.; Dang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Bio-Inspired Gelatin-Based Adhesive Modified with Waterborne Polyurethane on Click Chemistry. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 2747–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yorgancioglu, A.; Onem, E.; Basaran, B. Preparation, Characterization and Application of Lubricating Protein Filler for Sustainable Leather Production. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 18, 1946–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, B.; Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, G.; Li, Q.; Wang, M.; Wang, M. Extraction of Chromium from Tannery Sewage Sludge Extraction of Chromium from Tannery Sewage Sludge. Can. Metall. Q. 2022, 61, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shukla, A.; Mahmood, Z.; Singh, L.K. Studies on Recovery of Heavy Metals from Tannery Wastewater. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2021, 13, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bykovsky, N.A.; Kantor, E.A.; Rahman, P.A.; Puchkova, L.N.; Fanakova, N.N. Removal of Sulfides from Tannery-Sourced Wastewaters. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth. Environ. Sci. 2019, 350, 012030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mella, B.; Glanert, A.C.; Gutterres, M. Removal of Chromium from Tanning Wastewater and Its Reuse. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2015, 95, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Religa, P.; Kowalik, A.; Gierycz, P. Effect of Membrane Properties on Chromium(III) Recirculation from Concentrate Salt Mixture Solution by Nanofiltration. Desalination 2011, 274, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shivasankaran, N.; Balan, A.V.; Sankar, S.P.; Magibalan, S.; Dinesh, C.M. Removal of Hydrogen Sulphide and Odour from Tannery & Textile Effluents. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 21, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sodhi, V.; Bansal, A.; Jha, M.K. Excess Sludge Disruption and Pollutant Removal from Tannery Effluent by Upgraded Activated Sludge System. Biores Technol. 2018, 263, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sathish, M.; Madhan, B.; Raghava, J. Leather Solid Waste: An Eco-Benign Raw Material for Leather Chemical Preparation—A Circular Economy Example. Waste Manag. 2019, 87, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hedberg, Y.S. Chromium and Leather: A Review on the Chemistry of Relevance for Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Chromium. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2020, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Velusamy, M.; Chakali, B.; Ganesan, S.; Tinwala, F.; Shanmugham Venkatachalam, S. Investigation on Pyrolysis and Incineration of Chrome-Tanned Solid Waste from Tanneries for Effective Treatment and Disposal: An Experimental Study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 29778–29790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gore, C.T.; Omwoma, S.; Chen, W.; Song, Y.F. Interweaved LDH/PAN Nanocomposite Films: Application in the Design of Effective Hexavalent Chromium Adsorption Technology. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 794–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Naumczyk, J.H.; Kucharska, M.A. Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering Electrochemical Treatment of Tannery Wastewater-Raw, Coagulated, and Pretreated by AOPs. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2017, 52, 649–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, J.; Wu, Q.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Guo, H. Tannery Wastewater Treatment: Conventional and Promising Processes, an Updated 20-Year Review. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2022, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, P.; Singh, S.P.; Parakh, S.K.; Tong, Y.W. Health Hazards of Hexavalent Chromium (Cr (VI)) and Its Microbial Reduction. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mwinyihija, M.; Meharg, A.; Dawson, J.; Strachan, N.J.C.; Killham, K. An Ecotoxicological Approach to Assessing the Impact of Tanning Industry Effluent on River Health. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 50, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raji, P.; Samrot, A.V.; Bhavya, K.S.; Sharan, M.; Priya, S.; Paulraj, P. Greener Approach for Leather Tanning Using Less Chrome with Plant Tannins and Tannins Mediated Nanoparticles. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caliari, P.C.; Pacheco, M.J.; Ciríaco, L.; Lopes, A. Tannery Wastewater: Organic Load and Sulfide Removal Dynamics by Electrochemical Oxidation at Different Anode Materials. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2019, 14, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Seabra, I.J.; Chim, R.B.; Salgueiro, P.; Braga, M.E.M.; de Sousa, H.C. Influence of Solvent Additives on the Aqueous Extraction of Tannins from Pine Bark: Potential Extracts for Leather Tanning. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 1169–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rosu, L.; Varganici, C.D.; Crudu, A.-M.; Rosu, D. Influence of Different Tanning Agents on Bovine Leather Thermal Degradation. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 134, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pantazopoulou, E.; Zouboulis, A. Chemical Toxicity and Ecotoxicity Evaluation of Tannery Sludge Stabilized with Ladle Furnace Slag. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 216, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Araujo, A.S.F.; de Melo, W.J.; Araujo, F.F.; Van den Brink, P.J. Long-Term Effect of Composted Tannery Sludge on Soil Chemical and Biological Parameters. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 41885–41892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Noorzai, S. Extraction and Characterization of Collagen from Bovine Hides for Preparation of Biodegradable Films, 2020. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 5687–5698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Taylor, M.M.; Cabeza, L.F.; Brown, E.M.; Marmer, W.N. Chemical Modification of Protein Products Isolated from Chromium-Containing Solid Tannery Waste and Resultant Influence on Physical and Functional Properties. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 1999, 94, 171–181. [Google Scholar]
  60. Amertaning, D.; Bachrudin, Z.J.; Chin, K.B.; Erwanto, Y. Characteristics of Gelatin Extracted from Indonesian Local Cattle Hides Using Acid and Base Curing. Pak. J. Nutr. 2019, 18, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Adhikari, B.; Chae, M.; Bressler, D. Utilization of Slaughterhouse Waste in Value-Added Applications: Recent Advances in the Development of Wood Adhesives. Polymers 2018, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Šánek, L.; Pecha, J.; Kolomazník, K.; Bařinová, M. Biodiesel Production from Tannery Fleshings: Feedstock Pretreatment and Process Modeling. Fuel 2015, 148, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chowdhury, M.W.; Nabi, M.N.; Arefin, M.A.; Rashid, F.; Islam, M.T.; Gudimetla, P.; Muyeen, S.M. Recycling Slaughterhouse Wastes into Potential Energy and Hydrogen Sources: An Approach for the Future Sustainable Energy. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 19, 101133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chakawa, D.P.; Nkala, M.; Hlabangana, N.; Muzenda, E. The Novel Use of Calcium Sulphate Dihydrate as a Bleaching Agent for Pre-Processing Beef Tallow in the Soap Manufacturing Process. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 35, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thazeem, B.; Umesh, M.; Mani, V.M.; Beryl, G.P.; Preethi, K. Biotransformation of Bovine Tannery Fleshing into Utilizable Product with Multifunctionalities. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2020, 39, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Puhazhselvan, P.; Pandi, A.; Sujiritha, P.B.; Antony, G.S.; Jaisankar, S.N.; Ayyadurai, N.; Saravanan, P.; Kamini, N.R. Recycling of Tannery Fleshing Waste by a Two Step Process for Preparation of Retanning Agent. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 157, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bhaskar, N.; Sakhare, P.Z.; Suresh, P.V.; Gowda, L.; Mahendrakar, N. Biostabilization and Preparation of Protein Hydrolysates from Delimed Leather Fleshings. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2007, 66, 1054–1063. [Google Scholar]
  68. Muralidharan, V.; Palanivel, S.; Balaraman, M. Turning Problem into Possibility: A Comprehensive Review on Leather Solid Waste Intra-Valorization Attempts for Leather Processing. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 367, 133021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Masilamani, D.; Madhan, B.; Shanmugam, G.; Palanivel, S.; Narayan, B. Extraction of Collagen from Raw Trimming Wastes of Tannery: A Waste to Wealth Approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pérez-Aguilar, H.; Lacruz-Asaro, M.; Arán-Ais, F. Towards a Circular Bioeconomy: High Added Value Protein Recovery and Recycling from Animal Processing by-Products. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 28, 100667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Thazeem, B.; Preethi, K.; Umesh, M.; Radhakrishnan, S. Nutritive Characterization of Delimed Bovine Tannery Fleshings for Their Possible Use as a Proteinaceous Aqua Feed Ingredient. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 1289–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. D’agaro, E. Alternative Protein Sources in Sea Bass Nutrition Alternative Protein Sources in Sea Bass Nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 2 (Suppl. S1), 637–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alam, M.J.; Amin, M.R.; Samad, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Wadud, M.A. Use of Tannery Wastes in the Diet of Broiler. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 15, 1773–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rai, A.K.; General, T.; Bhaskar, N.; Suresh, P.V.; Sakhare, P.Z.; Halami, P.M.; Gowda, L.R.; Mahendrakar, N.S. Utilization of Tannery Fleshings: Optimization of Conditions for Fermenting Delimed Tannery Fleshings Using Enterococcus Faecium HAB01 by Response Surface Methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhou, C.; Wang, Y. Recent Progress in the Conversion of Biomass Wastes into Functional Materials for Value-Added Applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2020, 21, 787–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wood, J.D.; Enser, M.; Fisher, A.V.; Nute, G.R.; Sheard, P.R.; Richardson, R.I.; Hughes, S.I.; Whittington, F.M. Fat Deposition, Fatty Acid Composition and Meat Quality: A Review. Meat. Sci. 2008, 78, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guerrero, A.; Muela, E.; Valero, M.V.; Prado, I.N.; Campo, M.M.; Olleta, J.L.; Catalán, O.; Sañudo, C. Effect of the Type of Dietary Fat When Added as an Energy Source on Animal Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Intensively Reared Friesian Steers. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2016, 56, 1144–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xie, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y. A Low Trans Margarine Fat Analog to Beef Tallow for Healthier Formulations: Optimization of Enzymatic Interesterification Using Soybean Oil and Fully Hydrogenated Palm Oil. Food Chem. 2018, 255, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Knoema. Tallow Production in the World. Available online: https://knoema.com/data/agriculture-indicators-production+tallow (accessed on 29 September 2022).
  80. Ockerman, H.W.; Basu, L. By-Products | Hides and Skins. In Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 125–136. ISBN 9780123847317. [Google Scholar]
  81. DeFow, C.; Zabik, M.; Gray, J.I. Fractionated Edible Beef Tallow as a Deep-Fat Frying Medium for French Fries. J. Food Sci. 1981, 46, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ariaeenejad, S.; Kavousi, K.; Mamaghani, A.S.A.; Ghasemitabesh, R.; Hosseini Salekdeh, G. Simultaneous Hydrolysis of Various Protein-Rich Industrial Wastes by a Naturally Evolved Protease from Tannery Wastewater Microbiota. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 815, 152796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rombenso, A.N.; Trushenski, J.T.; Schwarz, M.H. Beef Tallow Is Suitable as a Primary Lipid Source in Juvenile Florida Pompano Feeds. Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 23, 1274–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pathan, E.; Ahmed, S.; Shakil, S.R. Utilization of Limed Flesh Through Fat Extraction and Soap Preparation. Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci. 2019, 4, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kumar Verma, S.; Prakash, S.C. Current Trends in Solid Tannery Waste Management. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022, 43, 805–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dayanandan, A.; Rani, S.H.V.; Shanmugavel, M.; Gnanamani, A.; Rajakumar, G.S. Enhanced Production of Aspergillus Tamarii Lipase for Recovery of Fat from Tannery Fleshings. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 44, 1089–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Devaraj, K.; Aathika, S.; Mani, Y.; Thanarasu, A.; Periyasamy, K.; Periyaraman, P.; Velayutham, K.; Subramanian, S. Experimental Investigation on Cleaner Process of Enhanced Fat-Oil Extraction from Alkaline Leather Fleshing Waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cunha, A.F.; Caetano, N.S.; Ramalho, E.; Crispim, A. Fat Extraction from Fleshings—Optimization of Operating Conditions. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Onem, E.; Renner, M.; Prokein, M. Green Separation and Characterization of Fatty Acids from Solid Wastes of Leather Industry in Supercritical Fluid CO2. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 22213–22223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mad Barn Tallow Beef—Equine Nutrition Analysis. Available online: https://madbarn.com/feeds/tallow-beef/ (accessed on 8 August 2023).
  91. Okur, N. The Effects of Soy Oil, Poultry Fat and Tallow with Fixed Energy : Protein Ratio on Broiler Performance. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2020, 63, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wickramasuriya, S.S.; Macelline, S.P.; Cho, H.M.; Hong, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Heo, J.M. Physiological Effects of a Tallow-Incorporated Diet Supplemented with an Emulsifier and Microbial Lipases on Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 583998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ahmed, S.; Khatun, J.; Manirul Islam, M.; Kabirul Islam Khan, M.; Niaz Mahmud, S.M.; Abdullah Al Noman, M.; Zohorul Islam, M. Effect of Beef Tallow on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Composition, and Lipid Profile of Growing Lambs. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2015, 2, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. López-Aguirre, S.; Pinos-Rodríguez, J.M.; Vicente, J.G.; Rangel, H.L.; de la Cruz, A.; Domínguez-Vara, I.A. Effects of Dietary Beef Tallow on Performance, Rumen Fermentation, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Growing Lambs. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 49, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. FDA. Feed Ban Enhancement: Implementation Questions and Answers. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/bovine-spongiform-encephalopathy/feed-ban-enhancement-implementation-questions-and-answers (accessed on 29 September 2022).
  96. Catalina, M.; Attenburrow, G.; Cot, J.; Covington, A.D.; Antunes, A.P.M. Isolation and Characterization of Gelatin Obtained from Chrome-Tanned Shavings. Available online: https://www.aaqtic.org.ar/congresos/istanbul2006/Visual%20Displays/V%2020%20-%20Isolation%20and%20characterization%20of%20gelatin%20obtained%20from%20chrome-tanned%20shavings.pdf (accessed on 29 September 2022).
  97. Silva, R.C.; de Resende Júnior, J.C.; de Lima, R.F.; de Sousa, R.V.; de Oliveira, L.C.A.; Daniel, J.L.P.; de Oliveira Moreira, A. Potential of Wet Blue Leather Waste for Ruminant Feeding. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2012, 41, 1070–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Famielec, S. Chromium Concentrate Recovery from Solid Tannery Waste in a Thermal Process. Materials 2020, 13, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gotschall, M.G. Making Big Money from Garbage: How Companies Are Forming International Alliances to Recycle Trash for Profit. Columbia J. World Bus. 1996, 31, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fortune. Tanneries to Start Recycling Waste for Profit. Available online: https://addisfortune.news/tanneries-to-start-recycling-waste-for-profit/2020 (accessed on 28 September 2023).
  101. The Daily Star. Not Waste Anymore: Maiden Shipment of Solid Tannery Soon|Daily Star. Available online: https://www.thedailystar.net/business/economy/news/not-waste-anymore-3128301 (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  102. Katsifas, E.A.; Giannoutsou, A.E.; Lambraki, A.M.; Barla, M.; Karagouni, A.A.D. Chromium Recycling of Tannery Waste through Microbial Fermentation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 31, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tushar Uddin, M.; Jaman Chowdhury, M.; Kanti Deb, A.; Hai Quadery, A. Extraction of Polypeptide Solution from Tannery Solid Waste (Chrome Shavings) and Its Application as Poultry Feed. IOSR J. Appl. Chem. 2016, 9, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ocak, B. Film-Forming Ability of Collagen Hydrolysate Extracted from Leather Solid Wastes with Chitosan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 4643–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ammasi, R.; Victor, J.S.; Chellan, R.; Chellappa, M. Amino Acid Enriched Proteinous Wastes: Recovery and Reuse in Leather Making. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 5793–5807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ferreira, M.J.; Almeida, M.F.; Sílvia, P.C.; Gomes, J.R.; Rodrigues, J.L. Alkaline Hydrolysis of Chromium Tanned Leather Scrap Fibers and Anaerobic Biodegradation of the Products. Waste Biomass Valorization 2014, 5, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Abebaw, G.; Abate, B. Chrome Tanned Leather Waste Dechroming Optimization for Potential Poultry Feed Additive Source: A Waste to Resources Approach of Feed for Future. J. Environ. Pollut. Manag. 2018, 1, 103. [Google Scholar]
  108. Santinon Scopel, B.; Restelatto, D.; Baldasso, C.; Dettmer, A.; Marlene, R.; Santana, C. Steam Explosion in Alkaline Medium for Gelatine Extraction from Chromium-Tanned Leather Wastes: Time Reduction and Process Optimization Steam Explosion in Alkaline Medium for Gelatine Extraction from Chromium-Tanned Leather Wastes: Time Reduction and Process Optimization. Environ. Technol. 2018, 41, 1857–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Popiolski, A.S.; Dallago, R.M.; Steffens, J.; Mignoni, M.L.; Venquiaruto, L.D.; Santos, D.; Duarte, F.A. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Cr from Residual Tannery Leather: Feasibility of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid as the Extraction Solution. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 16074–16080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Guo, S.; Yu, C.; Zhao, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Su, M.; Yang, X.; Yang, J. The Chromium Migration Risk from Tannery Sludge into Shallow Soil and Groundwater: Influence Factors, Modeling, and Microbial Response. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 374, 133776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Siddique, H.R.; Gupta, S.C.; Dhawan, A.; Murthy, R.C.; Saxena, D.K.; Chowdhuri, D.K. Genotoxicity of Industrial Solid Waste Leachates in Drosophila Melanogaster. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2005, 46, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Hinojosa, J.B.; Saldaña, L.M. Optimization of Alkaline Hydrolysis of Chrome Shavings to Recover Collagen Hydrolysate And Chromium Hydroxide. Leather Footwear J. 2020, 20, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sundar, V.J.; Raghavarao, J.; Muralidharan, C.; Mandal, A.B. Recovery and Utilization of Chromium-Tanned Proteinous Wastes of Leather Making: A Review Recovery and Utilization of Chromium-Tanned Proteinous Wastes of Leather Making: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 41, 2048–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Vallejo, J.S.; Almonacid, L.Y.; Agudelo, R.N.; Hernández, J.A.; Ortiz, Ó.L. Evaluación de La Hidrólisis Alcalina-Enzimática Para La Obtención de Colágeno Hidrolizado a Partir Virutas de Cuero Curtido. Rev. ION 2019, 32, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Alcance, B.S.; De Matos, E.F.; Berwig, K.H.; Detmer, A.; Baldasso, C. Optimización Del Proceso de Extracción de Proteínas de Residuos de Cuero Tanque Cromados Por Hidrólisis. In Proceedings of the XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Quimica, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil, 25–29 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  116. Chaudhary, R.; Pati, A. Poultry Feed Based on Protein Hydrolysate Derived from Chrome-Tanned Leather Solid Waste: Creating Value from Waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23, 8120–8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Savchuk, O.; Raksha, N.; Mokrousova, O.; Andreyeva, O. Extraction and Characterization of Collagen Obtained from Collagen-Containing Wastes of the Leather Industry. Solis State Phenom. 2017, 267, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc; National Academic Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Food and Drug Administration. Part 101: Food Labeling: Reference Daily Intakes. 1995. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=101.9 (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  120. Grevatt, P. Toxicological Review of Trivalent Chromium (CAS No. 16065-83-1). Available online: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P1006DAR.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1995+Thru+1999&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C95thru99%5CTxt%5C00000024%5CP1006DAR.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=Zy (accessed on 5 August 2023).
  121. Mitra, S.; Chakraborty, A.J.; Tareq, A.M.; Emran, T.B.; Nainu, F.; Khusro, A.; Idris, A.M.; Khandaker, M.U.; Osman, H.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; et al. Impact of Heavy Metals on the Environment and Human Health: Novel Therapeutic Insights to Counter the Toxicity. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Parvin, S.; Mazumder, L.T.; Hasan, S.; Rabbani, K.A.; Rahman, M.L. What Should We Do with Our Solid Tannery Waste. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 2017, 11, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Shin, D.Y.; Lee, S.M.; Jang, Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, C.M.; Cho, E.M.; Seo, Y.R. Adverse Human Health Effects of Chromium by Exposure Route: A Comprehensive Review Based on Toxicogenomic Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. OEHHA Proposition 65 Oral Maximum Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity for Chromium (Hexavalent Compounds). Available online: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/081210DraftMADLChromVI.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2023).
  125. Mazumder, L.T.; Hasan, S.; Rahman, L. Hexavalent Chromium in Tannery Solid Waste Based Poultry Feed in Bangladesh and Its Transfer to Food Chain. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 2013, 3, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhao, L.; Mu, S.; Wang, W.; Gu, H. Toxicity Evaluation of Collagen Hydrolysates from Chrome Shavings and Their Potential Use in the Preparation of Amino Acid Fertilizer for Crop Growth. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2022, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ahmed, S.; Zohra, F.T.; Khan, S.H.; Hashem, A. Chromium from Tannery Waste in Poultry Feed: A Potential Cradle to Transport Human Food Chain. Cogent Environ. Sci. 2017, 3, 1312767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Food and Drug Administration. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=573.304 (accessed on 4 August 2023).
  129. Bari, M.L.; Simol, H.A.; Khandoker, N.; Begum, R.; Sultana, U.N. Potential Human Health Risks of Tannery Waste-Contaminated Poultry Feed. J. Health Pollut. 2015, 5, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Silva, R.C.; de Resende Júnior, J.C.; Varaschin, M.S.; de Sousa, R.V.; Oliveira, L.C.A.; Daniel, J.L.P.; de Lima, R.F.; Moreiva, A.O. Chromium Poisoning in Rats Feeding on Tannery Residues. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2010, 50, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jini, R.; Bijinu, B.; Baskaran, V.; Bhaskar, N. Utilization of Solid Wastes from Tanneries as Possible Protein Source for Feed Applications: Acute and Sub-Acute Toxicological Studies to Assess Safety of Products Prepared from Delimed Tannery Fleshings. Waste Biomass Valorization 2016, 7, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Anderson, R.A.; Bryden, N.A.; Polansky, M.M. Dietary Chromium Intake—Freely Chosen Diets, Institutional Diets, and Individual Foods. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1992, 32, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jahangir-Alam, M.; Mufazzal-Hossain, M.; Anwarul-Haque Beg, M.; Nam, K.-C.; Lee, S.-S. Effects of Tannery Wastes on the Fattening of Growing Cattle, Carcass, and Meat Quality. Korean J. Food Sci. Animal. Resour. 2010, 30, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. United Nations. UN Comtrade Database. Available online: https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow?Frequency=A&Flows=X&CommodityCodes=TOTAL&Partners=0&Reporters=all&period=2022&AggregateBy=none&BreakdownMode=plus (accessed on 4 August 2023).
  135. The Observatory of Economic Complexity Leather Waste. Available online: https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/leather-waste (accessed on 4 August 2023).
  136. Fernández-Rodríguez, J.; Lorea, B.; González-Gaitano, G. Biological Solubilisation of Leather Industry Waste in Anaerobic Conditions: Effect of Chromium (III) Presence, Pre-Treatments and Temperature Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Low, A.; Holtz, N.; Madden, T.; Petcu, M.; Ericksen, R.; Slaughter, N.; Low, J.; Yu, M.; Lay, M.; Glasgow, G. Chromium Recovery from Tannery Wastewater Using Moleculary Imprinted Polymers: Water New Zealand. Available online: https://www.waternz.org.nz/Article?Action=View&Article_id=1387 (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  138. Buljan, J.; Fifteenth Session of the Leather and Leather Products Industry Panel. Costs of Waste Treatment. 2005. Available online: https://leatherpanel.org/sites/default/files/publications-attachments/costs_of_tannery_waste_treatment.pdf (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  139. Khan, M.R.; Naqvi, K.X. Down-Costing of Tannery Waste Water Chromium Recovery Plants in Pakistan: A Case Study of Techno-Economic Evaluation of a Chromium Recycling Plant. IJISET-Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Publications about tannery waste used for animal feed in the past 20 years reported in Scopus.
Figure 1. Publications about tannery waste used for animal feed in the past 20 years reported in Scopus.
Processes 11 02965 g001
Figure 2. Representation of key research articles on solid tannery waste recycling for animal feed production. The figure visualizes pivotal papers as interconnected nodes, each signifying its relevance in the field: (A) results from the search terms “tannery waste AND recycling”, (B) derived using “wet blue AND recycling”, (C) based on the words “beef tallow AND tanneries”. Each node represents an article, and the interconnections hint at related research or shared citations. Source: connected papers (accessed on 29 August 2023).
Figure 2. Representation of key research articles on solid tannery waste recycling for animal feed production. The figure visualizes pivotal papers as interconnected nodes, each signifying its relevance in the field: (A) results from the search terms “tannery waste AND recycling”, (B) derived using “wet blue AND recycling”, (C) based on the words “beef tallow AND tanneries”. Each node represents an article, and the interconnections hint at related research or shared citations. Source: connected papers (accessed on 29 August 2023).
Processes 11 02965 g002
Figure 3. Assessment of cowhide composition and identification of utilizable by-products in the tannery process [58].
Figure 3. Assessment of cowhide composition and identification of utilizable by-products in the tannery process [58].
Processes 11 02965 g003
Figure 5. Contemporary trade insights of leather waste—leading exporters (█) and prominent importers () in 2021 [134]; the embedded map shows the manufacture of leather around the world in 2015 in million square feet [135].
Figure 5. Contemporary trade insights of leather waste—leading exporters (█) and prominent importers () in 2021 [134]; the embedded map shows the manufacture of leather around the world in 2015 in million square feet [135].
Processes 11 02965 g005
Table 1. Classification of research articles based on the investigated topics.
Table 1. Classification of research articles based on the investigated topics.
Title of the ArticleTopic
1Use of tannery wastes in the diet of broilerFeed
2Protein recovery from tannery fleshings using proteases of chicken intestines for the animal feed industryRecycling
3Systems for chromium recirculation in tanneriesRecycling
4Chromium poisoning in rats feeding on tannery residuesToxicity
5Current trends in solid tannery waste managementRecycling
6Toxicity study in mice fed with corn produced in soil containing tannery sludge vermicompost and irrigated with domestic wastewaterToxicity
7Alternative protein sources in sea bass nutritionFeed
8Chromium contents linked to iron oxide at areas with tannery sludge disposalRecycling
9Enhanced production of Aspergillus tamarii lipase for recovery of fat from tannery fleshingsAnimal
10Poultry feed based on protein hydrolysate derived from chrome-tanned leather solid waste: creating value from wasteToxicity
11Effects of Leather Industry on Health and Recommendations for Improving the Situation in PakistanToxicity
12Genotoxicity of industrial solid waste leachates in Drosophila metanogasterToxicity
13An illustrative application of a prototype approach to evaluation of waste management options for the leather manufacturing industryRecycling
14In vitro antioxidant and antibacterial properties of hydrolyzed proteins of delimed tannery fleshings: comparison of acid hydrolysis and fermentation methodsRecycling
15Trace elements concentration in soil and plant within the vicinity of abandoned tanning sites in Bangladesh: an integrated chemometric approach for health risk assessmentToxicity
16An imaginary journey to the collagen molecule for a better understanding of leather waste treatmentsRecycling
17Histopathological changes studied in the liver and kidney of quail due to manifested by the different levels of chrome shaving replacing animal protein in the feed.Toxicity
18Production and potential uses of co-products from solid tannery wasteRecycling
19Chromium recycling of tannery waste through microbial fermentationRecycling
20Hydrolysis of tannery wastes to protein meal for animal feedstuffs: A process and product evaluationFeed
21Processing of leather waste: Pilot scale studies on chrome shavings. Isolation of potentially valuable protein products and chromiumFeed
22Chromium from tannery waste in poultry feed: A potential cradle to transport human food chainFeed
23Studies on recovery of chromium from tannery wastewater by Reverse OsmosisRecycling
24Leather solid waste: An eco-benign raw material for leather chemical preparation—A circular economy exampleRecycling
25Mathematical modeling and experimental studies on biochemical conversion of Cr (VI) of tannery effluent to Cr (III) in a chemostatFeed
26Microbial sorption studies for removal of trivalent chromium from model tanning bathRecycling
27Removal of organics and nutrients from tannery effluent by advanced integrated wastewater pond systems® technologyFeed
28Total control of chromium in tanneries—thermal decomposition of filtration cake from enzymatic hydrolysis of chrome shavingsRecycling
29Utilization of tannery fleshings: Optimization of conditions for fermenting delimed tannery fleshings using Enterococcus faecium HAB01 by response surface methodologyFeed
30Development of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) in a non-aerated SBRRecycling
31Utilization of Solid Wastes from Tanneries as Possible Protein Source for Feed Applications: Acute and Sub-Acute Toxicological Studies to Assess Safety of Products Prepared from Delimed Tannery FleshingsFeed
32Optimization of organic load for co-digestion of tannery solid waste in semi-continuous mode of operationRecycling
33Histopathological changes observed in the heart and gizzard of quail chicks Coturnix Coturnix japonica administrated by the different levels of chrome shavingFeed
34Chromium (Cr) Contamination of Poultry from Use of Tannery-Based Cr-Contaminated Feed Ingredients and Public Health and Environmental RisksFeed
35Removal of trivalent chromium contaminant from aqueous media using FAU-type zeolite membranesRecycling
36Biotransformation of bovine tannery fleshing into utilizable product with multi functionalitiesFeed
Table 3. Overview of research on utilizing nontanned fleshing wastes from tannery in animal feed formulations.
Table 3. Overview of research on utilizing nontanned fleshing wastes from tannery in animal feed formulations.
Authors DateType of StudyMain FindingsResults in AnimalsCite
Thazeem, B.; Preethi, K.; Umesh, M.; Radhakrishnan, S.
2018
The study type is experimental research where wet limed fleshings from bovine hides were treated and fermented, followed by the formulation of isonitrogenous diets for Labeo rohita, with varying replacement levels of fishmeal by fermented tannery fleshing flour. The ideal diet was then analyzed for multi-mycotoxins.The study found that the fermented tannery fleshing flour (FTF) contained ten essential and six nonessential amino acids. Fish fed with a diet that replaced fishmeal with 75% FTF (diet FTF3) showed the best growth performance, nutritional metrics, and body composition. Additionally, a multi-mycotoxin analysis of FTF3 confirmed the absence of harmful feed toxins in the diet.FTF3 diet helped to increase the size of fish from 1.57 to 9.54 cm and achieve an increment of 2.50 to 17.34 g kg−1 in body weight.
The study did not investigate the flavor, toxicity, and other variables of interest for the commercialization of FTF3.
The study suggested that diets based on tannery wastes can be a cost-effective, efficient, and safe protein alternative for aquatic animals.
[71]
D’agaro, E.
2003
The experimental research study, specifically a controlled growth trial of seabass fed varied diets, S1 and S2, including tannery fleshings, to evaluate their impact on growth. Diets containing tannery wastes S1 and S2 with 100 and 200 g kg−1, respectively.The primary finding of the study is that up to 40% of fishmeal (FM) in sea bass diets can be substituted with alfalfa concentrate without negatively impacting fish performance but not with tannery by-products.Fish fed with diets S2 and AV2, which replaced 40% of fishmeal with alternative protein sources, displayed the lowest specific growth rate, leading to poorer feed conversion ratio values. Despite these variations, the overall body composition of sea bass remained largely consistent by the experiment’s end.[72]
Alam, M.J.; Amin, M.R.; Samad, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Wadud, M.A.
2002
The type of study described is an experimental research study, specifically a controlled feeding trial. Diet 1 (10% protein concentrate), Diet 2 (5% PC + 5% tannery wastes), and Diet 3 (10% TW) for 144 days old Starbro broiler chicks.The study indicates that tannery waste can be a cost-effective alternative in broiler diets. While feed consumption, live weight, feed conversion ratio, and survivability remained consistent across diets, there were significant differences in production cost and profitability.Live weight, dressing percentage, neck, breast, thigh, drumstick, heart, liver, head and blood weights were almost similar between diets, but the profitability of Diet 1, Diet 2, and Diet 3 was 0.27, 0.90, and 1.27 USD kg−1, respectively.[73]
Rai, A.K.; General, T.; Bhaskar, N.; Suresh, P. V.; Sakhare, P.Z.; Halami, P.M.; Gowda, L.R.; Mahendrakar, N.S.
2010
The type of investigation described is an experimental research study specifically focused on optimization using response surface methodology (RSM) to enhance the fermentation process of tannery fleshings with a specific lactic acid bacterium (E. faecium HAB01).The ideal conditions determined were an inoculum of 12.5% (v/w), glucose at 17.5% (w/w), and a fermentation duration of 96 h at a temperature of 37 ± 1 °C to achieve the highest degree of hydrolysis of 92%.This study was not applied to feed animals but showed a good source of protein for animal food with better antioxidant properties than commercial animal diets. [74]
Table 5. Recovery of chromium from different processes.
Table 5. Recovery of chromium from different processes.
Recovery MethodInitialResultsCite
Microbial fermentation with Aspergillus carbonarius82.00
-
g kg−1 protein
g kg−1 chrome
* 68.40
* 28.00
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[102]
Hydrolysis with MgO and trypsin enzyme908.10
34.20
g kg−1 protein
g kg−1 chrome
646.30
1.47
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[103]
Enzymatic hydrolysis with alcalase-
-
g kg−1 protein
g kg−1 chrome
867.70
3.93
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[104]
Alkaline protease708.00
40.50
g kg−1 protein
g kg−1 chrome
-
-
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[105]
Pressure assisted hydrolysis with NaOH in an autoclave20.50
24.8
g kg−1 protein (N)
g kg−1 chrome
-
496.00
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[106]
Sodium and calcium hydroxide hydrolysis804.40
-
g kg−1 protein (N)
g kg−1 chrome oxide
570.00
0.0054
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[107]
Alkaline hydrolysis in steam explosion system with CaO146.00
45.60
g kg−1 protein (N)
g kg−1 chrome oxide
** 44.00
** 5.5
g kg−1 protein
mg kg−1 Cr3+
[108]
Ultrasound assisted with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid25.28g kg−1 chrome505.00mg kg−1 Cr3+[109]
* Original data: protein 68.4 g/L, Cr3+ 0.028 g/L; ** to compare the equivalence, 1 L = 1 kg was used.
Table 6. Cost of plants to dechrome tannery wastewater.
Table 6. Cost of plants to dechrome tannery wastewater.
Costs Related to the PlantOperating ConditionsPayback PeriodCountryCite
Year
Plant construction: USD 357,833
Maintenance costs: 4% of capital cost
Chromium value: USD 1.1 kg−1
Hazardous disposal savings: USD 74.5 TON−1
600 kg day−12.56 yearsNew Zealand[136]
Capital cost: USD 5 million
Chrome content in the spent liquor: 3–4 g L−1 as Cr2O3
Regenerated chrome liquor: USD 0.20 kg−1
Cr2O3 content: 9–10% by weight.
Effluent treatment: USD 2.6 m−3
Sludge production: 1600 TONS
Cost of landfilling: USD 66.8 TON−1
400–500 m3 day−1 of spent chrome liquor in an 8 h shift10 yearsBangladesh[137]
1981
2000
Initial fixed investment: USD 4083
Operating cost: USD 17,978
Benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio: 4.67,
Net present value (NPV): +USD 80,864
No data100 to 241 daysPakistan[138]
1994
2004
Pre-production expenditure: USD 10.199
Total initial fixed investment: USD 97.136
Pollution charges: USD 115.613
Total benefits in 2000–2001: USD 27.355
Benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio: 0.5
Net present value: −USD 176.431
Total annual operating cost: USD 176.43
No data36 yearsPakistan[139]
2007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Flores Tapia, N.E.; Brito Moina, H. Exploring Tannery Solid Wastes as a Source of Animal Feed. Processes 2023, 11, 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102965

AMA Style

Flores Tapia NE, Brito Moina H. Exploring Tannery Solid Wastes as a Source of Animal Feed. Processes. 2023; 11(10):2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102965

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flores Tapia, Nelly Esther, and Hannibal Brito Moina. 2023. "Exploring Tannery Solid Wastes as a Source of Animal Feed" Processes 11, no. 10: 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102965

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop