Next Article in Journal
Isolated Resistance Training Programs to Improve Peripheral Muscle Function in Outpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Intriguing Connections between von Willebrand Factor, ADAMTS13 and Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Outcomes of Genotype-Matched Therapy for Recurrent Gynecological Cancers: A Single Institutional Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arguments for Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer-Related Venous Thromboembolism
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Major Hepatectomy En Bloc with Cava Vein Resection for Locally Invasive Caudate Lobe Hepatocarcinoma

Healthcare 2021, 9(10), 1396; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101396
by Nicolae Bacalbasa 1,2,*,†, Irina Balescu 3, Florin Ichim 1, Ion Barbu 1, Alexandru Ristea 1, Razvan Lazea 1, Ioana Danciuc 1, Ioana Popa 1, Ovidiu Magdoiu 1, Gabriela Smira 4, Camelia Diaconu 5,6, Florentina Furtunescu 7, Ovidiu Stiru 8,9, Cornel Savu 10,11, Claudia Stoica 12,13, Vladislav Brasoveanu 1, Bogdan Ursut 13,14,† and Adnan Al Aloul 15,16
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Healthcare 2021, 9(10), 1396; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101396
Submission received: 7 August 2021 / Revised: 12 October 2021 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Haemostasis and Thrombosis Research in Cancer)
  1. Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors reported a case report with the aim of reporting successful right hepatectomy en bloc with the caudate lobe with the inferior cava vein resection and graft placement as palliative oncological procedures. The artice is well illustrated and referenced. The description of the case is given thoroughly. Although this is a clear case report, I would like to propose just one issue to discuss.

1. It would be great to have a clear and comprehensive description of strategies which should be used as palliative operation methods in association with venous reconstruction during extending hepatic resections. Please, make the conclusive part much more legible and pervasive

Author Response

Thank you for taking your time to review our paper. We modified the text according to your demands; 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In their manuscript the authors present a case report of of a male patient who successfully underwent right hepatectomy en bloc with the caudate lobe and the inferior cava vein. I would like to commend the authors/surgeons for performing what seems as indeed a challenging procedure yet their manuscript work is not as novel.  

  • R status, readmission status, 90-day mortality or long-term outcomes are not provided.
  • Indeed the literature was somewhat poor in presentation of complex resections 15 years ago. However now multiple series have been published.
  • The quality of language could be partly improved.

Author Response

Thank you for taking your time to review our paper. We modified the text according to your demands; 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This case report described a patient with HCC involved in caudate lobe and received right lobectomy and caudate lobe resection including invovled IVC.

Comments

  1. Several key data are missing, including liver panels (before and after operation), long-term changes of AFP, F/U images (at least 1 month post operation), and F/U period.
  2. Please check the language. In abstract result section:    the patient was successfully submitted to surgery, an extended right hepatectomy en bloc with cava vein resection was performed; due to the extended length of the resected cava vein reconstruction with synthetic graft was performed.  "due to" here is a bit strange. Similarly, in line 138-142, the sentence is too long and I would suggest it to break into several sentences. 
  3. Line 109, "local vascular invasion", do you mean IVC or other intreahepatic vessel?  line 111, "intramural thrombus", is it a tumor thrombus?
  4. Line 114, "primitive hepatocarcinoma", can you define it more clear? Do you mean hepatocellular carcinoma? what do you mean primitive?
  5. How about the non-tumor liver look like in pathology? Do this patient have any chronic liver disease anyway? NASH or alcoholic liver? 

Author Response

Thank you for taking your time to review our paper. We modified the text according to your demands; unfortunately we don’t have any follow up images except the one of the computed tomography which was performed before discharge.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed my remarks.

Author Response

Thank you for your time

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

I have no other comments.

Author Response

Thank you for your time and response!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop